![]() |
The Barnstar of Integrity | |
For proven staying power. Wakari07 ( talk) 21:22, 6 March 2018 (UTC) |
Please see this. I hope this time admins will pay attention to his behaviour. M.Karelin ( talk) 20:56, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Usernamekiran (AWB). I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Portal:Current events/2018 March 12— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —usernamekiran
(talk)
05:51, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Katsuobushi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fillet ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
The Portals WikiProject has been rebooted.
You are invited to join, and participate in the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system and all the portals in it.
There are sections on the WikiProject page dedicated to tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too), and areas on the talk page for discussing the improvement and automation of the various features of portals.
Many complaints have been lodged in the RfC to delete all portals, pointing out their various problems. They say that many portals are not maintained, or have fallen out of date, are useless, etc. Many of the !votes indicate that the editors who posted them simply don't believe in the potential of portals anymore.
It's time to change all that. Let's give them reasons to believe in portals, by revitalizing them.
The best response to a deletion nomination is to fix the page that was nominated. The further underway the effort is to improve portals by the time the RfC has run its course, the more of the reasons against portals will no longer apply. RfCs typically run 30 days. There are 19 days left in this one. Let's see how many portals we can update and improve before the RfC is closed, and beyond.
A healthy WikiProject dedicated to supporting and maintaining portals may be the strongest argument of all not to delete.
We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.
Let's do this.
See ya at the WikiProject!
Sincerely, —
The Transhumanist
10:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions abd time spent improving Wikipedia... I like what Im finding and would like to help. In many different ways, I feel I can be an asset to the efforts. My name is Nathan and have drive; one chance is all I need. Thanks again. Truly. KniceNotes ( talk) 13:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Journey to the West, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tongan ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.
By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.
Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.
If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.
Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 22:52, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ ping}} me. Thank you. -TT
What a weird question - as if one genocide can be justified by invoking another. This whole discussion is disturbing; why is that apologists and deniers have willing enablers? And what makes these individuals so willing to share their beliefs publicly? I share your concern and I'm tempted to hat that section as "off-topic comparative genocide studies", but not sure if should do that as a proposer. Oh well. -- K.e.coffman ( talk) 09:47, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
References
Hi I have been noticing this has been removed multiple times, as you said. I have stated this time only about the first degree murder charge.
Honestly this is very notable. It definitely should be added. -- 74.133.176.183 ( talk) 23:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Just saw that you removed additions by anonymous IPs who attempt to spread conspiracies about the Jim Acosta doctored video by InfoWars. Well, they seem to come back again, so I was wondering if protecting the November 8 was in order. I'm reverting them, but I don't want to start an edit war. Cheers.-- EdgarCabreraFariña ( talk) 12:07, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
I have now provided a source for the event that was deleted. This is scientific news. ― Дрейгорич / Dreigorich Talk 14:58, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Integrity | |
For proven staying power. Wakari07 ( talk) 21:22, 6 March 2018 (UTC) |
Please see this. I hope this time admins will pay attention to his behaviour. M.Karelin ( talk) 20:56, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Usernamekiran (AWB). I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Portal:Current events/2018 March 12— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —usernamekiran
(talk)
05:51, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Katsuobushi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fillet ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
The Portals WikiProject has been rebooted.
You are invited to join, and participate in the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system and all the portals in it.
There are sections on the WikiProject page dedicated to tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too), and areas on the talk page for discussing the improvement and automation of the various features of portals.
Many complaints have been lodged in the RfC to delete all portals, pointing out their various problems. They say that many portals are not maintained, or have fallen out of date, are useless, etc. Many of the !votes indicate that the editors who posted them simply don't believe in the potential of portals anymore.
It's time to change all that. Let's give them reasons to believe in portals, by revitalizing them.
The best response to a deletion nomination is to fix the page that was nominated. The further underway the effort is to improve portals by the time the RfC has run its course, the more of the reasons against portals will no longer apply. RfCs typically run 30 days. There are 19 days left in this one. Let's see how many portals we can update and improve before the RfC is closed, and beyond.
A healthy WikiProject dedicated to supporting and maintaining portals may be the strongest argument of all not to delete.
We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.
Let's do this.
See ya at the WikiProject!
Sincerely, —
The Transhumanist
10:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions abd time spent improving Wikipedia... I like what Im finding and would like to help. In many different ways, I feel I can be an asset to the efforts. My name is Nathan and have drive; one chance is all I need. Thanks again. Truly. KniceNotes ( talk) 13:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Journey to the West, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tongan ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.
By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.
Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.
If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.
Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 22:52, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ ping}} me. Thank you. -TT
What a weird question - as if one genocide can be justified by invoking another. This whole discussion is disturbing; why is that apologists and deniers have willing enablers? And what makes these individuals so willing to share their beliefs publicly? I share your concern and I'm tempted to hat that section as "off-topic comparative genocide studies", but not sure if should do that as a proposer. Oh well. -- K.e.coffman ( talk) 09:47, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
References
Hi I have been noticing this has been removed multiple times, as you said. I have stated this time only about the first degree murder charge.
Honestly this is very notable. It definitely should be added. -- 74.133.176.183 ( talk) 23:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Just saw that you removed additions by anonymous IPs who attempt to spread conspiracies about the Jim Acosta doctored video by InfoWars. Well, they seem to come back again, so I was wondering if protecting the November 8 was in order. I'm reverting them, but I don't want to start an edit war. Cheers.-- EdgarCabreraFariña ( talk) 12:07, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
I have now provided a source for the event that was deleted. This is scientific news. ― Дрейгорич / Dreigorich Talk 14:58, 1 January 2019 (UTC)