From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Twenty Eleven has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://www.myspace.com/twentyeleven) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot ( talk) 23:20, 6 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Notability of Twenty Eleven

The article Twenty Eleven has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -  CobaltBlueTony™  talk 17:37, 7 September 2008 (UTC) reply


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Twenty Eleven, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -  CobaltBlueTony™  talk 17:37, 7 September 2008 (UTC) reply


Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Twenty Eleven, you will be blocked from editing. -  CobaltBlueTony™  talk 17:51, 7 September 2008 (UTC) reply


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Twenty eleven, you will be blocked from editing. -  CobaltBlueTony™  talk 17:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC) reply


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing by repeated recreation of non-notable music group article without response to talk page messages; this block is to get you to read your talk page before editing again. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -  CobaltBlueTony™  talk 18:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC) reply

AfD nomination of Magnitude (Album)

I have nominated Magnitude (Album), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnitude (Album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dloh cierekim 02:13, 16 October 2008 (UTC) Dloh cierekim 02:13, 16 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Speedy deletion of Comin' Down

A tag has been placed on Comin' Down requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Scapler ( talk) 23:06, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Photo 41.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Photo 41.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 23:24, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Image copyright problem with Image:L 31677911730ad2f36fd84e3675b65b01.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Hi Hummadrooma!
We thank you for uploading Image:L 31677911730ad2f36fd84e3675b65b01.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot.

-- John Bot III ( talk) 01:40, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Speedy deletion of Rock WIt It

A tag has been placed on Rock WIt It requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Erik the Red 2 ~~ ~~ 02:31, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Speedy deletion of Rock Wit It

A tag has been placed on Rock Wit It, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Erik the Red 2 ~~ ~~ 02:43, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Rock Wit It, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{ hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Erik the Red 2 ~~ ~~ 02:45, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply

The recent edit you made to Rock WIt It constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. NuclearWarfare contact me My work 02:45, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Rock Wit It. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Erik the Red 2 ~~ ~~ 02:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page, as you did with Rock Wit It, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rwiggum ( Talk/ Contrib) 03:23, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. J.delanoy gabs adds 15:10, 22 October 2008 (UTC) reply

AfD nomination of Twenty Eleven (Hip Hop Band)

I have nominated Twenty Eleven (Hip Hop Band), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twenty Eleven (Hip Hop Band). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Spellcast ( talk) 15:16, 22 October 2008 (UTC) Spellcast ( talk) 15:16, 22 October 2008 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Twenty Eleven has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://www.myspace.com/twentyeleven) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot ( talk) 23:20, 6 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Notability of Twenty Eleven

The article Twenty Eleven has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -  CobaltBlueTony™  talk 17:37, 7 September 2008 (UTC) reply


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Twenty Eleven, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -  CobaltBlueTony™  talk 17:37, 7 September 2008 (UTC) reply


Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Twenty Eleven, you will be blocked from editing. -  CobaltBlueTony™  talk 17:51, 7 September 2008 (UTC) reply


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Twenty eleven, you will be blocked from editing. -  CobaltBlueTony™  talk 17:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC) reply


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing by repeated recreation of non-notable music group article without response to talk page messages; this block is to get you to read your talk page before editing again. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -  CobaltBlueTony™  talk 18:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC) reply

AfD nomination of Magnitude (Album)

I have nominated Magnitude (Album), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnitude (Album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dloh cierekim 02:13, 16 October 2008 (UTC) Dloh cierekim 02:13, 16 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Speedy deletion of Comin' Down

A tag has been placed on Comin' Down requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Scapler ( talk) 23:06, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Photo 41.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Photo 41.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 23:24, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Image copyright problem with Image:L 31677911730ad2f36fd84e3675b65b01.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Hi Hummadrooma!
We thank you for uploading Image:L 31677911730ad2f36fd84e3675b65b01.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot.

-- John Bot III ( talk) 01:40, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Speedy deletion of Rock WIt It

A tag has been placed on Rock WIt It requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Erik the Red 2 ~~ ~~ 02:31, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Speedy deletion of Rock Wit It

A tag has been placed on Rock Wit It, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Erik the Red 2 ~~ ~~ 02:43, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Rock Wit It, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{ hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Erik the Red 2 ~~ ~~ 02:45, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply

The recent edit you made to Rock WIt It constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. NuclearWarfare contact me My work 02:45, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Rock Wit It. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Erik the Red 2 ~~ ~~ 02:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page, as you did with Rock Wit It, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rwiggum ( Talk/ Contrib) 03:23, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. J.delanoy gabs adds 15:10, 22 October 2008 (UTC) reply

AfD nomination of Twenty Eleven (Hip Hop Band)

I have nominated Twenty Eleven (Hip Hop Band), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twenty Eleven (Hip Hop Band). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Spellcast ( talk) 15:16, 22 October 2008 (UTC) Spellcast ( talk) 15:16, 22 October 2008 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook