|
![]() |
Hi Humanist920! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 00:30, 1 May 2019 (UTC) |
![]() |
Hi Humanist920! You created a thread called {{
bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{
nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page.
Muninnbot (
talk)
19:02, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93 → Message me. ← 14:58, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Humanist920. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.
Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.
Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.
If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.
Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.
I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. -- Ronz ( talk) 03:21, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Greetings! I see you attempted to move Draft:Mackenzie Sol to the main encyclopedia space. However, the article is not yet ready: there is no clear assertion that Sol is a notable person. Rather than delete the page for failing to assert his significance or importance ( criterion for speedy deletion A7), I have moved it back to draft space. — C.Fred ( talk) 01:56, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk)
13:39, 19 May 2019 (UTC) |
Humanist920 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
It's my mistake because I have to create Apple screenshot for copyright warning message and I have to get through it. So I do not know how to do. If you want to unblock me, do not decline request for now, Thank you. Regards, HUmanist920 Humanist920 ( talk) 22:41, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Any request must come from your main account. — C.Fred ( talk) 22:42, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Humanist920 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Please Diannaa, I need to unblock this page and I edit article again. because I cannot edit articles at once. Humanist920 ( talk) 22:45, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As C.Fred states, you must request unblock from your main account. 331dot ( talk) 22:52, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
BTW, I just looked at your main account's page. I see that you had an appeal denied by ArbCom with instructions not to make another appeal to be unbanned until 16 May 2020. Based on that, there is literally nothing any admin will do for you during the next year. — C.Fred ( talk) 22:56, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Humanist920 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Dear
C.Fred, I have to explain something.
Sometimes my main account has been block indefinitely, because I disrupt and not clearly contribute the encyclopedia last 15 February, and on 26 February, I was been a sockpuppet. my account has been extremely disrupt my behaviour of edits on my wikipedia. and lastly in 26 March, my main account has been locked for long-term abuse.
Please, I would not vandalize edits on Wikipedia and so it will take to to appeal.
Thank you.
regards,
Humanist920
Humanist920 (
talk)
23:11, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You attempted to evade the block earlier today. Instead, try appealing in 2020. Huon ( talk) 23:18, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Humanist920 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Are you kidding me? how long do i take that next year? no way! because i cannot wait to appeal my account! Humanist920 ( talk) 23:29, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
2020 is indeed when you will need to wait until. stwalkerster ( talk) 23:37, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
|
![]() |
Hi Humanist920! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 00:30, 1 May 2019 (UTC) |
![]() |
Hi Humanist920! You created a thread called {{
bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{
nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page.
Muninnbot (
talk)
19:02, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93 → Message me. ← 14:58, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Humanist920. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.
Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.
Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.
If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.
Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.
I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. -- Ronz ( talk) 03:21, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Greetings! I see you attempted to move Draft:Mackenzie Sol to the main encyclopedia space. However, the article is not yet ready: there is no clear assertion that Sol is a notable person. Rather than delete the page for failing to assert his significance or importance ( criterion for speedy deletion A7), I have moved it back to draft space. — C.Fred ( talk) 01:56, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk)
13:39, 19 May 2019 (UTC) |
Humanist920 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
It's my mistake because I have to create Apple screenshot for copyright warning message and I have to get through it. So I do not know how to do. If you want to unblock me, do not decline request for now, Thank you. Regards, HUmanist920 Humanist920 ( talk) 22:41, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Any request must come from your main account. — C.Fred ( talk) 22:42, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Humanist920 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Please Diannaa, I need to unblock this page and I edit article again. because I cannot edit articles at once. Humanist920 ( talk) 22:45, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As C.Fred states, you must request unblock from your main account. 331dot ( talk) 22:52, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
BTW, I just looked at your main account's page. I see that you had an appeal denied by ArbCom with instructions not to make another appeal to be unbanned until 16 May 2020. Based on that, there is literally nothing any admin will do for you during the next year. — C.Fred ( talk) 22:56, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Humanist920 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Dear
C.Fred, I have to explain something.
Sometimes my main account has been block indefinitely, because I disrupt and not clearly contribute the encyclopedia last 15 February, and on 26 February, I was been a sockpuppet. my account has been extremely disrupt my behaviour of edits on my wikipedia. and lastly in 26 March, my main account has been locked for long-term abuse.
Please, I would not vandalize edits on Wikipedia and so it will take to to appeal.
Thank you.
regards,
Humanist920
Humanist920 (
talk)
23:11, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You attempted to evade the block earlier today. Instead, try appealing in 2020. Huon ( talk) 23:18, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Humanist920 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Are you kidding me? how long do i take that next year? no way! because i cannot wait to appeal my account! Humanist920 ( talk) 23:29, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
2020 is indeed when you will need to wait until. stwalkerster ( talk) 23:37, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.