talk page |
---|
2006 archive |
2007 archive |
2008 archive |
2009 archive |
2010 archive |
2011 archive |
I noticed that you have previously worked on Template:Civil2. I thought you should know that it is currently proposed for deletion. Please consider adding your comments at templates for deletion. -- Aylahs (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello, you recently reverted my edit to Seb Rochford. I realise that you would like to have the conversation on my talk page, however there has been no reply, so this is just to tell you that I stand by my edit, and would like to resolve this instead of just putting it back. Thanks, Thesamc 22:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:
If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 12:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Ignatzmice. I think you thought Folklore Village was an ad, which it wasn't. It's a grat place and I was going to write an article about it. Could you explain why you think it was an ad?
Sorry, Ignatzmice talk contribs 18:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorry! Ignatzmice talk contribs 13:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
FYI: I've moved our entire conversation to the talk page of happy number so others might join in! - DavidWBrooks 21:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Just so you know, the elbow page has been moved to elbow (disambiguation) and elbow joint has been moved to elbow, per your request. If you want, take a look so that everything looks OK. Thanks for mentioning this! For more information, you could also look at Talk:Elbow (disambiguation) Cheers! If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 06:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
This is probably on your watchlist, but it appears that the Brain Gym folks have removed everything they don't like again. I haven't reverted it on the chance that they've added something useful, but it's a bit hearts-and-flowers now. Acroterion (talk) 20:03, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for the improvement to my note on Nikolai Bernstein. (That was my first WP contribution.) Your solution, the new section, was the way I should have done it. Appreciate your help. FLJerseyBoy 18:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
At some point you expressed an interest in supporting meta:Wikimedia UK. We're now ready to begin receiving applications from prospective members. If you would like to join, application forms and further information can be found at: http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/join. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions, either via my user page at the English Wikipedia or by email (andrew.walker@wikimedia.org.uk).
Thanks, Andreww 15:03, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
(Membership officer, Wikimedia UK)
OK, I have no idea what I am doing. The enormity of this really hits home now. I hope you can read THIS! I think if I'm allowed a mentor I could do a lot of good, but don't know how or where to start. I should, but wasn't raised in the computer generation. Can you help? --Leah DosSantos 03:48, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for getting into contact with me, I'm racking my absolute brain trying to figure out how to use Wikipedia correctly! Infact, it took me a good half an hour to realize the + symbol at the top of the page allowed me to do this. I'll be highly embarassed if I've done it wrong now.
I need help adding information. I'd never add false information and I would always provide a valid source, I just don't know how to provide the source. Do I simply copy and paste the link to the publication that verifies what I have submit? Or is it more complex than that? Call me stupid (well, try not to!) but I couldn't see anywhere else to add the source when I edited the page. The reason I am so concerned I have done it wrong is because pages with extensive information have boxes like this [2] to the top right of the finished paragraph which then links to the source. I don't know how to do that!
Help me!
-- Rosario 12:35, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
It would be nice if you could help rewrite this section rather than reverse corrections and additions.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ehmhel ( talk • contribs) 17:53, 3 August 2007.
I would appreciate it if, either within the article or on the talk page, you would specify exactly what material you believe requires referencing. It seems well-referenced to me and in the absence of any further guidance I don't understand the validity of the criticism. Otto4711 22:28, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment on my RfA, which was successful. Lyrl Talk C 00:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Further to your removal of my comment on the Enterprise page, I have not written anything that is not true and have plenty of photographic evidence to back it up. What I wrote was not vandalism, it is fact, it is the culmination of having Enterprise employees in my home for the past 5 months fitting a kitchen, yes a kitchen! Something that is being looked into by the Council and the local Lib Dem party as it was not isolated to me but to over 70 houses. Janetsara07 21:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
The article was filled with absolute nonsense and the only piece of information that does make sense has no source and according to the official website of the band he is supposedly in, he's not listed as a member. Perhaps a previous member, but still, obviously not a notable person and therefore shouldn't be added to Wikipedia.
Speedy deletion?
Perhaps you might place the tag, I'm not sure I have the authority to. -- Rosario 15:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
talk page |
---|
2006 archive |
2007 archive |
2008 archive |
2009 archive |
2010 archive |
2011 archive |
I noticed that you have previously worked on Template:Civil2. I thought you should know that it is currently proposed for deletion. Please consider adding your comments at templates for deletion. -- Aylahs (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello, you recently reverted my edit to Seb Rochford. I realise that you would like to have the conversation on my talk page, however there has been no reply, so this is just to tell you that I stand by my edit, and would like to resolve this instead of just putting it back. Thanks, Thesamc 22:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:
If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 12:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Ignatzmice. I think you thought Folklore Village was an ad, which it wasn't. It's a grat place and I was going to write an article about it. Could you explain why you think it was an ad?
Sorry, Ignatzmice talk contribs 18:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorry! Ignatzmice talk contribs 13:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
FYI: I've moved our entire conversation to the talk page of happy number so others might join in! - DavidWBrooks 21:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Just so you know, the elbow page has been moved to elbow (disambiguation) and elbow joint has been moved to elbow, per your request. If you want, take a look so that everything looks OK. Thanks for mentioning this! For more information, you could also look at Talk:Elbow (disambiguation) Cheers! If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 06:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
This is probably on your watchlist, but it appears that the Brain Gym folks have removed everything they don't like again. I haven't reverted it on the chance that they've added something useful, but it's a bit hearts-and-flowers now. Acroterion (talk) 20:03, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for the improvement to my note on Nikolai Bernstein. (That was my first WP contribution.) Your solution, the new section, was the way I should have done it. Appreciate your help. FLJerseyBoy 18:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
At some point you expressed an interest in supporting meta:Wikimedia UK. We're now ready to begin receiving applications from prospective members. If you would like to join, application forms and further information can be found at: http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/join. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions, either via my user page at the English Wikipedia or by email (andrew.walker@wikimedia.org.uk).
Thanks, Andreww 15:03, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
(Membership officer, Wikimedia UK)
OK, I have no idea what I am doing. The enormity of this really hits home now. I hope you can read THIS! I think if I'm allowed a mentor I could do a lot of good, but don't know how or where to start. I should, but wasn't raised in the computer generation. Can you help? --Leah DosSantos 03:48, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for getting into contact with me, I'm racking my absolute brain trying to figure out how to use Wikipedia correctly! Infact, it took me a good half an hour to realize the + symbol at the top of the page allowed me to do this. I'll be highly embarassed if I've done it wrong now.
I need help adding information. I'd never add false information and I would always provide a valid source, I just don't know how to provide the source. Do I simply copy and paste the link to the publication that verifies what I have submit? Or is it more complex than that? Call me stupid (well, try not to!) but I couldn't see anywhere else to add the source when I edited the page. The reason I am so concerned I have done it wrong is because pages with extensive information have boxes like this [2] to the top right of the finished paragraph which then links to the source. I don't know how to do that!
Help me!
-- Rosario 12:35, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
It would be nice if you could help rewrite this section rather than reverse corrections and additions.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ehmhel ( talk • contribs) 17:53, 3 August 2007.
I would appreciate it if, either within the article or on the talk page, you would specify exactly what material you believe requires referencing. It seems well-referenced to me and in the absence of any further guidance I don't understand the validity of the criticism. Otto4711 22:28, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment on my RfA, which was successful. Lyrl Talk C 00:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Further to your removal of my comment on the Enterprise page, I have not written anything that is not true and have plenty of photographic evidence to back it up. What I wrote was not vandalism, it is fact, it is the culmination of having Enterprise employees in my home for the past 5 months fitting a kitchen, yes a kitchen! Something that is being looked into by the Council and the local Lib Dem party as it was not isolated to me but to over 70 houses. Janetsara07 21:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
The article was filled with absolute nonsense and the only piece of information that does make sense has no source and according to the official website of the band he is supposedly in, he's not listed as a member. Perhaps a previous member, but still, obviously not a notable person and therefore shouldn't be added to Wikipedia.
Speedy deletion?
Perhaps you might place the tag, I'm not sure I have the authority to. -- Rosario 15:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC)