2007 | <<
|
<<
|
<<
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
2008 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
2009 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
2010 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
Whey you made this and the related deletion, you seem to have missed the point. Those paras were in articlespace before I moved them to the talkpage. Good faith editors wanted to keep the content in the article to answer reader questions. As suggested by WP:TALK, I moved it to talk rather than delete it outright. I agree that Wikinews would ideally be a better place for it, but WN simply has far too few contributors to support complex ongoing topics and has barely touched this one compared to the extensive attention that WP editors have given it. LeadSongDog come howl 05:46, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Please be advised that I have recently conducted a review of the Rorschach test (formerly Rorschach inkblot test) talk page and archives. At some point, you have commented on the issue of the display and/or placement of the Rorschach inkblot image. Based on my understanding of your comment(s), I have placed you into one of three categories. I am issuing this note so that you can review how I have placed you, and to signal if this is an appropriate placement and/or to make known your current thoughts on this matter. You may either participate in discussion at the article talk page or leave a note at my talk page; but to keep things in one place, you should also clarify at Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review/addendum. Longer statements may be made here or quick clarifications/affirmations based on several pre-written statements can be made here. Best regards, – xeno talk 14:55, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
I note that you have reinstated Hayley Rey in the list Hayley as a reality TV entertainer, even though this is not mentioned either in the article about the stated program or in the target article about her husband. Notability is not inherited, nor gained by marriage; why include her in the list? - Fayenatic (talk) 17:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
I would like to thank you for coming out and participating in my Request for Adminship, which closed unsuccessfully at (48/8/6) based on my withdrawal. I withdrew because in my opinion I need to focus on problems with my content contributions before I can proceed with expanding my responsibilities. Overall I feel that the RfA has improved me as an editor and in turn some articles which in my eyes is successful. Thank you again for your support. Cheers and happy editing.-- kelapstick ( talk) 18:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Sorry hmwith, I've been out for the last month with exams, travel, and various other obligations. Sorry I wasn't around for this case; when it closed, I was right in the middle of exams. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 16:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Trust me... I just bullshit REALLY well. Just sound convincing when you say something, and anyone will believe it. Thanks for the encouraging word anyways. How you been, anyways? -- Jayron32. talk. contribs 01:56, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey Hmwith, Thanks for doing those templates-I know very little about that stuff, must learn one day! I think I'm probably going to use the top one, basic but will fit in with most people's userpages, if that's OK? Thanks! Dotty••| ☎ 14:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
|
The Template Barnstar | |
Thanks for doing those templates for me, appreciate it. Dotty••| ☎ 14:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC) |
The table gives the WHO figures for detected cases. "Human cases by country" clearly implies an estimate of the total number of infections/deaths. Where credible estimates of actual numbers exist these are an order of magnitude or two greater than the number of detections so the difference is important. Leaving the title as "Human cases by country" is seriously misleading and is not justified by a minor aesthetic point. This is to notify you that I've changed it back. Barnaby dawson ( talk) 22:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Sorry I didn't reply, re the post on Help Desk about Outlines of Knowledge. I agree that it would be a good idea to start a discussion re. the outlines, becuase I can see potential problems! Dotty••| ☎ 07:45, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello Hmwith. The link to the request is here Talk:Rajneesh_movement#RfC:_Title_for_this_page . ( Off2riorob ( talk) 09:42, 6 June 2009 (UTC))
Hi, you weighed in on the "display time since last edit on article" discussion at the Village pump. I have now started a straw poll on the subject at WP:Village pump (proposals)#Straw poll. Your opinion would be appreciated. -- Cybercobra ( talk) 04:48, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
That's a very good rewrite. I voted to keep and recommend closing as speedy keep. Thanks for all your hard work. -- ₪ Amused Repose Converse! 19:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Article Rescue Barnstar | |
For totally blowing away WP:HEY on the Kings article, I award this barnstar to HMWITH. Thanks! ₪ Amused Repose Converse! 19:46, 9 June 2009 (UTC) |
You missed a couple, but they weren't protected so I just went ahead and did them myself. The only one I didn't move was 2009 swine flu outbreak actions concerning pigs, because this is the one article where it probably makes sense to stick to the original title.
Additionally, most of the various templates haven't been renamed, but I see no point in renaming them since their titles aren't seen by readers anyway. -- ThaddeusB ( talk) 15:28, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Swine Flu Barnstar | |
For diligently moving and updating dozens of swine flu outbreak articles to reflect the new pandemic classification, I hereby award you this special barnstar. Congratulations! ThaddeusB ( talk) 15:28, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
Hi, I noticed you taking part of my statement on the paid editing RfC out of context—please see my reply on my statement and my comment on the talk page for my two replies to your comments. Thanks, {{ Nihiltres| talk| edits}} 04:28, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:2009 flu pandemic#disappointed archiving bot archives so quick Nil Einne, it's not off-topic. One sets (on a specific talk page) whether or not a bot automatically archives it and how often it does so. Therefore, that talk page is where one should discuss it, as that is where the code for frequency is located and decided upon. hmwithτ 21:34, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Please forgive my persistent stupidity as I couldn't find the appropriate section from which to gauge consensus from about the swine flu move. However, there are/were a few left confused by the dropping of swine. Likely none more than I. Thanks. - Pecoc ( talk) 00:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Not too shabby! :) ceran thor 00:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
I put up the Engineering college rankings in India question on the help desk a couple days back, which you answered and, as I can't quite find a specific barnstar to thank/award you, I'd like to give you:
![]() |
The Special Barnstar | |
For helping me (a rather inexperienced editor) improve a troublesome article. Thanks! -- Leif edling ( talk) 06:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC) |
But I need a bit more by way of help: as you are a mod, could you please tell me if a page listing educational institutions by rankings based on quality (or any such "rankings" article) is a valid entry to wikipedia? Does wikipedia have a policy against this? I ask this because this would be an important reason cited within the prod message. Hope you don't mind me asking this on your talk page. Thanks. -- Leif edling ( talk) 06:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
It's not a problem, I just needed to ask an Arbitrator or a clerk something, and at that point, you were the only one on that had not been idle for like four days :P J.delanoy gabs adds 16:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi Hmwith! Just wanted to drop you a line, letting you know I've proposed a new Wikiproject at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Rodents. I'm not sure how much time you have to devote to a wikiproject, or how focused you'd like to be on rodents, but feel free to comment there or add your name if you're interested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zappernapper ( talk • contribs)
2007 | <<
|
<<
|
<<
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
2008 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
2009 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
|||||||||||||
2010 | •
|
•
|
•
|
•
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
>>
|
Whey you made this and the related deletion, you seem to have missed the point. Those paras were in articlespace before I moved them to the talkpage. Good faith editors wanted to keep the content in the article to answer reader questions. As suggested by WP:TALK, I moved it to talk rather than delete it outright. I agree that Wikinews would ideally be a better place for it, but WN simply has far too few contributors to support complex ongoing topics and has barely touched this one compared to the extensive attention that WP editors have given it. LeadSongDog come howl 05:46, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Please be advised that I have recently conducted a review of the Rorschach test (formerly Rorschach inkblot test) talk page and archives. At some point, you have commented on the issue of the display and/or placement of the Rorschach inkblot image. Based on my understanding of your comment(s), I have placed you into one of three categories. I am issuing this note so that you can review how I have placed you, and to signal if this is an appropriate placement and/or to make known your current thoughts on this matter. You may either participate in discussion at the article talk page or leave a note at my talk page; but to keep things in one place, you should also clarify at Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review/addendum. Longer statements may be made here or quick clarifications/affirmations based on several pre-written statements can be made here. Best regards, – xeno talk 14:55, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
I note that you have reinstated Hayley Rey in the list Hayley as a reality TV entertainer, even though this is not mentioned either in the article about the stated program or in the target article about her husband. Notability is not inherited, nor gained by marriage; why include her in the list? - Fayenatic (talk) 17:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
I would like to thank you for coming out and participating in my Request for Adminship, which closed unsuccessfully at (48/8/6) based on my withdrawal. I withdrew because in my opinion I need to focus on problems with my content contributions before I can proceed with expanding my responsibilities. Overall I feel that the RfA has improved me as an editor and in turn some articles which in my eyes is successful. Thank you again for your support. Cheers and happy editing.-- kelapstick ( talk) 18:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Sorry hmwith, I've been out for the last month with exams, travel, and various other obligations. Sorry I wasn't around for this case; when it closed, I was right in the middle of exams. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 16:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Trust me... I just bullshit REALLY well. Just sound convincing when you say something, and anyone will believe it. Thanks for the encouraging word anyways. How you been, anyways? -- Jayron32. talk. contribs 01:56, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey Hmwith, Thanks for doing those templates-I know very little about that stuff, must learn one day! I think I'm probably going to use the top one, basic but will fit in with most people's userpages, if that's OK? Thanks! Dotty••| ☎ 14:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
|
The Template Barnstar | |
Thanks for doing those templates for me, appreciate it. Dotty••| ☎ 14:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC) |
The table gives the WHO figures for detected cases. "Human cases by country" clearly implies an estimate of the total number of infections/deaths. Where credible estimates of actual numbers exist these are an order of magnitude or two greater than the number of detections so the difference is important. Leaving the title as "Human cases by country" is seriously misleading and is not justified by a minor aesthetic point. This is to notify you that I've changed it back. Barnaby dawson ( talk) 22:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Sorry I didn't reply, re the post on Help Desk about Outlines of Knowledge. I agree that it would be a good idea to start a discussion re. the outlines, becuase I can see potential problems! Dotty••| ☎ 07:45, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello Hmwith. The link to the request is here Talk:Rajneesh_movement#RfC:_Title_for_this_page . ( Off2riorob ( talk) 09:42, 6 June 2009 (UTC))
Hi, you weighed in on the "display time since last edit on article" discussion at the Village pump. I have now started a straw poll on the subject at WP:Village pump (proposals)#Straw poll. Your opinion would be appreciated. -- Cybercobra ( talk) 04:48, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
That's a very good rewrite. I voted to keep and recommend closing as speedy keep. Thanks for all your hard work. -- ₪ Amused Repose Converse! 19:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Article Rescue Barnstar | |
For totally blowing away WP:HEY on the Kings article, I award this barnstar to HMWITH. Thanks! ₪ Amused Repose Converse! 19:46, 9 June 2009 (UTC) |
You missed a couple, but they weren't protected so I just went ahead and did them myself. The only one I didn't move was 2009 swine flu outbreak actions concerning pigs, because this is the one article where it probably makes sense to stick to the original title.
Additionally, most of the various templates haven't been renamed, but I see no point in renaming them since their titles aren't seen by readers anyway. -- ThaddeusB ( talk) 15:28, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Swine Flu Barnstar | |
For diligently moving and updating dozens of swine flu outbreak articles to reflect the new pandemic classification, I hereby award you this special barnstar. Congratulations! ThaddeusB ( talk) 15:28, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
Hi, I noticed you taking part of my statement on the paid editing RfC out of context—please see my reply on my statement and my comment on the talk page for my two replies to your comments. Thanks, {{ Nihiltres| talk| edits}} 04:28, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:2009 flu pandemic#disappointed archiving bot archives so quick Nil Einne, it's not off-topic. One sets (on a specific talk page) whether or not a bot automatically archives it and how often it does so. Therefore, that talk page is where one should discuss it, as that is where the code for frequency is located and decided upon. hmwithτ 21:34, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Please forgive my persistent stupidity as I couldn't find the appropriate section from which to gauge consensus from about the swine flu move. However, there are/were a few left confused by the dropping of swine. Likely none more than I. Thanks. - Pecoc ( talk) 00:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Not too shabby! :) ceran thor 00:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
I put up the Engineering college rankings in India question on the help desk a couple days back, which you answered and, as I can't quite find a specific barnstar to thank/award you, I'd like to give you:
![]() |
The Special Barnstar | |
For helping me (a rather inexperienced editor) improve a troublesome article. Thanks! -- Leif edling ( talk) 06:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC) |
But I need a bit more by way of help: as you are a mod, could you please tell me if a page listing educational institutions by rankings based on quality (or any such "rankings" article) is a valid entry to wikipedia? Does wikipedia have a policy against this? I ask this because this would be an important reason cited within the prod message. Hope you don't mind me asking this on your talk page. Thanks. -- Leif edling ( talk) 06:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
It's not a problem, I just needed to ask an Arbitrator or a clerk something, and at that point, you were the only one on that had not been idle for like four days :P J.delanoy gabs adds 16:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi Hmwith! Just wanted to drop you a line, letting you know I've proposed a new Wikiproject at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Rodents. I'm not sure how much time you have to devote to a wikiproject, or how focused you'd like to be on rodents, but feel free to comment there or add your name if you're interested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zappernapper ( talk • contribs)