![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Been away, just catching up on the June & November international debate. What is the criteria we are using for the June and Autumn tests? Couldn't see a decisive decision on discussion. And what is the reasoning behind the deletion of the 2015 & 2011 End-of-year tests (or what ever the name is)? Rugby.change ( talk) 22:22, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Mobile mundo (
talk)
13:55, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Please discuss your cull on the talk page first. You feel that the sources don't match the information in the article, but your removal of them is likewise based on your interpretation of what is written there, so needs a better explanation than a few words in the summary. Thanks. Crowsus ( talk) 05:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jmorrison230582 ( talk) 17:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Jmorrison230582 (
talk)
06:30, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Been away, just catching up on the June & November international debate. What is the criteria we are using for the June and Autumn tests? Couldn't see a decisive decision on discussion. And what is the reasoning behind the deletion of the 2015 & 2011 End-of-year tests (or what ever the name is)? Rugby.change ( talk) 22:22, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Mobile mundo (
talk)
13:55, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Please discuss your cull on the talk page first. You feel that the sources don't match the information in the article, but your removal of them is likewise based on your interpretation of what is written there, so needs a better explanation than a few words in the summary. Thanks. Crowsus ( talk) 05:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jmorrison230582 ( talk) 17:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Jmorrison230582 (
talk)
06:30, 17 June 2018 (UTC)