Hello HipHopAkshay, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to
Indian hip hop have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕ Contribs 09:13, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
|
Hello, I'm
Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Ravensfire (
talk)
05:59, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Desi hip hop shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ravensfire ( talk) 06:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Desi hip hop, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
Rob
van
vee
13:51, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
It's
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Desi hip hop, you may be
blocked from editing.
Rob
van
vee
05:53, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
RegentsPark (
comment)
13:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Hello HipHopAkshay, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to
Indian hip hop have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕ Contribs 09:13, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
|
Hello, I'm
Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Ravensfire (
talk)
05:59, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Desi hip hop shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ravensfire ( talk) 06:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Desi hip hop, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
Rob
van
vee
13:51, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
It's
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Desi hip hop, you may be
blocked from editing.
Rob
van
vee
05:53, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
RegentsPark (
comment)
13:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))