Hi HighwayCello. I've reverted edits that you have made which have been unencyclopedic and unacceptable. On the basis of your edits to A Series of Unfortunate Events, I checked your edit history which is where I spotted what you had done to the Kilbirnie article. In order to help you get a clearer picture of what Wikipedia is all about and how to edit it, I've added a standard "welcome" below which I hope you'll find useful. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, CLW 19:38, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, HighwayCello/Archive/1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Please don't blank content from peoples' user pages, as this is considered vandalism. Thanks! CLW 17:03, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Without meaning to sound patronising, I note that your recent edits are much more - dare I say it? - "encyclopedic". This is the kind of stuff we want! Cheers (smile back!) CLW 17:05, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
What I had added to my earlier comment was another stab at you. Apologies, I was somewhat angry at the time..
PS - How do you get your name to come up at the end of posts? *feels miffed*
(Later on) Ah! *sees timestap option and feels like idiot* Right... --
Highway
18:42, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
No problem. Sometimes when I notice new people making new articles I like to help out so they can learn by example. I hope you like Wikipedia, it's great to have one more editor! -- Pagrashtak 19:17, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Glad to help out. -- ProveIt (talk) 07:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
I saw your post on the cleanup talk page. The taskforce is here: Wikipedia:Cleanup_Taskforce. --K erowyn 00:53, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
What did I do? I not sure what I did wrong...sorry if it caused you any hassle. =D Jumping cheese 02:04, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
I've lost my password! My computer is logged in, but I can't get it anywhere else.
... you do have your e-mail in the system, yes? DS 17:44, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Thank you! : )
Problemo sovled!
Hi, I noticed you added some Pokémon material to your user page. However, fair use images are not allowed on user pages according to fair use policy item 9. Also, please do not include your user page in categories such as Category:Grass Pokémon, as those categories are intended for articles. Pagra shtak 18:33, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
It's just whenever you try and do something big like that, everyone decides to start editting : P Highway 23:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia's
no personal attacks policy: There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be
blocked for disruption. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thanks, --
Rory
0
96
18:53, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
While I appreciate your enthusiasm here, please do keep in mind that substantially modifying others' comments—which includes striking them out—is unacceptable; and that I'm quite capable of withdrawing my own objections when I feel they have been met, so there's no need to do that for me ;-) — Kirill Lok s hin 23:23, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
We had addressed some of the concerns that you had raised at the WP:FPCAN. Could you please check the page and advise? - Ganeshk ( talk) 21:01, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Hope this helps! -- Cel es tianpower háblame 14:57, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Well hello you! Yes, I consider myself to be quite hot on grammatical issues (though I'm not saying that I don't make sloppy mistakes myself now and then...) - what was it you were wondering about? CLW 17:47, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
There you go. Some of my changes were just personal style preference. The main thing I spotted was "it's"/"its" - "it's" is short for "it is", whereas "its" is the possessive form of "it". Lemme know if you've got any questions about changes I made! Cheers, CLW 18:21, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Additionally, you may not realize this, but the Beatles are, by far, the highest maintained group on English Wikipedia. There are literally over a dozen Beatles-related articles that are Featured, and some (such as the Sgt. Pepper's article) are just short of being Featured. Even more, read articles like Something, then tell me that the Queen article isn't even good. TheImpossibleMan 20:01, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
*hug* - Corbin Simpson 21:11, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
I hope I can in anything you're having a problem with, just ask ; ). That's my line. *wink* - Corbin Simpson 22:26, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your review. Maurreen 03:32, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
If you have reviewed an article (regardless of decision) you should remove it from Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations to prevent confusion.
The main problem with your review was that it wasn't very in-depth, as you only commented on the introduction, and ignored the rest of the article.
Well done you! Nice one :) CLW 08:13, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Excellant, thanks for your Input. I will work on this. When I have, can i come back to you for your opinion? -- Irishpunktom\ talk 13:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Sure. It's funny; I've been working on Queen (band), ended up fixing all the quotes and a few links, rewrote some sentences and removed some parenthetical asides. It's all good. - Corbin Simpson 01:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Agreed... Flcelloguy ( A note?) 23:10, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
You're going to need something like this: HighwayC e llo
As always, happy editing! - Corbin Simpson 03:37, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Okay, in Preferences, in the first tab, there's a field called Nickname, and below that, a checkbox marked Raw Signature. Check the checkbox, and then C'n'P this into the Nickname box:
[[User:HighwayCello|HighwayC]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:lime;">e</span>]][[User:HighwayCello|llo]]
What it does is take that wikitext and uses it as your new signature. You can have more complicated stuff in there, too. Look around at other's sigs and see what you like. Make sense, sort of? - Corbin Simpson 13:52, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
There's a camp for this stuff? Wow. Um, anyway, not really sure what you mean. Did you want one of the sections to point to your talk, or something like that? Figure out what you want, and I'll make it when I come back into town in a few hours. - Corbin Simpson 15:01, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey. Before removing a prod tag and tagging an article to be moved to Wiktionary, please check that the article does not already exist there, which this article does. Now I have to AFD this! ;p All the best, Proto|| type 00:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
|
|
Hey, HighwayCello! Since you added your username here, would you mind if I redesigned your user page? :) Nothing content-wise, but if you gave some information regarding color schemes and whatnot, I'd be happy to help with the style. Regards, Sango 123 (e) 22:58, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
I see you have set yourself a high standard as a reviewer of "good articles", including not contributing (including simple corrections) to an article you are reviewing. Of course, in the spirit of "so fix it", this seems to tick people off sometimes... personally, I have the following suggestion for you, which might keep you out of water hotter than you want to be in. Why not, if they are only minor tweeks, correct the things you think need correcting, but not alter the review status, leaving it for someone else to review? It's what I've taken to doing, and it works quite well. Also, I refuse to re-review articles I have previously failed, on the basis that the corrections made to them may in part have been the result of my comments or criticisms, so I have already contributed to the "feedback loop" for the article. Instead, what I might do is fail it, explain why I did so, try to make a couple of improvements, explain what else I think needs improving (usually the stuff beyond my power, knowledge or expertise) and sometimes even renominate the article when it looks like it's done. As a result, I don't think I've ever had negative comments directed at me after a review, even if I have been holding to a high standard and have been critical. Also, the fact I can never fail anything twice makes it obvious that I've not got anything personal against anyone! (In fact it's probably a good thing for different reviewers to get involved since it brings fresh insights and probably brings more uniform standards, since each reviewer can have a look at the rationale and thinking of the last) I don't know if these pointers will be helpful to you, but they have worked pretty well for me. You've certainly done a lot of good work on the WikiProject, I think it would be a shame if you get scared off doing more by people unhappy with the work your put in to your reviews! TheGrappler 00:16, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi there! The list that I made was intended as a test page that was to be integrated into the main article; I didn't make it by mistake. Just fyi. :-) -- Chris S. 03:46, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
With the images now fixed, I wondered if you could look over the article again. Soo 10:38, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey, I'm glad you like your new user page! :D Since you use an activity indicator, I've added a tool written by Topaz for you to update your status with one click. You should notice a 'status changer' panel under 'toolbox' on the left side of your screen or a few buttons in your upper-right personal toolbar that give(s) you the choices online, busy, or offline. Right now, you're 'online'. Click 'busy' or 'offline', go to your user page (or refresh it if you're already there), and see what happens! You don't have to use this tool, but it saves you the effort of having to edit your user page every time you log on, log off, or just happen to be around. :) Cheers, Sango 123 (e) 14:42, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Can you please explain (at the article's talk page) why you marked Jacoby 2NT with the wikify template? It looks fine (if a bit short) to me. Matchups 17:26, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Okay, gotcha. I added the {{ bridgenote}} template (also to Flannery). I guess I was a bit too lazy, even for a stub, the first time around. BTW, I think the right template to use if you see something like this again is {{ Context}}. Matchups 02:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
All right: an example, as requested. :)
Here's the code for the first red box.
<div style="float: left; margin-bottom: 0.37em; border: #CF5440 solid 1px; background: #CF5440; width: 99%; height: 3.35em;"> </div>
Say you wanted to add a link to Wikipedia. Note the colored text.
<div style="float: left; margin-bottom: 0.37em; border: #CF5440 solid 1px; background: #CF5440; width: 99%; height: 3.35em;"><font color="#CF5440">[[Wikipedia]]</font></div>
The second block of code will produce the following. (Click on the upper left region.)
Thanks for the funky shoes, by the way. :D Cheers, Sango 123 (e) 17:46, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey. Sorry, I had to revert your intro changes to the Friends page until we could clean it up a bit. While I think you might be right that it needs to be revamped, there were a few problems with your version that I wanted to talk to you about:
I tried just cleaning up your version, but I wasn't clear enough about your thought process to fix it up, so I just reverted it. Maybe we can get a functioning draft going before we try to put it back in the article. Thanks for your edits, and let me know if you have any questions. E WS23 | (Leave me a message!) 01:55, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Courtesy notice: I am contesting prod on Ira Zlotowitz. Thanks. - the.crazy.russian τ ç ë 03:33, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
I have changed the title to List of deaths attributed to computer or video games and would like to request that you take a look again at this nomination. The attributions are verified, including, in at least one case the deputy coroner. There is no policy against such lists, and it serves a useful purpose in identifying deaths that have, in fact, been attributed to c&vg by reputable source. Yours, For great justice. 06:53, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Why are you moving all the recent South Park episode articles? Has WP policy changed recently on the naming of these articles? I thought that the paranthetical information was only used where there was a need for disambiguation. –– Swid ( talk | edits) 16:29, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Please don't include South Park in the title unless there is another article at the episodes name ( Volcano is OK, Smug Alert! isn't). Sceptr e ( Talk) 16:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Here's to hoping that your stress calms down! Sit back with the relaxing coffee and have some downtime. -- Nataly a 18:35, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Radishes, eh? (I couldn't help it :) -- Nataly a 18:46, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
I've already started constructing the Wikiproject, and it should be finished by tonight. Feel free to help.-- TBC ??? ??? ??? 23:40, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Did you meet him in RL or is he a wikifriend? -- Ac t o w n e 00:29, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Hope the stress can pass. Stressed backwards is Desserts! -- Ac t o w n e 03:33, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
...and all I got was this new sig. Actually, you get to be the first person with the sig on your page. Rock on!!! - Corbin ∫ 1 ɱ p s ɔ ♫ Rock on, dude! 03:32, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi HighwayCello. I've reverted edits that you have made which have been unencyclopedic and unacceptable. On the basis of your edits to A Series of Unfortunate Events, I checked your edit history which is where I spotted what you had done to the Kilbirnie article. In order to help you get a clearer picture of what Wikipedia is all about and how to edit it, I've added a standard "welcome" below which I hope you'll find useful. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, CLW 19:38, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, HighwayCello/Archive/1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Please don't blank content from peoples' user pages, as this is considered vandalism. Thanks! CLW 17:03, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Without meaning to sound patronising, I note that your recent edits are much more - dare I say it? - "encyclopedic". This is the kind of stuff we want! Cheers (smile back!) CLW 17:05, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
What I had added to my earlier comment was another stab at you. Apologies, I was somewhat angry at the time..
PS - How do you get your name to come up at the end of posts? *feels miffed*
(Later on) Ah! *sees timestap option and feels like idiot* Right... --
Highway
18:42, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
No problem. Sometimes when I notice new people making new articles I like to help out so they can learn by example. I hope you like Wikipedia, it's great to have one more editor! -- Pagrashtak 19:17, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Glad to help out. -- ProveIt (talk) 07:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
I saw your post on the cleanup talk page. The taskforce is here: Wikipedia:Cleanup_Taskforce. --K erowyn 00:53, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
What did I do? I not sure what I did wrong...sorry if it caused you any hassle. =D Jumping cheese 02:04, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
I've lost my password! My computer is logged in, but I can't get it anywhere else.
... you do have your e-mail in the system, yes? DS 17:44, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Thank you! : )
Problemo sovled!
Hi, I noticed you added some Pokémon material to your user page. However, fair use images are not allowed on user pages according to fair use policy item 9. Also, please do not include your user page in categories such as Category:Grass Pokémon, as those categories are intended for articles. Pagra shtak 18:33, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
It's just whenever you try and do something big like that, everyone decides to start editting : P Highway 23:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia's
no personal attacks policy: There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be
blocked for disruption. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thanks, --
Rory
0
96
18:53, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
While I appreciate your enthusiasm here, please do keep in mind that substantially modifying others' comments—which includes striking them out—is unacceptable; and that I'm quite capable of withdrawing my own objections when I feel they have been met, so there's no need to do that for me ;-) — Kirill Lok s hin 23:23, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
We had addressed some of the concerns that you had raised at the WP:FPCAN. Could you please check the page and advise? - Ganeshk ( talk) 21:01, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Hope this helps! -- Cel es tianpower háblame 14:57, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Well hello you! Yes, I consider myself to be quite hot on grammatical issues (though I'm not saying that I don't make sloppy mistakes myself now and then...) - what was it you were wondering about? CLW 17:47, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
There you go. Some of my changes were just personal style preference. The main thing I spotted was "it's"/"its" - "it's" is short for "it is", whereas "its" is the possessive form of "it". Lemme know if you've got any questions about changes I made! Cheers, CLW 18:21, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Additionally, you may not realize this, but the Beatles are, by far, the highest maintained group on English Wikipedia. There are literally over a dozen Beatles-related articles that are Featured, and some (such as the Sgt. Pepper's article) are just short of being Featured. Even more, read articles like Something, then tell me that the Queen article isn't even good. TheImpossibleMan 20:01, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
*hug* - Corbin Simpson 21:11, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
I hope I can in anything you're having a problem with, just ask ; ). That's my line. *wink* - Corbin Simpson 22:26, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your review. Maurreen 03:32, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
If you have reviewed an article (regardless of decision) you should remove it from Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations to prevent confusion.
The main problem with your review was that it wasn't very in-depth, as you only commented on the introduction, and ignored the rest of the article.
Well done you! Nice one :) CLW 08:13, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Excellant, thanks for your Input. I will work on this. When I have, can i come back to you for your opinion? -- Irishpunktom\ talk 13:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Sure. It's funny; I've been working on Queen (band), ended up fixing all the quotes and a few links, rewrote some sentences and removed some parenthetical asides. It's all good. - Corbin Simpson 01:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Agreed... Flcelloguy ( A note?) 23:10, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
You're going to need something like this: HighwayC e llo
As always, happy editing! - Corbin Simpson 03:37, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Okay, in Preferences, in the first tab, there's a field called Nickname, and below that, a checkbox marked Raw Signature. Check the checkbox, and then C'n'P this into the Nickname box:
[[User:HighwayCello|HighwayC]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:lime;">e</span>]][[User:HighwayCello|llo]]
What it does is take that wikitext and uses it as your new signature. You can have more complicated stuff in there, too. Look around at other's sigs and see what you like. Make sense, sort of? - Corbin Simpson 13:52, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
There's a camp for this stuff? Wow. Um, anyway, not really sure what you mean. Did you want one of the sections to point to your talk, or something like that? Figure out what you want, and I'll make it when I come back into town in a few hours. - Corbin Simpson 15:01, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey. Before removing a prod tag and tagging an article to be moved to Wiktionary, please check that the article does not already exist there, which this article does. Now I have to AFD this! ;p All the best, Proto|| type 00:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
|
|
Hey, HighwayCello! Since you added your username here, would you mind if I redesigned your user page? :) Nothing content-wise, but if you gave some information regarding color schemes and whatnot, I'd be happy to help with the style. Regards, Sango 123 (e) 22:58, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
I see you have set yourself a high standard as a reviewer of "good articles", including not contributing (including simple corrections) to an article you are reviewing. Of course, in the spirit of "so fix it", this seems to tick people off sometimes... personally, I have the following suggestion for you, which might keep you out of water hotter than you want to be in. Why not, if they are only minor tweeks, correct the things you think need correcting, but not alter the review status, leaving it for someone else to review? It's what I've taken to doing, and it works quite well. Also, I refuse to re-review articles I have previously failed, on the basis that the corrections made to them may in part have been the result of my comments or criticisms, so I have already contributed to the "feedback loop" for the article. Instead, what I might do is fail it, explain why I did so, try to make a couple of improvements, explain what else I think needs improving (usually the stuff beyond my power, knowledge or expertise) and sometimes even renominate the article when it looks like it's done. As a result, I don't think I've ever had negative comments directed at me after a review, even if I have been holding to a high standard and have been critical. Also, the fact I can never fail anything twice makes it obvious that I've not got anything personal against anyone! (In fact it's probably a good thing for different reviewers to get involved since it brings fresh insights and probably brings more uniform standards, since each reviewer can have a look at the rationale and thinking of the last) I don't know if these pointers will be helpful to you, but they have worked pretty well for me. You've certainly done a lot of good work on the WikiProject, I think it would be a shame if you get scared off doing more by people unhappy with the work your put in to your reviews! TheGrappler 00:16, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi there! The list that I made was intended as a test page that was to be integrated into the main article; I didn't make it by mistake. Just fyi. :-) -- Chris S. 03:46, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
With the images now fixed, I wondered if you could look over the article again. Soo 10:38, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey, I'm glad you like your new user page! :D Since you use an activity indicator, I've added a tool written by Topaz for you to update your status with one click. You should notice a 'status changer' panel under 'toolbox' on the left side of your screen or a few buttons in your upper-right personal toolbar that give(s) you the choices online, busy, or offline. Right now, you're 'online'. Click 'busy' or 'offline', go to your user page (or refresh it if you're already there), and see what happens! You don't have to use this tool, but it saves you the effort of having to edit your user page every time you log on, log off, or just happen to be around. :) Cheers, Sango 123 (e) 14:42, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Can you please explain (at the article's talk page) why you marked Jacoby 2NT with the wikify template? It looks fine (if a bit short) to me. Matchups 17:26, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Okay, gotcha. I added the {{ bridgenote}} template (also to Flannery). I guess I was a bit too lazy, even for a stub, the first time around. BTW, I think the right template to use if you see something like this again is {{ Context}}. Matchups 02:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
All right: an example, as requested. :)
Here's the code for the first red box.
<div style="float: left; margin-bottom: 0.37em; border: #CF5440 solid 1px; background: #CF5440; width: 99%; height: 3.35em;"> </div>
Say you wanted to add a link to Wikipedia. Note the colored text.
<div style="float: left; margin-bottom: 0.37em; border: #CF5440 solid 1px; background: #CF5440; width: 99%; height: 3.35em;"><font color="#CF5440">[[Wikipedia]]</font></div>
The second block of code will produce the following. (Click on the upper left region.)
Thanks for the funky shoes, by the way. :D Cheers, Sango 123 (e) 17:46, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey. Sorry, I had to revert your intro changes to the Friends page until we could clean it up a bit. While I think you might be right that it needs to be revamped, there were a few problems with your version that I wanted to talk to you about:
I tried just cleaning up your version, but I wasn't clear enough about your thought process to fix it up, so I just reverted it. Maybe we can get a functioning draft going before we try to put it back in the article. Thanks for your edits, and let me know if you have any questions. E WS23 | (Leave me a message!) 01:55, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Courtesy notice: I am contesting prod on Ira Zlotowitz. Thanks. - the.crazy.russian τ ç ë 03:33, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
I have changed the title to List of deaths attributed to computer or video games and would like to request that you take a look again at this nomination. The attributions are verified, including, in at least one case the deputy coroner. There is no policy against such lists, and it serves a useful purpose in identifying deaths that have, in fact, been attributed to c&vg by reputable source. Yours, For great justice. 06:53, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Why are you moving all the recent South Park episode articles? Has WP policy changed recently on the naming of these articles? I thought that the paranthetical information was only used where there was a need for disambiguation. –– Swid ( talk | edits) 16:29, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Please don't include South Park in the title unless there is another article at the episodes name ( Volcano is OK, Smug Alert! isn't). Sceptr e ( Talk) 16:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Here's to hoping that your stress calms down! Sit back with the relaxing coffee and have some downtime. -- Nataly a 18:35, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Radishes, eh? (I couldn't help it :) -- Nataly a 18:46, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
I've already started constructing the Wikiproject, and it should be finished by tonight. Feel free to help.-- TBC ??? ??? ??? 23:40, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Did you meet him in RL or is he a wikifriend? -- Ac t o w n e 00:29, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Hope the stress can pass. Stressed backwards is Desserts! -- Ac t o w n e 03:33, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
...and all I got was this new sig. Actually, you get to be the first person with the sig on your page. Rock on!!! - Corbin ∫ 1 ɱ p s ɔ ♫ Rock on, dude! 03:32, 11 April 2006 (UTC)