![]() |
Hi Hibarnacle! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 19:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC) |
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Talk:British Isles naming dispute, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
The Banner
talk
09:19, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Stop going around reverting the edits of a user you disagree with. This is not helpful to the project, and it implies you are a single purpose account who's only purposes is to hound said user. If you continue reverting edits from a particular user as you have been you will be blocked from editing, especially since many of your edits are incorrect. This is disruptive editing. Canterbury Tail talk 18:57, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
You have made multiple personal attacks today and open with this one and follow with such as here, which have no place here and are not a valid use of an article talk page. Edits like this one are particularly worrying due to accusations of POV when there is nothing that could be construed as a POV in it, other than your decapitalizing of the country name.I have no issue with your edit count if the edits are of quality, but your edits today are worrying as you appeared all over my watchlist solely and specifically undoing edits of Mabuska's. If you stop hounding Mabuska and edit in a neutral manner elsewhere then we have no issues whatsoever. Oh and deleting something covers up nothing, every single edit is clearly available in the edit history for the world to see. Do note that I am a neutral editor who specializes in the Northern Ireland related disputes, I am frequently called both Republican and Loyalist, often on the same day by people who don't like their edits or versions of truth being reverted (this is background, I'm not accusing you of this). Canterbury Tail talk 19:50, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
1978 Lisnamuck shoot-out, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. POV and personal attacks
The Banner
talk
21:13, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding The Troubles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.This isn't restricted to just the period of the Troubles or articles to do with the Troubles, but also edits and topics that can be linked as being Troubles or loyalist/republican argument related. Mabuska (talk) 13:12, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Hibarnacle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " sandbox/Hibarnacle".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — pythoncoder ( talk | contribs) 13:09, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dunadd, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Irish and Gaelic. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Domnall Ua Lochlainn, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Please use the 'Articles needing cleanup' category if this is what you believe it needs. Your 'correction' was incorrect.
Synorem (
talk)
03:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Hibarnacle! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 19:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC) |
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Talk:British Isles naming dispute, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
The Banner
talk
09:19, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Stop going around reverting the edits of a user you disagree with. This is not helpful to the project, and it implies you are a single purpose account who's only purposes is to hound said user. If you continue reverting edits from a particular user as you have been you will be blocked from editing, especially since many of your edits are incorrect. This is disruptive editing. Canterbury Tail talk 18:57, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
You have made multiple personal attacks today and open with this one and follow with such as here, which have no place here and are not a valid use of an article talk page. Edits like this one are particularly worrying due to accusations of POV when there is nothing that could be construed as a POV in it, other than your decapitalizing of the country name.I have no issue with your edit count if the edits are of quality, but your edits today are worrying as you appeared all over my watchlist solely and specifically undoing edits of Mabuska's. If you stop hounding Mabuska and edit in a neutral manner elsewhere then we have no issues whatsoever. Oh and deleting something covers up nothing, every single edit is clearly available in the edit history for the world to see. Do note that I am a neutral editor who specializes in the Northern Ireland related disputes, I am frequently called both Republican and Loyalist, often on the same day by people who don't like their edits or versions of truth being reverted (this is background, I'm not accusing you of this). Canterbury Tail talk 19:50, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
1978 Lisnamuck shoot-out, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. POV and personal attacks
The Banner
talk
21:13, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding The Troubles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.This isn't restricted to just the period of the Troubles or articles to do with the Troubles, but also edits and topics that can be linked as being Troubles or loyalist/republican argument related. Mabuska (talk) 13:12, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Hibarnacle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " sandbox/Hibarnacle".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — pythoncoder ( talk | contribs) 13:09, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dunadd, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Irish and Gaelic. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Domnall Ua Lochlainn, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Please use the 'Articles needing cleanup' category if this is what you believe it needs. Your 'correction' was incorrect.
Synorem (
talk)
03:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)