Welcome to Wikipedia, Henryhe43! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
HiLo48 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 ( talk) 00:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Laozi. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. - Epinoia ( talk) 21:38, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
@Epinoia I don't understand aren't you also reverting my edits? {{unsigned|Henryhe43
@Epinoia Ok I understand but just letting you know that from my perspective it feels like you are bullying me simply because, what, you have seniority? You've been around longer? Just saying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henryhe43 ( talk • contribs)
It's imperative that you stop restoring disputed content when editors object to its inclusion. You are new and clearly unaware of our various policies and guidelines. Instead of ascribing nefarious reasons for the reverts, you'd be better served reading through the information and links provided to you that explain why the material is being removed.--
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
21:30, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
@jezebel'sponyo @ponyo Ok no problem. How bout you talk to me like a human being you colossal prick. You're probably a racist too. But that's not business. ooooohhhhh nefarious. Way to go buddy trying to threaten me huh? oooooohhhh. don't go around threatening people. you're just making me laugh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henryhe43 ( talk • contribs)
@jezebel'sponyo @ponyo if you block meyou are a racist. Because you are. You are consciously, insidiously suppressing the voice of a minority. Someone you KNOW who is in a weaker power position than yourself. I am less represented in the media, politically and economically the newspapers etc. The fact that you even threatened me with a ban already confirms to me your inherent mindset. please go take a long hard look at yourself in the mirror. Why do you think there's so much going on in America at the moment because individuals such as yourself are unable to objectively look at themselves and their relation to other's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henryhe43 ( talk • contribs)
@jezebel'sponyo @ponyo No, I think the real reason is because you're afraid and you know I'm right.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Henryhe43 ( talk • contribs)
@jezebel'sponyo @ponyo thanks white racist i will definitely take your advice. oh mister white man suh oh thank you mister white oppressor massa suh. you know what you should actually write in your next reply to me? a personal letter of apology apologizing for the 400 years of rape theft and murder the white race has committed against every other non white nation in this world. Think about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henryhe43 ( talk • contribs)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
23:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Lol 2. O. Boxing 00:43, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
AmbivalentUnequivocality (
talk)
23:54, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Henryhe43 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Racial bias on Wikipedia I find the article on Malcolm X to be highly biased, lacks highly relevant information, and does not portray Malcolm X in an objective manner. I would prefer is a non-white individual reviewed this unblock request. Furthermore there is evidence to show that the constant reversion of my edits by the user AmbivalentUnequivocality is emotional and vendetta driven. Henryhe43 ( talk) 21:29, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Civility is required here. We certainly do not tolerate or have any need to tolerate people who would call another volunteer "you fucking white racist cracker cunt". Also, checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts; this is now a checkuser block. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 22:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Welcome to Wikipedia, Henryhe43! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
HiLo48 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 ( talk) 00:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Laozi. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. - Epinoia ( talk) 21:38, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
@Epinoia I don't understand aren't you also reverting my edits? {{unsigned|Henryhe43
@Epinoia Ok I understand but just letting you know that from my perspective it feels like you are bullying me simply because, what, you have seniority? You've been around longer? Just saying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henryhe43 ( talk • contribs)
It's imperative that you stop restoring disputed content when editors object to its inclusion. You are new and clearly unaware of our various policies and guidelines. Instead of ascribing nefarious reasons for the reverts, you'd be better served reading through the information and links provided to you that explain why the material is being removed.--
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
21:30, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
@jezebel'sponyo @ponyo Ok no problem. How bout you talk to me like a human being you colossal prick. You're probably a racist too. But that's not business. ooooohhhhh nefarious. Way to go buddy trying to threaten me huh? oooooohhhh. don't go around threatening people. you're just making me laugh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henryhe43 ( talk • contribs)
@jezebel'sponyo @ponyo if you block meyou are a racist. Because you are. You are consciously, insidiously suppressing the voice of a minority. Someone you KNOW who is in a weaker power position than yourself. I am less represented in the media, politically and economically the newspapers etc. The fact that you even threatened me with a ban already confirms to me your inherent mindset. please go take a long hard look at yourself in the mirror. Why do you think there's so much going on in America at the moment because individuals such as yourself are unable to objectively look at themselves and their relation to other's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henryhe43 ( talk • contribs)
@jezebel'sponyo @ponyo No, I think the real reason is because you're afraid and you know I'm right.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Henryhe43 ( talk • contribs)
@jezebel'sponyo @ponyo thanks white racist i will definitely take your advice. oh mister white man suh oh thank you mister white oppressor massa suh. you know what you should actually write in your next reply to me? a personal letter of apology apologizing for the 400 years of rape theft and murder the white race has committed against every other non white nation in this world. Think about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henryhe43 ( talk • contribs)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
23:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Lol 2. O. Boxing 00:43, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
AmbivalentUnequivocality (
talk)
23:54, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Henryhe43 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Racial bias on Wikipedia I find the article on Malcolm X to be highly biased, lacks highly relevant information, and does not portray Malcolm X in an objective manner. I would prefer is a non-white individual reviewed this unblock request. Furthermore there is evidence to show that the constant reversion of my edits by the user AmbivalentUnequivocality is emotional and vendetta driven. Henryhe43 ( talk) 21:29, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Civility is required here. We certainly do not tolerate or have any need to tolerate people who would call another volunteer "you fucking white racist cracker cunt". Also, checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts; this is now a checkuser block. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 22:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))