![]() | This user may have left Wikipedia. Hedonil has not edited Wikipedia since August 19, 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
I'm sorry, I'm not following. What it is you need me to translate, and how/where would I do this? Also, my Italian is conversational, but hardly fluent. I'd love to help, but aside from an Arbitration matter I'm currently embroiled in, you could probably yield a translation of equal or superior quality with Google Translate. Nightscream ( talk) 14:00, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
Thanks for assisting me with xtools. Your work there is definitely showing. — cyberpower ChatOnline 17:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Technical Barnstar |
Another deserved one, for your continued hard work at stabilizing xtools while I deal with RL issues. — cyberpower ChatLimited Access 15:26, 12 May 2014 (UTC) |
Hello. I've been testing your version of X Tools. Here's some feedback, though only on the Top Edits tool: 1. For whatever reason, when checking a user on Top Edits (for example, Jimbo), when the articles show up, the article names (though not the hyperlinks) will appear without spaces (for example, JimmyWales rather than Jimmy Wales). Can this be fixed? The old XTools version (TParis' version the last time it worked properly) didn't have this issue.
2. When that is fixed, could the hyperlinks be changed so that underscores will show up rather than spaces? For example: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page rather than en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main Page
Thanks. And here's a barnstar for you.
![]() |
The da Vinci Barnstar | |
Good job on XTools. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 08:45, 24 May 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Technical Barnstar |
I love the look and feel of the tools, now. You've added a ton of features and I find the whole suite to be very useful and intuitive. I love the cross-tool-links which make it crazy easy to navigate to exactly the information I am looking for. The added speed of the tools is also no joke, they just pop up with hardly any loading. The stats that you've improved upon on the edit counter, to include admin states, are just incredible. Thank you for all of your hard work, you are definitely talented. v/r - T P 22:43, 2 June 2014 (UTC) |
One word for this - awesome. -- NeilN talk to me 19:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
I have left a query for you about your new tool on the Village Pump Help desk today, under the above heading. It is excellent, by the way, very user-friendly. -- P123ct1 ( talk) 20:46, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I hope it is ok to left message here :) I have some "problems" with Pages created tool. I have created 5000+ articles @lv wiki, but the "more" link doesn't work (I get the same first 5000 articles after pressing it). -- Edgars2007 ( talk/ contribs) 11:52, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
I have a few more suggestions and another query. Perhaps "Don't follow redirects" needs an explanatory note. This will baffle newbies, I think. (I still don't know what redirects are!) Also, what about a note that the page title is case sensitive, or is that obvious? If a phrase to be searched includes wikitext in the original, must the wikitext be omitted or included when typing in the phrase? (e.g. if phrase to be searched is "they said it was [[jihad]]".) How about placing a link to this gadget at the top of the "View history" page? That would be really helpful, especially as I imagine many will want to use this tool in conjunction with the "View history" pages. Just some suggestions to fine-tune what is already a brilliant tool! -- P123ct1 ( talk) 12:37, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
I think this is your tool. If not, let me know. Feedback here on the Bugs To Do list. This is a fine tool, by the way. Superior to anything else at WP I've accessed before. Is there a way we can delete the flagged "bugs" items one by one, so they don't keep adding forever and forever? I've looked through this list on Davy Crockett, and nothing there is really an error in grammar. In fact, you'll notice that it even flagged a section header for lacking commas, which section headers don't generally have. — Maile ( talk) 15:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Firefox 30.0. Below the usual page top line for the stats are line breaks with separate lines for (right-margin aligned) Results, Checkwiki, Wikidata, Language Tool and Dead links. Don't mind seeing the info, but it leaves a couple of inches of white space on the left-hand side of those items above the top of the article. — Maile ( talk) 12:10, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi! What is about the files oploaded (not those on Commons) and pages moved? I have some that doesn't appear here.-- Edgars2007 ( talk/ contribs) 13:36, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
I am having trouble with your new gadget. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, and quite often it comes up with a message saying "Internal error", "The URI you have requested, /xtools/blame/?project=en.wikipedia.org&article=Islamic+State+of+Iraq+and+the+Levant&text=agreed+to+supply+Kurdish+forces, appears to be non-functional at this time." What is happening? Hope you can fix it soon, as it is such a good tool and I rely on it! -- P123ct1 ( talk) 16:04, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
I very much like your new version of the edit counter.
I have a small problem which perhaps is of little significance and may not be changeable. I assume it is rare but I know it has occurred to at least two other editors. This was revealed when they were candidates for administrator in the recent past. The additional information on my page shows that I have one block and a longest block of 31 hours. The block was actually a mistake and lasted only 1 minute while the administrator realized and corrected his/her error. In effect, I have had no blocks. I assume the administrator mistakenly blocked me instead of a vandal whose edut(s) I had recently reverted.
Anyone who clicks on the block log itself will see the immediate unblock. Nonetheless, I am chagrined to see this black mark on my record, which I intend to keep clean. (Anyone can make a bad, inadvertent mistake, but I have not done so in over four years of editing.) I immediately inquired about having the entire record cleared when the mistake occurred but that seems not to be possible or to have some unintended side effect. It seems better just to have the block log and the immediate unblock as a clear public record because of this.
I will appreciate your consideration as to whether there is some way to note that the only block shown on my edit count page was a mistake, which lasted only a minute. I suppose anyone who is interested might click on the log and see the mistake but anyone who just looks at the counter page, few as I would expect that to be, will see a record of a 31-hour block. I can understand if it is too difficult to account for this unusual and rare situation but I thought it would not hurt to ask whether some note or other reference could be made on the counter page itself as long as I have maintained and continue to maintain a clear record.
Thanks for all your great work with the project. Donner60 ( talk) 07:47, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
The link to Xtools seems to be broken, this week the page didn't load every time I tried to view my stats. Now it is saying 404. Is someone addressing this? Lightspeed2012 18:50, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
I see. You mean a page like this one: https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/articleinfo/index.php?article=MediaWiki:Histlegend&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia It currently shows this HTTP header: HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request => Server => nginx/1.5.0 Date => Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:50:12 GMT Content-Type => text/html Content-Length => 172 Connection => close The tool "articleinfo", which you are talking about is part of "xtools" as listed here. The maintainers are User:Hedonil, User:Cyberpower678 and User:Tparis. Reply Parent 88.130.120.519:09, 23 November 2014
.....................I would appreciate any help, I thank you for your time-- Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 21:16, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This user may have left Wikipedia. Hedonil has not edited Wikipedia since August 19, 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
I'm sorry, I'm not following. What it is you need me to translate, and how/where would I do this? Also, my Italian is conversational, but hardly fluent. I'd love to help, but aside from an Arbitration matter I'm currently embroiled in, you could probably yield a translation of equal or superior quality with Google Translate. Nightscream ( talk) 14:00, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
Thanks for assisting me with xtools. Your work there is definitely showing. — cyberpower ChatOnline 17:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Technical Barnstar |
Another deserved one, for your continued hard work at stabilizing xtools while I deal with RL issues. — cyberpower ChatLimited Access 15:26, 12 May 2014 (UTC) |
Hello. I've been testing your version of X Tools. Here's some feedback, though only on the Top Edits tool: 1. For whatever reason, when checking a user on Top Edits (for example, Jimbo), when the articles show up, the article names (though not the hyperlinks) will appear without spaces (for example, JimmyWales rather than Jimmy Wales). Can this be fixed? The old XTools version (TParis' version the last time it worked properly) didn't have this issue.
2. When that is fixed, could the hyperlinks be changed so that underscores will show up rather than spaces? For example: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page rather than en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main Page
Thanks. And here's a barnstar for you.
![]() |
The da Vinci Barnstar | |
Good job on XTools. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 08:45, 24 May 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Technical Barnstar |
I love the look and feel of the tools, now. You've added a ton of features and I find the whole suite to be very useful and intuitive. I love the cross-tool-links which make it crazy easy to navigate to exactly the information I am looking for. The added speed of the tools is also no joke, they just pop up with hardly any loading. The stats that you've improved upon on the edit counter, to include admin states, are just incredible. Thank you for all of your hard work, you are definitely talented. v/r - T P 22:43, 2 June 2014 (UTC) |
One word for this - awesome. -- NeilN talk to me 19:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
I have left a query for you about your new tool on the Village Pump Help desk today, under the above heading. It is excellent, by the way, very user-friendly. -- P123ct1 ( talk) 20:46, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I hope it is ok to left message here :) I have some "problems" with Pages created tool. I have created 5000+ articles @lv wiki, but the "more" link doesn't work (I get the same first 5000 articles after pressing it). -- Edgars2007 ( talk/ contribs) 11:52, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
I have a few more suggestions and another query. Perhaps "Don't follow redirects" needs an explanatory note. This will baffle newbies, I think. (I still don't know what redirects are!) Also, what about a note that the page title is case sensitive, or is that obvious? If a phrase to be searched includes wikitext in the original, must the wikitext be omitted or included when typing in the phrase? (e.g. if phrase to be searched is "they said it was [[jihad]]".) How about placing a link to this gadget at the top of the "View history" page? That would be really helpful, especially as I imagine many will want to use this tool in conjunction with the "View history" pages. Just some suggestions to fine-tune what is already a brilliant tool! -- P123ct1 ( talk) 12:37, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
I think this is your tool. If not, let me know. Feedback here on the Bugs To Do list. This is a fine tool, by the way. Superior to anything else at WP I've accessed before. Is there a way we can delete the flagged "bugs" items one by one, so they don't keep adding forever and forever? I've looked through this list on Davy Crockett, and nothing there is really an error in grammar. In fact, you'll notice that it even flagged a section header for lacking commas, which section headers don't generally have. — Maile ( talk) 15:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Firefox 30.0. Below the usual page top line for the stats are line breaks with separate lines for (right-margin aligned) Results, Checkwiki, Wikidata, Language Tool and Dead links. Don't mind seeing the info, but it leaves a couple of inches of white space on the left-hand side of those items above the top of the article. — Maile ( talk) 12:10, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi! What is about the files oploaded (not those on Commons) and pages moved? I have some that doesn't appear here.-- Edgars2007 ( talk/ contribs) 13:36, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
I am having trouble with your new gadget. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, and quite often it comes up with a message saying "Internal error", "The URI you have requested, /xtools/blame/?project=en.wikipedia.org&article=Islamic+State+of+Iraq+and+the+Levant&text=agreed+to+supply+Kurdish+forces, appears to be non-functional at this time." What is happening? Hope you can fix it soon, as it is such a good tool and I rely on it! -- P123ct1 ( talk) 16:04, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
I very much like your new version of the edit counter.
I have a small problem which perhaps is of little significance and may not be changeable. I assume it is rare but I know it has occurred to at least two other editors. This was revealed when they were candidates for administrator in the recent past. The additional information on my page shows that I have one block and a longest block of 31 hours. The block was actually a mistake and lasted only 1 minute while the administrator realized and corrected his/her error. In effect, I have had no blocks. I assume the administrator mistakenly blocked me instead of a vandal whose edut(s) I had recently reverted.
Anyone who clicks on the block log itself will see the immediate unblock. Nonetheless, I am chagrined to see this black mark on my record, which I intend to keep clean. (Anyone can make a bad, inadvertent mistake, but I have not done so in over four years of editing.) I immediately inquired about having the entire record cleared when the mistake occurred but that seems not to be possible or to have some unintended side effect. It seems better just to have the block log and the immediate unblock as a clear public record because of this.
I will appreciate your consideration as to whether there is some way to note that the only block shown on my edit count page was a mistake, which lasted only a minute. I suppose anyone who is interested might click on the log and see the mistake but anyone who just looks at the counter page, few as I would expect that to be, will see a record of a 31-hour block. I can understand if it is too difficult to account for this unusual and rare situation but I thought it would not hurt to ask whether some note or other reference could be made on the counter page itself as long as I have maintained and continue to maintain a clear record.
Thanks for all your great work with the project. Donner60 ( talk) 07:47, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
The link to Xtools seems to be broken, this week the page didn't load every time I tried to view my stats. Now it is saying 404. Is someone addressing this? Lightspeed2012 18:50, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
I see. You mean a page like this one: https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/articleinfo/index.php?article=MediaWiki:Histlegend&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia It currently shows this HTTP header: HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request => Server => nginx/1.5.0 Date => Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:50:12 GMT Content-Type => text/html Content-Length => 172 Connection => close The tool "articleinfo", which you are talking about is part of "xtools" as listed here. The maintainers are User:Hedonil, User:Cyberpower678 and User:Tparis. Reply Parent 88.130.120.519:09, 23 November 2014
.....................I would appreciate any help, I thank you for your time-- Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 21:16, 23 November 2014 (UTC)