![]() |
Hi Heather - Dream! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
Chip123456. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you!
Chip
123456
16:03, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Talib Kweli, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
Materialscientist (
talk)
22:05, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Talib Kweli, you may be
blocked from editing. In particular, the term "murder" should not be used without a reliable source to call it such. All the sources currently in related articles don't support the term. —
C.Fred (
talk)
23:15, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
I was asked outside of Wikipedia to do so.
What I added was a list of songs, why do I need a source for that?
1. I reverted it back to an old version to get back the As Featured Artists List and forgot that it was changed. 2. it was a murder. 3. Funny how I linked the source to Mike Brown's page and it was taken down unnecessarily. 4. Out of curiosity, what authority do you have? This isn't meant to sound rude I am really just curious.
Your recent editing history at Talib Kweli shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — C.Fred ( talk) 20:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
You appear to be involved in an edit war on Talib Kweli. This means that you have added material that other editors have disagreed with. When your edits were reverted, you merely replaced them, over and over. Wikipedia has a three-revert rule: you only get to revert others' edits (including edits where they have removed your material) three times; any more than that and you can be blocked to prevent further disruption. Since multiple editors have expressed concern over this material, your proper response is to take the matter to the talk page and try to build consensus for your edits. I have reverted your last edit one more time. If you replace it, I will have to report your actions to the proper administrative venue. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 21:15, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
to be fair, when no one gives you an explanation as to why its hard to see why they keep changing it. Still should be on the page. No reason for it to need a source just like discography doesn't need one.
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 16:50, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Jessicacaremoore.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Jessica Care Moore.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Heather - Dream! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
Chip123456. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you!
Chip
123456
16:03, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Talib Kweli, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
Materialscientist (
talk)
22:05, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Talib Kweli, you may be
blocked from editing. In particular, the term "murder" should not be used without a reliable source to call it such. All the sources currently in related articles don't support the term. —
C.Fred (
talk)
23:15, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
I was asked outside of Wikipedia to do so.
What I added was a list of songs, why do I need a source for that?
1. I reverted it back to an old version to get back the As Featured Artists List and forgot that it was changed. 2. it was a murder. 3. Funny how I linked the source to Mike Brown's page and it was taken down unnecessarily. 4. Out of curiosity, what authority do you have? This isn't meant to sound rude I am really just curious.
Your recent editing history at Talib Kweli shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — C.Fred ( talk) 20:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
You appear to be involved in an edit war on Talib Kweli. This means that you have added material that other editors have disagreed with. When your edits were reverted, you merely replaced them, over and over. Wikipedia has a three-revert rule: you only get to revert others' edits (including edits where they have removed your material) three times; any more than that and you can be blocked to prevent further disruption. Since multiple editors have expressed concern over this material, your proper response is to take the matter to the talk page and try to build consensus for your edits. I have reverted your last edit one more time. If you replace it, I will have to report your actions to the proper administrative venue. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 21:15, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
to be fair, when no one gives you an explanation as to why its hard to see why they keep changing it. Still should be on the page. No reason for it to need a source just like discography doesn't need one.
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 16:50, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Jessicacaremoore.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Jessica Care Moore.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)