I have nominated Category:Harriet Harman ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 20:45, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Template:Harriet Harman has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Off2riorob (
talk)
18:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Template:Peter Mandelson has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
ShawnIsHere (
talk)
00:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Labour Party (UK), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Please discuss this on the article's Talk page, as previously advised.
Rodhull
andemu
14:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing
verifiable and
reliable sources, as you did to
Floella Benjamin. Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Off2riorob (
talk)
16:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Nasty Party, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Road Wizard (
talk)
20:05, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Please stop it, you are new and your creations appear to have no support, if you continue along this path editing restrictions could follow, take your time and discuss more. Regards. Off2riorob ( talk) 20:26, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Harman family, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Off2riorob (
talk)
20:57, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I have deleted this, yet again. There are several things wrong with it: (1) The term is unsourced, and even if it were, you would have to show that it is uniquely associated with the UK Conservative Party and no other; (2) it is not a neutral term (3) it is an unlikely search term for anyone seeking the article on the Conservative Party (and I notice you haven't created "The Stupid Party", which I have also seen them called - but please don't be tempted). Since you've recreated it, I've prevented its recreation by any editor other than an Admin unless you can gain consensus for it to be created. Your edits are getting disruptive, and I note that it is not just I who am losing patience with your edits. If in doubt, please ask. Rodhull andemu 19:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
The article Nasty Party has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Cptmurdok (
talk)
17:41, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively here, we would like to remind you not to
attack other editors, as you did with
this edit to
User talk:Rodhullandemu. You may wish to read the
introduction to editing for more information about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Alan (
talk)
12:34, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).
A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved
bot account.
Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:
{{
unblock-un|your new username here}}
on
your user talk page. You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Spartaz
Humbug!
19:29, 29 April 2010 (UTC)I have nominated Category:Harman family ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Robofish ( talk) 00:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Harriet Harman ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 20:45, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Template:Harriet Harman has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Off2riorob (
talk)
18:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Template:Peter Mandelson has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
ShawnIsHere (
talk)
00:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Labour Party (UK), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Please discuss this on the article's Talk page, as previously advised.
Rodhull
andemu
14:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing
verifiable and
reliable sources, as you did to
Floella Benjamin. Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Off2riorob (
talk)
16:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Nasty Party, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Road Wizard (
talk)
20:05, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Please stop it, you are new and your creations appear to have no support, if you continue along this path editing restrictions could follow, take your time and discuss more. Regards. Off2riorob ( talk) 20:26, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Harman family, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Off2riorob (
talk)
20:57, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I have deleted this, yet again. There are several things wrong with it: (1) The term is unsourced, and even if it were, you would have to show that it is uniquely associated with the UK Conservative Party and no other; (2) it is not a neutral term (3) it is an unlikely search term for anyone seeking the article on the Conservative Party (and I notice you haven't created "The Stupid Party", which I have also seen them called - but please don't be tempted). Since you've recreated it, I've prevented its recreation by any editor other than an Admin unless you can gain consensus for it to be created. Your edits are getting disruptive, and I note that it is not just I who am losing patience with your edits. If in doubt, please ask. Rodhull andemu 19:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
The article Nasty Party has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Cptmurdok (
talk)
17:41, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively here, we would like to remind you not to
attack other editors, as you did with
this edit to
User talk:Rodhullandemu. You may wish to read the
introduction to editing for more information about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Alan (
talk)
12:34, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).
A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved
bot account.
Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:
{{
unblock-un|your new username here}}
on
your user talk page. You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Spartaz
Humbug!
19:29, 29 April 2010 (UTC)I have nominated Category:Harman family ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Robofish ( talk) 00:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC)