A tag has been placed on Adriana Ferreyr, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hiphopmast3r ( talk) 11:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Julia Roberts worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Everard Proudfoot ( talk) 17:48, 16 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Adriana Ferreyr has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people must include reliable soruces for all claims.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Everard Proudfoot ( talk) 17:50, 16 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from articles without addressing the issue, as you did with Adriana Ferreyr., as you did with Adriana Ferreyr. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Everard Proudfoot ( talk) 20:27, 16 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I have removed everything from Adriana Ferreyr that was not sourced to a reliable source. Everard Proudfoot ( talk) 06:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adriana Ferreyr, you may be blocked from editing. Everard Proudfoot ( talk) 22:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Adriana Ferreyr. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Toddst1 ( talk) 19:06, 12 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Adriana Ferreyr. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 00:52, 18 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Could you please tell me what was defamatory about my claims?

She is not a soap star. She is not billed as a star in the show. She has not run successful businesses. The business is no longer running. At its demise it crashed and was not sold. Successful businesses are sold on. That's business. There are false claims on the Linkedin profile. You know. The photo was not at a NY summit. It was taken after the event. Ask the photographer. The same photographer you didn't credit. Claiming the picture was open source. She made false claims against Mr Soros, as the police investigation discovered. Let's see how the court case goes shall we? — Preceding unsigned comment added by William de Berg ( talk • contribs) 10:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC) William de Berg ( talk) 11:29, 17 September 2011 (UTC) (sorry) reply

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 16:06, 17 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Just to let you know, I've copied one of your comments to Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Adriana Ferreyr so that the concerns can be discussed. -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 16:37, 17 September 2011 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adriana Ferreyr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adriana Ferreyr until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bbb23 ( talk) 20:56, 17 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Adriana Ferreyr. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Off2riorob ( talk)

Rather than revert against experienced uninvolved neutral editors you would do better joining in the AFD discussion or it wont exist in a few days at all. Off2riorob ( talk) 00:52, 18 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Stop putting in false, unsourced claims. There is no proof that she is an "entrepreneur" or that she heads a charity. Google it! All that comes up is HER OWN linkedin page.

Why is Adriana Ferreyr the ONLY wikipedia page you edit??

Also, IMDB is NOT a reliable source.