Are you here because you think that my bot HRoestBot made a mistake? Please read the FAQ first. Maybe your questions will be answered there already.
Nice to see a helpful editor working on techie things in WE. Lots to do here and an opportunity to learn a lot of stuff from various folks.-- Smokefoot 16:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
I am trying to figure out the meaning of the collection of chemical formulas at Lindlar catalyst. It is very, very difficult to depict the nature of a heterogeneous catalyst, but the thing you posted is not a Lindlar catalyst but a set of ingredients. Possibly you might choose to recast these formulas into some sort of in-line equation that describes how the catalyst is prepared, but the collection of individual formulas are barely relevant to the nature of catalyst itself. The catalyst does not contain lead acetate, for example - it is derived from lead acetate (or other lead(II) sources). Just a suggestion. Best wishes,-- Smokefoot 16:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Rather than blank a page or some such thing, use {{db-copyvio|url=http://www.goldenlemon.com/story.htm}} (substituting the appropriate URL) and let an administrator deal with it. Postcard Cathy 12:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
For this image, you say it was made by you, but you give GurkanSengun as the author. What gives? Lupo 13:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I have just seen on your de.wikipedia.org user page that you are an ETH student; well, it was easy to guess just looking at your edits. Please do not add captions such as "ETH Zürich, the most prestigious university in Switzerland" to articles in Wikipedia" — except if you have reliable sources to back this claim, but prestige is something quite hard to measure... Also, the changes you made to the lead of Education in Switzerland single out a couple of Swiss Universities, without explaining why they should be mentioned instead of the other ones. The lead is already quite long, so we should remove content rather that add more. Thanks ! Schutz ( talk) 13:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Maybe you are right about the word "prestigious" but I do not have a substitute available that would express the same content. Feel free to propose one. You are right in that one ranking is not an adequate source, therefore I looked around and found some others that basically said the same thing (see list below). It is not our task here to criticize the rankings, but we can merely depict their results and reproduce their findings. I do not deny that many universities in Switzerland are good at what they do and have fields where they are leading in Switzerland but it seems obvious to me that ETH has the best international reputation , given the rankings. ETH was on top of all the national and international rankings I could find, the Shanghai ranking was just one example...here are some more:
Good work. Tim Vickers ( talk) 18:33, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Ging3rnut ( talk) 21:42, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
You can alter the controls at the bottom, eg diff will stop it updating the summary text. We kept to genes since any other organisation would be impossible to extend to all the other gene articles, however having summary articles on functional complexes sounds useful. Tim Vickers ( talk) 21:47, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I took some real data (I think from MTHFR), fitted it to the MM equation, subtracted the residuals from the data and re-plotted and re-fitted. The values on the Y and X axes are indeed arbitrary - I didn't think it made much difference if it was 100, 200 300 or 1000, 2000 etc Tim Vickers ( talk) 16:59, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it would have been nice if I'd included annotation and links - but I'm not very good with html. I was going to go back and insert links, and I had issues reverting back to my edits.
A quick Google would have verified my edits - you didn't need to remove them. The album I mentioned can even be found in Wikipedia - it's not exactly unknown stuff, just unknown to whoever wrote the article!
Please don't be so quick to remove my edits in future - I am a keen participant in updating music pages, and would like to see the Heavy Metal page become more accurate.
Thank you. MarkCertif1ed ( talk) 21:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, welcome to the Wikiproject! If you have any questions, comments or suggestions please drop me a note on my talkpage, or post on one of the project's discussion pages. All the best Tim Vickers ( talk) 22:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Please notice this difference:
In the second case (1) the digit 1 is not italicized; (2) a proper minus sign is used, not a hyphen; (3) spaces precede and follow the minus sign. The latter form is prescribed by Wikipedia:Manual of Style (mathematics). Also, please notice my other recent edits to Moran process. Michael Hardy ( talk) 06:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, that's certainly my impression as well. I'll have a look. Tim Vickers ( talk) 17:01, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi Hannes,
I was looking at your stunning pictures: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mouse_NT_antibody_NF_Ki67.jpg
But I couldn't find any details on which antibodies were used for this immunofluorescence. Could you let me know?
Best, — J.S. talk 14:48, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Hannes,
we found this picture at http://www.pdb.org/pdb/explore/images.do?structureId=2W96 and we would like to put it on our page. But we have problmes with the licensing tag. On this page: http://www.pdb.org/pdb/static.do?p=general_information/about_pdb/policies_references.html it says that everybody can use it for free. But how do we tag it on the wikipage?
Thanks for your help!
Hi. Thanks for your class's contributions to improving Wikipedia protein articles. Per your request, I have updated FGD1 (gene) and Major sperm protein articles. Please note that you don't need an administrator to do this, you can do it yourself.
Before updating the articles, I did some copyediting to both, especially to the citations. In the future, I strongly urge your students to use User:Diberri's Wikipedia template filling tool ( instructions). Given a PubMed ID, one can quickly produce a full citation that can be copied and pasted into a Wikipedia article. This tool will save you a lot of work, cut down on errors, and insure that the citations are displayed in a consistent manor. Cheers. Boghog ( talk) 04:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello,
We at WikiProject Viruses noticed that you used to be a participant of the project before the project went inactive. We would like to take this opportunity to invite you to become a participant of WikiProject Viruses again. We believe that viruses are an extremely important part of an encyclopedia, and that is why we need you! Our new project coordinator is
Thomas888b (
talk ·
contribs).
We hope you seriously consider our invitation. See you there.
If you are interested in joining our crew again, please place a notice on
Our Talkpage, or you will be removed from our participants list.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Viruses at 21:22, 24 February 2011 (UTC).
See this bot edit. Many of the DAB interwikis have been incorrectly changed from Slam to Slam (Suburban Studs album), and I'm not sure why. + m t 23:06, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Dieser denke ich passt so nicht ganz - da es sich bei der Weiterleitung auf "Artigo sobre evento futuro" (Artikel über die bevorstehende Veranstaltung) um eine temporäre Weiterleitung handelt -- Langholz8 ( talk) 00:41, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to bring to your attention the history of this article. Three bots seem to be warring here. Could you try and explain what exactly is happening there? Thanks. Lynch 7 12:36, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This edit is an edit your bot performed concerning interwiki linking. Always Forever is an album, while it:Al cuor non si comanda is a TV film. Aside from the name similarities, these two are unrelated, so that's why I reverted the edit. Thank you, and have a nice day. Backtable Speak to me concerning my deeds. 22:40, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Quick heads-up: it:Donkey Kong (disambigua) was added by HRoestBot to Donkey Kong. It belonged to Donkey Kong (disambiguation). I've fixed the issue. Salvidrim! 00:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
You have previously shown an interest in
Wikiproject Viruses by adding your name to our
List of Participants. We are currently reviving the project, and would be grateful if you could indicate whether you are still interested in contributing or not on our
Talk Page. You do not need to have expertise in virology to contribute to our project, as we welcome people with any degree of knowledge of the subject.
Thank you.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Viruses at 17:30, 15 February 2012 (UTC).
Hallo! The {{ virusbox}} we use here is very different from a normal taxobox. It's part of the new {{ automatic taxobox}} family. The way an automatic taxobox works is super-complex, but is calculates and displays the scientific classification so that all an editor has to do to add a taxobox is know the first parent taxon (for examples, Velociraptor). If you like, I can help you put this system together for the German Wikipedia; it exists on five wikis so far, and German isn't one of those five. I've even studied German myself for several years, so this would be the easiest translation I could do of this template. Bob the WikipediaN ( talk • contribs) 15:05, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Is there any way to flag an article here (English Wikipedia) so that your bot will not add an interwiki link from some given foreign-language edition?
The article " Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories" has been getting interwiki links (added by HRoestBot) from the French Wikipedia article " Théorie du complot sur la citoyenneté de Barack Obama". The French article is horridly incomplete and (IMO) completely inappropriate to be linked to from the English Wikipedia.
Someone removed the link from the English article, but HRoestBot added it back. I went to the French article and commented out the interwiki link there; HRoestBot didn't add the link back in enwiki, but EmausBot did. Then, I completely removed the link in the French article (and then in the English article), and presumably this will fix the problem unless someone at frwiki adds the link back (either not realizing the issue, or possibly not willing to agree that the link doesn't belong at enwiki).
If the interwiki link gets added back at frwiki — and if people over there refuse to remove it and leave it out — it seems to me that we need to have some accepted way to tell bots not to insert a corresponding interwiki link here at enwiki. I've also brought up this issue on the talk page for EmausBot, and presumably a common convention should be agreed and implemented in both bots (and in any other bots that maintain interwiki links). Comments? — Rich wales 05:36, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Wikipedia invites everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, but one or more redirects you created, such as with
2012–13 Real Madrid C.F. season, have been considered
disruptive and/or malicious, and have been reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you.
Bobby (
talk)
06:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm trying to update the page of Paul Hermann Müller but I'm having a lot of difficulty finding sources in English. Is there any chance I can convince you to search for some sources in German and send them to me? This guy is a Nobel prize winner but his page is still a stub. Thank you! AdventurousSquirrel ( talk) 00:19, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Rosetta Barnstar |
For your outstanding work translating sources and helping with the Paul Hermann Müller article. AdventurousSquirrel ( talk) 23:13, 24 November 2012 (UTC) |
Wikidata phase 1 is live on the English Wikipedia. Please don't add iw-links back to article once it's been removed. Thanks! -- KTC ( talk) 00:06, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Greetings from Singapore! I just wanted to find out your reason for undoing revision 538382758 by 203.78.9.149 on 160213. Thank you for your attention.
A proposal to de-authorize a group of idle interwiki bots on the English Wikipedia is currently in process. A bot account of yours has been included in the list. If you are no longer using this bot, no action is neccessary by you. Should you wish to revive your bot in the near future, please remove your bot from the list here: en:Wikipedia:Bot_owners'_noticeboard#Bot_that_are_inactive_for_the_last_2-4_years_and_may_lose_bot_flag. Thank you for your contributions. For the en: Bot Approvals Group, en:user:Xaosflux 12:23, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Hannes,
I posted this reply on my talk page, but I'm not sure if you'll get a notice about that reply, so I am reposting here:
I felt similarly about the article ( Zestern analysis), which is why I added the citation needed notations. I had to go back and look at it again to remind myself about the technique (as I'd never heard of it elsewhere before), and I'm surprised that it hasn't been updated since I added those tags in April. It could indeed be entirely fabricated, or an advertisement, as the single source would suggest. I didn't dig around on Google for more than a minute or two back in April before I tagged the article, and I can't hunt for sources at the moment, but I am familiar with most types of immunoassay (immunoblots, anyway) and I had never heard of the "Zestern analysis " until reading that wiki, and I vaguely remember it being called a "Zestern blot." May I ask how you came across the wikipedia page? I'm pretty sure I stumbled upon it while reading a news article of some kind, but since it was way back in April I don't remember for sure.
The page could certainly use another template at the top, and perhaps should even be submitted for deletion. Perhaps some attention by the deletion mods and some experts would get this article fixed - or deleted if that's what's warranted. Thanks for asking me about it. When I have some time later today I'll look into this a little more. Spiral5800 ( talk) 17:02, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Hannes Röst. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Hannes Röst. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello Hannes Röst,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mortuary Drape for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Famousdog (woof) (grrr) 12:57, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Hannes Röst. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I wonder if you could comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Viruses#Top level for virus taxoboxes, as I'd like some more input.
I rather like the way the German Wikipedia handles virus taxoboxes, e.g. at de:Caudovirales. Perhaps we here should have one section for the classification, using the ICTV 2018 system, and another section for information like the genome/Baltimore virus group. Peter coxhead ( talk) 11:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Hannes Röst,
Thanks for creating Otto Naegeli-Preis! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Meatsgains( talk) 02:39, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Richard Yost.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work - The references needed more info which I have added, I think you copied and pasted the categories for a different article without changing them. Can you please check my corrections to the categories in case I have misunderstood something
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren ( talk) 03:30, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Susan Weintraub.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren ( talk) 07:44, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Canadian Society for Mass Spectrometry, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk)
06:21, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Biemann Medal.
User:Doomsdayer520 while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Thank you for your new article on the Biemann Medal.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
--- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 14:16, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello Hannes Röst,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Canadian National Proteomics Network for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 15:19, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
This review https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24845483
Meets WP:MEDRS. Why did you remove it? Best Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 04:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Greetings!
As a fellow Wikipedia spell-checker, I was wondering if your spell.py tool is still supported? For example this attempt is getting some sort of libmysqlclient error. Thanks! -- Beland ( talk) 23:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Hannes Röst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Metabolomics".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Meszzy2 ( talk) 06:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emily M. Gray Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Douglas Robinson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello I was hoping you could help me understand how many citations qualify for NPROF. You commented in one discussion that 15 citations over 16 years is not enough to qualify. I think I read somewhere that 100 citations was enough. Could you help me get a sense of how many citations are needed to qualify for notability for academics? Nweil ( talk) 21:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Smith (pathologist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
I wanted you to know that your edit was reverted by me not because of what you said but because it can be fixed by adding more info from the same source (i.e. Swissinfo). Best, 172.58.236.248 ( talk) 05:23, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomson Medal (Royal Society of New Zealand), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Anderson and Peter Lee.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
JBchrch talk 14:44, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Your edit to
Houston Grand Opera has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
Sennecaster (
What now?)
02:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eradication of infectious diseases, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! You are listed as a previous member of the Toronto WikiClub. The WikiClub is hosting a meetup event on 7 July 2024, and we'd love to have you if you are around! We have a photowalk and an editathon planned, as well as time for discussion! More info here:
Wikipedia:Meetup/Toronto/2024 July 7
SophieWMCA (
talk)
17:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Are you here because you think that my bot HRoestBot made a mistake? Please read the FAQ first. Maybe your questions will be answered there already.
Nice to see a helpful editor working on techie things in WE. Lots to do here and an opportunity to learn a lot of stuff from various folks.-- Smokefoot 16:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
I am trying to figure out the meaning of the collection of chemical formulas at Lindlar catalyst. It is very, very difficult to depict the nature of a heterogeneous catalyst, but the thing you posted is not a Lindlar catalyst but a set of ingredients. Possibly you might choose to recast these formulas into some sort of in-line equation that describes how the catalyst is prepared, but the collection of individual formulas are barely relevant to the nature of catalyst itself. The catalyst does not contain lead acetate, for example - it is derived from lead acetate (or other lead(II) sources). Just a suggestion. Best wishes,-- Smokefoot 16:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Rather than blank a page or some such thing, use {{db-copyvio|url=http://www.goldenlemon.com/story.htm}} (substituting the appropriate URL) and let an administrator deal with it. Postcard Cathy 12:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
For this image, you say it was made by you, but you give GurkanSengun as the author. What gives? Lupo 13:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I have just seen on your de.wikipedia.org user page that you are an ETH student; well, it was easy to guess just looking at your edits. Please do not add captions such as "ETH Zürich, the most prestigious university in Switzerland" to articles in Wikipedia" — except if you have reliable sources to back this claim, but prestige is something quite hard to measure... Also, the changes you made to the lead of Education in Switzerland single out a couple of Swiss Universities, without explaining why they should be mentioned instead of the other ones. The lead is already quite long, so we should remove content rather that add more. Thanks ! Schutz ( talk) 13:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Maybe you are right about the word "prestigious" but I do not have a substitute available that would express the same content. Feel free to propose one. You are right in that one ranking is not an adequate source, therefore I looked around and found some others that basically said the same thing (see list below). It is not our task here to criticize the rankings, but we can merely depict their results and reproduce their findings. I do not deny that many universities in Switzerland are good at what they do and have fields where they are leading in Switzerland but it seems obvious to me that ETH has the best international reputation , given the rankings. ETH was on top of all the national and international rankings I could find, the Shanghai ranking was just one example...here are some more:
Good work. Tim Vickers ( talk) 18:33, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Ging3rnut ( talk) 21:42, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
You can alter the controls at the bottom, eg diff will stop it updating the summary text. We kept to genes since any other organisation would be impossible to extend to all the other gene articles, however having summary articles on functional complexes sounds useful. Tim Vickers ( talk) 21:47, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I took some real data (I think from MTHFR), fitted it to the MM equation, subtracted the residuals from the data and re-plotted and re-fitted. The values on the Y and X axes are indeed arbitrary - I didn't think it made much difference if it was 100, 200 300 or 1000, 2000 etc Tim Vickers ( talk) 16:59, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it would have been nice if I'd included annotation and links - but I'm not very good with html. I was going to go back and insert links, and I had issues reverting back to my edits.
A quick Google would have verified my edits - you didn't need to remove them. The album I mentioned can even be found in Wikipedia - it's not exactly unknown stuff, just unknown to whoever wrote the article!
Please don't be so quick to remove my edits in future - I am a keen participant in updating music pages, and would like to see the Heavy Metal page become more accurate.
Thank you. MarkCertif1ed ( talk) 21:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, welcome to the Wikiproject! If you have any questions, comments or suggestions please drop me a note on my talkpage, or post on one of the project's discussion pages. All the best Tim Vickers ( talk) 22:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Please notice this difference:
In the second case (1) the digit 1 is not italicized; (2) a proper minus sign is used, not a hyphen; (3) spaces precede and follow the minus sign. The latter form is prescribed by Wikipedia:Manual of Style (mathematics). Also, please notice my other recent edits to Moran process. Michael Hardy ( talk) 06:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, that's certainly my impression as well. I'll have a look. Tim Vickers ( talk) 17:01, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi Hannes,
I was looking at your stunning pictures: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mouse_NT_antibody_NF_Ki67.jpg
But I couldn't find any details on which antibodies were used for this immunofluorescence. Could you let me know?
Best, — J.S. talk 14:48, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Hannes,
we found this picture at http://www.pdb.org/pdb/explore/images.do?structureId=2W96 and we would like to put it on our page. But we have problmes with the licensing tag. On this page: http://www.pdb.org/pdb/static.do?p=general_information/about_pdb/policies_references.html it says that everybody can use it for free. But how do we tag it on the wikipage?
Thanks for your help!
Hi. Thanks for your class's contributions to improving Wikipedia protein articles. Per your request, I have updated FGD1 (gene) and Major sperm protein articles. Please note that you don't need an administrator to do this, you can do it yourself.
Before updating the articles, I did some copyediting to both, especially to the citations. In the future, I strongly urge your students to use User:Diberri's Wikipedia template filling tool ( instructions). Given a PubMed ID, one can quickly produce a full citation that can be copied and pasted into a Wikipedia article. This tool will save you a lot of work, cut down on errors, and insure that the citations are displayed in a consistent manor. Cheers. Boghog ( talk) 04:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello,
We at WikiProject Viruses noticed that you used to be a participant of the project before the project went inactive. We would like to take this opportunity to invite you to become a participant of WikiProject Viruses again. We believe that viruses are an extremely important part of an encyclopedia, and that is why we need you! Our new project coordinator is
Thomas888b (
talk ·
contribs).
We hope you seriously consider our invitation. See you there.
If you are interested in joining our crew again, please place a notice on
Our Talkpage, or you will be removed from our participants list.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Viruses at 21:22, 24 February 2011 (UTC).
See this bot edit. Many of the DAB interwikis have been incorrectly changed from Slam to Slam (Suburban Studs album), and I'm not sure why. + m t 23:06, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Dieser denke ich passt so nicht ganz - da es sich bei der Weiterleitung auf "Artigo sobre evento futuro" (Artikel über die bevorstehende Veranstaltung) um eine temporäre Weiterleitung handelt -- Langholz8 ( talk) 00:41, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to bring to your attention the history of this article. Three bots seem to be warring here. Could you try and explain what exactly is happening there? Thanks. Lynch 7 12:36, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This edit is an edit your bot performed concerning interwiki linking. Always Forever is an album, while it:Al cuor non si comanda is a TV film. Aside from the name similarities, these two are unrelated, so that's why I reverted the edit. Thank you, and have a nice day. Backtable Speak to me concerning my deeds. 22:40, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Quick heads-up: it:Donkey Kong (disambigua) was added by HRoestBot to Donkey Kong. It belonged to Donkey Kong (disambiguation). I've fixed the issue. Salvidrim! 00:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
You have previously shown an interest in
Wikiproject Viruses by adding your name to our
List of Participants. We are currently reviving the project, and would be grateful if you could indicate whether you are still interested in contributing or not on our
Talk Page. You do not need to have expertise in virology to contribute to our project, as we welcome people with any degree of knowledge of the subject.
Thank you.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Viruses at 17:30, 15 February 2012 (UTC).
Hallo! The {{ virusbox}} we use here is very different from a normal taxobox. It's part of the new {{ automatic taxobox}} family. The way an automatic taxobox works is super-complex, but is calculates and displays the scientific classification so that all an editor has to do to add a taxobox is know the first parent taxon (for examples, Velociraptor). If you like, I can help you put this system together for the German Wikipedia; it exists on five wikis so far, and German isn't one of those five. I've even studied German myself for several years, so this would be the easiest translation I could do of this template. Bob the WikipediaN ( talk • contribs) 15:05, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Is there any way to flag an article here (English Wikipedia) so that your bot will not add an interwiki link from some given foreign-language edition?
The article " Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories" has been getting interwiki links (added by HRoestBot) from the French Wikipedia article " Théorie du complot sur la citoyenneté de Barack Obama". The French article is horridly incomplete and (IMO) completely inappropriate to be linked to from the English Wikipedia.
Someone removed the link from the English article, but HRoestBot added it back. I went to the French article and commented out the interwiki link there; HRoestBot didn't add the link back in enwiki, but EmausBot did. Then, I completely removed the link in the French article (and then in the English article), and presumably this will fix the problem unless someone at frwiki adds the link back (either not realizing the issue, or possibly not willing to agree that the link doesn't belong at enwiki).
If the interwiki link gets added back at frwiki — and if people over there refuse to remove it and leave it out — it seems to me that we need to have some accepted way to tell bots not to insert a corresponding interwiki link here at enwiki. I've also brought up this issue on the talk page for EmausBot, and presumably a common convention should be agreed and implemented in both bots (and in any other bots that maintain interwiki links). Comments? — Rich wales 05:36, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Wikipedia invites everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, but one or more redirects you created, such as with
2012–13 Real Madrid C.F. season, have been considered
disruptive and/or malicious, and have been reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you.
Bobby (
talk)
06:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm trying to update the page of Paul Hermann Müller but I'm having a lot of difficulty finding sources in English. Is there any chance I can convince you to search for some sources in German and send them to me? This guy is a Nobel prize winner but his page is still a stub. Thank you! AdventurousSquirrel ( talk) 00:19, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Rosetta Barnstar |
For your outstanding work translating sources and helping with the Paul Hermann Müller article. AdventurousSquirrel ( talk) 23:13, 24 November 2012 (UTC) |
Wikidata phase 1 is live on the English Wikipedia. Please don't add iw-links back to article once it's been removed. Thanks! -- KTC ( talk) 00:06, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Greetings from Singapore! I just wanted to find out your reason for undoing revision 538382758 by 203.78.9.149 on 160213. Thank you for your attention.
A proposal to de-authorize a group of idle interwiki bots on the English Wikipedia is currently in process. A bot account of yours has been included in the list. If you are no longer using this bot, no action is neccessary by you. Should you wish to revive your bot in the near future, please remove your bot from the list here: en:Wikipedia:Bot_owners'_noticeboard#Bot_that_are_inactive_for_the_last_2-4_years_and_may_lose_bot_flag. Thank you for your contributions. For the en: Bot Approvals Group, en:user:Xaosflux 12:23, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Hannes,
I posted this reply on my talk page, but I'm not sure if you'll get a notice about that reply, so I am reposting here:
I felt similarly about the article ( Zestern analysis), which is why I added the citation needed notations. I had to go back and look at it again to remind myself about the technique (as I'd never heard of it elsewhere before), and I'm surprised that it hasn't been updated since I added those tags in April. It could indeed be entirely fabricated, or an advertisement, as the single source would suggest. I didn't dig around on Google for more than a minute or two back in April before I tagged the article, and I can't hunt for sources at the moment, but I am familiar with most types of immunoassay (immunoblots, anyway) and I had never heard of the "Zestern analysis " until reading that wiki, and I vaguely remember it being called a "Zestern blot." May I ask how you came across the wikipedia page? I'm pretty sure I stumbled upon it while reading a news article of some kind, but since it was way back in April I don't remember for sure.
The page could certainly use another template at the top, and perhaps should even be submitted for deletion. Perhaps some attention by the deletion mods and some experts would get this article fixed - or deleted if that's what's warranted. Thanks for asking me about it. When I have some time later today I'll look into this a little more. Spiral5800 ( talk) 17:02, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Hannes Röst. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Hannes Röst. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello Hannes Röst,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mortuary Drape for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Famousdog (woof) (grrr) 12:57, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Hannes Röst. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I wonder if you could comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Viruses#Top level for virus taxoboxes, as I'd like some more input.
I rather like the way the German Wikipedia handles virus taxoboxes, e.g. at de:Caudovirales. Perhaps we here should have one section for the classification, using the ICTV 2018 system, and another section for information like the genome/Baltimore virus group. Peter coxhead ( talk) 11:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Hannes Röst,
Thanks for creating Otto Naegeli-Preis! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Meatsgains( talk) 02:39, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Richard Yost.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work - The references needed more info which I have added, I think you copied and pasted the categories for a different article without changing them. Can you please check my corrections to the categories in case I have misunderstood something
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren ( talk) 03:30, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Susan Weintraub.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren ( talk) 07:44, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Canadian Society for Mass Spectrometry, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk)
06:21, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Biemann Medal.
User:Doomsdayer520 while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Thank you for your new article on the Biemann Medal.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
--- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 14:16, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello Hannes Röst,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Canadian National Proteomics Network for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 15:19, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
This review https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24845483
Meets WP:MEDRS. Why did you remove it? Best Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 04:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Greetings!
As a fellow Wikipedia spell-checker, I was wondering if your spell.py tool is still supported? For example this attempt is getting some sort of libmysqlclient error. Thanks! -- Beland ( talk) 23:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Hannes Röst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Metabolomics".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Meszzy2 ( talk) 06:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emily M. Gray Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Douglas Robinson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello I was hoping you could help me understand how many citations qualify for NPROF. You commented in one discussion that 15 citations over 16 years is not enough to qualify. I think I read somewhere that 100 citations was enough. Could you help me get a sense of how many citations are needed to qualify for notability for academics? Nweil ( talk) 21:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Smith (pathologist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
I wanted you to know that your edit was reverted by me not because of what you said but because it can be fixed by adding more info from the same source (i.e. Swissinfo). Best, 172.58.236.248 ( talk) 05:23, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomson Medal (Royal Society of New Zealand), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Anderson and Peter Lee.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
JBchrch talk 14:44, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Your edit to
Houston Grand Opera has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
Sennecaster (
What now?)
02:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eradication of infectious diseases, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! You are listed as a previous member of the Toronto WikiClub. The WikiClub is hosting a meetup event on 7 July 2024, and we'd love to have you if you are around! We have a photowalk and an editathon planned, as well as time for discussion! More info here:
Wikipedia:Meetup/Toronto/2024 July 7
SophieWMCA (
talk)
17:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)