Your Personal Opinion is not needed or wanted. This is a site that strives on the intelligence and neutral point of subjects. Your comment about Chris Brown on the page for
Rihanna, no matter how true it was, is unneeded. This is the fourth time you have been caught for vandalizing. Superiors have been notified. --
Boygenius 13 (
talk) 07:43, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit you made to Scientology has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Snowolf How can I help? 00:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Project Chanology constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. - ✰ ALLSTAR✰ echo 00:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC))
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Yamanbaiia(
free hugs!) 00:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- What?
Hannabee (
talk) 00:05, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- " Truth added": Though it is unclear why anyone would oppose something so inherently incredible as this. Wikipedia tries to keep a neutral point of view, which means we are (in theory) not against or with the Church of Scientology. Please stop adding your personal opinions on these articles.-- Yamanbaiia( free hugs!) 00:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Aunsby
An article that you have been involved in editing,
Aunsby , has been proposed for a
merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going
here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.
Brunnian (
talk) 17:06, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Your Personal Opinion is not needed or wanted. This is a site that strives on the intelligence and neutral point of subjects. Your comment about Chris Brown on the page for
Rihanna, no matter how true it was, is unneeded. This is the fourth time you have been caught for vandalizing. Superiors have been notified. --
Boygenius 13 (
talk) 07:43, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit you made to Scientology has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Snowolf How can I help? 00:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Project Chanology constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. - ✰ ALLSTAR✰ echo 00:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC))
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Yamanbaiia(
free hugs!) 00:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- What?
Hannabee (
talk) 00:05, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- " Truth added": Though it is unclear why anyone would oppose something so inherently incredible as this. Wikipedia tries to keep a neutral point of view, which means we are (in theory) not against or with the Church of Scientology. Please stop adding your personal opinions on these articles.-- Yamanbaiia( free hugs!) 00:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Aunsby
An article that you have been involved in editing,
Aunsby , has been proposed for a
merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going
here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.
Brunnian (
talk) 17:06, 25 April 2010 (UTC)