From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2013

Hello, I'm Mtpaley. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Lake Highland Preparatory School because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mtpaley ( talk) 00:48, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Greater Roadrunner ‎ and Peerage of England ‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mtpaley ( talk) 00:51, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

You are at 2 warns already and one of these was for 2 articles (and I am giving you the benefit of the doubt on Blue Jay). Please stop making vandalizing edits. Mtpaley ( talk) 01:05, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Ok

Ok how many more warnings do I get Hammy00 ( talk) 01:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC) P.S. I was not messing around about the Blue Jay one reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Blue Jay, you may be blocked from editing. Mtpaley ( talk) 01:11, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Seventh-day Adventist theology, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Seventh-day Adventist theology was changed by Hammy00 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864572 on 2013-04-08T01:18:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 01:18, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Please do not attack other editors, as you did to User talk:Mtpaley. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. hmssolent\ Let's convene My patrols 01:26, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

-- Vsmith ( talk) 01:33, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hammy00 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I was just messing around wont do it wigan i knew that the admins would fix it instantly Hammy00 ( talk) 01:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Thank you for creating work; I presume you understand that the most effective way to correct the problems you're creating is to leave this preventative block in place. Kuru (talk) 03:17, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2013

Hello, I'm Mtpaley. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Lake Highland Preparatory School because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mtpaley ( talk) 00:48, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Greater Roadrunner ‎ and Peerage of England ‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mtpaley ( talk) 00:51, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

You are at 2 warns already and one of these was for 2 articles (and I am giving you the benefit of the doubt on Blue Jay). Please stop making vandalizing edits. Mtpaley ( talk) 01:05, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Ok

Ok how many more warnings do I get Hammy00 ( talk) 01:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC) P.S. I was not messing around about the Blue Jay one reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Blue Jay, you may be blocked from editing. Mtpaley ( talk) 01:11, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Seventh-day Adventist theology, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Seventh-day Adventist theology was changed by Hammy00 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864572 on 2013-04-08T01:18:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 01:18, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Please do not attack other editors, as you did to User talk:Mtpaley. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. hmssolent\ Let's convene My patrols 01:26, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

-- Vsmith ( talk) 01:33, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hammy00 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I was just messing around wont do it wigan i knew that the admins would fix it instantly Hammy00 ( talk) 01:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Thank you for creating work; I presume you understand that the most effective way to correct the problems you're creating is to leave this preventative block in place. Kuru (talk) 03:17, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook