Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
Balfour Declaration, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. Thank you.
Chris Troutman (
talk)
11:10, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- This was added initially to understand the wiki system and i acknowledge it as a mistake hence never appealed against its removal.
Hammadrs (
talk)
11:08, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- All the reasons of blocking are based on assumptions and hypothesis e.g. "i think" Let me respond to why i voted after 9 years: I belong to IT industry and have created my wiki account long ago and forgot the credentials too. I used one of my very old gmail profile where my old passwords were saved in chrome to look for details regarding zameen(using google) as someone told me that zameen's parent company empg is rebranded to dubizzle group which was a surprise for me. When i reached the wiki i saw the deletion notification, i read the details and as i belong to Pakistan and know the tech sector for the last 20 years i thought to help by sharing that information on the page is correct.I clicked on deletion discussion page and once i clicked on edit it prompted me to login and chrome saved login details pop up otherwise i might have left the page without commenting.
- My intention was to help the people and not to game the system. Blocking the account should not be on assumptions and hypothesis. People can contribute to this knowledge base and such actions may restrict people to do that.
- I even don't need to spend so much time to respond to this but this can happen to anyone else and this is grossly wrong or a mistake and there should be a better process to gauge the authenticity of a user and its feedback.
- Regards, Hammadrs ( talk) 17:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --
Blablubbs (
talk)
18:43, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Hammadrs ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
,Hi , I feel the allegation is baseless. I know zameen.com since many years as this is the biggest real estate portal in Pakistan. The information on the page is also relevant and true especially for those who want to know about the group, its management and its progress over the past many years. delete message on the page was a shock for me as i reached to that page from google search.I reviewed the page and voted to keep it. I have not voted on someone else advice. Yes i rarely login on wikipedia but in no way this was an act of manipulation. I am willing to present myself for cross examination or prove my true intent. I feel this suspension is harsh and based on suspicion rather than detailed investigation. I would appreciate if you review the page that was in question and my account history. I have never been involved in manipulating the system. I would appreciate if you can review and unblock my account.
- Thanks Hammadrs ( talk) 10:18, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I don't think that after nine years you suddently decided to search for the company at issue at random. Maybe someone else will, but not me. I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 14:59, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
Balfour Declaration, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. Thank you.
Chris Troutman (
talk)
11:10, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- This was added initially to understand the wiki system and i acknowledge it as a mistake hence never appealed against its removal.
Hammadrs (
talk)
11:08, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- All the reasons of blocking are based on assumptions and hypothesis e.g. "i think" Let me respond to why i voted after 9 years: I belong to IT industry and have created my wiki account long ago and forgot the credentials too. I used one of my very old gmail profile where my old passwords were saved in chrome to look for details regarding zameen(using google) as someone told me that zameen's parent company empg is rebranded to dubizzle group which was a surprise for me. When i reached the wiki i saw the deletion notification, i read the details and as i belong to Pakistan and know the tech sector for the last 20 years i thought to help by sharing that information on the page is correct.I clicked on deletion discussion page and once i clicked on edit it prompted me to login and chrome saved login details pop up otherwise i might have left the page without commenting.
- My intention was to help the people and not to game the system. Blocking the account should not be on assumptions and hypothesis. People can contribute to this knowledge base and such actions may restrict people to do that.
- I even don't need to spend so much time to respond to this but this can happen to anyone else and this is grossly wrong or a mistake and there should be a better process to gauge the authenticity of a user and its feedback.
- Regards, Hammadrs ( talk) 17:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --
Blablubbs (
talk)
18:43, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Hammadrs ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
,Hi , I feel the allegation is baseless. I know zameen.com since many years as this is the biggest real estate portal in Pakistan. The information on the page is also relevant and true especially for those who want to know about the group, its management and its progress over the past many years. delete message on the page was a shock for me as i reached to that page from google search.I reviewed the page and voted to keep it. I have not voted on someone else advice. Yes i rarely login on wikipedia but in no way this was an act of manipulation. I am willing to present myself for cross examination or prove my true intent. I feel this suspension is harsh and based on suspicion rather than detailed investigation. I would appreciate if you review the page that was in question and my account history. I have never been involved in manipulating the system. I would appreciate if you can review and unblock my account.
- Thanks Hammadrs ( talk) 10:18, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I don't think that after nine years you suddently decided to search for the company at issue at random. Maybe someone else will, but not me. I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 14:59, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.