Please note that although this user is well-intentioned, he is an utter buffoon, and may make many idiotic mistakes. He requests others not to get mad at him for these.
![]() | Has this user made a silly mistake? Click on the trout to notify him! |
There are no angry mastodons here! - Freude, Tochter aus Elysium...
|
Yes you clearly do think of yourself as a good doer, maybe next time you could consider a slightly less accusatory tone. What I did was directly quote the RSS page, check it yourself, you will find the words I used right at the start. This to clarify to the majority of people outside of the country what the RSS is, rather than just having an abbreviation.
This section is (was) labelled Controversy, hence an explanation was needed why it was controversial, hence my addition.
When the CEO of an internationally known company insists on attending meetings of an organisation such as the RSS, again read the article, they are as far right as it gets, and there is a public response then this is a notable event. Taking part in an edit war to keep removing this, that is what is politicisation, and is not worthy of an encyclopedia, I would therefore kindly suggest that you cease doing so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.11.56.13 ( talk) 14:00, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 09:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Battle of Gaugamela. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Doug Weller
talk
09:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
A less common view is that Darius' army was already broken when he ran; this view is supported by an astronomical diary from Babylon written within days of the battle:
The twenty-fourth [day of the lunar month], in the morning, the king of the world [i.e., Darius] [erected his] standard [lacuna]. Opposite each other, they fought and a heavy defeat of the troops [of the king he inflicted]. The king [i.e., Darius], his troops deserted him and to their cities [they went]. They fled to the land of the Guti. [1]
You (presumably by mistake) deleted this along with the parts I inserted. Can I add this back? (Note that there is an academic source backing it.) Thanks, HalfdanRagnarsson ( talk) 16:20, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
WP:s policies and guidelines aren't superclear on this. Here's two discussions that may give a little insight:
Happy editing! Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 12:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
@ Gråbergs Gråa Sång: Thanks! HalfdanRagnarsson ( talk) 12:53, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi HalfdanRagnarsson! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hi, can you explain what "violates NPOV" in my edit [1] so as you decided to summarily revert it? — kashmīrī TALK 10:55, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Re your edit summary [2] - please (1) list diffs of my FOUR reverts within 24 hours of the same text, (2) list not a dozen but at least a single established editor whom I reverted from adding that text. And if you can't, apologise. — kashmīrī TALK 19:40, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Ghmyrtle ( talk) 12:40, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi HalfdanRagnarsson! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Please improve it in draftspace and then move again, you are welcome with due respect Fisha Malik ( talk) 10:01, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
@ Fisha Malik: Just a question - why did you use a Wikipedia:RedWarn? It's an anti-vandalism tool... HalfdanRagnarsson ( talk) 10:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
I have just use it to make my work easy as it provides good format to talk, but what matters is you should add citations to the said article. Fisha Malik ( talk) 10:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar | |
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of the constructive way in which you handled the proposed changes to the Punic Wars. It was appreciated. Gog the Mild ( talk) 09:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC) |
Hallo, Please remember that whatever stubs we use for Phameas or anyone/anything else should go at the end of the article, below the categories etc - see WP:ORDER. Thanks. Pam D 11:53, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi HalfdanRagnarsson! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hello, I'm
Sundayclose. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Battle of Kings Mountain without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Sundayclose (
talk)
15:48, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Battle of Kings Mountain, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that. Thank you.
Sundayclose (
talk)
16:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi HalfdanRagnarsson! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
![]() |
treats -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 23:08, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Achaean War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thebes.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Epirus (Roman province), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anastasius I.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Downlink | The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter |
---|---|---|
1 February 2021 — 28 February 2021 |
Volume 2 — Issue 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the News!
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article of the month.
![]() The Mars Pathfinder is an American robotic spacecraft that landed a base station with a roving probe on Mars in 1997. It consisted of a lander, and a lightweight wheeled robotic Mars rover named Sojourner, which became the first rover to land and operate on Mars. |
Image of the month.
![]() The first 360-degree panorama taken by Mastcam-Z, on Perseverance. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Members
New Members:
Number of active members: 100.
Total number of members: 313.
February Launches
March Launches
|
Article Statistics This data reflects values from the 28 February 2021
Monthly Changes
Since January, 44 new pages have been added to Spaceflight and 1 file has become featured. There are 2 new files as well as 1 more C class, 4 more start class and 3 more stub class articles, with an additional 3 list articles. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at
The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the
Mailing list. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Downlink | The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter |
---|---|---|
1 March 2021 — 31 March 2021 |
Volume 2 — Issue 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the News!
Featured Content | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article of the month.
![]() The Hubble Space Telescope was launched into low Earth orbit in 1990 and remains in operation. It was not the first space telescope, but it is one of the largest and most versatile, renowned both as a vital research tool and as a public relations boon for astronomy. The Hubble telescope is named after astronomer Edwin Hubble and is one of NASA's Great Observatories. |
Image of the month.
![]() Astronaut Roger B. Chaffee is shown at console in the Mission Control Center, Houston, Texas during the Gemini-Titan 3 flight. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Members
New Members:
Number of active members: 104.
Total number of members: 316.
March Launches
April Launches
|
Article Statistics This data reflects values from the 31 March 2021.
Monthly Changes
Since February, 28 new pages have been added to Spaceflight and Apollo 12 has been promoted to featured article! 1 more article has reached GA-class, with 1 more file, 6 more C-class, 14 more start-class and 8 new stub class articles. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at
The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the
Mailing list. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:16, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement § Normchou.
Shibbolethink (
♔
♕)
00:18, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in and edits about COVID-19. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
— Paleo Neonate – 10:17, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please note that although this user is well-intentioned, he is an utter buffoon, and may make many idiotic mistakes. He requests others not to get mad at him for these.
![]() | Has this user made a silly mistake? Click on the trout to notify him! |
There are no angry mastodons here! - Freude, Tochter aus Elysium...
|
Yes you clearly do think of yourself as a good doer, maybe next time you could consider a slightly less accusatory tone. What I did was directly quote the RSS page, check it yourself, you will find the words I used right at the start. This to clarify to the majority of people outside of the country what the RSS is, rather than just having an abbreviation.
This section is (was) labelled Controversy, hence an explanation was needed why it was controversial, hence my addition.
When the CEO of an internationally known company insists on attending meetings of an organisation such as the RSS, again read the article, they are as far right as it gets, and there is a public response then this is a notable event. Taking part in an edit war to keep removing this, that is what is politicisation, and is not worthy of an encyclopedia, I would therefore kindly suggest that you cease doing so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.11.56.13 ( talk) 14:00, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 09:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Battle of Gaugamela. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Doug Weller
talk
09:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
A less common view is that Darius' army was already broken when he ran; this view is supported by an astronomical diary from Babylon written within days of the battle:
The twenty-fourth [day of the lunar month], in the morning, the king of the world [i.e., Darius] [erected his] standard [lacuna]. Opposite each other, they fought and a heavy defeat of the troops [of the king he inflicted]. The king [i.e., Darius], his troops deserted him and to their cities [they went]. They fled to the land of the Guti. [1]
You (presumably by mistake) deleted this along with the parts I inserted. Can I add this back? (Note that there is an academic source backing it.) Thanks, HalfdanRagnarsson ( talk) 16:20, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
WP:s policies and guidelines aren't superclear on this. Here's two discussions that may give a little insight:
Happy editing! Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 12:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
@ Gråbergs Gråa Sång: Thanks! HalfdanRagnarsson ( talk) 12:53, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi HalfdanRagnarsson! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hi, can you explain what "violates NPOV" in my edit [1] so as you decided to summarily revert it? — kashmīrī TALK 10:55, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Re your edit summary [2] - please (1) list diffs of my FOUR reverts within 24 hours of the same text, (2) list not a dozen but at least a single established editor whom I reverted from adding that text. And if you can't, apologise. — kashmīrī TALK 19:40, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Ghmyrtle ( talk) 12:40, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi HalfdanRagnarsson! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Please improve it in draftspace and then move again, you are welcome with due respect Fisha Malik ( talk) 10:01, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
@ Fisha Malik: Just a question - why did you use a Wikipedia:RedWarn? It's an anti-vandalism tool... HalfdanRagnarsson ( talk) 10:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
I have just use it to make my work easy as it provides good format to talk, but what matters is you should add citations to the said article. Fisha Malik ( talk) 10:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar | |
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of the constructive way in which you handled the proposed changes to the Punic Wars. It was appreciated. Gog the Mild ( talk) 09:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC) |
Hallo, Please remember that whatever stubs we use for Phameas or anyone/anything else should go at the end of the article, below the categories etc - see WP:ORDER. Thanks. Pam D 11:53, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi HalfdanRagnarsson! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hello, I'm
Sundayclose. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Battle of Kings Mountain without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Sundayclose (
talk)
15:48, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Battle of Kings Mountain, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that. Thank you.
Sundayclose (
talk)
16:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi HalfdanRagnarsson! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
![]() |
treats -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 23:08, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Achaean War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thebes.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Epirus (Roman province), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anastasius I.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Downlink | The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter |
---|---|---|
1 February 2021 — 28 February 2021 |
Volume 2 — Issue 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the News!
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article of the month.
![]() The Mars Pathfinder is an American robotic spacecraft that landed a base station with a roving probe on Mars in 1997. It consisted of a lander, and a lightweight wheeled robotic Mars rover named Sojourner, which became the first rover to land and operate on Mars. |
Image of the month.
![]() The first 360-degree panorama taken by Mastcam-Z, on Perseverance. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Members
New Members:
Number of active members: 100.
Total number of members: 313.
February Launches
March Launches
|
Article Statistics This data reflects values from the 28 February 2021
Monthly Changes
Since January, 44 new pages have been added to Spaceflight and 1 file has become featured. There are 2 new files as well as 1 more C class, 4 more start class and 3 more stub class articles, with an additional 3 list articles. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at
The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the
Mailing list. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Downlink | The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter |
---|---|---|
1 March 2021 — 31 March 2021 |
Volume 2 — Issue 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the News!
Featured Content | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article of the month.
![]() The Hubble Space Telescope was launched into low Earth orbit in 1990 and remains in operation. It was not the first space telescope, but it is one of the largest and most versatile, renowned both as a vital research tool and as a public relations boon for astronomy. The Hubble telescope is named after astronomer Edwin Hubble and is one of NASA's Great Observatories. |
Image of the month.
![]() Astronaut Roger B. Chaffee is shown at console in the Mission Control Center, Houston, Texas during the Gemini-Titan 3 flight. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Members
New Members:
Number of active members: 104.
Total number of members: 316.
March Launches
April Launches
|
Article Statistics This data reflects values from the 31 March 2021.
Monthly Changes
Since February, 28 new pages have been added to Spaceflight and Apollo 12 has been promoted to featured article! 1 more article has reached GA-class, with 1 more file, 6 more C-class, 14 more start-class and 8 new stub class articles. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at
The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the
Mailing list. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:16, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement § Normchou.
Shibbolethink (
♔
♕)
00:18, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in and edits about COVID-19. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
— Paleo Neonate – 10:17, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)