Jika anda tidak sanggup untuk melakukan blocked or Deletion or janga blokir setiap pengguna yang memiliki Copyright,pembuat akun -- Hacker-index ( talk) 18:27, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Hacker-index! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! -- Fyrael ( talk) 15:00, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
At 17:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC), you removed a comment from the Wikipedia Teahouse that was made by another editor. [1]
Please do not do that.
I have restored it. [2] davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 🎄 16:01, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
That page is for the specific purpose of asking that a redirect or category be created. Your edits gave sources, targets, reasons for creation, and sources that didn't make sense. Your first requested that unblock be created as a redirect to Administrator with the stated reason of Copyright, citing Vandalism as the source. Your second requested that pembajakan be created as a redirect to Administrator with the stated reason of Vandalism with "pembajakan" listed as a source. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 🎄 19:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
If you are a bot, as you claim to be, who is operating you?, as I have an important message for you. You refuse to communicate in English on English Wikipedia, ignore and blank communications from other users concerning your editing behavior, and are overly active on Talk pages which have no relation to your editing.
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- Quisqualis ( talk) 21:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bishonen |
tålk
17:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Hacker-index ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
my conversation only wants to propose a discussion not to damage, if my discussion is destructive, please delete it-- Hacker-index ( talk) 15:59, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 16:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock-- Hacker-index ( talk) 09:44, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
You are not permitted to remove (or edit) declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Please do not do so again. You are welcome to remove all other content from this page if you wish. -- Yamla ( talk) 17:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Hacker-index ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
As you are only posting nonsense I have removed your ability to edit this page. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 18:43, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. It's not clear what you are trying to do, but it's inappropriate. Stop it. You have access to this talk page solely so you can make an unblock request. WP:GAB explains how. You will lose access to your talk page if you continue messing around. -- Yamla ( talk) 18:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks Duta2000 ®talk 20:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User talk:Hacker-index/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
The page User talk:Hacker-index/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Vanjagenije (talk) 22:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Jika anda tidak sanggup untuk melakukan blocked or Deletion or janga blokir setiap pengguna yang memiliki Copyright,pembuat akun -- Hacker-index ( talk) 18:27, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Hacker-index! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! -- Fyrael ( talk) 15:00, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
At 17:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC), you removed a comment from the Wikipedia Teahouse that was made by another editor. [1]
Please do not do that.
I have restored it. [2] davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 🎄 16:01, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
That page is for the specific purpose of asking that a redirect or category be created. Your edits gave sources, targets, reasons for creation, and sources that didn't make sense. Your first requested that unblock be created as a redirect to Administrator with the stated reason of Copyright, citing Vandalism as the source. Your second requested that pembajakan be created as a redirect to Administrator with the stated reason of Vandalism with "pembajakan" listed as a source. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 🎄 19:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
If you are a bot, as you claim to be, who is operating you?, as I have an important message for you. You refuse to communicate in English on English Wikipedia, ignore and blank communications from other users concerning your editing behavior, and are overly active on Talk pages which have no relation to your editing.
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- Quisqualis ( talk) 21:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bishonen |
tålk
17:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Hacker-index ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
my conversation only wants to propose a discussion not to damage, if my discussion is destructive, please delete it-- Hacker-index ( talk) 15:59, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 16:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock-- Hacker-index ( talk) 09:44, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
You are not permitted to remove (or edit) declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Please do not do so again. You are welcome to remove all other content from this page if you wish. -- Yamla ( talk) 17:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Hacker-index ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
As you are only posting nonsense I have removed your ability to edit this page. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 18:43, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. It's not clear what you are trying to do, but it's inappropriate. Stop it. You have access to this talk page solely so you can make an unblock request. WP:GAB explains how. You will lose access to your talk page if you continue messing around. -- Yamla ( talk) 18:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks Duta2000 ®talk 20:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User talk:Hacker-index/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
The page User talk:Hacker-index/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Vanjagenije (talk) 22:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)