Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Seven Military Classics, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 03:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Tang dynasty, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Remsense
诉
09:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. It seems that you have added
Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as
Negrito. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia
guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at
Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an
attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. —
Diannaa (
talk)
20:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tang dynasty, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense 诉 20:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Genetic and anthropometric studies on Japanese people into
Jōmon people. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. --
Mikeblas (
talk)
15:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.HabichuelasBeans ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
This must be a mistake. How can I just be blocked like this? I do not understand why my account would be blocked. I did nothing wrong. What is the evidence for " Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively". I may have accidentally edited logged off but that long ago and few time times and it was not for any edit war, not more than one time. You can check. My account which previously blocked was un-banned. If you want evidence I shall provide it. My IP got unblocked but now now again you blocked it. What is the point? You might aswell had never given me the chance to come back to wikipedia. HabichuelasBeans ( talk) 21:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
One unblock request at a time. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 02:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
HabichuelasBeans ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Why unblock my IP address only to block me again. Should have blocked me forever instead of making me wait 1 year for nothing. What is even the point of lifting my block and than again only to block me again. HabichuelasBeans ( talk) 22:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
One unblock request at a time. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 02:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
HabichuelasBeans ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
This is my IP account which gave me 1 year block length and it was lifted. /info/en/?search=User_talk:77.103.186.178 " I waited until it expired. It said this ----> " Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. The blocked was 15:40, 9 May 2023, I waited until it got lifted, now I'm supposed to be blocked again. What was the whole of me waiting for 1 year. I did not used any other account from the day I got lifted. This is all extremely unfair on me. If you can tell me what other account I abused? I used only 1 account. What other account are you accusing me off... please check on it HabichuelasBeans ( talk) 23:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Due to the repeated sockpuppetry proven by CheckUser evidence, you are considered to be banned by the English Wikipedia community. The instructions for how to appeal this ban are at WP:UNBAN. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 02:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
What was even the point to give me 1 year account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HabichuelasBeans ( talk • contribs) 13:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Seven Military Classics, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 03:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Tang dynasty, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Remsense
诉
09:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. It seems that you have added
Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as
Negrito. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia
guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at
Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an
attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. —
Diannaa (
talk)
20:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tang dynasty, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense 诉 20:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Genetic and anthropometric studies on Japanese people into
Jōmon people. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. --
Mikeblas (
talk)
15:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.HabichuelasBeans ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
This must be a mistake. How can I just be blocked like this? I do not understand why my account would be blocked. I did nothing wrong. What is the evidence for " Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively". I may have accidentally edited logged off but that long ago and few time times and it was not for any edit war, not more than one time. You can check. My account which previously blocked was un-banned. If you want evidence I shall provide it. My IP got unblocked but now now again you blocked it. What is the point? You might aswell had never given me the chance to come back to wikipedia. HabichuelasBeans ( talk) 21:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
One unblock request at a time. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 02:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
HabichuelasBeans ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Why unblock my IP address only to block me again. Should have blocked me forever instead of making me wait 1 year for nothing. What is even the point of lifting my block and than again only to block me again. HabichuelasBeans ( talk) 22:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
One unblock request at a time. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 02:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
HabichuelasBeans ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
This is my IP account which gave me 1 year block length and it was lifted. /info/en/?search=User_talk:77.103.186.178 " I waited until it expired. It said this ----> " Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. The blocked was 15:40, 9 May 2023, I waited until it got lifted, now I'm supposed to be blocked again. What was the whole of me waiting for 1 year. I did not used any other account from the day I got lifted. This is all extremely unfair on me. If you can tell me what other account I abused? I used only 1 account. What other account are you accusing me off... please check on it HabichuelasBeans ( talk) 23:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Due to the repeated sockpuppetry proven by CheckUser evidence, you are considered to be banned by the English Wikipedia community. The instructions for how to appeal this ban are at WP:UNBAN. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 02:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
What was even the point to give me 1 year account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HabichuelasBeans ( talk • contribs) 13:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)