This user may have left Wikipedia. Gwynand has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Archives |
---|
Hi, you opposed my last RFA at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Gary King a few weeks ago. I have decided to open an Editor Review at Wikipedia:Editor review/Gary King so I could receive a new assessment for my recent activity on Wikipedia. I would greatly appreciate it if you could take the time to look over my recent contributions and point out areas where I could improve. Thanks in advance! Gary King ( talk) 05:19, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
The Socratic Barnstar | ||
I don't know if we share the same conclusions yet, but who cares. :-) You've been saying some utterly sane things at [1] -- Kim Bruning ( talk) 19:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC) |
Hello, Gwynand.
I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the after closure discussion regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After bureaucratic discussion, the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. Once again, thank you for your participation. -- Avi ( talk) 21:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Gwynand; I wanted to say thank you for supporting my request for adminship, which passed with 100 supports, 0 opposes and 1 neutral. I wanted to get round everybody individually, even though it's considered by some to be spam (which... I suppose it is! but anyway. :)). It means a lot to me that the community has placed its trust in my ability to use the extra buttons, and I only hope I can live up to its expectations. If you need anything, or notice something that bothers you, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks again, PeterSymonds | talk 21:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey Gwynand. Your oppose was made very clearly, and I understood it completely. I was just responding to your "nit-picky" statement. As for withdrawing, I'm going to stay in it until the bitter end, and receive all the constructive criticism I can from the experience. Happy editing, Mastrchf ( t/ c) 00:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
He was really starting to bug me. I even tried to get an admin invovled. Anyways, about the sig. The "Simon" is my name and it's just there to greet people. The KSK are my links. But you're right, simple sigs are good too.Simon K S K 17:27, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Just so you know, you had this one right I'm afraid. Like watching a car wreck. I never did go back and switch, glad I didn't. Time to move along! (Or as the clerk at the DMV says....Next! Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
I am going to restyle it tomorrow morning. asenine say what? 22:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
If you have noticed, I have read all RFAs before posting my comments. I usually read all of them before replying to them at one go. Hope that this helps. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 03:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
I've never tried it, so I don't know, sorry. Phlegm Rooster ( talk) 12:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
That article needs plenty of work, for sure. We're slowly working on it. But more hands would be helpful. I've got to be careful not to make it look too much like my article on nicknames. There is some crossover (and common reference materials) but it's not quite the same subject. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 13:59, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Fritz is ready to go. If you'd like, write a quick co-nom so we can go live with it. For your convenience: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fritzpoll. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 14:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Although you opposed me in my recent RFA I will still say thanks as from your comments and the other users comments that opposed me I have made a todo list for before my next RFA. I hope I will have resolved all of the issues before then and I hope that you would be able to support me in the future. If you would like to reply to this message or have any more suggestions for me then please message me on my talk page as I will not be checking back here. Thanks again. ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 16:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. Thanks for the question that you asked me on my administrator coaching page. I have replied to the comment that you left on that page. Cheers, Razor flame 19:41, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Your comments about me at Steve's talk page were very flattering. Thanks. Useight ( talk) 02:23, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
RyRy5 ( talk ♠ copy-edit) 02:53, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your support in myRfA, which closed successfully this morning. Look forward to seeing you at our forum ;) TravellingCari the Busy Bee 17:50, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
I just wanted to say, regardless of the eventual outcome, thanks very much for the co-nom on my RfA - if I hadn't known you were at least considering it, there's no way I'd have gone ahead with it. That said, it is rather nerve-wracking, and there are another five days left...well, I'm going to say thank you anyway :-P Fritzpoll ( talk) 18:13, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I just saw your message that you left Balloonman, and I would just like to point out a major mistake that you wrote. Though I did say that I would never try there again, that was actually not the case. The reason why I said this was because I was hoping people would pick up on the other meaning that I was trying to get at, which was that I would wait for someone to nominate me for adminship over there. I did not come over here to try to get adminship just because I failed 6 RfA's. Actually, I came over here because I saw a lot of vandalism that I could revert and I wanted to help out. It just happened to become so much more than that. Cheers, Razor flame 19:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Gwynaud, this user is disrupting other editers although im quite sure its not intentional. He/she obviously has some issues and i think we need to be extra sensitive around this. The editer has been accused of trolling, i dont want the editer to get hurt if its not his/her fault. I think you know what im trying to say, could you help keep an eye on this. Yours -- Realist2 ( Come Speak To Me) 01:01, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Hy Gwynand - in case you don't know, my RfA ended successfully this afternoon. I wanted to thank you very much both for the co-nomination, and also the discussions that you held elsewhere (I saw you cropping up on a few talkpages) in response to comments at the RfA. As I said to Keeper (who got the part a of this message), I didn't expect to succeed, but your willingness to co-nom me given your exacting standards at RfA was a confidence-booster sufficient to accept the nomination. I hope that I can, in time, justify your confidence in me. Fritzpoll ( talk) 14:45, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
The policy is tricky - I guess it comes down to whether or not you think the account is going to be disruptive, and whether it is appropriate to guess that ahead of time. On the other hand, looks like another overreaction to Kurt, in my opinion - what do you think? Fritzpoll ( talk) 15:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
If any more ideas pop into your head regarding any theoretical way to fix RFA, feel free to add them to my newly-created page here. Useight ( talk) 16:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
It's English, Northern. StewieGriffin! • Talk 18:31, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
← By the way, you can "subscribe" without receiving delivery now - Wikipedia:Radio Wikipedia#Listeners who do not require delivery. I'm sure a lot of people would prefer to just keep the page watchlisted to see when new episodes were available, so this will help get an idea of the listenership regardless of if they want their talk page updated or not. xenocidic ( talk ¿ listen ) 02:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Need to run for RfA. I just read your comment in mine and it was one of the best RfA comments I've ever seen. You'd be better than I'll ever be. dihydrogen monoxide ( H2O) 02:00, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
I have my heart set on a successful RFA in the near future and don't want to hurt my chances at all. Could we continue this here on the discussion page? Dusti complain/compliment 17:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
I've replied on my talk page Bjewiki ( Talk) 18:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
You're thinking of Anonymous Dissident, correct? The other two I know are Ilyanep, myself, and a third one who I suspect doesn't want his/her age revealed. Nousernamesleft copper, not wood 19:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm the only one that is willing to answer any of your questions :-), regardless of forum. wt:rfa, my talk, wt:rollback, Pedro/mentoring....anywhere else you need me Gail? Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
With all due respect, I would have preferred it to remain open for another twelve hours or so. An administrator suggested last night that I withdraw and take the commentary and learn from it, but I asked for it to remain open for at least 24 hours to gather feedback, if nothing else. I know that I was off to an awful start and had no chance of succeeding, but I wanted to gather significant feedback, if possible. As it is, everyone pretty much picked on one misguided / misworded edit and piled on to that one, rather than digging deeper.
Ehhh, regardless, I appreciate the thought. I would have withdrawn later this evening, more than likely, anyways, so I suppose it's six of one, a half-dozen of another.
Regards, -- InDeBiz1 ( talk) 17:20, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
I'll do so then. What's the procedure? Ironho lds 13:33, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
I recently looked over your contributions whilst trying to escape the bot saga - given today's discussion on Keep's talkpage, I jotted down what my assessment would be if participating in an RfA here - sorry for the abbreviation in the page name, but I'm lazy! :) Maybe you won't run now, but I still think this will apply Fritzpoll ( talk) 15:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
For reverting this edit to my talkpage. It was rather random, wasn't it, as you pointed out in your edit summary! Best wishes, and happy editing! Lra drama 18:19, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
I know I said I wouldn't fight the opposers, and I thank you for even taking the time to comment, but I couldn't let that last point stand unanswered in your mind. I won't mince words here: I fucking HATE when people make it a point of who is an admin and who isn't, especially in content disputes and dispute resolution. In fact, admins are not more special in any way, shape, or form, but should (in some cases) be held to a bit of a higher standard. I would like the tools (for infrequent image work/username concerns), but definitely don't need them, nor the title of administrator. We should be aiming to devolve power and make Wikipedia more open and accessible. I sufficiently realize that saying this will not change your opinion, but it needs to be said. Apologies for the profanity. Well, mahalo. -- Ali'i 18:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
was this spelling correction. Personally, I like the idea of threatening FAC better :-) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 14:21, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. Tony1 has replied - could I possibly get your take on his comment. Also, he's now leaving messages on other's talkpages, see here. I'm struggling to know what to do now. D.M.N. ( talk) 15:40, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
[2] I've had enough. Contact me via e-mail if necessary. D.M.N. ( talk) 16:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the copy-edits, I appreciate it. I'm going to get to The Rambling Man ( talk · contribs) 's comments. After that, if you wish to dive in with any comments, or further edits, please do. You've been a great help so far. Thanks, D.M.N. ( talk) 18:50, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Well then, you need proof Abomb dies. And frankly it's not a heated edit war: if that IP readds the false info (for the third time) I'll revert it again. I'm very careful, and reserving the right to undo the various drive-by editors is not in violation in 3RR. If you want me to add an invisible note, fine. Alientraveller ( talk) 18:17, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
...but I wondered what this edit [3] was about? :) Fritzpoll ( talk) 15:56, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey, no problem. Your questions were legitimate, and it was good to clarify what happened. Best, Gwernol 14:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
I did a harmless edit, and seeing that this is the meme she is related to, I added it. Wapanese means someone who is very into japanese culture etc. (n japanese is is called otaku).( Arguecat4 ( talk) 18:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC))
duly noted, but I also consider myself to be of the same subculture. What about Japanophile?( Arguecat4 ( talk) 18:43, 19 June 2008 (UTC)) Also, memes don't need to be sourced. She is the source. She is very into Japan and her dream is to move there at any possible chance. ( Arguecat4 ( talk) 18:44, 19 June 2008 (UTC))
A meme is an internet phenomenon. They are nearly impossible to source. Also, I noticed there was a meme area under the info box so i put which one she is related to. How is that bad? Also, I already quit editing and don't care about the block. let them, this article is shit anyways, and I was trying to improve it.( Arguecat4 ( talk) 19:28, 19 June 2008 (UTC))
If something is impossible to source, then it doesnt belong on Wikipedia. Good luck in the future. Gwynand | Talk• Contribs 19:29, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Coming soon, in more ways that one! Please copyedit and approve your pending template. :-) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 16:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
I have commented on my talkpage Dusti SPEAK!! 22:35, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | ||
For a special person, don't worry....you'll be there soon Dusti SPEAK!! 15:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC) |
As the new CEO, would you also like to help record shows? I'm looking for some regular segments. Cheers, Red Thunder 16:59, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
G-man, this diff made me laugh out loud. The very next edit made me laugh even louder in response. OMG, I'm gonna split a rib... Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 18:22, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for your prompt assistance in that momentary witch-hunt last week! TONY (talk) 05:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
I realize you're probably at a hospital right now, realizing just how insignificant and unimportant Wikipedia really is compared to becoming a parent, but please do update us when you can! You can use the village pump for your announcement. Been thinking 'bout you, hope all is well :-) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Dude. The suspense is killing me. Girl, boy, alien? Inquiring minds want to know. Naerii 09:06, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Posted a message on Keeper's talk (all the traffic is there). Thanks everyone for coming here and posting. Gwynand | Talk• Contribs 00:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
See User talk:Whistling42#Pronouns. Whistling42 ( talk) 18:27, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for telling Whistling42 not to edit my comments (I hope you and other editors will undo further cases of this, if there are any). Making an innocent mistake about someone's gender is not sexual harrassment or a 'personal attack.' Skoojal ( talk) 02:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
I request that any further discussion on this matter should take place at my Talk page. I say this only because it is the one place I know where no one can easily come along and insist it be removed. Whistling42 ( talk) 04:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Is there any way that I could legally pause the discussion, edit the questions, or should I just let things be? Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 18:58, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
I've put the links up for clarity. Regards, D.M.N. ( talk) 19:16, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Here you go, everything from this year. I can't copy/paste the source, so nothing's linked, but you can fix that yourself... Tan | 39 14:14, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Oh wow, thanks to both of you! If only I had the tools I could've done this myself :P. I'll be taking a close look at this. Not as concerning as I'd thought, though. Gwynand | Talk• Contribs 14:19, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Ya I know I !voted rather quickly, and that was a mistake. Thanks. America69 ( talk) 19:36, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
There is a point, though, to concerns about the unqualified statement that 14 is the number. An explanation of some kind is fair. His argument that it's 11 and not 14 is bogus. But someone else with no axe to grind might raise the same question. So a footnote to the 14 would seem a valid thing to do. However, filling the lead with an explanation why it's 14, I don't buy. Also, he caught my attention with this "last year we..." What last year? Who was he editing under before? An IP address? A banned user? (I know of one notorious case from Atlanta area). I'd like to hear that explanation. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 18:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
What perfect timing for my return to find that you've finally taken the plunge. Whilst I was away, I did use my mobile to leave a message sending my congratulations on the new addition - got lost on my talk page! Anyway, best of luck in both endeavours - let me know which you find more stressful ;) Fritzpoll ( talk) 19:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
...you asked all those questions! :). I've answered them. Gwynand | Talk• Contribs 00:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Best of luck for your RFA -- Tinu Cherian - 06:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I know from experience that failing RfA is anything but the end of the world. ;-) — Giggy 11:11, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
What Giggy said. It's not that the standards are "tight", or the bar set too high, as some would have you believe. It's that the process is fickle, arbitrary and nonsensical. Don't take the RfA result as the community's collective opinion about you as an editor, it's light years away from being that. It's just the belching of a few malcontents with nothing better to do than to hang around the slough of despond, trying to drag in innocent victims by making them as miserable as themselves. If you even think about retiring over this I'll be exceedingly disappointed in you. ;-) -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 12:44, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
There needs to be more administrators like you. There are too many drama mongers running the show here. Unfortunately, you can only vote admins in, not out (usually).
If every administrator was as level headed as you, I would be contributing tons of content to the mainspace. After learning how this site is really run, however, I have no confidence that any edit I make will remain in any shape or form after 18 months (probably 2000 of my edits have already been removed from this site). You failing the RFA only does more to discourage me from actively improving the 'encyclopedia' that's become a giant (bad) soap opera.
You'd certainly be more reliable and competent than most current administrators. Good luck with your next RfA, which I will hopefully be here to witness. Just don't give in when the usual suspects ask you, "Come on, play right!" SashaNein ( talk) 12:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Just dropped by to thank you for voting in my RfA - I didn't realise you were on the same trail. Keep up the good work - when you have a little more mainspace work under your belt I hope you'll try again (one of my very first friends here had to try three times, and is now highly respected sysop). All the best, Ben MacDui Talk/ Walk 18:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Gwyn - I wondered what kind of articles you like editing. I have a handful of pages on my to-do list that I could use a hand with, but I wondered what interests/expertise you might have. I'm really annoyed about the RfA (not at you) hence some extensive comments at WT:RFA and on Keeper's talk. On the other hand, a chance to grow, and I could use a hand on my cleanup tasks. Let me know if you're interested. Fritzpoll ( talk) 12:46, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Regarding your withdrawal statement at the RfA, rest assured (as you drink your 12 year old bourbon), the problem is not with you. The process is broken, and the standard that people set is just, well, strange sometimes. That's all I will say. Regards, S. Dean Jameson 15:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello Gwynand. I just read your comment in MFC's RfA and wanted to say how reasonable I thought it was. I don't know if MFC will ever be ready for adminship, but if he is I'd wager it'll be from taking what you said (or the same sentiment from another source) to heart. Best, Olaf Davis | Talk 21:18, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I was contributing to Jack Daniel's earlier today and as expected, writing about it made me want to drink it... at 9:00 am when I'm at work. This could be problematic. Gwynand | Talk• Contribs 16:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Shapiros10. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Heh! I warn Gwynand for vandalism! Shapiros10 contact me My work 17:59, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
I chucked down a draft article structure on the talkpage of Jack Daniel's for your consideration. See what you think - you don't have to write it all on your lonesome! Also, leave the lead until the end - you'll be wanting to summarise what you've written, which you can't do til you've written it. Fritzpoll ( talk) 18:36, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
(Insert annoying AOL voice here) You've got mail. Fritzpoll ( talk) 19:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Since you have experience of the discussion at Talk:Atlanta Braves involving this editor, you may wish to contribute to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/MAL01159 and share your view. Regards, SHEFFIELDSTEEL TALK 13:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
How goes work on the JD article? Fritzpoll ( talk) 18:34, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Gwynand. I've come back off my vacation, and, as we discussed before my vacation, I have nominated the 1995 Japanese Grand Prix article for FA status. Please comment at the FAC. Thanks, D.M.N. ( talk) 08:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you...
...for participating in my RfA, which closed with 119 in support, 4 neutral and 5 opposes. I'm honestly overwhelmed at the level of support that I've received from the community, and will do my best to maintain the trust placed in me. I 'm also thankful to those who opposed or expressed a neutral position, for providing clear rationales and superb feedback for me to build on. I've set up a space for you to provide any further feedback or thoughts, should you feel inclined to. However you voted, thanks for taking the time out to contribute to the process, it's much appreciated. Kind regards, Gazi moff 22:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC) |
Hope you and your family are doing well. I just told Fritzpoll that I think you are perhaps the smartest between the three of us, seeing as he and I continue to deal with this shit. Anyway, pop over and say hey. Keeper ǀ 76 20:30, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
In response to [5] ...
As the receiver of the brunt of Jaysweet's displeasure -- the alleged "isolated jackoff" and "ignorant asshole" in question -- I'm a little puzzled by your comment about "decid[ing] to avoid dispute resolution". I don't really see any dispute to resolve. I mean this with all possible respect and no sarcasm or reproach, but can you please explain? - Revolving Bugbear 23:07, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey Gwynand, hope you and your family are alive and well. Miss you, and Tanthalas, and Fritzpoll, who've all seemed to disappear. I may not be far behind. Keeper ǀ 76 21:12, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Gwynand.
You've linked to WP:RESUME on an AFD. There's a discussion about that essay going on at Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not the place to post your résumé#Tone - you might want to join in. -- HughCharlesParker ( talk - contribs) 19:20, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Ramiele Malubay. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramiele Malubay. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Murder of Eve Carson. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Eve Carson. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Magibon. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magibon (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that you participated in a previous RFC at Wikipedia talk:Notability (criminal acts)/Opinions. I was wondering if you might share your opinion here: RFC: Should Wikipedia:Notability (criminal acts) be merged with Wikipedia:Notability (events) and Wikipedia:Notability (people)? Thanks! Location ( talk) 19:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
This user may have left Wikipedia. Gwynand has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Archives |
---|
Hi, you opposed my last RFA at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Gary King a few weeks ago. I have decided to open an Editor Review at Wikipedia:Editor review/Gary King so I could receive a new assessment for my recent activity on Wikipedia. I would greatly appreciate it if you could take the time to look over my recent contributions and point out areas where I could improve. Thanks in advance! Gary King ( talk) 05:19, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
The Socratic Barnstar | ||
I don't know if we share the same conclusions yet, but who cares. :-) You've been saying some utterly sane things at [1] -- Kim Bruning ( talk) 19:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC) |
Hello, Gwynand.
I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the after closure discussion regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After bureaucratic discussion, the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. Once again, thank you for your participation. -- Avi ( talk) 21:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Gwynand; I wanted to say thank you for supporting my request for adminship, which passed with 100 supports, 0 opposes and 1 neutral. I wanted to get round everybody individually, even though it's considered by some to be spam (which... I suppose it is! but anyway. :)). It means a lot to me that the community has placed its trust in my ability to use the extra buttons, and I only hope I can live up to its expectations. If you need anything, or notice something that bothers you, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks again, PeterSymonds | talk 21:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey Gwynand. Your oppose was made very clearly, and I understood it completely. I was just responding to your "nit-picky" statement. As for withdrawing, I'm going to stay in it until the bitter end, and receive all the constructive criticism I can from the experience. Happy editing, Mastrchf ( t/ c) 00:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
He was really starting to bug me. I even tried to get an admin invovled. Anyways, about the sig. The "Simon" is my name and it's just there to greet people. The KSK are my links. But you're right, simple sigs are good too.Simon K S K 17:27, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Just so you know, you had this one right I'm afraid. Like watching a car wreck. I never did go back and switch, glad I didn't. Time to move along! (Or as the clerk at the DMV says....Next! Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
I am going to restyle it tomorrow morning. asenine say what? 22:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
If you have noticed, I have read all RFAs before posting my comments. I usually read all of them before replying to them at one go. Hope that this helps. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 03:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
I've never tried it, so I don't know, sorry. Phlegm Rooster ( talk) 12:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
That article needs plenty of work, for sure. We're slowly working on it. But more hands would be helpful. I've got to be careful not to make it look too much like my article on nicknames. There is some crossover (and common reference materials) but it's not quite the same subject. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 13:59, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Fritz is ready to go. If you'd like, write a quick co-nom so we can go live with it. For your convenience: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fritzpoll. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 14:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Although you opposed me in my recent RFA I will still say thanks as from your comments and the other users comments that opposed me I have made a todo list for before my next RFA. I hope I will have resolved all of the issues before then and I hope that you would be able to support me in the future. If you would like to reply to this message or have any more suggestions for me then please message me on my talk page as I will not be checking back here. Thanks again. ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 16:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. Thanks for the question that you asked me on my administrator coaching page. I have replied to the comment that you left on that page. Cheers, Razor flame 19:41, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Your comments about me at Steve's talk page were very flattering. Thanks. Useight ( talk) 02:23, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
RyRy5 ( talk ♠ copy-edit) 02:53, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your support in myRfA, which closed successfully this morning. Look forward to seeing you at our forum ;) TravellingCari the Busy Bee 17:50, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
I just wanted to say, regardless of the eventual outcome, thanks very much for the co-nom on my RfA - if I hadn't known you were at least considering it, there's no way I'd have gone ahead with it. That said, it is rather nerve-wracking, and there are another five days left...well, I'm going to say thank you anyway :-P Fritzpoll ( talk) 18:13, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I just saw your message that you left Balloonman, and I would just like to point out a major mistake that you wrote. Though I did say that I would never try there again, that was actually not the case. The reason why I said this was because I was hoping people would pick up on the other meaning that I was trying to get at, which was that I would wait for someone to nominate me for adminship over there. I did not come over here to try to get adminship just because I failed 6 RfA's. Actually, I came over here because I saw a lot of vandalism that I could revert and I wanted to help out. It just happened to become so much more than that. Cheers, Razor flame 19:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Gwynaud, this user is disrupting other editers although im quite sure its not intentional. He/she obviously has some issues and i think we need to be extra sensitive around this. The editer has been accused of trolling, i dont want the editer to get hurt if its not his/her fault. I think you know what im trying to say, could you help keep an eye on this. Yours -- Realist2 ( Come Speak To Me) 01:01, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Hy Gwynand - in case you don't know, my RfA ended successfully this afternoon. I wanted to thank you very much both for the co-nomination, and also the discussions that you held elsewhere (I saw you cropping up on a few talkpages) in response to comments at the RfA. As I said to Keeper (who got the part a of this message), I didn't expect to succeed, but your willingness to co-nom me given your exacting standards at RfA was a confidence-booster sufficient to accept the nomination. I hope that I can, in time, justify your confidence in me. Fritzpoll ( talk) 14:45, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
The policy is tricky - I guess it comes down to whether or not you think the account is going to be disruptive, and whether it is appropriate to guess that ahead of time. On the other hand, looks like another overreaction to Kurt, in my opinion - what do you think? Fritzpoll ( talk) 15:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
If any more ideas pop into your head regarding any theoretical way to fix RFA, feel free to add them to my newly-created page here. Useight ( talk) 16:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
It's English, Northern. StewieGriffin! • Talk 18:31, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
← By the way, you can "subscribe" without receiving delivery now - Wikipedia:Radio Wikipedia#Listeners who do not require delivery. I'm sure a lot of people would prefer to just keep the page watchlisted to see when new episodes were available, so this will help get an idea of the listenership regardless of if they want their talk page updated or not. xenocidic ( talk ¿ listen ) 02:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Need to run for RfA. I just read your comment in mine and it was one of the best RfA comments I've ever seen. You'd be better than I'll ever be. dihydrogen monoxide ( H2O) 02:00, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
I have my heart set on a successful RFA in the near future and don't want to hurt my chances at all. Could we continue this here on the discussion page? Dusti complain/compliment 17:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
I've replied on my talk page Bjewiki ( Talk) 18:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
You're thinking of Anonymous Dissident, correct? The other two I know are Ilyanep, myself, and a third one who I suspect doesn't want his/her age revealed. Nousernamesleft copper, not wood 19:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm the only one that is willing to answer any of your questions :-), regardless of forum. wt:rfa, my talk, wt:rollback, Pedro/mentoring....anywhere else you need me Gail? Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
With all due respect, I would have preferred it to remain open for another twelve hours or so. An administrator suggested last night that I withdraw and take the commentary and learn from it, but I asked for it to remain open for at least 24 hours to gather feedback, if nothing else. I know that I was off to an awful start and had no chance of succeeding, but I wanted to gather significant feedback, if possible. As it is, everyone pretty much picked on one misguided / misworded edit and piled on to that one, rather than digging deeper.
Ehhh, regardless, I appreciate the thought. I would have withdrawn later this evening, more than likely, anyways, so I suppose it's six of one, a half-dozen of another.
Regards, -- InDeBiz1 ( talk) 17:20, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
I'll do so then. What's the procedure? Ironho lds 13:33, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
I recently looked over your contributions whilst trying to escape the bot saga - given today's discussion on Keep's talkpage, I jotted down what my assessment would be if participating in an RfA here - sorry for the abbreviation in the page name, but I'm lazy! :) Maybe you won't run now, but I still think this will apply Fritzpoll ( talk) 15:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
For reverting this edit to my talkpage. It was rather random, wasn't it, as you pointed out in your edit summary! Best wishes, and happy editing! Lra drama 18:19, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
I know I said I wouldn't fight the opposers, and I thank you for even taking the time to comment, but I couldn't let that last point stand unanswered in your mind. I won't mince words here: I fucking HATE when people make it a point of who is an admin and who isn't, especially in content disputes and dispute resolution. In fact, admins are not more special in any way, shape, or form, but should (in some cases) be held to a bit of a higher standard. I would like the tools (for infrequent image work/username concerns), but definitely don't need them, nor the title of administrator. We should be aiming to devolve power and make Wikipedia more open and accessible. I sufficiently realize that saying this will not change your opinion, but it needs to be said. Apologies for the profanity. Well, mahalo. -- Ali'i 18:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
was this spelling correction. Personally, I like the idea of threatening FAC better :-) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 14:21, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. Tony1 has replied - could I possibly get your take on his comment. Also, he's now leaving messages on other's talkpages, see here. I'm struggling to know what to do now. D.M.N. ( talk) 15:40, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
[2] I've had enough. Contact me via e-mail if necessary. D.M.N. ( talk) 16:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the copy-edits, I appreciate it. I'm going to get to The Rambling Man ( talk · contribs) 's comments. After that, if you wish to dive in with any comments, or further edits, please do. You've been a great help so far. Thanks, D.M.N. ( talk) 18:50, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Well then, you need proof Abomb dies. And frankly it's not a heated edit war: if that IP readds the false info (for the third time) I'll revert it again. I'm very careful, and reserving the right to undo the various drive-by editors is not in violation in 3RR. If you want me to add an invisible note, fine. Alientraveller ( talk) 18:17, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
...but I wondered what this edit [3] was about? :) Fritzpoll ( talk) 15:56, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey, no problem. Your questions were legitimate, and it was good to clarify what happened. Best, Gwernol 14:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
I did a harmless edit, and seeing that this is the meme she is related to, I added it. Wapanese means someone who is very into japanese culture etc. (n japanese is is called otaku).( Arguecat4 ( talk) 18:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC))
duly noted, but I also consider myself to be of the same subculture. What about Japanophile?( Arguecat4 ( talk) 18:43, 19 June 2008 (UTC)) Also, memes don't need to be sourced. She is the source. She is very into Japan and her dream is to move there at any possible chance. ( Arguecat4 ( talk) 18:44, 19 June 2008 (UTC))
A meme is an internet phenomenon. They are nearly impossible to source. Also, I noticed there was a meme area under the info box so i put which one she is related to. How is that bad? Also, I already quit editing and don't care about the block. let them, this article is shit anyways, and I was trying to improve it.( Arguecat4 ( talk) 19:28, 19 June 2008 (UTC))
If something is impossible to source, then it doesnt belong on Wikipedia. Good luck in the future. Gwynand | Talk• Contribs 19:29, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Coming soon, in more ways that one! Please copyedit and approve your pending template. :-) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 16:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
I have commented on my talkpage Dusti SPEAK!! 22:35, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | ||
For a special person, don't worry....you'll be there soon Dusti SPEAK!! 15:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC) |
As the new CEO, would you also like to help record shows? I'm looking for some regular segments. Cheers, Red Thunder 16:59, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
G-man, this diff made me laugh out loud. The very next edit made me laugh even louder in response. OMG, I'm gonna split a rib... Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 18:22, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for your prompt assistance in that momentary witch-hunt last week! TONY (talk) 05:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
I realize you're probably at a hospital right now, realizing just how insignificant and unimportant Wikipedia really is compared to becoming a parent, but please do update us when you can! You can use the village pump for your announcement. Been thinking 'bout you, hope all is well :-) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Dude. The suspense is killing me. Girl, boy, alien? Inquiring minds want to know. Naerii 09:06, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Posted a message on Keeper's talk (all the traffic is there). Thanks everyone for coming here and posting. Gwynand | Talk• Contribs 00:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
See User talk:Whistling42#Pronouns. Whistling42 ( talk) 18:27, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for telling Whistling42 not to edit my comments (I hope you and other editors will undo further cases of this, if there are any). Making an innocent mistake about someone's gender is not sexual harrassment or a 'personal attack.' Skoojal ( talk) 02:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
I request that any further discussion on this matter should take place at my Talk page. I say this only because it is the one place I know where no one can easily come along and insist it be removed. Whistling42 ( talk) 04:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Is there any way that I could legally pause the discussion, edit the questions, or should I just let things be? Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 18:58, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
I've put the links up for clarity. Regards, D.M.N. ( talk) 19:16, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Here you go, everything from this year. I can't copy/paste the source, so nothing's linked, but you can fix that yourself... Tan | 39 14:14, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Oh wow, thanks to both of you! If only I had the tools I could've done this myself :P. I'll be taking a close look at this. Not as concerning as I'd thought, though. Gwynand | Talk• Contribs 14:19, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Ya I know I !voted rather quickly, and that was a mistake. Thanks. America69 ( talk) 19:36, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
There is a point, though, to concerns about the unqualified statement that 14 is the number. An explanation of some kind is fair. His argument that it's 11 and not 14 is bogus. But someone else with no axe to grind might raise the same question. So a footnote to the 14 would seem a valid thing to do. However, filling the lead with an explanation why it's 14, I don't buy. Also, he caught my attention with this "last year we..." What last year? Who was he editing under before? An IP address? A banned user? (I know of one notorious case from Atlanta area). I'd like to hear that explanation. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 18:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
What perfect timing for my return to find that you've finally taken the plunge. Whilst I was away, I did use my mobile to leave a message sending my congratulations on the new addition - got lost on my talk page! Anyway, best of luck in both endeavours - let me know which you find more stressful ;) Fritzpoll ( talk) 19:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
...you asked all those questions! :). I've answered them. Gwynand | Talk• Contribs 00:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Best of luck for your RFA -- Tinu Cherian - 06:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I know from experience that failing RfA is anything but the end of the world. ;-) — Giggy 11:11, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
What Giggy said. It's not that the standards are "tight", or the bar set too high, as some would have you believe. It's that the process is fickle, arbitrary and nonsensical. Don't take the RfA result as the community's collective opinion about you as an editor, it's light years away from being that. It's just the belching of a few malcontents with nothing better to do than to hang around the slough of despond, trying to drag in innocent victims by making them as miserable as themselves. If you even think about retiring over this I'll be exceedingly disappointed in you. ;-) -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 12:44, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
There needs to be more administrators like you. There are too many drama mongers running the show here. Unfortunately, you can only vote admins in, not out (usually).
If every administrator was as level headed as you, I would be contributing tons of content to the mainspace. After learning how this site is really run, however, I have no confidence that any edit I make will remain in any shape or form after 18 months (probably 2000 of my edits have already been removed from this site). You failing the RFA only does more to discourage me from actively improving the 'encyclopedia' that's become a giant (bad) soap opera.
You'd certainly be more reliable and competent than most current administrators. Good luck with your next RfA, which I will hopefully be here to witness. Just don't give in when the usual suspects ask you, "Come on, play right!" SashaNein ( talk) 12:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Just dropped by to thank you for voting in my RfA - I didn't realise you were on the same trail. Keep up the good work - when you have a little more mainspace work under your belt I hope you'll try again (one of my very first friends here had to try three times, and is now highly respected sysop). All the best, Ben MacDui Talk/ Walk 18:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Gwyn - I wondered what kind of articles you like editing. I have a handful of pages on my to-do list that I could use a hand with, but I wondered what interests/expertise you might have. I'm really annoyed about the RfA (not at you) hence some extensive comments at WT:RFA and on Keeper's talk. On the other hand, a chance to grow, and I could use a hand on my cleanup tasks. Let me know if you're interested. Fritzpoll ( talk) 12:46, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Regarding your withdrawal statement at the RfA, rest assured (as you drink your 12 year old bourbon), the problem is not with you. The process is broken, and the standard that people set is just, well, strange sometimes. That's all I will say. Regards, S. Dean Jameson 15:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello Gwynand. I just read your comment in MFC's RfA and wanted to say how reasonable I thought it was. I don't know if MFC will ever be ready for adminship, but if he is I'd wager it'll be from taking what you said (or the same sentiment from another source) to heart. Best, Olaf Davis | Talk 21:18, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I was contributing to Jack Daniel's earlier today and as expected, writing about it made me want to drink it... at 9:00 am when I'm at work. This could be problematic. Gwynand | Talk• Contribs 16:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Shapiros10. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Heh! I warn Gwynand for vandalism! Shapiros10 contact me My work 17:59, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
I chucked down a draft article structure on the talkpage of Jack Daniel's for your consideration. See what you think - you don't have to write it all on your lonesome! Also, leave the lead until the end - you'll be wanting to summarise what you've written, which you can't do til you've written it. Fritzpoll ( talk) 18:36, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
(Insert annoying AOL voice here) You've got mail. Fritzpoll ( talk) 19:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Since you have experience of the discussion at Talk:Atlanta Braves involving this editor, you may wish to contribute to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/MAL01159 and share your view. Regards, SHEFFIELDSTEEL TALK 13:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
How goes work on the JD article? Fritzpoll ( talk) 18:34, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Gwynand. I've come back off my vacation, and, as we discussed before my vacation, I have nominated the 1995 Japanese Grand Prix article for FA status. Please comment at the FAC. Thanks, D.M.N. ( talk) 08:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you...
...for participating in my RfA, which closed with 119 in support, 4 neutral and 5 opposes. I'm honestly overwhelmed at the level of support that I've received from the community, and will do my best to maintain the trust placed in me. I 'm also thankful to those who opposed or expressed a neutral position, for providing clear rationales and superb feedback for me to build on. I've set up a space for you to provide any further feedback or thoughts, should you feel inclined to. However you voted, thanks for taking the time out to contribute to the process, it's much appreciated. Kind regards, Gazi moff 22:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC) |
Hope you and your family are doing well. I just told Fritzpoll that I think you are perhaps the smartest between the three of us, seeing as he and I continue to deal with this shit. Anyway, pop over and say hey. Keeper ǀ 76 20:30, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
In response to [5] ...
As the receiver of the brunt of Jaysweet's displeasure -- the alleged "isolated jackoff" and "ignorant asshole" in question -- I'm a little puzzled by your comment about "decid[ing] to avoid dispute resolution". I don't really see any dispute to resolve. I mean this with all possible respect and no sarcasm or reproach, but can you please explain? - Revolving Bugbear 23:07, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey Gwynand, hope you and your family are alive and well. Miss you, and Tanthalas, and Fritzpoll, who've all seemed to disappear. I may not be far behind. Keeper ǀ 76 21:12, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Gwynand.
You've linked to WP:RESUME on an AFD. There's a discussion about that essay going on at Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not the place to post your résumé#Tone - you might want to join in. -- HughCharlesParker ( talk - contribs) 19:20, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Ramiele Malubay. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramiele Malubay. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Murder of Eve Carson. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Eve Carson. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Magibon. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magibon (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that you participated in a previous RFC at Wikipedia talk:Notability (criminal acts)/Opinions. I was wondering if you might share your opinion here: RFC: Should Wikipedia:Notability (criminal acts) be merged with Wikipedia:Notability (events) and Wikipedia:Notability (people)? Thanks! Location ( talk) 19:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)