This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
LAAFan has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
The
Rock music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 9 - October 2008 | |
|
|
Be Black Hole Sun ( talk · contribs)
--Say Headcheese!-- hexa Chord 2 15:33, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Oh, gawd I love the good ol' BC, him and his incredibility with the amazing acts of him met with what seems that he intentionally performs them anonymously. I'll join this when I get the time. Thanks. GunMetal Angel
No U. GunMetal Angel
Done. Let me know if there's any further vandalism to your page. Dreadstar † 01:29, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Ah, thanks for the information - good day. ≈ The Haunted Angel 14:40, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Merry Christmas. Chubb enna itor 17:35, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
I've added the article to my watchlist and will help keep an eye on it. Right now it doesn't look like the vandalism is heavy or persistent enough to semi-protect, but if it gets worse I'll protect it. And a Merry Christmas to you! Dreadstar † 18:47, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
I want to summon you to the Avenged Sevenfold talk page to discuss about the genrre issue before an edit war would occur.-- F-22 Raptor I V 15:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
News from Bucketheadland Issue 1 - January 22, 2009
You're reading the first issue of News from Bucketheadland, the infamous but irregular organ of the Buckethead Taskforce, telling you what binges and what not in the land of Headcheese. Feel free to kill your canary.
NOTE: No rainforests have been harmed in the making of this nonsense. |
[1] Hmm. I searched for the IP using Ctrl+F in the talk page before doing the revert, and found nothing, so I assumed it was arbitrary genre-changing. But then I looked again after you re-reverted, and found this discussion.
Sorry for the misunderstanding. Have a nice day. 21655 ταλκ/ 01ҁ 23:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
News from Bucketheadland Issue 2 - January 30, 2009
You're reading the second issue of News from Bucketheadland, the infamous but irregular organ of the Buckethead Taskforce, telling you what binges and what not in the land of Headcheese. Feel free to kill your mum.
NOTE: No chickens harmed in the making of these lines. |
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. Tim meh ! 02:59, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
News from Bucketheadland Issue 3 - February 25, 2009
You're reading the third issue of News from Bucketheadland, the infamous but irregular organ of the Buckethead Taskforce, telling you what binges and what not in the land of Headcheese. Feel free to shout out: " I'm Cocoa for Cuckoo Puffs!"
NOTE: Currently no chickens in the Slaughterhouse on the Prairie. |
Nice name for his new album! Haha, Little House on the Prairie parody. GunMetal Angel 20:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Re [2]: please read wp:v, and do not mark article sourcing and the removal of unsourced material as vandalism. -- Jeandré, 2009-03-08 t19:35z
May I ask why you undid my addition of orcahestral hardcore on the Bone Palace Ballet? it was sourced, however it was from a newspaper article and I am unsure of how I should make this clear Addug ( talk) 22:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
News from Bucketheadland Issue 4 - March 21, 2009
You're reading the forth issue of News from Bucketheadland, the infamous but irregular organ of the Buckethead Taskforce, telling you what binges and what not in the land of Headcheese. Feel free to shout out: " Well, well, well..."
NOTE: Currently all chickens are Somewhere Over the Slaughterhouse. |
Sorry for the edit conflict! I hate them too. FireCrystal ( talk) 21:00, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Yeah thanks for the fix. I was just about to do that. My booklet does say that though. The 2nd edition of the album does in fact say that Shannon Lucas was the drummer. I don't know so I just went with whatever Shannon Lucas said. I just went to his Wikipedia article and it says that he says that he wrote the drum parts. So yeah I trust him more. I also noticed that he wasn't on the "This Calling" video. That video was released 2 months before the album was released. So i am confused as hell. Can you help me understand? I don't know why my booklet says Mickey was the drummer, but the 2nd edition said Shannon Lucas was the drummer.-- Kevinlovesyou ( talk) 00:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
That's odd, death metal does not have any of the standards that The Weak Willed shares in the song, (before, I would say it would be a deathcore song, but I noticed 5 words of clean vocals sung near the end). So if that's the case, if you can find a cite reference, it would be best to state on the article "the band refers to the song 'The Weak Willed' as a 'death metal song'", instead of stating "The Weak Willed is a death metal song". ~-~ GunMetal Angel
Hi. Please see the featured articles, AC/DC and Nirvana, for a more correct format. There is no need for a "current members" subsection. Tim meh ! 20:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Job for a Cowboy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Canniba loki 20:31, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Really no problem. I know how you must feel because I too was confused about it all but in the same situation an admin explained it all to me and I just accepted it as it is. People at WP:CATEGORY and WP:ALBUM would probably say the same things. Anyway I was going to clean out and add to the category sometime soon. Also, you do know that on the artist album categories that all of their albums would fall into those categories which is not wrong in the way of categorization (but can be a little confusing to people that associate their albums to different genres). As for articles now, musicians that played other genres before should still be added - especially if the act is strongly associated with that other genre, for instance Job for a Cowboy with deathcore and death metal still being seen as having deathcore elements to some. Glad you understand now. FireCrystal ( talk) 18:53, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
News from Bucketheadland Issue 5 - April 27, 2009
You're reading the fifth issue of News from Bucketheadland, the infamous but irregular organ of the Buckethead Taskforce, telling you what binges and what not in the land of Headcheese. Feel free to shout out: " Ain't got no boy!"
NOTE: Did you encounter Flesh for the Beast? |
I APPROVE OF THESE MATTERS!!!
When modifying a paragraph, could you avoid adding or removing spaces around the paragraph? It causes the diff to show the entire paragraph in red ( example), making it difficult to quickly see what you've changed. If you must change the spacing, then could you do it in a separate edit? For example: here, if you compare the top and bottom revisions, [3], then you'll see a lot of red, making it very difficult to see what I've done; however, if you examine each diff individually, then it's easy to see the minor changes. Thanks. — LOL T/ C 05:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Stop putting in the Slipknot (1980 band) article "Not to confuse by the heavy metal band Slipknot". Although I don't believe that nu metal is a subgenre of heavy metal (I don't mind if it has the word "metal" in it's name), this is a thrash metal band, that is also heavy metal, if you like saying that. In your terms, there are both heavy metal bands, so is better to leave the disambiguation as "nu metal band". -- Anarkangel ( talk) 21:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Please don't revert that IP again; I've blocked him for edit warring. Please find a citation and/or engage in constructive discussion (if you haven't already done so) regarding the genre. If you require any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Take care, Scarian Call me Pat! 22:42, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
News from Bucketheadland Issue 6 - May 8, 2009
You're reading the sixth issue of News from Bucketheadland, the infamous but irregular organ of the Buckethead Taskforce, telling you what binges and what not in the land of Headcheese. Feel free to shout out: " Byrralku Dhangudha!"
NOTE: Are you waiting for Captain EO to return? |
How about this:
With Corey from Slipknot starting work on his side project called Superego, the rest of the band has headed into the studio with Buckethead to record an album under the working title “hockey stick guitars and goofy getups”. [4]
--Avant-garde a clue- hexa Chord 2 19:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
that userbox thing on your page, "my userboxes". can you tell me more about that. how do you get it? what do you have to do to get the userboxes in there? CallMeAndrew ( talk) 00:18, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:JFAC demo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 06:05, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
I didn't revert your edits, I modified them. For example, your edits said "a song by Disturbed," mine say, "a song by American heavy metal band Disturbed." Your say, "a song by Disturbed, the song was released as a single, etc" and mine say "a song by American heavy metal band Disturbed, released as a single, etc." Mine are simply more descriptive. -- The Guy complain edits 21:21, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Might I draw your attention here: Template:Infobox Album#Professional reviews: "Numerical ratings, letter grades and other non-symbol ratings should be shown using plain text in parentheses, like (3.5/10), (B) or (90%)." = ∫ t c 5th Eye 15:50, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:No Time to Bleed.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:42, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey you always criticize my edits but who are you to call the shots? as it seems to me it looks like more people agree with the changes i make then what you do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CrunchPuff ( talk • contribs) 23:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Singles are by no means inherently notable. We don't need pages on every single ones, especially ones that didn't chart. Most songs don't warrant an article unless they prove exceptional notability through coverage in multiple reliable sources. Please do not undo my redirects unless you address the problem by adding third party sources (i.e., significant coverage that isn't the band's official website/MySpace/etc.). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer)
1. My intentions were not vandalism, do not assume that.
2. You decide after a month to post a message?
3. Consider putting a source next to the genre, it took me time to find out the album has nu-metal elements.-- F-22 Raptor I V 00:35, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
You had no reason for your reverts either. Also, add a source before reverting back to questionable material. And assume Wikipedia:Good Faith.-- F-22 Raptor I V 18:47, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Maybe you're right about the spaces, but if you'd lurk moar, you'd see that even if the comma in the date isn't there in the source, it still shows up on the article, Wikipedia made it that way for a reason. Chris9086 ( talk) 02:09, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
What are you doing here? You have to not delete the sources. I deleted the Indie London's source because it isn't reliable: Kerrang! Awards: Enter Shakiri v My Chemical Romance - YOUR London Reviews. I deleted post hardcore because the source does not say that 30 STM are post hardcore. You don't delete neoprogressive because there is the source: http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:3zfixql0ldke~T0 . I don't understand because you cancelled my edit, Can you explain me?-- Matthew Riva ( talk) 22:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for my lateness. I don't really do specific requests but I'll take a look when I get around to it. Oh and an initial question: what exactly does the article need that isn't already found? FireCrystal ( talk) 23:09, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Tim meh 18:17, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey, what's up? Just stopped by to say thanks for fixing the grammer errors on my user page. It's funny, usually i'm a grammer freak, so yeah. I was just on your user page and I noticed we like alot of the same video games and bands, cool huh? But yeah, thanks again!:) Emo777 ( talk) 10:15, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Metallica is also a rock band in broad context, but yet their article says they are a heavy metal band in the first sentence. If so, Aerosmith should get to keep the hard rock tag as well. Heavy metal is a specific genre of music that falls under the broader category of "rock", and the same goes for hard rock. Aerosmith and Metallica are both rock bands, yet one is hard rock and the other is heavy metal. I think it'd be better to clear that up by putting the more specific genre of music (hard rock or heavy metal) than the broad genre (rock). Also, hard rock is what the source (Allmusic) says anyhow...that Aerosmith is a hard rock band. In fact, Allmusic actually says Aerosmith is a hard rock band TWICE in the first sentence of their biography of Aerosmith. Nowehere does it just say "rock".
Additionally, the lead already says that Aerosmith was formed in 1970 in Boston, but in a more appropriate place. Not every band article needs to have the exact same first lead sentence that you think it should be. If it seems more appropriate for a certain band article to have it say when and where they were formed in the 2nd or 3rd sentence to make for a better read that fits with the chronological nature of the lead, then that's what it should be. Abog ( talk) 20:10, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, Gunmetal Angel! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.
MOTD Needs Your Help!
Delivered By – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 18:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Yes, you have. It's been three days since you last commented on the issue. If you wish to discuss it further, go right ahead, and I won't edit war with you. Tim meh 00:45, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
LAAFan has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
The
Rock music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 9 - October 2008 | |
|
|
Be Black Hole Sun ( talk · contribs)
--Say Headcheese!-- hexa Chord 2 15:33, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Oh, gawd I love the good ol' BC, him and his incredibility with the amazing acts of him met with what seems that he intentionally performs them anonymously. I'll join this when I get the time. Thanks. GunMetal Angel
No U. GunMetal Angel
Done. Let me know if there's any further vandalism to your page. Dreadstar † 01:29, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Ah, thanks for the information - good day. ≈ The Haunted Angel 14:40, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Merry Christmas. Chubb enna itor 17:35, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
I've added the article to my watchlist and will help keep an eye on it. Right now it doesn't look like the vandalism is heavy or persistent enough to semi-protect, but if it gets worse I'll protect it. And a Merry Christmas to you! Dreadstar † 18:47, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
I want to summon you to the Avenged Sevenfold talk page to discuss about the genrre issue before an edit war would occur.-- F-22 Raptor I V 15:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
News from Bucketheadland Issue 1 - January 22, 2009
You're reading the first issue of News from Bucketheadland, the infamous but irregular organ of the Buckethead Taskforce, telling you what binges and what not in the land of Headcheese. Feel free to kill your canary.
NOTE: No rainforests have been harmed in the making of this nonsense. |
[1] Hmm. I searched for the IP using Ctrl+F in the talk page before doing the revert, and found nothing, so I assumed it was arbitrary genre-changing. But then I looked again after you re-reverted, and found this discussion.
Sorry for the misunderstanding. Have a nice day. 21655 ταλκ/ 01ҁ 23:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
News from Bucketheadland Issue 2 - January 30, 2009
You're reading the second issue of News from Bucketheadland, the infamous but irregular organ of the Buckethead Taskforce, telling you what binges and what not in the land of Headcheese. Feel free to kill your mum.
NOTE: No chickens harmed in the making of these lines. |
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. Tim meh ! 02:59, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
News from Bucketheadland Issue 3 - February 25, 2009
You're reading the third issue of News from Bucketheadland, the infamous but irregular organ of the Buckethead Taskforce, telling you what binges and what not in the land of Headcheese. Feel free to shout out: " I'm Cocoa for Cuckoo Puffs!"
NOTE: Currently no chickens in the Slaughterhouse on the Prairie. |
Nice name for his new album! Haha, Little House on the Prairie parody. GunMetal Angel 20:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Re [2]: please read wp:v, and do not mark article sourcing and the removal of unsourced material as vandalism. -- Jeandré, 2009-03-08 t19:35z
May I ask why you undid my addition of orcahestral hardcore on the Bone Palace Ballet? it was sourced, however it was from a newspaper article and I am unsure of how I should make this clear Addug ( talk) 22:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
News from Bucketheadland Issue 4 - March 21, 2009
You're reading the forth issue of News from Bucketheadland, the infamous but irregular organ of the Buckethead Taskforce, telling you what binges and what not in the land of Headcheese. Feel free to shout out: " Well, well, well..."
NOTE: Currently all chickens are Somewhere Over the Slaughterhouse. |
Sorry for the edit conflict! I hate them too. FireCrystal ( talk) 21:00, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Yeah thanks for the fix. I was just about to do that. My booklet does say that though. The 2nd edition of the album does in fact say that Shannon Lucas was the drummer. I don't know so I just went with whatever Shannon Lucas said. I just went to his Wikipedia article and it says that he says that he wrote the drum parts. So yeah I trust him more. I also noticed that he wasn't on the "This Calling" video. That video was released 2 months before the album was released. So i am confused as hell. Can you help me understand? I don't know why my booklet says Mickey was the drummer, but the 2nd edition said Shannon Lucas was the drummer.-- Kevinlovesyou ( talk) 00:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
That's odd, death metal does not have any of the standards that The Weak Willed shares in the song, (before, I would say it would be a deathcore song, but I noticed 5 words of clean vocals sung near the end). So if that's the case, if you can find a cite reference, it would be best to state on the article "the band refers to the song 'The Weak Willed' as a 'death metal song'", instead of stating "The Weak Willed is a death metal song". ~-~ GunMetal Angel
Hi. Please see the featured articles, AC/DC and Nirvana, for a more correct format. There is no need for a "current members" subsection. Tim meh ! 20:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Job for a Cowboy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Canniba loki 20:31, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Really no problem. I know how you must feel because I too was confused about it all but in the same situation an admin explained it all to me and I just accepted it as it is. People at WP:CATEGORY and WP:ALBUM would probably say the same things. Anyway I was going to clean out and add to the category sometime soon. Also, you do know that on the artist album categories that all of their albums would fall into those categories which is not wrong in the way of categorization (but can be a little confusing to people that associate their albums to different genres). As for articles now, musicians that played other genres before should still be added - especially if the act is strongly associated with that other genre, for instance Job for a Cowboy with deathcore and death metal still being seen as having deathcore elements to some. Glad you understand now. FireCrystal ( talk) 18:53, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
News from Bucketheadland Issue 5 - April 27, 2009
You're reading the fifth issue of News from Bucketheadland, the infamous but irregular organ of the Buckethead Taskforce, telling you what binges and what not in the land of Headcheese. Feel free to shout out: " Ain't got no boy!"
NOTE: Did you encounter Flesh for the Beast? |
I APPROVE OF THESE MATTERS!!!
When modifying a paragraph, could you avoid adding or removing spaces around the paragraph? It causes the diff to show the entire paragraph in red ( example), making it difficult to quickly see what you've changed. If you must change the spacing, then could you do it in a separate edit? For example: here, if you compare the top and bottom revisions, [3], then you'll see a lot of red, making it very difficult to see what I've done; however, if you examine each diff individually, then it's easy to see the minor changes. Thanks. — LOL T/ C 05:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Stop putting in the Slipknot (1980 band) article "Not to confuse by the heavy metal band Slipknot". Although I don't believe that nu metal is a subgenre of heavy metal (I don't mind if it has the word "metal" in it's name), this is a thrash metal band, that is also heavy metal, if you like saying that. In your terms, there are both heavy metal bands, so is better to leave the disambiguation as "nu metal band". -- Anarkangel ( talk) 21:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Please don't revert that IP again; I've blocked him for edit warring. Please find a citation and/or engage in constructive discussion (if you haven't already done so) regarding the genre. If you require any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Take care, Scarian Call me Pat! 22:42, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
News from Bucketheadland Issue 6 - May 8, 2009
You're reading the sixth issue of News from Bucketheadland, the infamous but irregular organ of the Buckethead Taskforce, telling you what binges and what not in the land of Headcheese. Feel free to shout out: " Byrralku Dhangudha!"
NOTE: Are you waiting for Captain EO to return? |
How about this:
With Corey from Slipknot starting work on his side project called Superego, the rest of the band has headed into the studio with Buckethead to record an album under the working title “hockey stick guitars and goofy getups”. [4]
--Avant-garde a clue- hexa Chord 2 19:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
that userbox thing on your page, "my userboxes". can you tell me more about that. how do you get it? what do you have to do to get the userboxes in there? CallMeAndrew ( talk) 00:18, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:JFAC demo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 06:05, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
I didn't revert your edits, I modified them. For example, your edits said "a song by Disturbed," mine say, "a song by American heavy metal band Disturbed." Your say, "a song by Disturbed, the song was released as a single, etc" and mine say "a song by American heavy metal band Disturbed, released as a single, etc." Mine are simply more descriptive. -- The Guy complain edits 21:21, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Might I draw your attention here: Template:Infobox Album#Professional reviews: "Numerical ratings, letter grades and other non-symbol ratings should be shown using plain text in parentheses, like (3.5/10), (B) or (90%)." = ∫ t c 5th Eye 15:50, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:No Time to Bleed.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:42, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey you always criticize my edits but who are you to call the shots? as it seems to me it looks like more people agree with the changes i make then what you do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CrunchPuff ( talk • contribs) 23:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Singles are by no means inherently notable. We don't need pages on every single ones, especially ones that didn't chart. Most songs don't warrant an article unless they prove exceptional notability through coverage in multiple reliable sources. Please do not undo my redirects unless you address the problem by adding third party sources (i.e., significant coverage that isn't the band's official website/MySpace/etc.). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer)
1. My intentions were not vandalism, do not assume that.
2. You decide after a month to post a message?
3. Consider putting a source next to the genre, it took me time to find out the album has nu-metal elements.-- F-22 Raptor I V 00:35, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
You had no reason for your reverts either. Also, add a source before reverting back to questionable material. And assume Wikipedia:Good Faith.-- F-22 Raptor I V 18:47, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Maybe you're right about the spaces, but if you'd lurk moar, you'd see that even if the comma in the date isn't there in the source, it still shows up on the article, Wikipedia made it that way for a reason. Chris9086 ( talk) 02:09, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
What are you doing here? You have to not delete the sources. I deleted the Indie London's source because it isn't reliable: Kerrang! Awards: Enter Shakiri v My Chemical Romance - YOUR London Reviews. I deleted post hardcore because the source does not say that 30 STM are post hardcore. You don't delete neoprogressive because there is the source: http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:3zfixql0ldke~T0 . I don't understand because you cancelled my edit, Can you explain me?-- Matthew Riva ( talk) 22:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for my lateness. I don't really do specific requests but I'll take a look when I get around to it. Oh and an initial question: what exactly does the article need that isn't already found? FireCrystal ( talk) 23:09, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Tim meh 18:17, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey, what's up? Just stopped by to say thanks for fixing the grammer errors on my user page. It's funny, usually i'm a grammer freak, so yeah. I was just on your user page and I noticed we like alot of the same video games and bands, cool huh? But yeah, thanks again!:) Emo777 ( talk) 10:15, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Metallica is also a rock band in broad context, but yet their article says they are a heavy metal band in the first sentence. If so, Aerosmith should get to keep the hard rock tag as well. Heavy metal is a specific genre of music that falls under the broader category of "rock", and the same goes for hard rock. Aerosmith and Metallica are both rock bands, yet one is hard rock and the other is heavy metal. I think it'd be better to clear that up by putting the more specific genre of music (hard rock or heavy metal) than the broad genre (rock). Also, hard rock is what the source (Allmusic) says anyhow...that Aerosmith is a hard rock band. In fact, Allmusic actually says Aerosmith is a hard rock band TWICE in the first sentence of their biography of Aerosmith. Nowehere does it just say "rock".
Additionally, the lead already says that Aerosmith was formed in 1970 in Boston, but in a more appropriate place. Not every band article needs to have the exact same first lead sentence that you think it should be. If it seems more appropriate for a certain band article to have it say when and where they were formed in the 2nd or 3rd sentence to make for a better read that fits with the chronological nature of the lead, then that's what it should be. Abog ( talk) 20:10, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, Gunmetal Angel! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.
MOTD Needs Your Help!
Delivered By – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 18:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Yes, you have. It's been three days since you last commented on the issue. If you wish to discuss it further, go right ahead, and I won't edit war with you. Tim meh 00:45, 22 July 2009 (UTC)