You can stop the bot by pushing the stop button. The bot sees and immediately stops running. Unless it is an emergency please consider reporting problems first to my talk page. |
My Fave Wiki Guy | |
I love Bots! Craigevans2 ( talk) 23:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC) |
The removal of the double braces in
this edit by GreenC bot seems to be an error. With the double braces in place the template displays a properly formatted (and correct) equation. Without them, it does not display correctly.
David Wilson (
talk ·
cont) 19:38, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
In this edit [1] the bot failed to honour the dmy template. Please shut the bot down until this problem is corrected. Hawkeye7 ( talk) 01:12, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
The bot is using the wrong date format in many articles. Example: Green Party of Canada Me-123567-Me ( talk) 17:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
|df=y
argument in {{
wayback}}
which tells it to display DMY. When there is no |df=
then {{wayback}}
defaults to MDY. --
Green
C 17:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
{{wayback}}
, it hid the date format from editors, bots and tools, it was only visible in the rendered output (or if you knew the syntax of the template in the wikisource). The new WYSIWYG format of {{webarchive}}
is easier to work with and less error prone. --
Green
C 18:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
{{wayback}}
so it honors the per-existing configuration when making the merger. It might expose a problem that was already there, but it's not causing new breakage. But then again it might cause new breakage changing the date format. Suggest if a date format changer bot is wanted that is a different project and BRFA cycle. --
Green
C 22:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
I agree with Hawkeye - looks like it needs fixing. Hchc2009 ( talk) 22:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Bot_owners'_noticeboard#.7B.7Bwebarchive.7D.7D_merge -- Green C 22:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
This change by GreenC bot seems not to have found a page with any useful information related to the topic of the article. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Master_and_Commander:_The_Far_Side_of_the_World&diff=750338005&oldid=750090248 which is a change to External Links for the movie, Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World on November 19, 2016. The original link points to current movies by that producer, so an archived version of the page is needed, but a version with some content. Can that be found? -- Prairieplant ( talk) 23:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This was possibly raised and already addressed. Anyway, have a look here [2]. Materialscientist ( talk) 00:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
The nice bot seems to have introduced a formatting error to the infobox at Sumba, but I can't work out how or why! Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 08:56, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
In the article RSX-11 GreenC bot appears to have made this [ ]. I can't speak to the web archive portion of the edit, but the "...process control computer..." deletion may indicate a bug in the bot. I'm fixing the article myself, but I thought you would like to know about this apparent bug. Cheers Overjive ( talk) 01:07, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Will the bot continue its work of adding Webarchive links to articles? I found that really helpful. Cheers.-- BabbaQ ( talk) 01:10, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
[3] [4] the Internet Archive links work... SpiderMum ( talk) 22:40, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Also, please don't do this. It's not your personal post to delete. -- Green C 23:04, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
2. and 3. are in Wayback template, with archive IDs / numbers SpiderMum ( talk) 23:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC) ad 1.: Sometimes it takes a couple of tries to get to the archived page (instead of the "robots.txt" message ) SpiderMum ( talk) 23:33, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
{{
wayback}}
will be deleted in a few weeks and is no not supported, please use {{
cite web}}
. The links 2 & 3 are blocked by robots but if you want to keep them that is ok. --
Green
C 00:12, 19 January 2017 (UTC)What's the reasoning behind this edit? -- Mhhossein talk 17:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
{{webarchive}}
templates (see rest of cite). Caused during the merger of {{wayback}}
to {{webarchive}}
due to unforeseen interactions between GreenC bot and
User:InternetArchiveBot. GreenC bot is going back and removing the dups. --
Green
C 17:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
A weird edit. Not even sure what task the bot is doing. — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 15:57, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
I found an old edit ( diff) where end braces should have been removed (ie. both "{{urlencode:" and "}}"). I hope you have fixed this. Regards. – Allen4 names ( contributions) 00:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
{{subst:urlencode:
https://www.example.org/}}
converts to https%3A%2F%2Fwww.example.org%2F
. Any other concerns? –
Allen4
names (
contributions) 20:11, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
?url={{subst:urlencode:
https://www.example.org/}}
(before
substitution)?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.example.org%2F
(after substitution)
Hi, i work on a navbox for ways of obtaining science in two related field, scientific method from philosophy of science and dikw pyramid from information science. i need help of some people like you to finsh this,
you can see a prototype of navbox in my sand box: /info/en/?search=User:KPU0/sandbox Plutonium 16:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by KPU0 ( talk • contribs)
In this diff GreenC bot managed to break the first of the four URLs it was trying to fix. I repaired it, and I haven’t seen any other occurrence of it, but you might still want to look at it – I can’t see how it managed to get that one wrong.-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 19:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
In the first ref edited here [5] the bot replaces a dead Internet Archive link with a live link to WebCite... normally no problem, but in this case it is a duplicate of the other archive url already used in the citation. It seems rather pointless to have [url]...[archive url]...[same archive url] in the reference. The bot obviously knows that duplicated archive links might as well be removed when it comes across such situations (see second ref edited in the diff), but seemingly not when it causes that situation. - Evad37 [ talk 23:43, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, A few references were saved here https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Aubrey%E2%80%93Maturin_series&diff=771877255&oldid=767934751 but one of them needs more information to be a correct citation. On the finished page it says it needs an archive date. I am not up to speed on how to fix that. I appreciate the saved citations, nonetheless. -- Prairieplant ( talk) 02:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Good User Mega Fixer Lee ( talk) 03:48, 28 March 2017 (UTC) |
The bot reformatted this link, and did so incorrectly. Not only is the date it added incorrect (I was the one who created that citation, so I should know), but it added an unnecessary extra string of characters to the end of the URL. Please change the bot so it doesn't do this. Thanks! ··· 日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 03:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
The WikiChevrons | ||
For rescuing dead links and readding them to the articles of the Military history WikiProject you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons. Keep up the good work! TomStar81 ( Talk) 06:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC) |
Hi, there is a problem with
this edit in that on one of the cites it has removed the |archiveurl=
and |archivedate=
parameters leaving it with an invalid cite.
Keith D (
talk)
|archive-url=
args or the {{!}} .. or combo. I'll check and rerun the article, there is more than one error. --
Green
C 20:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)See [6]. That date is very close to the epoch time of 1 January 1970. - Evad37 [ talk 01:34, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi.
The bot has made a rather odd change to a cite I added to the article Fløibanen. It has changed the cite's archivedate= and archiveurl= values to use a version of the cited pdf archived on 10 September 2013 rather than one archived on 12 April 2014. The edit comment was:
which doesn't make any sense to me. Both archives exist and work, and I don't see how swapping one for the other can be regarded as rescuing anything. On a cursory examination, the two archives look identical, but the fact remains that the 2014 one was the source for my contributions to the WP article, and the 2013 one wasn't. It may be there are subtle changes between the two that invalidate the earlier one as a source, and without any better explanation than that above I don't propose to spend the time checking that out. Is there any reason why I shouldn't just revert your bots change?. -- chris_j_wood ( talk) 15:00, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
On the article Athlone, there seems to have been a malfunction in this edit. -- David Biddulph ( talk) 21:15, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
The bot removed `archivedate=` in Special:Diff/778062515. Here it was being used for (a non-archive.org…) archive of an older 1905 work. — Sladen ( talk) 04:26, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
|archivedate=
pairs with |archiveurl=
- any other usage is 'off-label' (see template documentation) and liable to be deleted by cleanup bots like WaybackMedic. Without an |archivedate=
, the |archiveurl=
doesn't get displayed and serves no purpose for the template other than maybe a personal note in the wikisource. --
Green
C 14:15, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
|archivedate=
on Wikipedia not be cleaned up (there are thousands) because you use a couple for undocumented purposes. That will require discussion at
Help_talk:Citation_Style_1. The bot behaves in accordance to CS1 documentation. In the mean time if it's only a couple refs use the {{
cbignore}}
which will tell all link bots to bypass the ref - which has its own downsides but will keep the undocumented usage from being corrected. --
Green
C 22:37, 4 May 2017 (UTC)I see you edited our page. I am a member of the CTRC are you? We would prefer any additions to our page be cleared through the CTRC before they are added to our page. Sparky1997 ( talk) 23:28, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
The bot keeps changing the formatting of the URLS (and the date, in some cases), and the formatting is completely unnecessary. Thnere is no need to add the "?url.thats.being.archived" to the end of the URL. It's a completely useless addition that serves no valid purpose. Please adjust the parameters of the bot to not do this. Thanks! ··· 日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:53, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
See Orenair engaged in warfare with InternetArchiveBot, I fail to see how removing archived links is helpful. Endercase ( talk) 16:30, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
The close reference tag was removed in this edit. Another two here Regards CV9933 ( talk) 16:20, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello! GreenC Bot performed this edit on the Baltimore article, causing two duplicate ref def errors. What's the appropriate way to fix this? Normally, I'd just roll back the edit because it doesn't appear to be adding any meaningful content, and instead broke a couple references on the page. -- Mikeblas ( talk) 16:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
|deadurl=
argument. The underlying problem is duplicate named refs in the article, and a duplicate in {{
Baltimore weatherbox}}
, neither the bot's fault. Sometimes bots fix one problem and it exposes other problems that were always there but the bot can't detect or fix. It's a process of moving forward that isn't always complete, though not very common. The solution is to merge the duplicates once they become flagged by the ref dup detector. I fixed the other ref (page preview to see or it won't show up due the template). --
Green
C 17:46, 26 May 2017 (UTC)GreenCBot just changed two of my citations on the Malcolm Baldrige Jr. article. The first one it just stripped some attributes from the URL: |archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=| which are laid down by the Visual Source Editor when you create citations using it. This one is the Great Westerners citation.
The second citation it replaced a perfectly good citation thinking it was a broken link when it wasn't. And pointed it to the Internet Archive Wayback Machine. This one is the ProRodeo Hall of Fame citation.
Now I know how to fix these. However, I thought you might want to look at first so I did not. I am not in a hurry, just wanted to let you know. I have had this happen before actually, and I just fixed it. But now I see it's a continuing problem. I have even had editors remove these attributes manually from my citations recently and wondered why. I mean, don't the engineers who build the Visual Source Editor have a reason for putting these attributes in there in the first place? I'm sure they don't mean them to cause problems? Perhaps you can convince me to go back to adding citations in the regular source editor or use the Refill tool. I would appreciate your advice. Thanks! dawnleelynn (talk) 20:29, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
is probably a better choice than {{
cite news}}
for the two cs1|2 template you mentioned; they are not newspapers or similar sources....which is pretty much the opposite of what the bot is supposed to do: [7]. Plus there seems to be a bug in the counter for the edit summary, as only one link was changed. - Evad37 [ talk 01:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Your bot appears to be competing with another bot and reverting each other. Look at the edits from May 20 to June 6 on this page: Mayabazar history Bollyjeff | talk 02:09, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
You can stop the bot by pushing the stop button. The bot sees and immediately stops running. Unless it is an emergency please consider reporting problems first to my talk page. |
My Fave Wiki Guy | |
I love Bots! Craigevans2 ( talk) 23:03, 10 November 2016 (UTC) |
The removal of the double braces in
this edit by GreenC bot seems to be an error. With the double braces in place the template displays a properly formatted (and correct) equation. Without them, it does not display correctly.
David Wilson (
talk ·
cont) 19:38, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
In this edit [1] the bot failed to honour the dmy template. Please shut the bot down until this problem is corrected. Hawkeye7 ( talk) 01:12, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
The bot is using the wrong date format in many articles. Example: Green Party of Canada Me-123567-Me ( talk) 17:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
|df=y
argument in {{
wayback}}
which tells it to display DMY. When there is no |df=
then {{wayback}}
defaults to MDY. --
Green
C 17:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
{{wayback}}
, it hid the date format from editors, bots and tools, it was only visible in the rendered output (or if you knew the syntax of the template in the wikisource). The new WYSIWYG format of {{webarchive}}
is easier to work with and less error prone. --
Green
C 18:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
{{wayback}}
so it honors the per-existing configuration when making the merger. It might expose a problem that was already there, but it's not causing new breakage. But then again it might cause new breakage changing the date format. Suggest if a date format changer bot is wanted that is a different project and BRFA cycle. --
Green
C 22:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
I agree with Hawkeye - looks like it needs fixing. Hchc2009 ( talk) 22:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Bot_owners'_noticeboard#.7B.7Bwebarchive.7D.7D_merge -- Green C 22:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
This change by GreenC bot seems not to have found a page with any useful information related to the topic of the article. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Master_and_Commander:_The_Far_Side_of_the_World&diff=750338005&oldid=750090248 which is a change to External Links for the movie, Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World on November 19, 2016. The original link points to current movies by that producer, so an archived version of the page is needed, but a version with some content. Can that be found? -- Prairieplant ( talk) 23:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This was possibly raised and already addressed. Anyway, have a look here [2]. Materialscientist ( talk) 00:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
The nice bot seems to have introduced a formatting error to the infobox at Sumba, but I can't work out how or why! Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 08:56, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
In the article RSX-11 GreenC bot appears to have made this [ ]. I can't speak to the web archive portion of the edit, but the "...process control computer..." deletion may indicate a bug in the bot. I'm fixing the article myself, but I thought you would like to know about this apparent bug. Cheers Overjive ( talk) 01:07, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Will the bot continue its work of adding Webarchive links to articles? I found that really helpful. Cheers.-- BabbaQ ( talk) 01:10, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
[3] [4] the Internet Archive links work... SpiderMum ( talk) 22:40, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Also, please don't do this. It's not your personal post to delete. -- Green C 23:04, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
2. and 3. are in Wayback template, with archive IDs / numbers SpiderMum ( talk) 23:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC) ad 1.: Sometimes it takes a couple of tries to get to the archived page (instead of the "robots.txt" message ) SpiderMum ( talk) 23:33, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
{{
wayback}}
will be deleted in a few weeks and is no not supported, please use {{
cite web}}
. The links 2 & 3 are blocked by robots but if you want to keep them that is ok. --
Green
C 00:12, 19 January 2017 (UTC)What's the reasoning behind this edit? -- Mhhossein talk 17:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
{{webarchive}}
templates (see rest of cite). Caused during the merger of {{wayback}}
to {{webarchive}}
due to unforeseen interactions between GreenC bot and
User:InternetArchiveBot. GreenC bot is going back and removing the dups. --
Green
C 17:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
A weird edit. Not even sure what task the bot is doing. — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 15:57, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
I found an old edit ( diff) where end braces should have been removed (ie. both "{{urlencode:" and "}}"). I hope you have fixed this. Regards. – Allen4 names ( contributions) 00:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
{{subst:urlencode:
https://www.example.org/}}
converts to https%3A%2F%2Fwww.example.org%2F
. Any other concerns? –
Allen4
names (
contributions) 20:11, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
?url={{subst:urlencode:
https://www.example.org/}}
(before
substitution)?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.example.org%2F
(after substitution)
Hi, i work on a navbox for ways of obtaining science in two related field, scientific method from philosophy of science and dikw pyramid from information science. i need help of some people like you to finsh this,
you can see a prototype of navbox in my sand box: /info/en/?search=User:KPU0/sandbox Plutonium 16:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by KPU0 ( talk • contribs)
In this diff GreenC bot managed to break the first of the four URLs it was trying to fix. I repaired it, and I haven’t seen any other occurrence of it, but you might still want to look at it – I can’t see how it managed to get that one wrong.-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 19:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
In the first ref edited here [5] the bot replaces a dead Internet Archive link with a live link to WebCite... normally no problem, but in this case it is a duplicate of the other archive url already used in the citation. It seems rather pointless to have [url]...[archive url]...[same archive url] in the reference. The bot obviously knows that duplicated archive links might as well be removed when it comes across such situations (see second ref edited in the diff), but seemingly not when it causes that situation. - Evad37 [ talk 23:43, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, A few references were saved here https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Aubrey%E2%80%93Maturin_series&diff=771877255&oldid=767934751 but one of them needs more information to be a correct citation. On the finished page it says it needs an archive date. I am not up to speed on how to fix that. I appreciate the saved citations, nonetheless. -- Prairieplant ( talk) 02:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Good User Mega Fixer Lee ( talk) 03:48, 28 March 2017 (UTC) |
The bot reformatted this link, and did so incorrectly. Not only is the date it added incorrect (I was the one who created that citation, so I should know), but it added an unnecessary extra string of characters to the end of the URL. Please change the bot so it doesn't do this. Thanks! ··· 日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 03:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
The WikiChevrons | ||
For rescuing dead links and readding them to the articles of the Military history WikiProject you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons. Keep up the good work! TomStar81 ( Talk) 06:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC) |
Hi, there is a problem with
this edit in that on one of the cites it has removed the |archiveurl=
and |archivedate=
parameters leaving it with an invalid cite.
Keith D (
talk)
|archive-url=
args or the {{!}} .. or combo. I'll check and rerun the article, there is more than one error. --
Green
C 20:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)See [6]. That date is very close to the epoch time of 1 January 1970. - Evad37 [ talk 01:34, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi.
The bot has made a rather odd change to a cite I added to the article Fløibanen. It has changed the cite's archivedate= and archiveurl= values to use a version of the cited pdf archived on 10 September 2013 rather than one archived on 12 April 2014. The edit comment was:
which doesn't make any sense to me. Both archives exist and work, and I don't see how swapping one for the other can be regarded as rescuing anything. On a cursory examination, the two archives look identical, but the fact remains that the 2014 one was the source for my contributions to the WP article, and the 2013 one wasn't. It may be there are subtle changes between the two that invalidate the earlier one as a source, and without any better explanation than that above I don't propose to spend the time checking that out. Is there any reason why I shouldn't just revert your bots change?. -- chris_j_wood ( talk) 15:00, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
On the article Athlone, there seems to have been a malfunction in this edit. -- David Biddulph ( talk) 21:15, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
The bot removed `archivedate=` in Special:Diff/778062515. Here it was being used for (a non-archive.org…) archive of an older 1905 work. — Sladen ( talk) 04:26, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
|archivedate=
pairs with |archiveurl=
- any other usage is 'off-label' (see template documentation) and liable to be deleted by cleanup bots like WaybackMedic. Without an |archivedate=
, the |archiveurl=
doesn't get displayed and serves no purpose for the template other than maybe a personal note in the wikisource. --
Green
C 14:15, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
|archivedate=
on Wikipedia not be cleaned up (there are thousands) because you use a couple for undocumented purposes. That will require discussion at
Help_talk:Citation_Style_1. The bot behaves in accordance to CS1 documentation. In the mean time if it's only a couple refs use the {{
cbignore}}
which will tell all link bots to bypass the ref - which has its own downsides but will keep the undocumented usage from being corrected. --
Green
C 22:37, 4 May 2017 (UTC)I see you edited our page. I am a member of the CTRC are you? We would prefer any additions to our page be cleared through the CTRC before they are added to our page. Sparky1997 ( talk) 23:28, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
The bot keeps changing the formatting of the URLS (and the date, in some cases), and the formatting is completely unnecessary. Thnere is no need to add the "?url.thats.being.archived" to the end of the URL. It's a completely useless addition that serves no valid purpose. Please adjust the parameters of the bot to not do this. Thanks! ··· 日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:53, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
See Orenair engaged in warfare with InternetArchiveBot, I fail to see how removing archived links is helpful. Endercase ( talk) 16:30, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
The close reference tag was removed in this edit. Another two here Regards CV9933 ( talk) 16:20, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello! GreenC Bot performed this edit on the Baltimore article, causing two duplicate ref def errors. What's the appropriate way to fix this? Normally, I'd just roll back the edit because it doesn't appear to be adding any meaningful content, and instead broke a couple references on the page. -- Mikeblas ( talk) 16:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
|deadurl=
argument. The underlying problem is duplicate named refs in the article, and a duplicate in {{
Baltimore weatherbox}}
, neither the bot's fault. Sometimes bots fix one problem and it exposes other problems that were always there but the bot can't detect or fix. It's a process of moving forward that isn't always complete, though not very common. The solution is to merge the duplicates once they become flagged by the ref dup detector. I fixed the other ref (page preview to see or it won't show up due the template). --
Green
C 17:46, 26 May 2017 (UTC)GreenCBot just changed two of my citations on the Malcolm Baldrige Jr. article. The first one it just stripped some attributes from the URL: |archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=| which are laid down by the Visual Source Editor when you create citations using it. This one is the Great Westerners citation.
The second citation it replaced a perfectly good citation thinking it was a broken link when it wasn't. And pointed it to the Internet Archive Wayback Machine. This one is the ProRodeo Hall of Fame citation.
Now I know how to fix these. However, I thought you might want to look at first so I did not. I am not in a hurry, just wanted to let you know. I have had this happen before actually, and I just fixed it. But now I see it's a continuing problem. I have even had editors remove these attributes manually from my citations recently and wondered why. I mean, don't the engineers who build the Visual Source Editor have a reason for putting these attributes in there in the first place? I'm sure they don't mean them to cause problems? Perhaps you can convince me to go back to adding citations in the regular source editor or use the Refill tool. I would appreciate your advice. Thanks! dawnleelynn (talk) 20:29, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
is probably a better choice than {{
cite news}}
for the two cs1|2 template you mentioned; they are not newspapers or similar sources....which is pretty much the opposite of what the bot is supposed to do: [7]. Plus there seems to be a bug in the counter for the edit summary, as only one link was changed. - Evad37 [ talk 01:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Your bot appears to be competing with another bot and reverting each other. Look at the edits from May 20 to June 6 on this page: Mayabazar history Bollyjeff | talk 02:09, 7 June 2017 (UTC)