Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 1 Night in Paris, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 1 Night in Paris was changed by Gogogog00 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.982445 on 2011-01-17T22:21:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 22:21, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Rebecca Black (Artist)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Rebecca Black (Artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact
one of these administrators to request that the administrator
userfy the page or email a copy to you.
role
player 17:59, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Kingda Ka, you may be
blocked from editing.
role
player 17:59, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
This is your last and only warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with
this edit to
Kingda Ka.
Seaphoto
Talk 17:58, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
I am not vandalising - I have contributed to kingda ka and stealth both correctly and helpfully, but keep getting reported for vandalism. someone please help?
- I have now blocked you for a week for vandalism of Kingda Ka, and for vandalism/ personal attacks against User:Seaphoto. Wikipedia is meant to be an encyclopedia, which is a serious project - your juvenile additions to the article are not appreciated. - Mike Rosoft ( talk) 18:23, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Gogogog00 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
- 92.29.122.239 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Gogogog00". The reason given for Gogogog00's block is: "Vandalism".
- Blocking administrator: Mike Rosoft ( talk • blocks)
Gogogog00 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was not vandalising, i generally believed the information i was putting onto kingda ka wiki was true as i got it from a yahoo answer page and believed it. I am also sorry for any offence i caused to User:Seaphoto. I generally did not intentionally vandalise as i believed the information i was uploading was legitimate and helpful. I understand now that wikipedia is a serious website and i give my word i will not intentionaly cause offence or upload edits on pages that might be classed as vandalism again. I am new to wikipedia and if unblocked i will make sure i read all the tutorial how to wikis on creating articles and editing. Again sorry for the inconveniance and i hope you understand what i am saying. Gogogog00 (talk) 23:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Block endorsed due to obvious vandalism, some instances of which also include violations of WP:NPA (i.e., [1]). Kinu t/ c 01:39, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gogogog00 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I didn't vandalise? I edited a page on a fact that i believed was true as i got it from a yahoo answers page and i thought it was notable enough to be added to the page. People keep saying obvious vandalism but it isn't? Can someone explain to me how what i done was vandalism as i seem to be missing how it is vandalism? Gogogog00 ( talk) 15:27, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If this isn't vandalism, I don't know what is. None of your edits are any different. I would have blocked you indefinitely, so you should be thanking Mike for the generous gift of a second chance you'll be getting in a week, not moaning sarcastically. Closedmouth ( talk) 15:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gogogog00 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'd like to be given the oppertunity to become an administrator on wikipedia. If you unblock me please tell me how and i will help make wikipedia better for everyone. Come on guys, unblock me and i will become an admin and do my bit for wikipedia!!! Gogogog00 (talk) 20:03, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| i am so good Gogogog00 ( talk) 23:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC) |
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Solange Knowles, you may be
blocked from editing.
Elizium23 (
talk) 20:10, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Beyonce 2011 nba.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.
If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.
Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:32, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Please stop removing notices of the unsourced and unlicensed image without explanation. Continuing to do so will result in you blocked from editing. —
WP:PENGUIN · [
TALK ] 15:37, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- The image you uploaded has no license for use and is therefore violating US laws. Do not add unlicensed and unsourced images. You may be blocked without warning. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:43, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that
biographical information about living persons must not include
unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to
Rihanna with
this edit, you must include proper
sources. If you don't know how to
cite a source, you may want to read
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you.
Mark Arsten (
talk) 15:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Rihanna with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
DVdm (
talk) 15:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Rihanna, you may be
blocked from editing. —
WP:PENGUIN · [
TALK ] 16:08, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Rihanna, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found
here.
Fæ (
talk) 16:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
JohnCD (
talk) 16:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 1 Night in Paris, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 1 Night in Paris was changed by Gogogog00 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.982445 on 2011-01-17T22:21:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 22:21, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Rebecca Black (Artist)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Rebecca Black (Artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact
one of these administrators to request that the administrator
userfy the page or email a copy to you.
role
player 17:59, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Kingda Ka, you may be
blocked from editing.
role
player 17:59, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
This is your last and only warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with
this edit to
Kingda Ka.
Seaphoto
Talk 17:58, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
I am not vandalising - I have contributed to kingda ka and stealth both correctly and helpfully, but keep getting reported for vandalism. someone please help?
- I have now blocked you for a week for vandalism of Kingda Ka, and for vandalism/ personal attacks against User:Seaphoto. Wikipedia is meant to be an encyclopedia, which is a serious project - your juvenile additions to the article are not appreciated. - Mike Rosoft ( talk) 18:23, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Gogogog00 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
- 92.29.122.239 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Gogogog00". The reason given for Gogogog00's block is: "Vandalism".
- Blocking administrator: Mike Rosoft ( talk • blocks)
Gogogog00 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was not vandalising, i generally believed the information i was putting onto kingda ka wiki was true as i got it from a yahoo answer page and believed it. I am also sorry for any offence i caused to User:Seaphoto. I generally did not intentionally vandalise as i believed the information i was uploading was legitimate and helpful. I understand now that wikipedia is a serious website and i give my word i will not intentionaly cause offence or upload edits on pages that might be classed as vandalism again. I am new to wikipedia and if unblocked i will make sure i read all the tutorial how to wikis on creating articles and editing. Again sorry for the inconveniance and i hope you understand what i am saying. Gogogog00 (talk) 23:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Block endorsed due to obvious vandalism, some instances of which also include violations of WP:NPA (i.e., [1]). Kinu t/ c 01:39, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gogogog00 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I didn't vandalise? I edited a page on a fact that i believed was true as i got it from a yahoo answers page and i thought it was notable enough to be added to the page. People keep saying obvious vandalism but it isn't? Can someone explain to me how what i done was vandalism as i seem to be missing how it is vandalism? Gogogog00 ( talk) 15:27, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If this isn't vandalism, I don't know what is. None of your edits are any different. I would have blocked you indefinitely, so you should be thanking Mike for the generous gift of a second chance you'll be getting in a week, not moaning sarcastically. Closedmouth ( talk) 15:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gogogog00 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'd like to be given the oppertunity to become an administrator on wikipedia. If you unblock me please tell me how and i will help make wikipedia better for everyone. Come on guys, unblock me and i will become an admin and do my bit for wikipedia!!! Gogogog00 (talk) 20:03, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
|
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| i am so good Gogogog00 ( talk) 23:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC) |
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Solange Knowles, you may be
blocked from editing.
Elizium23 (
talk) 20:10, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Beyonce 2011 nba.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.
If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.
Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:32, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Please stop removing notices of the unsourced and unlicensed image without explanation. Continuing to do so will result in you blocked from editing. —
WP:PENGUIN · [
TALK ] 15:37, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- The image you uploaded has no license for use and is therefore violating US laws. Do not add unlicensed and unsourced images. You may be blocked without warning. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 15:43, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that
biographical information about living persons must not include
unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to
Rihanna with
this edit, you must include proper
sources. If you don't know how to
cite a source, you may want to read
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you.
Mark Arsten (
talk) 15:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Rihanna with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
DVdm (
talk) 15:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Rihanna, you may be
blocked from editing. —
WP:PENGUIN · [
TALK ] 16:08, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Rihanna, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found
here.
Fæ (
talk) 16:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
JohnCD (
talk) 16:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)