Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 04:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you Goburst ( talk) 04:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
|
![]() |
Hi Goburst! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Hey very nice, thank-you I will take advantage of this. Talk soon!-- Goburst ( talk) 17:46, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Ronz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
University Canada West because it appeared to be promotional.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "
soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Goburst, it's clear you have a conflict of interest in University Canada West, are having great difficulty in understanding our policies/guidelines. Please take it much slower and learn your way around. -- Ronz ( talk) 15:17, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Ronz, it's clear you have a conflict of interest in University Canada West; review the University Canada West Talk page since 2009. I'm not in a conflict of interest and have provided context and content that has severally changed the landscape of this undue University Canada West Wikipedia page. I have referenced and sourced everything I contributed, in reviewing the last 4 days I believe my progression and willingness to learn is evidenced in the University Canada West "Talk" page. Do you feel spamming my Talk points with Wikipedia legislation creates an opinion of me on a Wikipedia back panel? Is this way to keep the University Canada West page undue? Ronz as a primary Editor of the university Canada west page aren't you concerned you've allowed an undue article to be unmaintained for over 4 years? [1]. I ask for a top Wikipedia editor; a individual in the upper echelons of Wikipedia editing to review the University Canada West Talk page and historical articles and inform me I have broken the cardinal point of Wikipedia which is to write a neutral unbiased article which depicts the whole truth or nothing at all. [2]
I will set up a Wikipedia:Requests for comment for you guys. But can you outline the problem for me first - just explain the dispute for me first. -- Moxy ( talk) 18:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Here is where I'm coming from:
Tuition for a full undergraduate degree program at UCAN is higher than similar programs at public universities due to the fact that it is not publicly subsidized. According to the Student Aid BC website, 30 per cent of UCW students defaulted on their government-backed loans in 2009. That compares with a default rate of 3.7% at the University of British Columbia and 4.7% at the University of Victoria. [3]
Grammatical, punctuation, spelling and overall article transition suggestions are ignored and restored to their original form. Also, referenced material is ignored without discussion. Lastly, certain affiliations of University Canada West like the BC transfer guide. a division of The BC Council on Admissions and Transfer (BCCAT) who is responsible for the facilitation of admission, articulation and transfer arrangements among the colleges, institutes, and universities in BC is deemed irrelevant to the article [4] , so is the CICIC a unit of the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC), an intergovernmental body who collects and shares information related to the recognition and portability of academic and occupational qualifications.[36]However, the AUCC a non-governmental, not-for-profit membership organization[34] is relevant?
Anyway, it's been a back and forth versus a Consensus decision-making.
PS- how do I change my screen name I want to use my real identity?
-- Goburst ( talk) 20:10, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
I think you're getting a feel for what are considered minor edits (spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc.) from edits that could be contentious (changes in emphasis, introduction of unsourced or poorly-sourced information, removal of sourced information, etc). Keep trying and don't take it personally if others don't agree.
I've been trying to go through your edits and make sure all the minor changes haven't been removed. My apologies if I've missed some. -- Ronz ( talk) 18:57, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
autogenerated1
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 04:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you Goburst ( talk) 04:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
|
![]() |
Hi Goburst! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Hey very nice, thank-you I will take advantage of this. Talk soon!-- Goburst ( talk) 17:46, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Ronz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
University Canada West because it appeared to be promotional.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "
soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Goburst, it's clear you have a conflict of interest in University Canada West, are having great difficulty in understanding our policies/guidelines. Please take it much slower and learn your way around. -- Ronz ( talk) 15:17, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Ronz, it's clear you have a conflict of interest in University Canada West; review the University Canada West Talk page since 2009. I'm not in a conflict of interest and have provided context and content that has severally changed the landscape of this undue University Canada West Wikipedia page. I have referenced and sourced everything I contributed, in reviewing the last 4 days I believe my progression and willingness to learn is evidenced in the University Canada West "Talk" page. Do you feel spamming my Talk points with Wikipedia legislation creates an opinion of me on a Wikipedia back panel? Is this way to keep the University Canada West page undue? Ronz as a primary Editor of the university Canada west page aren't you concerned you've allowed an undue article to be unmaintained for over 4 years? [1]. I ask for a top Wikipedia editor; a individual in the upper echelons of Wikipedia editing to review the University Canada West Talk page and historical articles and inform me I have broken the cardinal point of Wikipedia which is to write a neutral unbiased article which depicts the whole truth or nothing at all. [2]
I will set up a Wikipedia:Requests for comment for you guys. But can you outline the problem for me first - just explain the dispute for me first. -- Moxy ( talk) 18:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Here is where I'm coming from:
Tuition for a full undergraduate degree program at UCAN is higher than similar programs at public universities due to the fact that it is not publicly subsidized. According to the Student Aid BC website, 30 per cent of UCW students defaulted on their government-backed loans in 2009. That compares with a default rate of 3.7% at the University of British Columbia and 4.7% at the University of Victoria. [3]
Grammatical, punctuation, spelling and overall article transition suggestions are ignored and restored to their original form. Also, referenced material is ignored without discussion. Lastly, certain affiliations of University Canada West like the BC transfer guide. a division of The BC Council on Admissions and Transfer (BCCAT) who is responsible for the facilitation of admission, articulation and transfer arrangements among the colleges, institutes, and universities in BC is deemed irrelevant to the article [4] , so is the CICIC a unit of the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC), an intergovernmental body who collects and shares information related to the recognition and portability of academic and occupational qualifications.[36]However, the AUCC a non-governmental, not-for-profit membership organization[34] is relevant?
Anyway, it's been a back and forth versus a Consensus decision-making.
PS- how do I change my screen name I want to use my real identity?
-- Goburst ( talk) 20:10, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
I think you're getting a feel for what are considered minor edits (spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc.) from edits that could be contentious (changes in emphasis, introduction of unsourced or poorly-sourced information, removal of sourced information, etc). Keep trying and don't take it personally if others don't agree.
I've been trying to go through your edits and make sure all the minor changes haven't been removed. My apologies if I've missed some. -- Ronz ( talk) 18:57, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
autogenerated1
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).