|
Why can't I edit the subsection In Mathematics"? Giantnut76 ( talk) 03:15, 29 September 2015 (UTC) {{ helpme}}
Most, if not all, of your edits to articles have been unhelpful. Several of them have simply been mathematically incorrect, some of them have been incomprehensible, at least one of them has messed up formatting of an article, and your edit to Template:X1 looked rather like vandalism: if it wasn't, then it is very unclear what it was supposed to achieve. You are, of course, very welcome to contribute to the encyclopaedia, but please be very careful, and i strongly advise you to keep away from editing mathematical articles, as your grasp of mathematics does not seem to be up to the task. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 10:53, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 2147483659 (number). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 14:27, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Giantnut76,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --
Sam Sailor
Talk!
13:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
|
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:Giantnut76/Selected numbers:10000 to 100000, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 13:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
⟨⟩
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
User page Giantnut76 ( talk) 01:24, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
I'm afraid what I wrote to you in August is still true: most, if not all, of your edits to articles have been unhelpful. Your edit to 1001 (number), for example, was totally unhelpful: nobody reading an article needs to be confronted with that sort of information. Some of your edits appear to be deliberate vandalism, rather than good-faith but unhelpful editing: for example, it is difficult to see your edit at "Afghanistan Analysts Network" as anything other than vandalism. Also, most of your edits out of article space look like playing around, and a few of them appear to be vandalism. If you carry on in the same way, you are likely to be blocked from editing, because you are taking up time of other editors who have to clean up after you, and their time could be more usefully spent on other work. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 16:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of abundant numbers, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:32, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Giantnut76. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " 500000 (number)".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 09:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Giantnut76. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " List of abundant numbers".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 22:53, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
|
Why can't I edit the subsection In Mathematics"? Giantnut76 ( talk) 03:15, 29 September 2015 (UTC) {{ helpme}}
Most, if not all, of your edits to articles have been unhelpful. Several of them have simply been mathematically incorrect, some of them have been incomprehensible, at least one of them has messed up formatting of an article, and your edit to Template:X1 looked rather like vandalism: if it wasn't, then it is very unclear what it was supposed to achieve. You are, of course, very welcome to contribute to the encyclopaedia, but please be very careful, and i strongly advise you to keep away from editing mathematical articles, as your grasp of mathematics does not seem to be up to the task. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 10:53, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 2147483659 (number). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 14:27, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Giantnut76,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --
Sam Sailor
Talk!
13:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
|
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:Giantnut76/Selected numbers:10000 to 100000, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 13:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
⟨⟩
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
User page Giantnut76 ( talk) 01:24, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
I'm afraid what I wrote to you in August is still true: most, if not all, of your edits to articles have been unhelpful. Your edit to 1001 (number), for example, was totally unhelpful: nobody reading an article needs to be confronted with that sort of information. Some of your edits appear to be deliberate vandalism, rather than good-faith but unhelpful editing: for example, it is difficult to see your edit at "Afghanistan Analysts Network" as anything other than vandalism. Also, most of your edits out of article space look like playing around, and a few of them appear to be vandalism. If you carry on in the same way, you are likely to be blocked from editing, because you are taking up time of other editors who have to clean up after you, and their time could be more usefully spent on other work. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 16:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of abundant numbers, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:32, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Giantnut76. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " 500000 (number)".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 09:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Giantnut76. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " List of abundant numbers".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo ( talk) 22:53, 21 May 2016 (UTC)