 | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a
sockpuppet of
Endsplus (
talk ·
contribs ·
logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Ghost. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Bonadea (
talk)
10:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ghost. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ghost was changed by Ghosttagger (u) (t) deleting 17145 characters on 2008-04-17T10:33:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 10:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
About your edits to Toilet - there are many synonyms and euphemisms that could be in the lead sentence there, but because there is no way to include them all, there is no reason to include only one of them in the article's introduction. You could start a discussion on the article's talk page about whether that particular synonym should be included in the "etymology" section (I think it very well could, but I suspect there may be different opinions about it and it's always better to discuss it first :-) ) Thank you! -- Bonadea ( talk) 10:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
|
| An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a
sockpuppet of
Endsplus (
talk ·
contribs ·
logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Ghost. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Bonadea (
talk)
10:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ghost. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ghost was changed by Ghosttagger (u) (t) deleting 17145 characters on 2008-04-17T10:33:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 10:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
About your edits to Toilet - there are many synonyms and euphemisms that could be in the lead sentence there, but because there is no way to include them all, there is no reason to include only one of them in the article's introduction. You could start a discussion on the article's talk page about whether that particular synonym should be included in the "etymology" section (I think it very well could, but I suspect there may be different opinions about it and it's always better to discuss it first :-) ) Thank you! -- Bonadea ( talk) 10:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)