At present you are reverting back to an inferior version (poor grammar; mistakes; no sources) with no rationale. This is not appropriate. The username has also been reported to a Checkuser to determine if this account is a sockpuppet. Asgardian ( talk) 06:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
All the appearances are not listed. There are many, many appearances from the 90's onwards that are not listed. The 60's - 80's are all there is, and they are important as they chart the early years when there was also a great deal more focus on continuity. The inferior version of the article focuses on the later years and provides no insight into the early issues, and this would probably be due to the fact that the editors who came prior on the article simply haven't read them. Asgardian ( talk) 11:22, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Now, I would like you to answer my questions please. Why do you persistently revert when the reasons against have been provided? You are welcome to change a sentence etc as needed without removing correct information. Also, do you have a medical condition or is there some other side issue users need to be aware of as there is inevitably interaction? Asgardian ( talk) 02:21, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
I am neutrally stating that there is a "Request for Comment - User: Asgardian" that is ongoing here, and may be pertinent to the edit war at Juggernaut (comics). -- Tenebrae ( talk) 15:07, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I was wondering if you would help me finish up the RFC/U regarding User:Asgardian. I'm going to put the RFC into place before the end of the year, so it would really be great if you could provide any help you are able to give. What I need most are diffs displaying the disputed behavior. I have some already here, but could use some more. I mean just a list of diffs to put in the first five or so categories I listed there, as I already have more than enough illustrative examples. Anything that you think is edit warring (mutiple similar edits to the same article in the span of a few days), incivility, inaccurate edit summaries, or other similar behavioral problems. List them on the RFCU talk page - just the diffs is all I need, because I want people reading the RFC to be able to draw their own conclusions.
Also, I have come up with a desired outcome and a description of the case based on the comments that have been gathered, and I would appreciate any responses to that on the talk page.
Thanks! BOZ ( talk) 05:51, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi there,
I'm just letting you know that the Asgardian RFC/U has begun.
If you like, you may post an "Outside view" below Asgardian's response section, detailing their own feelings on the matter. Likewise, you may endorse the main statement, Asgardian's response, or any other view posted on the page.
Thank you for your participation. BOZ ( talk) 00:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
I am informing you that the recent RFC/U regarding Asgardian has been closed, and the case is now at arbitration. You are neither required nor requested to participate, but you may view the initial statements for the case (please do not edit that page), and you may view the evidence presented and add more evidence if you wish, or simply follow the case. BOZ ( talk) 04:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi. A disagreement has arisen over which of two photos would be better as the main Infobox image for the Ben Templesmith article. Can you participate in this discussion? Thanks, and Happy Holidays. :-) Nightscream ( talk) 04:56, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Can you offer your opinion on the matter discussed at the bottom of this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 02:27, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
At present you are reverting back to an inferior version (poor grammar; mistakes; no sources) with no rationale. This is not appropriate. The username has also been reported to a Checkuser to determine if this account is a sockpuppet. Asgardian ( talk) 06:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
All the appearances are not listed. There are many, many appearances from the 90's onwards that are not listed. The 60's - 80's are all there is, and they are important as they chart the early years when there was also a great deal more focus on continuity. The inferior version of the article focuses on the later years and provides no insight into the early issues, and this would probably be due to the fact that the editors who came prior on the article simply haven't read them. Asgardian ( talk) 11:22, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Now, I would like you to answer my questions please. Why do you persistently revert when the reasons against have been provided? You are welcome to change a sentence etc as needed without removing correct information. Also, do you have a medical condition or is there some other side issue users need to be aware of as there is inevitably interaction? Asgardian ( talk) 02:21, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
I am neutrally stating that there is a "Request for Comment - User: Asgardian" that is ongoing here, and may be pertinent to the edit war at Juggernaut (comics). -- Tenebrae ( talk) 15:07, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I was wondering if you would help me finish up the RFC/U regarding User:Asgardian. I'm going to put the RFC into place before the end of the year, so it would really be great if you could provide any help you are able to give. What I need most are diffs displaying the disputed behavior. I have some already here, but could use some more. I mean just a list of diffs to put in the first five or so categories I listed there, as I already have more than enough illustrative examples. Anything that you think is edit warring (mutiple similar edits to the same article in the span of a few days), incivility, inaccurate edit summaries, or other similar behavioral problems. List them on the RFCU talk page - just the diffs is all I need, because I want people reading the RFC to be able to draw their own conclusions.
Also, I have come up with a desired outcome and a description of the case based on the comments that have been gathered, and I would appreciate any responses to that on the talk page.
Thanks! BOZ ( talk) 05:51, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi there,
I'm just letting you know that the Asgardian RFC/U has begun.
If you like, you may post an "Outside view" below Asgardian's response section, detailing their own feelings on the matter. Likewise, you may endorse the main statement, Asgardian's response, or any other view posted on the page.
Thank you for your participation. BOZ ( talk) 00:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
I am informing you that the recent RFC/U regarding Asgardian has been closed, and the case is now at arbitration. You are neither required nor requested to participate, but you may view the initial statements for the case (please do not edit that page), and you may view the evidence presented and add more evidence if you wish, or simply follow the case. BOZ ( talk) 04:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi. A disagreement has arisen over which of two photos would be better as the main Infobox image for the Ben Templesmith article. Can you participate in this discussion? Thanks, and Happy Holidays. :-) Nightscream ( talk) 04:56, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Can you offer your opinion on the matter discussed at the bottom of this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 02:27, 6 March 2013 (UTC)