FDW777 ( talk) 22:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sucharit Bhakdi; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn ( talk) 07:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
If you launch a DR you are supposed to inform all involved editors. Slatersteven ( talk) 12:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. FDW777 ( talk) 15:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
15:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Gcmackay ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The Wikipedia page on reliable sources states that "Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." The opening statement on the Sucharit Bhakdi states he is known for spreading misinformation but there is no reference to back this up. The statement is also controversial. I have discussed the subject on the talk page and no reference has been provided. Every time I edit the article (according to the instructions on the reliable sources guidelines page, the edit is reverted without discussion Gcmackay ( talk) 15:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. signed, Rosguill talk 18:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Don't do this. You are not permitted to remove other people's comments like that from an admin noticeboard. You are welcome to respond to the accusations there, but not to simply remove them. Do not do this again. -- Yamla ( talk) 14:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
FDW777 ( talk) 22:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sucharit Bhakdi; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn ( talk) 07:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
If you launch a DR you are supposed to inform all involved editors. Slatersteven ( talk) 12:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. FDW777 ( talk) 15:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
15:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Gcmackay ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The Wikipedia page on reliable sources states that "Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." The opening statement on the Sucharit Bhakdi states he is known for spreading misinformation but there is no reference to back this up. The statement is also controversial. I have discussed the subject on the talk page and no reference has been provided. Every time I edit the article (according to the instructions on the reliable sources guidelines page, the edit is reverted without discussion Gcmackay ( talk) 15:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. signed, Rosguill talk 18:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Don't do this. You are not permitted to remove other people's comments like that from an admin noticeboard. You are welcome to respond to the accusations there, but not to simply remove them. Do not do this again. -- Yamla ( talk) 14:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)