This is Gcchemistry's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Gcchemistry ( talk) 14:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Well, Should I remove the "Fictional reference" section? Did you check in my sandbox? Are there any more improvements I can make to make the article more interesting and wanted? Gcchemistry ( talk) 14:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
We can discuss on either my talk page or your talk page. Thank you. -Gcchemistry
If I accidentally do something wrong, let me know in this section. Thanks. -Gcchemistry
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Unbitrium, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Double sharp (
talk)
07:21, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Please give me ideas for improvement on my user page here. -Gcchemistry
If you edit my user page, please inform me. If I do not get a message that my user page was edited, I will revert it. Thank you. -Gcchemistry
(List your edits to my user page here)
Answered your quiz. Double sharp ( talk) 09:59, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Hey! I just wanted to tell you I moved your draft to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Unbitrium. You can edit it there. Thanks, Nathan2055 talk - contribs 22:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Please also see WT:ELEM#Ubt recreated. Double sharp ( talk) 06:19, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Well, should I put better sources and better information, or should I wait until it has a more notable feature or until it has a synthesis attempt? Gcchemistry ( talk) 19:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
BTW, Unbitrium, by the extended periodic table, is expected to be the element above unsepttrium, which is notable. Gcchemistry ( talk) 20:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Double sharp ( talk) 10:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
They are notated as 180mTa, and not 180mTa. Double sharp ( talk) 05:57, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
DO NOT go below this point until you answer the quiz.
Have you considered changing "Francoium" with its awkward hiatus to "Franconium"? (The symbol can stay the same.) Double sharp ( talk) 16:27, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
This is Gcchemistry's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Gcchemistry ( talk) 14:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Well, Should I remove the "Fictional reference" section? Did you check in my sandbox? Are there any more improvements I can make to make the article more interesting and wanted? Gcchemistry ( talk) 14:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
We can discuss on either my talk page or your talk page. Thank you. -Gcchemistry
If I accidentally do something wrong, let me know in this section. Thanks. -Gcchemistry
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Unbitrium, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Double sharp (
talk)
07:21, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Please give me ideas for improvement on my user page here. -Gcchemistry
If you edit my user page, please inform me. If I do not get a message that my user page was edited, I will revert it. Thank you. -Gcchemistry
(List your edits to my user page here)
Answered your quiz. Double sharp ( talk) 09:59, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Hey! I just wanted to tell you I moved your draft to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Unbitrium. You can edit it there. Thanks, Nathan2055 talk - contribs 22:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Please also see WT:ELEM#Ubt recreated. Double sharp ( talk) 06:19, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Well, should I put better sources and better information, or should I wait until it has a more notable feature or until it has a synthesis attempt? Gcchemistry ( talk) 19:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
BTW, Unbitrium, by the extended periodic table, is expected to be the element above unsepttrium, which is notable. Gcchemistry ( talk) 20:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Double sharp ( talk) 10:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
They are notated as 180mTa, and not 180mTa. Double sharp ( talk) 05:57, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
DO NOT go below this point until you answer the quiz.
Have you considered changing "Francoium" with its awkward hiatus to "Franconium"? (The symbol can stay the same.) Double sharp ( talk) 16:27, 24 December 2012 (UTC)