Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Guru Tegh Bahadur. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop. You are writing in encyclopedic prose and interpreting primary sources which is not allowed. Go to the talk page of the article. Southasianhistorian8 ( talk) 14:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi Ganda Singh! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
Guru Tegh Bahadur several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Guru Tegh Bahadur, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. RegentsPark ( comment) 18:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
I disagree that your edits are "more attractive", but that's a matter of taste and I'll let it slide. However, you've added (well, copied from your source) the paragraph
It's truly remarkable how an orphan at the tender age of four, who initially served as a humble stable boy, feeding horses with grass and grain, ascended to become the foremost military and political leader of the Sikhs and the architect of a significant state. He enjoyed the extraordinary opportunity of capturing Lahore and minting his own currency. Additionally, he had the unparalleled honor of sitting on the throne of the Mughal Emperors within the majestic Red Fort in Delhi. Moreover, he engaged in several direct confrontations with Ahmad Shah Durrani, widely regarded as the preeminent Asian general of his era.
That's not in keeping with the encyclopedic tone and neutral point of view that we strive for at Wikipedia and was clearly written by a person who is quite a fan. I would recommend rewording as follows:
As a young orphan, he found work as a stable boy, and eventually ascended to become a military and political leader of the Sikhs. He captured Lahore, minted his own currency, and occupied the Mughal throne in the Red Fort of Delhi. During his rule, he engaged in several confrontations with Ahmed Shah Durrani.
WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 14:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
The Blade of the Northern Lights (
話して下さい)
20:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Guru Tegh Bahadur. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop. You are writing in encyclopedic prose and interpreting primary sources which is not allowed. Go to the talk page of the article. Southasianhistorian8 ( talk) 14:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi Ganda Singh! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
Guru Tegh Bahadur several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Guru Tegh Bahadur, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. RegentsPark ( comment) 18:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
I disagree that your edits are "more attractive", but that's a matter of taste and I'll let it slide. However, you've added (well, copied from your source) the paragraph
It's truly remarkable how an orphan at the tender age of four, who initially served as a humble stable boy, feeding horses with grass and grain, ascended to become the foremost military and political leader of the Sikhs and the architect of a significant state. He enjoyed the extraordinary opportunity of capturing Lahore and minting his own currency. Additionally, he had the unparalleled honor of sitting on the throne of the Mughal Emperors within the majestic Red Fort in Delhi. Moreover, he engaged in several direct confrontations with Ahmad Shah Durrani, widely regarded as the preeminent Asian general of his era.
That's not in keeping with the encyclopedic tone and neutral point of view that we strive for at Wikipedia and was clearly written by a person who is quite a fan. I would recommend rewording as follows:
As a young orphan, he found work as a stable boy, and eventually ascended to become a military and political leader of the Sikhs. He captured Lahore, minted his own currency, and occupied the Mughal throne in the Red Fort of Delhi. During his rule, he engaged in several confrontations with Ahmed Shah Durrani.
WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 14:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
The Blade of the Northern Lights (
話して下さい)
20:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)