![]() |
This user has been
blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. (see: block log · contributions · current autoblocks) |
![]() | The owner of this account is suspected of
abusively using multiple accounts.
(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets) |
Welcome!
Hello, Gameboy1947, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
RekishiEJ (
talk)
08:14, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
Operation Enduring Freedom has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles. All information in this encyclopedia must be
verifiable in a
reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please
cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's
talk page. Please use the
sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Shadowjams (
talk)
14:11, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to
Timeline of the Kashmir conflict, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Abecedare (
talk)
03:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
I checked all of your edits, like I said in the edit summery most of your entries from today were from 2008, which is not needed to be covered since a number for that whole year has been provided. You didn't make one or two mistakes, only three entries were good. Also, several more of your entries were doublecounting of already listed incidents. I checked everything. Also, check the Afghan security forces losses confirmed by time periods section of the article. It has covered the number of killed policemen from the start of January to the end of February of this year. UrukHaiLoR ( talk) 12:57, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
You are inserting incorrect information, which I have noticed is a trend with you. I would advise you to be more carefull in the future since some editors can consider that to be vandalism and could block you. UrukHaiLoR ( talk) 12:58, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|I dont know whats my mistake or error but i say sorry and tell me whats my mistake so i try to remove that mistake and i promise that mistake cant happen.}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Mifter (
talk)
23:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC)I dont know whats my mistake or error but i say sorry and tell me whats my mistake so i try to remove that mistake and i promise that mistake cant happen. Please accept my sorry and tell me what i was done for which my user blocked. What should i do to unblock my user?
Please anyone please unblock my user.I beg you to unblock my user. If ii was done any mistake or violate any error so i am sorry. I want to edit several articles like software articles, war articles, etc.If you unblock me so i edit those pages with a correct refrence. Please give me one more chance and if i done any mistake then tell me. Please, please, please accept my sorry and forgive me.
This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
= [[Article title]] =
) and save the page before you improve it.If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{ helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you.-- William S. Saturn ( talk) 20:19, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Gameboy1947 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I almost read guidelines and i promise to follow guidelines and rules.Please unblock my user.Now i follow rules and guidelines.
Decline reason:
You were blocked for a disruptive username as well, which your unblock request doesn't address. — Daniel Case ( talk) 04:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mujahid, do you understand why your unblock request was denied? Your username, "Mujahid" is considered offensive, especially here on English Wikipedia. In order to edit on English Wikipedia, you will need to change your username. This means that your next unblock request will need explain that you intend to change your username (or use another account) once you are unblocked. AzureFury ( talk | contribs) 04:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Anyways can you please tell me how to make new user which will not blocked or can you tell me any other idea to unblock my user.
Gameboy1947 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
What should i do to unblock my user.I promise, i will sincarely doesnt violate any wikipedia rules in future.Please unblock my user and give me one chance to proof myself as a good user.
Decline reason:
Your statements on this page do not convince me that you understand the reasons for your block and Wikipedia's relevant principles and policies. Moreover, your command of English does not seem to be good enough to allow you to contribute productively to an English language encyclopedia. Sandstein 21:56, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Do you want to change the name of your account, and if you do so, what username would you like to take? Cs32en Talk to me 18:03, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
For answers of those points which was comment on talk page of war in afghanistan.
1. Ok.If my user will unblock then i edit articles by logged in.I mean i doesnt use ip to edit any article.
2. I doesnt understand what you say in this point.
3. I have already 2nd account named Akhlaque1947.What should i do now?
4. I write my answer above.
5. I dont know why my user blocked?I use this user only a few times.Not much.I made this user in November and it blocked in January.
6. I posted messages on talk page because my those articles which i eit is smi-protedted so i request to other peoples to add the following informnation in this this articles.
7. Done.
For answers of those points which was comment on talk page of war in afghanistan.
1. Ok.If my user will unblock then i edit articles by logged in.I mean i doesnt use ip to edit any article.
2. I doesnt understand what you say in this point.
3. I have already 2nd account named Akhlaque1947.What should i do now?
4. I write my answer above.
5. I dont know why my user blocked?I use this user only a few times.Not much.I made this user in November and it blocked in January.
6. I posted messages on talk page because my those articles which i edit is semi-protected so i request to other peoples to add the following informnation in this this articles.
7. Done.
(For the record.)
I have been following this for a while. Let me try to explain what you should do:
- STOP editing without being logged in! This actually means: At the moment, you can only edit your talk page User talk:Mujahid1947.
- Declare that you will not add content to articles that is not based on reliable sources, and that the content you are adding will represent what the sources you are using actually say.
- Declare that you will only use one account on Wikipedia, and that you will not edit without being logged in to that account in a deceptive way. If you happen to edit using your IP by mistake, because you have been logged off and did not notice, or forgot to log in, then make an edit with your account to clarify the situtation.
- Declare all accounts that you have used on Wikipedia in the past on your user page. It seems that you have edited on Wikipedia before registering your account Mujahid1947 ( talk · contribs). If you haven't used any account prior to the account Mujahid1947 ( talk · contribs), please state how long you have been editing on Wikipedia without an account (approximately), and name some pages that you have edited during that time. If you have never edited Wikipedia before registering the account Mujahid1947 ( talk · contribs), please state that you never did so.
- Explain where you think you have made mistakes prior to the block of your account. Describe how you would work in the future to avoid similar mistakes.
- If you have misunderstood messages that have been posted to your talk page, or that have been posted to talk pages of articles that you have edited, please explain how and why you have misunderstood them, if possible.
- Make these statement on the talk page of User talk:Mujahid1947.
If your statements are convincing, it is possible that your block will be reviewed. I cannot promise anything, however, and will only take a favorable view on your request if your statement really are convincing. Cs32en Talk to me 19:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Cs32en Talk to me 21:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|For God sake unblock my user.I want to change my usrername but i doesnt know how to do it.I want to change my username to Pakistan1947.If you can change my username then please change my username to Pakistan1947.My english is poor becuase my language is Urdu.I speak Urdu as normal language.Really my head ache start 2 weeks of block.I think edit without user is better than edit with a user.I was edit without user from last 1 year.I make first user, i mean this user in November 2009 which was blcoked 2 weeks before.Please for god sake unblock my user.I hear in news that wikipedia users become decrease.Now i think due to these block system user leave wikipedia.But i doesnt want to leave wikipedia, i love it so please unblock my user.Please.Please.Please.}}
اگر اپ چاہتے ہیں کہ اپ کو اڈٹ پر اتفاق کے قواعد پر عمل کریں. ایک بڑی حکمرانی نہیں ہے چھیلنا پیٹرولیم کی ایک اور شخص بغیر الفاظ پر اتفاق
Anyways whats about Gameboy1947.
{{subst:Renameuser|Mujahid1947|Gameboy1947|3=Mujahid is a username violation}} ~~~~
I'm just seeing that your account has been unblocked. I'd like to give you two bits of advice:
Cs32en Talk to me 00:24, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Please have a look a your recent on Coalition casualties in Afghanistan.
Please be more careful when editing articles. Cs32en Talk to me 14:11, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
14:30, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
I want to make this page easier and i want to edit and some changes which will make this page easier.The article is impossible to read for a normal man. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualties_of_the_War_in_Afghanistan_%282001%E2%80%93present%29#Aggregation_of_estimates But i cant because at starting estimate headline, i cant edit.I mean edit page opens but it start my headche. mean how to start, where i edit.Every refrence there is differnt and in mostly areas n/a, n/a.Please.help.I want to update that page according to this refrence only. http://www.brookings.edu/foreign-policy/%7E/media/Files/Programs/FP/afghanistan%20index/index.pdf
Please do not replace material cited to reliable sources with claims cited to other Wikipedia articles as you did in this edit. Please see WP:CIRCULAR for guidance on this. Nick-D ( talk) 02:26, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
I have also reverted this series of edits in the List of Coalition aircraft losses in Afghanistan article as it was uncited and this addition to the Coalition casualties in Afghanistan as the killing of people in Pakistan by the Taliban on the suspicion that they were American spies is totally outside of the article's scope (it's unclear whether they were in any way members of the 'Coalition', and they sure weren't 'in Afghanistan'). As a reminder, you were unblocked only after agreeing to abide by the above conditions that you would not add unsourced material or add dubious claims to articles. Your recent additions are clear violations of this commitment. This will be your last warning before you are blocked again. Nick-D ( talk) 02:39, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add content without citing
verifiable and
reliable sources, as you did with
this edit to
2010s. Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
Zhang He (
talk)
07:28, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Nick-D (
talk)
19:41, 25 January 2010 (UTC){{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below.
Nick-D (
talk)
06:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC){{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below.
Nick-D (
talk)
07:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Please not when adding info about events in Indian occupied Kashmir please reffer to Jammu and Kashmir which is controlled by India as Indian-administered Kashmir instead of Indian kashmir as india controlls/administrates the region stating that events occured in "Indian Kashmir" implys India has rightful soveriegnty over the region which it does not thanks 86.153.128.139 ( talk) 23:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
12:29, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
It's pretty common practice to revert unexplained deletions. In a high profile article like this one, you need to be very careful about deletions if you want them to stick. This means explaining why you are deleting them in the edit summary, and if it's especially controversial, a comment on the talk page. AzureFury ( talk | contribs) 20:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Nick-D (
talk)
22:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)In particular:
Gameboy1947 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My user blocked because i slightly change a sentence which i as own write.I really apologise and say sorry.Next time i doesnt change any sentense from news.I will write only those things which are written in news.Please accept my sorry and unblock my user.
Decline reason:
We're not looking for an apology, we're looking for some sign from you that you understand why you are blocked and will be able to avoid repeating these problematic behaviors in the future. If you are unable to understand why you are blocked we won't be able accept your request. I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox ( talk) 02:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gameboy1947 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I apologise the violation of copyright.I am sorry.Please unblock me.
Decline reason:
This doesn't make it clear that you understand what copyright is. FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 12:19, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gameboy1947 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Please unblock my user.Mercy is better than punishment and giving chance is a postive activity. I apopogise the violation of copyrights.Please unblock my user.Please.As user Nick-D always watching my activities and he block my user before any warning.I edit too much careflly.But sometimes i mistakely violate copyright rules.And then Nick-D dont do anything on that page where i violate the copyright.He just block my user with any warning.5 months before when i have no user, if i edit some wrong thing then first several times warning and then block for a short time.But when i made this user.I blcoked several times with my small mistakes.Mostly from Nick-d.Anyways please forgive me and mercy on me and give me one more chance.
Decline reason:
One instance of this, I might be able to understand. But five times in the last month? That alone would make me uncomfortable unblocking you, but your contribution history indicates a wanton disregard for copyright. You don't seem to realize that this is something that can literally get Wikipedia sued out of existence. Block upheld and talk page disabled. Blueboy 96 14:22, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This editor is continuing to evade their block and post copyright violations. They edit from 119.x and 116.x ranges and have posted copyright violations such as this. Nick-D ( talk) 07:36, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
This user has been
blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. (see: block log · contributions · current autoblocks) |
![]() | The owner of this account is suspected of
abusively using multiple accounts.
(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets) |
Welcome!
Hello, Gameboy1947, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
RekishiEJ (
talk)
08:14, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
Operation Enduring Freedom has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles. All information in this encyclopedia must be
verifiable in a
reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please
cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's
talk page. Please use the
sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Shadowjams (
talk)
14:11, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to
Timeline of the Kashmir conflict, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Abecedare (
talk)
03:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
I checked all of your edits, like I said in the edit summery most of your entries from today were from 2008, which is not needed to be covered since a number for that whole year has been provided. You didn't make one or two mistakes, only three entries were good. Also, several more of your entries were doublecounting of already listed incidents. I checked everything. Also, check the Afghan security forces losses confirmed by time periods section of the article. It has covered the number of killed policemen from the start of January to the end of February of this year. UrukHaiLoR ( talk) 12:57, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
You are inserting incorrect information, which I have noticed is a trend with you. I would advise you to be more carefull in the future since some editors can consider that to be vandalism and could block you. UrukHaiLoR ( talk) 12:58, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|I dont know whats my mistake or error but i say sorry and tell me whats my mistake so i try to remove that mistake and i promise that mistake cant happen.}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Mifter (
talk)
23:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC)I dont know whats my mistake or error but i say sorry and tell me whats my mistake so i try to remove that mistake and i promise that mistake cant happen. Please accept my sorry and tell me what i was done for which my user blocked. What should i do to unblock my user?
Please anyone please unblock my user.I beg you to unblock my user. If ii was done any mistake or violate any error so i am sorry. I want to edit several articles like software articles, war articles, etc.If you unblock me so i edit those pages with a correct refrence. Please give me one more chance and if i done any mistake then tell me. Please, please, please accept my sorry and forgive me.
This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
= [[Article title]] =
) and save the page before you improve it.If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{ helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you.-- William S. Saturn ( talk) 20:19, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Gameboy1947 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I almost read guidelines and i promise to follow guidelines and rules.Please unblock my user.Now i follow rules and guidelines.
Decline reason:
You were blocked for a disruptive username as well, which your unblock request doesn't address. — Daniel Case ( talk) 04:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mujahid, do you understand why your unblock request was denied? Your username, "Mujahid" is considered offensive, especially here on English Wikipedia. In order to edit on English Wikipedia, you will need to change your username. This means that your next unblock request will need explain that you intend to change your username (or use another account) once you are unblocked. AzureFury ( talk | contribs) 04:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Anyways can you please tell me how to make new user which will not blocked or can you tell me any other idea to unblock my user.
Gameboy1947 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
What should i do to unblock my user.I promise, i will sincarely doesnt violate any wikipedia rules in future.Please unblock my user and give me one chance to proof myself as a good user.
Decline reason:
Your statements on this page do not convince me that you understand the reasons for your block and Wikipedia's relevant principles and policies. Moreover, your command of English does not seem to be good enough to allow you to contribute productively to an English language encyclopedia. Sandstein 21:56, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Do you want to change the name of your account, and if you do so, what username would you like to take? Cs32en Talk to me 18:03, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
For answers of those points which was comment on talk page of war in afghanistan.
1. Ok.If my user will unblock then i edit articles by logged in.I mean i doesnt use ip to edit any article.
2. I doesnt understand what you say in this point.
3. I have already 2nd account named Akhlaque1947.What should i do now?
4. I write my answer above.
5. I dont know why my user blocked?I use this user only a few times.Not much.I made this user in November and it blocked in January.
6. I posted messages on talk page because my those articles which i eit is smi-protedted so i request to other peoples to add the following informnation in this this articles.
7. Done.
For answers of those points which was comment on talk page of war in afghanistan.
1. Ok.If my user will unblock then i edit articles by logged in.I mean i doesnt use ip to edit any article.
2. I doesnt understand what you say in this point.
3. I have already 2nd account named Akhlaque1947.What should i do now?
4. I write my answer above.
5. I dont know why my user blocked?I use this user only a few times.Not much.I made this user in November and it blocked in January.
6. I posted messages on talk page because my those articles which i edit is semi-protected so i request to other peoples to add the following informnation in this this articles.
7. Done.
(For the record.)
I have been following this for a while. Let me try to explain what you should do:
- STOP editing without being logged in! This actually means: At the moment, you can only edit your talk page User talk:Mujahid1947.
- Declare that you will not add content to articles that is not based on reliable sources, and that the content you are adding will represent what the sources you are using actually say.
- Declare that you will only use one account on Wikipedia, and that you will not edit without being logged in to that account in a deceptive way. If you happen to edit using your IP by mistake, because you have been logged off and did not notice, or forgot to log in, then make an edit with your account to clarify the situtation.
- Declare all accounts that you have used on Wikipedia in the past on your user page. It seems that you have edited on Wikipedia before registering your account Mujahid1947 ( talk · contribs). If you haven't used any account prior to the account Mujahid1947 ( talk · contribs), please state how long you have been editing on Wikipedia without an account (approximately), and name some pages that you have edited during that time. If you have never edited Wikipedia before registering the account Mujahid1947 ( talk · contribs), please state that you never did so.
- Explain where you think you have made mistakes prior to the block of your account. Describe how you would work in the future to avoid similar mistakes.
- If you have misunderstood messages that have been posted to your talk page, or that have been posted to talk pages of articles that you have edited, please explain how and why you have misunderstood them, if possible.
- Make these statement on the talk page of User talk:Mujahid1947.
If your statements are convincing, it is possible that your block will be reviewed. I cannot promise anything, however, and will only take a favorable view on your request if your statement really are convincing. Cs32en Talk to me 19:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Cs32en Talk to me 21:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|For God sake unblock my user.I want to change my usrername but i doesnt know how to do it.I want to change my username to Pakistan1947.If you can change my username then please change my username to Pakistan1947.My english is poor becuase my language is Urdu.I speak Urdu as normal language.Really my head ache start 2 weeks of block.I think edit without user is better than edit with a user.I was edit without user from last 1 year.I make first user, i mean this user in November 2009 which was blcoked 2 weeks before.Please for god sake unblock my user.I hear in news that wikipedia users become decrease.Now i think due to these block system user leave wikipedia.But i doesnt want to leave wikipedia, i love it so please unblock my user.Please.Please.Please.}}
اگر اپ چاہتے ہیں کہ اپ کو اڈٹ پر اتفاق کے قواعد پر عمل کریں. ایک بڑی حکمرانی نہیں ہے چھیلنا پیٹرولیم کی ایک اور شخص بغیر الفاظ پر اتفاق
Anyways whats about Gameboy1947.
{{subst:Renameuser|Mujahid1947|Gameboy1947|3=Mujahid is a username violation}} ~~~~
I'm just seeing that your account has been unblocked. I'd like to give you two bits of advice:
Cs32en Talk to me 00:24, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Please have a look a your recent on Coalition casualties in Afghanistan.
Please be more careful when editing articles. Cs32en Talk to me 14:11, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
14:30, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
I want to make this page easier and i want to edit and some changes which will make this page easier.The article is impossible to read for a normal man. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualties_of_the_War_in_Afghanistan_%282001%E2%80%93present%29#Aggregation_of_estimates But i cant because at starting estimate headline, i cant edit.I mean edit page opens but it start my headche. mean how to start, where i edit.Every refrence there is differnt and in mostly areas n/a, n/a.Please.help.I want to update that page according to this refrence only. http://www.brookings.edu/foreign-policy/%7E/media/Files/Programs/FP/afghanistan%20index/index.pdf
Please do not replace material cited to reliable sources with claims cited to other Wikipedia articles as you did in this edit. Please see WP:CIRCULAR for guidance on this. Nick-D ( talk) 02:26, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
I have also reverted this series of edits in the List of Coalition aircraft losses in Afghanistan article as it was uncited and this addition to the Coalition casualties in Afghanistan as the killing of people in Pakistan by the Taliban on the suspicion that they were American spies is totally outside of the article's scope (it's unclear whether they were in any way members of the 'Coalition', and they sure weren't 'in Afghanistan'). As a reminder, you were unblocked only after agreeing to abide by the above conditions that you would not add unsourced material or add dubious claims to articles. Your recent additions are clear violations of this commitment. This will be your last warning before you are blocked again. Nick-D ( talk) 02:39, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add content without citing
verifiable and
reliable sources, as you did with
this edit to
2010s. Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
Zhang He (
talk)
07:28, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Nick-D (
talk)
19:41, 25 January 2010 (UTC){{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below.
Nick-D (
talk)
06:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC){{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below.
Nick-D (
talk)
07:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Please not when adding info about events in Indian occupied Kashmir please reffer to Jammu and Kashmir which is controlled by India as Indian-administered Kashmir instead of Indian kashmir as india controlls/administrates the region stating that events occured in "Indian Kashmir" implys India has rightful soveriegnty over the region which it does not thanks 86.153.128.139 ( talk) 23:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
12:29, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
It's pretty common practice to revert unexplained deletions. In a high profile article like this one, you need to be very careful about deletions if you want them to stick. This means explaining why you are deleting them in the edit summary, and if it's especially controversial, a comment on the talk page. AzureFury ( talk | contribs) 20:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Nick-D (
talk)
22:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)In particular:
Gameboy1947 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My user blocked because i slightly change a sentence which i as own write.I really apologise and say sorry.Next time i doesnt change any sentense from news.I will write only those things which are written in news.Please accept my sorry and unblock my user.
Decline reason:
We're not looking for an apology, we're looking for some sign from you that you understand why you are blocked and will be able to avoid repeating these problematic behaviors in the future. If you are unable to understand why you are blocked we won't be able accept your request. I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox ( talk) 02:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gameboy1947 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I apologise the violation of copyright.I am sorry.Please unblock me.
Decline reason:
This doesn't make it clear that you understand what copyright is. FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 12:19, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gameboy1947 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Please unblock my user.Mercy is better than punishment and giving chance is a postive activity. I apopogise the violation of copyrights.Please unblock my user.Please.As user Nick-D always watching my activities and he block my user before any warning.I edit too much careflly.But sometimes i mistakely violate copyright rules.And then Nick-D dont do anything on that page where i violate the copyright.He just block my user with any warning.5 months before when i have no user, if i edit some wrong thing then first several times warning and then block for a short time.But when i made this user.I blcoked several times with my small mistakes.Mostly from Nick-d.Anyways please forgive me and mercy on me and give me one more chance.
Decline reason:
One instance of this, I might be able to understand. But five times in the last month? That alone would make me uncomfortable unblocking you, but your contribution history indicates a wanton disregard for copyright. You don't seem to realize that this is something that can literally get Wikipedia sued out of existence. Block upheld and talk page disabled. Blueboy 96 14:22, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This editor is continuing to evade their block and post copyright violations. They edit from 119.x and 116.x ranges and have posted copyright violations such as this. Nick-D ( talk) 07:36, 9 May 2010 (UTC)