Hi GJAHANA! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! GPL93 ( talk) 20:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, GJAHANA!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
~Styyx
Talk? ^-^
19:08, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
|
Anyone can help me to edit my article??? Please !!!! GJAHANA ( talk) 16:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Why all the time they are declining my article?? Please help me to publish my article!!! GJAHANA ( talk) 16:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi GJAHANA! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, Click this link to read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, .
|
Shoxrux Hamdamov. Why my article were declined? There is not any information about the actor Shoxrux Hamdamov. I followed everything which is written in the rules or Wikipedia. Tell me The reason- declined means my draft the information about Shoxruc Hamdamov will Be deleted ? It won’t publish ?? GJAHANA ( talk) 13:42, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello GJAHANA. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:GJAHANA. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=GJAHANA|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
Theroadislong (
talk)
17:04, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi GJAHANA, I just reverted your edit to Wikipedia:Questions because that page is not a page for asking questions, but a pointer to other places – like the Teahouse – where you can do so. Also, the question you posted looked like it was meant for a specific person, but you didn't mention their username; and if someone answers your question on the Teahouse or another talk page it's best to keep the conversation in the same place. ClaudineChionh ( talk – contribs) 05:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
The article Hamdamov Shoxrux has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Sourcing does not demonstrate notability. On IMDB [1] but little else.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
User:力 (powera,
π,
ν)
02:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with... My article about HAMDAMOV Shoxrux what was my mistake? GJAHANA ( talk) 09:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi GJAHANA! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
![]() |
Hi GJAHANA! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Hello there, i have added his you tube channel, what can i do now? please help me to publish my first article... GJAHANA ( talk) 20:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Ulugʻbek Qodirov, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you. --
Bamyers99 (
talk)
19:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The article HAMDAMOV SHOXRUX has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable, spam. Any reliable sources?
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Wd Dabbir (
talk)
21:49, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Shoxrux Hamdamov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CUPIDICAE💕 17:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Please don't move articles out of draft into article space. They must wait until they have passed an independent review. Deb ( talk) 17:31, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
This is turning into a time sink, and it's not as if there has ever been any strong indication that he is notable.
bonadea contributions talk 21:11, 28 June 2022 (UTC){{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Thanks for creating Shoxrux Hamdamov. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 15:44, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi GJAHANA! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! GPL93 ( talk) 20:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, GJAHANA!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
~Styyx
Talk? ^-^
19:08, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
|
Anyone can help me to edit my article??? Please !!!! GJAHANA ( talk) 16:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Why all the time they are declining my article?? Please help me to publish my article!!! GJAHANA ( talk) 16:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi GJAHANA! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, Click this link to read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, .
|
Shoxrux Hamdamov. Why my article were declined? There is not any information about the actor Shoxrux Hamdamov. I followed everything which is written in the rules or Wikipedia. Tell me The reason- declined means my draft the information about Shoxruc Hamdamov will Be deleted ? It won’t publish ?? GJAHANA ( talk) 13:42, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello GJAHANA. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:GJAHANA. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=GJAHANA|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
Theroadislong (
talk)
17:04, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi GJAHANA, I just reverted your edit to Wikipedia:Questions because that page is not a page for asking questions, but a pointer to other places – like the Teahouse – where you can do so. Also, the question you posted looked like it was meant for a specific person, but you didn't mention their username; and if someone answers your question on the Teahouse or another talk page it's best to keep the conversation in the same place. ClaudineChionh ( talk – contribs) 05:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
The article Hamdamov Shoxrux has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Sourcing does not demonstrate notability. On IMDB [1] but little else.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
User:力 (powera,
π,
ν)
02:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with... My article about HAMDAMOV Shoxrux what was my mistake? GJAHANA ( talk) 09:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi GJAHANA! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
![]() |
Hi GJAHANA! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Hello there, i have added his you tube channel, what can i do now? please help me to publish my first article... GJAHANA ( talk) 20:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Ulugʻbek Qodirov, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you. --
Bamyers99 (
talk)
19:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The article HAMDAMOV SHOXRUX has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable, spam. Any reliable sources?
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Wd Dabbir (
talk)
21:49, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Shoxrux Hamdamov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CUPIDICAE💕 17:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Please don't move articles out of draft into article space. They must wait until they have passed an independent review. Deb ( talk) 17:31, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
This is turning into a time sink, and it's not as if there has ever been any strong indication that he is notable.
bonadea contributions talk 21:11, 28 June 2022 (UTC){{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Thanks for creating Shoxrux Hamdamov. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 15:44, 5 January 2023 (UTC)