Hello, Fuseemusee, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on
my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help.
Red Director (
talk)
21:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Fuseemusee. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about in the page
Sherborne School, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Breaking sticks ( talk) 23:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia is one of the 10 most used sites on the entire internet and staffed almost entirely by volunteers (a few of the dozen or so employees of Wikipedia edit, but do it on their own time. Vandalism fighting is something that has to be done with user assisted tools or it gets completely overwhelmed. There are certainly areas where more exacting attention is necessary. I invite you to stay around and check out various wiki projects in the hope that one will align better with what you are looking for. I hope you do stay. Naraht ( talk) 15:11, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Nice work on the Sherborne School bios. Keep it up!-- MainlyTwelve ( talk) 18:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Glad to see you managed to resolve the differences and reach a favourable outcome! Maybe you can post another userpage update now? ;) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 19:54, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you very much Bungle. I have a feeling you have made my 'come-back' possible so a big thank you. No doubt I am making a few mistakes as I go, but I feel it is now a truly collaborative exercise which is great. As time goes on I hope it becomes even clearer that my intentions are to be a good Wikipedia editor. I feel I have a lot to add so I hope so. Fuseemusee ( talk) 01:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
I've moved Dr William Thornton to William Thornton (d. 1707) as we don't use honorifics or academic or military titles in article names ( WP:NCP). Hope that helps, Cabayi ( talk) 13:00, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Hugh Hodges.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please do not cut and past copyrighted material onto WP. See WP:COPYVIO.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 16:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
{{Re|Onel5969}}
Many thanks and noted for the future.
Fuseemusee (
talk)
16:26, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Thomas Wyndham (of Witham Friary).
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Write a helpful note for Fuseemusee. It will be posted on their talk page.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 16:18, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello Fuseemusee, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to
Richard Wright (MP) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 20:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Violations of the copyright policy were also found in the following articles:
The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 16:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John King (lord of the manor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John King (lord of the manor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 02:34, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you marked Delete, but I suggest you might want to review it and maybe change it to "Keep" instead, or rebuke me if I am in the wrong.-- Epiphyllumlover ( talk) 18:06, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Aha! Now I see how it works - and I humbly thank you Epiphyllumlover rather than rebuke you of course. Still finding my way around. I gather you also added a link which was kind. Thank you for your kind help and support. Fuseemusee ( talk) 19:19, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | Please come to IRC. By the looks of your question, I think it would be best to have you log on to IRC. IRC stands for "Internet Relay Chat", which allows for real-time text-based communication with other users. This way, in addition to the help I can provide, I can get others on Wikipedia's Live Help to help you, as well. You don't have to download anything to talk to us, just click here! See you there! |
I am puzzled as to why the three left aligned images in the Sherborne School article appear so low down when they are placed at the head of the History article to which they relate. Would appreciate some help if anyone has any ideas. Fuseemusee ( talk) 16:48, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi S-I-T-H, many thanks. That looks good. Might see if I can make them a bit larger. Appreciate your help. Fuseemusee ( talk) 12:59, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Thomas Putt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Thomas Putt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 18:51, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Claver Morris.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thank you for your new article on Claver Morris.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
--- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 22:11, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Vanderbank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George White. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 07:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you DPL Bot. Link now fixed [[ Fuseemusee ( talk) 07:34, 19 September 2020 (UTC)]]
Hello, Fuseemusee, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on
my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help.
Red Director (
talk)
21:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Fuseemusee. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about in the page
Sherborne School, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Breaking sticks ( talk) 23:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia is one of the 10 most used sites on the entire internet and staffed almost entirely by volunteers (a few of the dozen or so employees of Wikipedia edit, but do it on their own time. Vandalism fighting is something that has to be done with user assisted tools or it gets completely overwhelmed. There are certainly areas where more exacting attention is necessary. I invite you to stay around and check out various wiki projects in the hope that one will align better with what you are looking for. I hope you do stay. Naraht ( talk) 15:11, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Nice work on the Sherborne School bios. Keep it up!-- MainlyTwelve ( talk) 18:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Glad to see you managed to resolve the differences and reach a favourable outcome! Maybe you can post another userpage update now? ;) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 19:54, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you very much Bungle. I have a feeling you have made my 'come-back' possible so a big thank you. No doubt I am making a few mistakes as I go, but I feel it is now a truly collaborative exercise which is great. As time goes on I hope it becomes even clearer that my intentions are to be a good Wikipedia editor. I feel I have a lot to add so I hope so. Fuseemusee ( talk) 01:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
I've moved Dr William Thornton to William Thornton (d. 1707) as we don't use honorifics or academic or military titles in article names ( WP:NCP). Hope that helps, Cabayi ( talk) 13:00, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Hugh Hodges.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please do not cut and past copyrighted material onto WP. See WP:COPYVIO.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 16:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
{{Re|Onel5969}}
Many thanks and noted for the future.
Fuseemusee (
talk)
16:26, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Thomas Wyndham (of Witham Friary).
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Write a helpful note for Fuseemusee. It will be posted on their talk page.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 16:18, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello Fuseemusee, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to
Richard Wright (MP) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 20:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Violations of the copyright policy were also found in the following articles:
The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 16:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John King (lord of the manor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John King (lord of the manor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 02:34, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you marked Delete, but I suggest you might want to review it and maybe change it to "Keep" instead, or rebuke me if I am in the wrong.-- Epiphyllumlover ( talk) 18:06, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Aha! Now I see how it works - and I humbly thank you Epiphyllumlover rather than rebuke you of course. Still finding my way around. I gather you also added a link which was kind. Thank you for your kind help and support. Fuseemusee ( talk) 19:19, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | Please come to IRC. By the looks of your question, I think it would be best to have you log on to IRC. IRC stands for "Internet Relay Chat", which allows for real-time text-based communication with other users. This way, in addition to the help I can provide, I can get others on Wikipedia's Live Help to help you, as well. You don't have to download anything to talk to us, just click here! See you there! |
I am puzzled as to why the three left aligned images in the Sherborne School article appear so low down when they are placed at the head of the History article to which they relate. Would appreciate some help if anyone has any ideas. Fuseemusee ( talk) 16:48, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi S-I-T-H, many thanks. That looks good. Might see if I can make them a bit larger. Appreciate your help. Fuseemusee ( talk) 12:59, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Thomas Putt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Thomas Putt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 18:51, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Claver Morris.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thank you for your new article on Claver Morris.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
--- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 22:11, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Vanderbank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George White. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 07:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you DPL Bot. Link now fixed [[ Fuseemusee ( talk) 07:34, 19 September 2020 (UTC)]]