A tag has been placed on John A. Fondots, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eggy49er 17:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
A {{
prod}} template has been added to the article
Fondotsism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{
db-author}}.
Fabrictramp
23:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Christianity. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Elliskev
15:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
List of Pokémon (241-260), you will be
blocked from editing. Your account has a history of unconstructive edits. It is likely you will soon be blocked if you continue to make any more such edits —
TheBilly(
Talk)
21:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on John A. Fondots, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eggy49er 17:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
A {{
prod}} template has been added to the article
Fondotsism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{
db-author}}.
Fabrictramp
23:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Christianity. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Elliskev
15:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
List of Pokémon (241-260), you will be
blocked from editing. Your account has a history of unconstructive edits. It is likely you will soon be blocked if you continue to make any more such edits —
TheBilly(
Talk)
21:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC)