Welcome!
Hello, Fritleyfrisp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! ..
dave souza,
talk
00:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Some tips...
Some will attempt to bamboozle you with wiki policies, guidelines, and red herrings (or orange marlins, as the case may be). Remain polite, even when you recognize that the rules you're being clubbed with are routinely violated by those accusing you of violating rules.
Second, contribute to more articles than one. This will avoid "single purpose" account accusations.
Speak the truth, expect hostility, and turn the other cheek. They will hate you for speaking the truth. Good luck. Pernicious Swarm ( talk) 04:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi guys, thanks for your messages. I'm concerned that a one sided view of the debate is being presented. The scientific merits of creationism are not in dispute in the academic community but an article documenting the facts of the controversy is not the appropriate place to express this as it gives undue bias. Oh my, I feel like I've typed this so many times I'm going to go blind. Thanks for the tips and I will try to stay sharp Fritleyfrisp ( talk) 10:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Yes, you are missing my point. I am suggesting that the scientific community does not hold any regard for creationism so why, in an article about the controversy, are we defending evolution against creationist beliefs? for example, why do we need to section on transitional fossils to say that the creationist viewpoint is based on a misunderstanding? THAT is bias...THAT is the evolutionist's viewpoint...so the brawn wins it. It is inappropriate in this article. Fritleyfrisp ( talk) 22:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
What the hell? Here's a warning.
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to
Bradford Christian School. If your
vandalism continues, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Blatant vandalism, that you admit is vandalism, is very, very
blockable and means your contributions will not be taken seriously by other editors. There is no real need to
assume good faith when another editor admits to vandalism.
WLU (
talk)
22:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
I would like to invite you to consider taking part in the AGF Challenge which has been proposed for use in the RfA process [1] by User: Kim Bruning. You can answer in multiple choice format, or using essay answers, or anonymously. You can of course skip any parts of the Challenge you find objectionable or inadvisable.-- Filll ( talk) 13:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi please tell me how you know there are people who read the bible and maintain there are no prophecies? Id like a citation! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MamaMario13 ( talk • contribs) 07:13, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Fritleyfrisp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! ..
dave souza,
talk
00:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Some tips...
Some will attempt to bamboozle you with wiki policies, guidelines, and red herrings (or orange marlins, as the case may be). Remain polite, even when you recognize that the rules you're being clubbed with are routinely violated by those accusing you of violating rules.
Second, contribute to more articles than one. This will avoid "single purpose" account accusations.
Speak the truth, expect hostility, and turn the other cheek. They will hate you for speaking the truth. Good luck. Pernicious Swarm ( talk) 04:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi guys, thanks for your messages. I'm concerned that a one sided view of the debate is being presented. The scientific merits of creationism are not in dispute in the academic community but an article documenting the facts of the controversy is not the appropriate place to express this as it gives undue bias. Oh my, I feel like I've typed this so many times I'm going to go blind. Thanks for the tips and I will try to stay sharp Fritleyfrisp ( talk) 10:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Yes, you are missing my point. I am suggesting that the scientific community does not hold any regard for creationism so why, in an article about the controversy, are we defending evolution against creationist beliefs? for example, why do we need to section on transitional fossils to say that the creationist viewpoint is based on a misunderstanding? THAT is bias...THAT is the evolutionist's viewpoint...so the brawn wins it. It is inappropriate in this article. Fritleyfrisp ( talk) 22:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
What the hell? Here's a warning.
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to
Bradford Christian School. If your
vandalism continues, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Blatant vandalism, that you admit is vandalism, is very, very
blockable and means your contributions will not be taken seriously by other editors. There is no real need to
assume good faith when another editor admits to vandalism.
WLU (
talk)
22:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
I would like to invite you to consider taking part in the AGF Challenge which has been proposed for use in the RfA process [1] by User: Kim Bruning. You can answer in multiple choice format, or using essay answers, or anonymously. You can of course skip any parts of the Challenge you find objectionable or inadvisable.-- Filll ( talk) 13:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi please tell me how you know there are people who read the bible and maintain there are no prophecies? Id like a citation! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MamaMario13 ( talk • contribs) 07:13, 13 August 2011 (UTC)