![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to
Fisting: you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. This refers specifically to the reversion made to edits by
90.224.35.242. Thanks and happy editing! —
Spike
Toronto 19:22, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
The article
Charles Stewart Parnell you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is capable of meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some issues which need to be addressed. If these are fixed within fourteen days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See
Talk:Charles Stewart Parnell for things which need to be addressed.
Jezhotwells (
talk) 17:36, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to
Fisting: you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. This refers specifically to the reversion made to edits by
90.224.35.242. Thanks and happy editing! —
Spike
Toronto 19:22, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
The article
Charles Stewart Parnell you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is capable of meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some issues which need to be addressed. If these are fixed within fourteen days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See
Talk:Charles Stewart Parnell for things which need to be addressed.
Jezhotwells (
talk) 17:36, 18 December 2009 (UTC)