Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Wests Tigers, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Sydney Roosters, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. •
Florrie•
leave a note•
00:21, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Hull Kingston Rovers. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. •
Florrie•
waltz a matilda•
05:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add content without
citing
reliable sources, as you did to
Hull Kingston Rovers. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. •
Florrie•
waltz a matilda•
12:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
1 month block. It has been pointed out that this account has made the same edits as User:124.179.79.34, who is currently blocked for edit warring/non-consensual editing. LessHeard vanU ( talk) 17:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Karmichael Hunt. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
florrie
11:44, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Fraser Anderson, you will be
blocked from editing.
florrie
13:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you created Dominique Peyroux, but listed no sources for the information contained in the article. According to Wikipedia's content policies, all information must be verifiable from reliable sources. Therefore, it's necessary to cite your sources so other editors can check that the information included in the article is correct and matches the sources used. Information not previously published in such sources is prohibited as original research, since other editors can't verify it. Unsourced information may be challenged and removed at any time, and articles that can't be verified are likely to be deleted. Guidance on how to cite your sources is available, and if you need any further help, feel free to leave a message on my talk page.-- Unscented ( talk) 17:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add content without
citing
reliable sources, as you did to
Clinton Schifcofske. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
florrie
06:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Danny Mills (rugby league), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Mark Chovain 07:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dominique Peyroux, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The Windler talk 09:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Selasi Berdie, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The Windler talk 09:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Will Naitoro, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The Windler talk 09:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sisa Waqa, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The Windler talk 09:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I see that many of your rugby league edits have been reverted and some pages you created are currently up for deletion. If I may say so here are a few things to take on board:
I hope this advice helps you improve your edits and become a valuable member of the Wikipedia community. If you have any questions just ask, regards Mattlore ( talk) 10:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Well, it is only proposed deletion, you have 5 days before it will be deleted, and if you address the concerns raised on the proposed deletion template, then the articles will stay. From their current form, however, they are just not meeting notability guidelines. I'm watching these pages, and this page, so I'll know if they are fixed or not, thankyou The Windler talk 11:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Will Naitoro, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Will Naitoro. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Mark Chovain 11:21, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add content without
citing
reliable sources, as you did to
Dene Halatau. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. A public message board is not a reliable source.
florrie
14:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add content without
citing
reliable sources, as you did to
Warrington Wolves. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
GW(
talk)
22:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced or
original content, as you did to
Craig Wing. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
florrie
14:52, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Hayden James, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayden James. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. The Windler talk 21:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
13:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to
Wikipedia, you will be
blocked from editing.
X MarX the Spot (
talk)
11:40, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below.
Alexf
(talk)
12:51, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello Folau111! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot notifying you on behalf of the
the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an
Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The
biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
verifiability, all biographies should be based on
reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
792 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 10:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
The article Rynard Pretorius has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Mattlore (
talk)
04:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
The article Andre Louder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Mattlore (
talk)
04:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Wests Tigers, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Sydney Roosters, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. •
Florrie•
leave a note•
00:21, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Hull Kingston Rovers. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. •
Florrie•
waltz a matilda•
05:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add content without
citing
reliable sources, as you did to
Hull Kingston Rovers. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. •
Florrie•
waltz a matilda•
12:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
1 month block. It has been pointed out that this account has made the same edits as User:124.179.79.34, who is currently blocked for edit warring/non-consensual editing. LessHeard vanU ( talk) 17:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Karmichael Hunt. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
florrie
11:44, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Fraser Anderson, you will be
blocked from editing.
florrie
13:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you created Dominique Peyroux, but listed no sources for the information contained in the article. According to Wikipedia's content policies, all information must be verifiable from reliable sources. Therefore, it's necessary to cite your sources so other editors can check that the information included in the article is correct and matches the sources used. Information not previously published in such sources is prohibited as original research, since other editors can't verify it. Unsourced information may be challenged and removed at any time, and articles that can't be verified are likely to be deleted. Guidance on how to cite your sources is available, and if you need any further help, feel free to leave a message on my talk page.-- Unscented ( talk) 17:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add content without
citing
reliable sources, as you did to
Clinton Schifcofske. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
florrie
06:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Danny Mills (rugby league), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Mark Chovain 07:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dominique Peyroux, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The Windler talk 09:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Selasi Berdie, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The Windler talk 09:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Will Naitoro, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The Windler talk 09:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sisa Waqa, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The Windler talk 09:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I see that many of your rugby league edits have been reverted and some pages you created are currently up for deletion. If I may say so here are a few things to take on board:
I hope this advice helps you improve your edits and become a valuable member of the Wikipedia community. If you have any questions just ask, regards Mattlore ( talk) 10:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Well, it is only proposed deletion, you have 5 days before it will be deleted, and if you address the concerns raised on the proposed deletion template, then the articles will stay. From their current form, however, they are just not meeting notability guidelines. I'm watching these pages, and this page, so I'll know if they are fixed or not, thankyou The Windler talk 11:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Will Naitoro, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Will Naitoro. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Mark Chovain 11:21, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add content without
citing
reliable sources, as you did to
Dene Halatau. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. A public message board is not a reliable source.
florrie
14:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add content without
citing
reliable sources, as you did to
Warrington Wolves. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
GW(
talk)
22:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced or
original content, as you did to
Craig Wing. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
florrie
14:52, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Hayden James, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayden James. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. The Windler talk 21:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
13:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to
Wikipedia, you will be
blocked from editing.
X MarX the Spot (
talk)
11:40, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below.
Alexf
(talk)
12:51, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello Folau111! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot notifying you on behalf of the
the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an
Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The
biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
verifiability, all biographies should be based on
reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
792 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 10:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
The article Rynard Pretorius has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Mattlore (
talk)
04:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
The article Andre Louder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Mattlore (
talk)
04:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)