Please stop to scramble the article. Your edits are not supported by the discussion in the talk page. -- Olahus ( talk) 09:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Fnr Kllrb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Beeblebrox (
talk)
09:45, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Roma people. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Molotron
03:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Roma people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --
Molotron
19:02, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to
Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an
edit summary for your edits. Thank you. --
Molotron
12:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution. --
Molotron
12:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
And again, 48h, edit warring and incivility [1] William M. Connolley ( talk) 13:13, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Fnr Kllrb. I'm unclear why this is considered an issue worth edit-warring over, but I do know that the cited source uses the term "Turkic-speaking". Altering the text without citing a different source is falsifying the citation and amounts to vandalism. Can you explain? I have also posted this question at Talk:Tatars and would encourage you to join the conversation there at some point. Regards, Kafka Liz ( talk) 16:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Tatars. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
Kafka Liz (
talk)
14:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
– Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:53, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
You have been accused of
sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fnr Kllrb. Thank you.
Kafka Liz (
talk)
11:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Please stop to scramble the article. Your edits are not supported by the discussion in the talk page. -- Olahus ( talk) 09:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Fnr Kllrb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Beeblebrox (
talk)
09:45, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Roma people. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Molotron
03:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Roma people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --
Molotron
19:02, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to
Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an
edit summary for your edits. Thank you. --
Molotron
12:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution. --
Molotron
12:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
And again, 48h, edit warring and incivility [1] William M. Connolley ( talk) 13:13, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Fnr Kllrb. I'm unclear why this is considered an issue worth edit-warring over, but I do know that the cited source uses the term "Turkic-speaking". Altering the text without citing a different source is falsifying the citation and amounts to vandalism. Can you explain? I have also posted this question at Talk:Tatars and would encourage you to join the conversation there at some point. Regards, Kafka Liz ( talk) 16:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Tatars. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
Kafka Liz (
talk)
14:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
– Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:53, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
You have been accused of
sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fnr Kllrb. Thank you.
Kafka Liz (
talk)
11:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC)