Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Florence Henderson has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 01:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Valerie Harper with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated
vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —
Frosty
☃ 03:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
Valerie Harper with
this edit. It is considered
spamming and
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
Donner60 (
talk) 03:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Valerie Harper.
Your edits have been automatically marked as
vandalism and have been automatically
reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism:
Valerie Harper was
changed by
FlorenceHenderson
(u)
(t) ANN scored at 0.906419 on 2016-02-24T03:46:43+00:00 . Thank you.
ClueBot NG (
talk) 03:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a
spam link, as you did at
Valerie Harper. Persistent spammers may have their websites
blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all
Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.
Your edit
here to
Valerie Harper was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
https://twitter.com/VaIerieHarper,
https://twitter.com/VaIerieHarper,
https://twitter.com/VaIerieHarper) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
blog,
forum,
free web hosting service,
fansite, or similar site (see
'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's
copyright (see
Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised,
reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see
conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk) 03:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Materialscientist ( talk) 04:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Florence Henderson has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 01:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Valerie Harper with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated
vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —
Frosty
☃ 03:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
Valerie Harper with
this edit. It is considered
spamming and
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
Donner60 (
talk) 03:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Valerie Harper.
Your edits have been automatically marked as
vandalism and have been automatically
reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism:
Valerie Harper was
changed by
FlorenceHenderson
(u)
(t) ANN scored at 0.906419 on 2016-02-24T03:46:43+00:00 . Thank you.
ClueBot NG (
talk) 03:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a
spam link, as you did at
Valerie Harper. Persistent spammers may have their websites
blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all
Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.
Your edit
here to
Valerie Harper was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
https://twitter.com/VaIerieHarper,
https://twitter.com/VaIerieHarper,
https://twitter.com/VaIerieHarper) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
blog,
forum,
free web hosting service,
fansite, or similar site (see
'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's
copyright (see
Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised,
reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see
conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk) 03:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Materialscientist ( talk) 04:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)