Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Harmony Kendall, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{
helpme}}
" on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Hazel. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Theroadislong ( talk) 07:56, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for wanting to do the right thing!
Pine
✉ 09:03, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
I see you've been busy adding characters to List of fictional cats in literature! I appreciate all the hard work you've done, and I just wanted to let you know to keep it up! I wanted to bring to your attention that it seems you've added a few with no references. While having a few characters that aren't referenced isn't an issue, this can open the door to cruft and the list can become unimaginably large, you may want to consider finding some references or they may be challenged and removed. Again, thanks! Ncboy2010 ( talk) 13:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
{{
Help me}}
No question -
Mdann52 (
talk) 10:06, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh, geez, I just realized. In the section "Tobermory" in "List of fictional cats in literature," I might have committed OR. Please see where I wrote:
When I entered that, I was thinking simply of "Wikipedia doesn't avoid spoilers." (a), I did use that commentary in my original article. (b), I'm not mentioning my article, and it is not "in-universe." So, under (a), should I delete it? Or under (b), is it okay? I'll use your answer as a guide for future edits. Thank you! FiverFan65 ( talk) 05:52, 24 June 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
FiverFan65 ( talk) 11:44, 24 June 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
|
Hi. When you recently edited List of fictional cats in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonesy ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{Help me-helped}} on this page with {{Help me}}, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Working on "Watership Down." I honestly thought I was doing the very simplest of fixes, and correcting when I saw a typo. But I got this:
"Sorry! We could not process your edit due to a loss of session data. Please try again. If it still does not work, try logging out and logging back in."
I'm a newbie; I don't know what Session Data is (although I expect it is what it sounds like. Still, always make sure, right?).
If I send this, and then log out and in, will this all vanish, as in a time travel story? Well, if THAT happened, the few of us involved in it will all become millionnaires, I suspect! If only. Thanks for helping out, guys and gals. Okay, I'll do that log out and in.
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I'm confused again! I've been editing the
Watership Down page and, after having done so about six times, this time I'm getting the message:
Three times I've chosen "Stay On This Page," but would "Leave This Page" somehow be a better choice? Because each time I choose "Stay on This Page" I am sent to an Internet Explorer page listing various hits for "Watership Down." Thanks!!! FiverFan65 ( talk) 09:20, 9 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
Hi there FiverFan65,
You may have noticed that your recent edits to Watership Down have been reverted. I've left a message on that article's talk page ( the article's talk page that offers an explanation/discussion. However, I wanted to also send a message to you personally. I know that I have removed work that you gave a lot of time and effort to and I really hesitated before I did it. Your work really is appreciated by me (and I'm sure others) and I'm glad that you've decided to help out. This isn't a personal attack on you, but something that I think needed to be done for the good of Wikipedia. This place does have a bit of a learning curve and I know that when I started out I was sometimes disheartened when other editors removed work that I had spent a lot of time on. Please don't be discouraged; Wikipedia needs new editors like you! I think it's great that you are contributing to the Watership Down article, and I would suggest that you read Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary, which is a very helpful guideline that I often use myself. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to reply on the talk page of the article (if it's a general response) or write on my talk page (if it's meant just for me).
FiverFan65 ( talk) 15:17, 9 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
Again, thank you for your contributions and please ask me if you have any questions. Mr. Absurd ( talk) 14:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi all! The Big Salad is topped with the warning box: This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources.
I've added three citations which I hope are acceptable. Will someone please check my work? Thanks! FiverFan65 ( talk) 01:03, 13 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
And have now added extra citations and Critical Response to The Soup Nazi. Thanks! FiverFan65 ( talk) 05:05, 13 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
... and to The Chinese Restaurant. I will appreciate anyone who will take the time to look at these.
NEXT QUESTION, concerning the last: I want to mention "The Chinese Restaurant" as a famous example among many famous examples of stories which exploit delayed hopes among the characters and delayed expectations from the audience. The first example that came to my mind was Henry James's The Figure in the Carpet, but I'm getting away from my point.
When I've seen "[citation needed]" on various pages, I assumed that an editor had inserted it to incite the author to supply what was needed. Remember, I'm a newbie. Is that actually a bracketed request from the author for somebody ELSE to supply the info? I could have helped, in literary pages, so many times! But this is a protocol I'm not familiar with.
I'm not going to add Original Research to this particular Seinfeld ep until given guidance; I do really want to know what the guidelines are. Thanks, all of you! FiverFan65 ( talk) 07:01, 13 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
FiverFan65 ( talk) 08:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
{{ Help me}}
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi all! After reading a story in Entertainment Weekly about the Dybbuk Box, I've been editing that article. It's about the movie "The Possession," which has a Wikipedia page, but I can't figure out why the hotlink from the Box article to the movie article doesn't work. Can you help? Thanks very much.
The Original Barnstar | ||
Good job on fleshing out more of the article for The Possession! It's looking pretty spiffy now! Tokyogirl79 ( talk) 06:47, 30 July 2012 (UTC) |
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I just edited the article on Jeffrey Dean Morgan to remove the terms "currently," "recently" and "upcoming," because when I write for Salem Press, they instruct contributors not to use them as they are not good encyclopedia-speak. So, I did that out of habit. Then I checked the MOS for films and I don't see any such instructions. Should I ignore such terms, then? The article on Morgan was written long enough ago that "recently" meant 2008. Thanks! FiverFan65 ( talk) 22:12, 30 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I've been editing The Omega Glory and Reference #3 appears in bold, with parts being italicized that shouldn't be. My newb-ness is showing, because I can't see where my "programming" went wrong. Can you help? Thanks so much. FiverFan65 ( talk) 06:36, 31 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
The MOS for fiction helpfully provides a "List of exemplary articles" and I see that many of these have, first, a heading "Themes" and then one for "Reception" - the latter appears to be for book reviews, book sales, and so on, so the former would be for criticism. Starship Troopers has, instead, a section called "Controversy" and then a subsection, "Literary critiques". Hitchhiker's Guide, one of the articles cited, doesn't have any of these.
But I've also seen these:
Criticism and interpretation Literary significance and reception Analysis
Should I stick with "Themes" when I want to add a section for criticism? FiverFan65 ( talk) 07:26, 31 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
This
help request has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{Help me-helped}} on this page with {{Help me}}, post a new help me template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own
user talk page. |
I am bereft! I had a ref problem, so I clicked on "Help," but the back button gave me the message that my page had expired! I'm creating a page for Quvenzhané Wallis, star of Beasts of the Southern Wild, and I put a LOT of work into it. Please tell me that my info is not gone forever! Thank you, thank you! FiverFan65 ( talk) 05:06, 4 August 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
And I started a new Sandbox while I kept gathering information - and THAT page disappeared too, because "Internet Explorer stopped working," which is no one's fault, but is dreadfully frustrating. FiverFan65 ( talk) 06:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
It's great to hear that you're having a postive experience here. I see you're doing some editing on Seinfeld pages, it's a topic I enjoy as well. The new content you're adding looks good, but watch the plot section doesn't get too long (more on that here). Good Luck!
Millermk ( talk) 07:37, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi all! I've spent some hours on "Northanger Abbey" today and hoped to nail a precise quote. A previous contributor to this page remarks:
"Austen biographer Claire Tomalin speculates that Austen may have begun this book, which is more explicitly comic than her other works and contains many literary allusions that her parents and siblings would have enjoyed, as a family entertainment—a piece of lighthearted parody to be read aloud by the fireside."
I didn't find Tomalin's book online, but I did find the above sentence, not a word substituted, in "Northanger Abbey: An Overview" at http://www.janeausten.co.uk/northanger-abbey-an-overview/
Surprised, I compared that essay with the WP page, and they are distressingly similar. I suppose it's possible that the Overview author contributed here, but wouldn't that violate NOR?
Is it best if I assume that the Overview copied WP? (Though I'd have expected better from The Jane Austen Centre.) FiverFan65 ( talk) 03:22, 5 August 2012 (UTC) FiverFan65
Regarding this edit you made to the Twin Peaks article, did you intend to finish that sentence? The paragraph you added to the critical acclaim subsection is unfinished, and, in its current state, makes no sense. You should take a look at it. Thanks! --- The Old Jacobite The '45 12:50, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
In case you're interested, have a look at http://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/news/11012011/libraries-tap-crowd-power and /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Loves_Libraries. Pine ✉ 09:57, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Big hugs, FiverFan65 ( talk) 07:56, 16 August 2012 (UTC) FiverFan65
Hi, all!
I've been reading some books and essays about "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" and was reminded of a disingenuously outraged article about fan fictions over at Cracked.
I have three friends who write Buffy slash fiction, and WP of course has a tiny section about slash.
I am not particularly inclined to make a link to Cracked, but a friend sent the link http://www.cracked.com/article_16554_the-5-most-baffling-sex-scenes-in-history-fanfiction.html,
and I would like to know where "we" (I mean, the Administrators) draw the line.
This is not URLesque, not Urban dictionary. But Wikipedia is not Funk & Wagnalls, either.
I'll be happy if you can tell me where this Encyclopedia draws its lines! Thanks very much. FiverFan65 ( talk) 07:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC) FiverFan65
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 03:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi - I've removed your addition to paleontology. Firstly, it was WP:undue weight re: two novels. Seems to do the topic justice a separate article would be needed as there is no shortage of material possibilities. Perhaps more importantly the sourcing was solely to the books themselves and we need good secondary sources which discuss the books rather than a synopsis based on your reading of the books. See WP:reliable sources. Vsmith ( talk) 10:19, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Funniest Joke in the World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decoding ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:13, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hello, everyone, especially Bester fans!
The Alfred Bester page is fairly long, but I could add to it. My question is: Should I?
I have at home the manuscript of a book-length bibliography on Bester, a writer whom I spent more than 7 years on: reading, studying, phoning people about, and writing articles about. I still gather information about him.
My bibliography manuscript is over 130 pages long, because I gathered information from books and essays about Bester (one was translated for me by a Swedish friend) in European languages, too.
Those who know SF well know how very important Bester is, so I don't have to persuade you folks.
Should I not try to add any of my enormous knowledge of Bester here? Would it be better to create a Web page, and then direct readers from WP to my Bester page?
I never met the man, which breaks my heart, but I know a lot about him from letters and emails to me from his friends, including Charles Platt (author) and Harry Harrison. Plus, I know more about his later life than is captured in the WP article about him - I know about Judith McKeown, and I know more about the "Joe Suder, bartender" situation, too.
Do the administrators think that the article on Bester is just fine as it is?
I love Wikipedia and everyone I've met here so far, so I'll do whatever you say. Thanks! FiverFan65 ( talk) 09:13, 28 August 2012 (UTC) FiverFan65
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi, folks! If anyone here knows the literary author Bruce McAllister and/or his work, would you please have a look at what I've added to his page?
I know OF him, but not enough - at one point I began adding info re the aviation historian Bruce McAllister, until I realized they couldn't be the same man - so I will be grateful if anyone can tell me that I've made any other error. Cheers all, FiverFan65 ( talk) 08:31, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Pine ✉ 19:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:00, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Pine ✉ 11:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi, all!
I've been working on Henry Slesar's autobiography. For some of us, he's one of the great writers of mystery and crime fiction, a prolific writer for and friend of Alfred Hitchcock, so I want to get his facts straight.
(For those of you who want to "plotz" when you see the long list of publications I've added, no worries: I'm planning to create a separate page tomorrow and shift over most of those, leaving only the most famous titles under Slesar's name page.)
Slesar was born in 1927 and many sources - not many of which I've found, so far, I consider worthy of citing for WP - say that he served in World War II.
What I contributed yesterday was:
During World War II, for some years [1] [2] he served in the United States Air Force...
I'm concerned about the Locus obituary. So just now I started to add to that footnote:
"It is dubious that Slesar served for five years, as he would have been 12 when the war began, and he was not a career serviceman."
But if I'm dubious, should I add the footnote at all? I've been up pretty late looking around the WP policy columns and couldn't find relevant rules (beyond common sense, which is why I'm asking).
I'll use responses as Advice for Future Contributions.
I appreciate your time and attention!
PS: Oh, and: I'm hoping that Detectionary is allowed by WP; I really don't like my citation for Slesar's serving in the Air Force - I can read Dutch, yet I'm sure I also read this info in the Intro to one of his books, one I got from the library, so I'll check the book out again, and replace the maybe-dubious book-seller's bio. Thanks so much! FiverFan65 ( talk) 09:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC) FiverFan65
FiverFan65 ( talk) 10:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC) FiverFan65
Pine ✉ 19:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Pine ✉ 20:33, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:49, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gary K. Wolfe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Gunn and David Lindsay ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:47, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:08, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Tales of the Unexpected episodes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bully and Michael Byrne ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:58, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello FiverFan65. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled The Wrong House.
If you no longer want this submission, it will shortly be deleted. However, if you wish to keep it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Wrong House}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, click "Save", and an administrator will place the undeleted submission in your user space.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. j⚛e decker talk 18:39, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Redhead, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 13:47, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/''Relativity: Stories and Essays'', a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 15:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello FiverFan65. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled The Redhead.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Redhead}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 20:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello FiverFan65. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled Relativity: Stories and Essays.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Relativity: Stories and Essays}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 13:01, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Redhead, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:32, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Redhead, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Redhead, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Redhead, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, FiverFan65. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " The Redhead".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CatcherStorm talk 11:02, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
He worked in advertising for several years (with a five-year break to serve during World War II)...
{{
cite journal}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help); Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |journal=
(
help); More than one of |number=
and |issue=
specified (
help)
Militaire dienst: US Army, 1946-1947.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Harmony Kendall, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{
helpme}}
" on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Hazel. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Theroadislong ( talk) 07:56, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for wanting to do the right thing!
Pine
✉ 09:03, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
I see you've been busy adding characters to List of fictional cats in literature! I appreciate all the hard work you've done, and I just wanted to let you know to keep it up! I wanted to bring to your attention that it seems you've added a few with no references. While having a few characters that aren't referenced isn't an issue, this can open the door to cruft and the list can become unimaginably large, you may want to consider finding some references or they may be challenged and removed. Again, thanks! Ncboy2010 ( talk) 13:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
{{
Help me}}
No question -
Mdann52 (
talk) 10:06, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh, geez, I just realized. In the section "Tobermory" in "List of fictional cats in literature," I might have committed OR. Please see where I wrote:
When I entered that, I was thinking simply of "Wikipedia doesn't avoid spoilers." (a), I did use that commentary in my original article. (b), I'm not mentioning my article, and it is not "in-universe." So, under (a), should I delete it? Or under (b), is it okay? I'll use your answer as a guide for future edits. Thank you! FiverFan65 ( talk) 05:52, 24 June 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
FiverFan65 ( talk) 11:44, 24 June 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
|
Hi. When you recently edited List of fictional cats in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonesy ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{Help me-helped}} on this page with {{Help me}}, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Working on "Watership Down." I honestly thought I was doing the very simplest of fixes, and correcting when I saw a typo. But I got this:
"Sorry! We could not process your edit due to a loss of session data. Please try again. If it still does not work, try logging out and logging back in."
I'm a newbie; I don't know what Session Data is (although I expect it is what it sounds like. Still, always make sure, right?).
If I send this, and then log out and in, will this all vanish, as in a time travel story? Well, if THAT happened, the few of us involved in it will all become millionnaires, I suspect! If only. Thanks for helping out, guys and gals. Okay, I'll do that log out and in.
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I'm confused again! I've been editing the
Watership Down page and, after having done so about six times, this time I'm getting the message:
Three times I've chosen "Stay On This Page," but would "Leave This Page" somehow be a better choice? Because each time I choose "Stay on This Page" I am sent to an Internet Explorer page listing various hits for "Watership Down." Thanks!!! FiverFan65 ( talk) 09:20, 9 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
Hi there FiverFan65,
You may have noticed that your recent edits to Watership Down have been reverted. I've left a message on that article's talk page ( the article's talk page that offers an explanation/discussion. However, I wanted to also send a message to you personally. I know that I have removed work that you gave a lot of time and effort to and I really hesitated before I did it. Your work really is appreciated by me (and I'm sure others) and I'm glad that you've decided to help out. This isn't a personal attack on you, but something that I think needed to be done for the good of Wikipedia. This place does have a bit of a learning curve and I know that when I started out I was sometimes disheartened when other editors removed work that I had spent a lot of time on. Please don't be discouraged; Wikipedia needs new editors like you! I think it's great that you are contributing to the Watership Down article, and I would suggest that you read Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary, which is a very helpful guideline that I often use myself. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to reply on the talk page of the article (if it's a general response) or write on my talk page (if it's meant just for me).
FiverFan65 ( talk) 15:17, 9 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
Again, thank you for your contributions and please ask me if you have any questions. Mr. Absurd ( talk) 14:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi all! The Big Salad is topped with the warning box: This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources.
I've added three citations which I hope are acceptable. Will someone please check my work? Thanks! FiverFan65 ( talk) 01:03, 13 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
And have now added extra citations and Critical Response to The Soup Nazi. Thanks! FiverFan65 ( talk) 05:05, 13 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
... and to The Chinese Restaurant. I will appreciate anyone who will take the time to look at these.
NEXT QUESTION, concerning the last: I want to mention "The Chinese Restaurant" as a famous example among many famous examples of stories which exploit delayed hopes among the characters and delayed expectations from the audience. The first example that came to my mind was Henry James's The Figure in the Carpet, but I'm getting away from my point.
When I've seen "[citation needed]" on various pages, I assumed that an editor had inserted it to incite the author to supply what was needed. Remember, I'm a newbie. Is that actually a bracketed request from the author for somebody ELSE to supply the info? I could have helped, in literary pages, so many times! But this is a protocol I'm not familiar with.
I'm not going to add Original Research to this particular Seinfeld ep until given guidance; I do really want to know what the guidelines are. Thanks, all of you! FiverFan65 ( talk) 07:01, 13 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
FiverFan65 ( talk) 08:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
{{ Help me}}
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi all! After reading a story in Entertainment Weekly about the Dybbuk Box, I've been editing that article. It's about the movie "The Possession," which has a Wikipedia page, but I can't figure out why the hotlink from the Box article to the movie article doesn't work. Can you help? Thanks very much.
The Original Barnstar | ||
Good job on fleshing out more of the article for The Possession! It's looking pretty spiffy now! Tokyogirl79 ( talk) 06:47, 30 July 2012 (UTC) |
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I just edited the article on Jeffrey Dean Morgan to remove the terms "currently," "recently" and "upcoming," because when I write for Salem Press, they instruct contributors not to use them as they are not good encyclopedia-speak. So, I did that out of habit. Then I checked the MOS for films and I don't see any such instructions. Should I ignore such terms, then? The article on Morgan was written long enough ago that "recently" meant 2008. Thanks! FiverFan65 ( talk) 22:12, 30 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I've been editing The Omega Glory and Reference #3 appears in bold, with parts being italicized that shouldn't be. My newb-ness is showing, because I can't see where my "programming" went wrong. Can you help? Thanks so much. FiverFan65 ( talk) 06:36, 31 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
The MOS for fiction helpfully provides a "List of exemplary articles" and I see that many of these have, first, a heading "Themes" and then one for "Reception" - the latter appears to be for book reviews, book sales, and so on, so the former would be for criticism. Starship Troopers has, instead, a section called "Controversy" and then a subsection, "Literary critiques". Hitchhiker's Guide, one of the articles cited, doesn't have any of these.
But I've also seen these:
Criticism and interpretation Literary significance and reception Analysis
Should I stick with "Themes" when I want to add a section for criticism? FiverFan65 ( talk) 07:26, 31 July 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
This
help request has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{Help me-helped}} on this page with {{Help me}}, post a new help me template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own
user talk page. |
I am bereft! I had a ref problem, so I clicked on "Help," but the back button gave me the message that my page had expired! I'm creating a page for Quvenzhané Wallis, star of Beasts of the Southern Wild, and I put a LOT of work into it. Please tell me that my info is not gone forever! Thank you, thank you! FiverFan65 ( talk) 05:06, 4 August 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
And I started a new Sandbox while I kept gathering information - and THAT page disappeared too, because "Internet Explorer stopped working," which is no one's fault, but is dreadfully frustrating. FiverFan65 ( talk) 06:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)FiverFan65
It's great to hear that you're having a postive experience here. I see you're doing some editing on Seinfeld pages, it's a topic I enjoy as well. The new content you're adding looks good, but watch the plot section doesn't get too long (more on that here). Good Luck!
Millermk ( talk) 07:37, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi all! I've spent some hours on "Northanger Abbey" today and hoped to nail a precise quote. A previous contributor to this page remarks:
"Austen biographer Claire Tomalin speculates that Austen may have begun this book, which is more explicitly comic than her other works and contains many literary allusions that her parents and siblings would have enjoyed, as a family entertainment—a piece of lighthearted parody to be read aloud by the fireside."
I didn't find Tomalin's book online, but I did find the above sentence, not a word substituted, in "Northanger Abbey: An Overview" at http://www.janeausten.co.uk/northanger-abbey-an-overview/
Surprised, I compared that essay with the WP page, and they are distressingly similar. I suppose it's possible that the Overview author contributed here, but wouldn't that violate NOR?
Is it best if I assume that the Overview copied WP? (Though I'd have expected better from The Jane Austen Centre.) FiverFan65 ( talk) 03:22, 5 August 2012 (UTC) FiverFan65
Regarding this edit you made to the Twin Peaks article, did you intend to finish that sentence? The paragraph you added to the critical acclaim subsection is unfinished, and, in its current state, makes no sense. You should take a look at it. Thanks! --- The Old Jacobite The '45 12:50, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
In case you're interested, have a look at http://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/news/11012011/libraries-tap-crowd-power and /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Loves_Libraries. Pine ✉ 09:57, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Big hugs, FiverFan65 ( talk) 07:56, 16 August 2012 (UTC) FiverFan65
Hi, all!
I've been reading some books and essays about "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" and was reminded of a disingenuously outraged article about fan fictions over at Cracked.
I have three friends who write Buffy slash fiction, and WP of course has a tiny section about slash.
I am not particularly inclined to make a link to Cracked, but a friend sent the link http://www.cracked.com/article_16554_the-5-most-baffling-sex-scenes-in-history-fanfiction.html,
and I would like to know where "we" (I mean, the Administrators) draw the line.
This is not URLesque, not Urban dictionary. But Wikipedia is not Funk & Wagnalls, either.
I'll be happy if you can tell me where this Encyclopedia draws its lines! Thanks very much. FiverFan65 ( talk) 07:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC) FiverFan65
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 03:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi - I've removed your addition to paleontology. Firstly, it was WP:undue weight re: two novels. Seems to do the topic justice a separate article would be needed as there is no shortage of material possibilities. Perhaps more importantly the sourcing was solely to the books themselves and we need good secondary sources which discuss the books rather than a synopsis based on your reading of the books. See WP:reliable sources. Vsmith ( talk) 10:19, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Funniest Joke in the World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decoding ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:13, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hello, everyone, especially Bester fans!
The Alfred Bester page is fairly long, but I could add to it. My question is: Should I?
I have at home the manuscript of a book-length bibliography on Bester, a writer whom I spent more than 7 years on: reading, studying, phoning people about, and writing articles about. I still gather information about him.
My bibliography manuscript is over 130 pages long, because I gathered information from books and essays about Bester (one was translated for me by a Swedish friend) in European languages, too.
Those who know SF well know how very important Bester is, so I don't have to persuade you folks.
Should I not try to add any of my enormous knowledge of Bester here? Would it be better to create a Web page, and then direct readers from WP to my Bester page?
I never met the man, which breaks my heart, but I know a lot about him from letters and emails to me from his friends, including Charles Platt (author) and Harry Harrison. Plus, I know more about his later life than is captured in the WP article about him - I know about Judith McKeown, and I know more about the "Joe Suder, bartender" situation, too.
Do the administrators think that the article on Bester is just fine as it is?
I love Wikipedia and everyone I've met here so far, so I'll do whatever you say. Thanks! FiverFan65 ( talk) 09:13, 28 August 2012 (UTC) FiverFan65
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi, folks! If anyone here knows the literary author Bruce McAllister and/or his work, would you please have a look at what I've added to his page?
I know OF him, but not enough - at one point I began adding info re the aviation historian Bruce McAllister, until I realized they couldn't be the same man - so I will be grateful if anyone can tell me that I've made any other error. Cheers all, FiverFan65 ( talk) 08:31, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Pine ✉ 19:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:00, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Pine ✉ 11:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi, all!
I've been working on Henry Slesar's autobiography. For some of us, he's one of the great writers of mystery and crime fiction, a prolific writer for and friend of Alfred Hitchcock, so I want to get his facts straight.
(For those of you who want to "plotz" when you see the long list of publications I've added, no worries: I'm planning to create a separate page tomorrow and shift over most of those, leaving only the most famous titles under Slesar's name page.)
Slesar was born in 1927 and many sources - not many of which I've found, so far, I consider worthy of citing for WP - say that he served in World War II.
What I contributed yesterday was:
During World War II, for some years [1] [2] he served in the United States Air Force...
I'm concerned about the Locus obituary. So just now I started to add to that footnote:
"It is dubious that Slesar served for five years, as he would have been 12 when the war began, and he was not a career serviceman."
But if I'm dubious, should I add the footnote at all? I've been up pretty late looking around the WP policy columns and couldn't find relevant rules (beyond common sense, which is why I'm asking).
I'll use responses as Advice for Future Contributions.
I appreciate your time and attention!
PS: Oh, and: I'm hoping that Detectionary is allowed by WP; I really don't like my citation for Slesar's serving in the Air Force - I can read Dutch, yet I'm sure I also read this info in the Intro to one of his books, one I got from the library, so I'll check the book out again, and replace the maybe-dubious book-seller's bio. Thanks so much! FiverFan65 ( talk) 09:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC) FiverFan65
FiverFan65 ( talk) 10:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC) FiverFan65
Pine ✉ 19:43, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Pine ✉ 20:33, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:49, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gary K. Wolfe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Gunn and David Lindsay ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:47, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:08, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Tales of the Unexpected episodes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bully and Michael Byrne ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:58, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello FiverFan65. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled The Wrong House.
If you no longer want this submission, it will shortly be deleted. However, if you wish to keep it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Wrong House}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, click "Save", and an administrator will place the undeleted submission in your user space.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. j⚛e decker talk 18:39, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Redhead, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 13:47, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/''Relativity: Stories and Essays'', a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 15:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello FiverFan65. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled The Redhead.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Redhead}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 20:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello FiverFan65. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled Relativity: Stories and Essays.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Relativity: Stories and Essays}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 13:01, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Redhead, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:32, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Redhead, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Redhead, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Redhead, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, FiverFan65. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " The Redhead".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CatcherStorm talk 11:02, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
He worked in advertising for several years (with a five-year break to serve during World War II)...
{{
cite journal}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help); Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |journal=
(
help); More than one of |number=
and |issue=
specified (
help)
Militaire dienst: US Army, 1946-1947.