==February 2009==
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to the page
Garrett A. Morgan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Staffwaterboy
Critique Me
Guestbook
Hate Comments
18:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
I apologize about that that was a error that I made when trying to revert certain articles.
Take Care Staffwaterboy Critique Me Guestbook Hate Comments 20:25, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. Indeed I do have knowledge of how 3D graphics are rendered, and we can quibble over your semantics all day, but this is besides the point - what you wrote was original research, which means you added your own knowledge into the article that means the sentence is no longer backed up by the citation that follows the sentence. Come back with a reference that explicitly states what you reworded it to, and we can word that sentence better. SynergyBlades ( talk) 01:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for being civil, and you are correct, I will find an article about this to back it, one should exist, as it is a common misconception. By the way, do you believe I am correct otherwise? 21:39 (EST)
Hi, Feneeth! Just so you know, our Manual of Style recommends leaving a blank line above section headings for readability purposes. Please don't remove them; they're there for a reason. =) Thanks! Powers T 14:36, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Feneeth. Your recent edit to {{ xt}} broke the template, resulting in the font styles and color to not be displayed. If you must make edits to highly visible templates, please work on them in the sandbox or your own userspace first before deploying them, thus not causing many pages that use the template to appear broken. Best, Matthewedwards : Chat 00:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
==February 2009==
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to the page
Garrett A. Morgan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Staffwaterboy
Critique Me
Guestbook
Hate Comments
18:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
I apologize about that that was a error that I made when trying to revert certain articles.
Take Care Staffwaterboy Critique Me Guestbook Hate Comments 20:25, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. Indeed I do have knowledge of how 3D graphics are rendered, and we can quibble over your semantics all day, but this is besides the point - what you wrote was original research, which means you added your own knowledge into the article that means the sentence is no longer backed up by the citation that follows the sentence. Come back with a reference that explicitly states what you reworded it to, and we can word that sentence better. SynergyBlades ( talk) 01:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for being civil, and you are correct, I will find an article about this to back it, one should exist, as it is a common misconception. By the way, do you believe I am correct otherwise? 21:39 (EST)
Hi, Feneeth! Just so you know, our Manual of Style recommends leaving a blank line above section headings for readability purposes. Please don't remove them; they're there for a reason. =) Thanks! Powers T 14:36, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Feneeth. Your recent edit to {{ xt}} broke the template, resulting in the font styles and color to not be displayed. If you must make edits to highly visible templates, please work on them in the sandbox or your own userspace first before deploying them, thus not causing many pages that use the template to appear broken. Best, Matthewedwards : Chat 00:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)