![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Curious to know when you asked him about all these opinions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mooohargrove ( talk • contribs) 03:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
I invite you to please join the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari.
Hello, we are seeking help with the Sarah Azhari article, created in 2013 & recently the subject of a deletion proposal. At issue was whether or not the Indonesian language sources establish notability. I am inviting you to the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari#Help with Indonesian language sources because you are in the Category:User id-N & have a minimum of 1,000 edits across all Wikimedia projects.
I realize that some of you are very busy while others may no longer be editing. Nevertheless, I thought it wise to consult with you.
Thank your for the work that you do on Wiki[mp]edia! Peaceray ( talk) 21:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
I was shocked your site cannot take hard facts. NOTHING i posted was incorrect. IT is a British film that the cast was GOD AWFUL not by a few viewers but the reviews in 19 critics reviews. But hey . facts are not going to be posted on here. then what the site for? Propaganda. We got plenty of that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.9.168.6 ( talk) 23:59, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
I was recently on the singlet page and it dates 1 of the states of singlet is 1🔺G. It states 1 is dipole measure spin gravity.
This is wrong though if u refer to the quantum state of oxygen ur looking at 1 🔺g which is 1 dimensional gravity particle w no spin & no measurement other then a faint Planck measure which is same as the permeability or permiality electric or magnet ur enenuating by this article it’s radiation so it’s not a gravity particle and the g should be removed it’s a B flux sign 🪧 state
I look forward to ur response for clarification for my own edification as my understanding of this subject could be wrong
Thank you Alphamuon702 ( talk) 23:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you 👍 Alphamuon702 ( talk) 01:29, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Why did u remove meh edit? Watercolour1234 ( talk) 21:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC) |
Hi Fehufanga. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY 22:42, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Fehufanga, you just removed my edit. I was trying to add my link under the notes and reference section and I think my link is just as relevant as the two that are already in this section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndyK63 ( talk • contribs) 03:56, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
I have changed the link to the technical paper as you suggested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndyK63 ( talk • contribs) 05:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
-- *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 22:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Hey you just left a note on my talk page 1 second after I reverted vandalism, claiming you had reverted an edit because it wasn’t a constructive edit. In reality you did no such thing. I removed the unconstructive edit. You didn’t. There’s a lot of arrogant wikipedians and also some claiming credit for things they don’t do. 12.174.49.50 ( talk) 23:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
And @Fehufanga what does that have to do with someone here claiming to have fixed a problem they didn’t? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.174.49.50 ( talk) 23:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For helping with the botnet spam. Sea Cow ( talk) 00:52, 18 February 2022 (UTC) |
Sea Cow ( talk) 00:52, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
I would like you to put my edits back in plz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elias Boyd ( talk • contribs) 23:00, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Your decision was not right.
-- 2001:56B:BCB6:ED00:A9CB:A514:F1E1:3CCB ( talk) 00:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
This is your only notice, if you revert
vandalism before I do again, you may be awarded
barnstars without further notice.
You are so darn fast! I know how you do it though (Huggle). :P InterstateFive ( talk) - just another roadgeek 00:41, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Fehufanga, Thank you for your help. 178.148.119.189 ( talk) 08:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{ re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 13:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I'm Ed6767, the original creator of RedWarn, now one of the most popular tools on the English Wikipedia that's been used by over 1,000 Wikimedians to make over 300,000 edits since mid-2020 that's been praised for its user friendliness and ease of use, but criticised for its limited functionality. I'm leaving this message as I think it may be of interest here - I left the RedWarn project in November to develop Teyora, my successor to RedWarn (alongside Chlod's UltraViolet). It's a new in development web app that uses some of the latest web technologies to create a highly extendable all in one editing tool with a focus on administration, counter vandalism and general patrolling - not to mention, it'll work on every Wikimedia project without any prior configuration and can be used by any user with at least auto-confirmed rights*. Now, I'm ready to give the Wikimedia community a first look at what I've been doing over the past six months and what to expect going forward.
You can check out the 20 minute first look at the in development version on YouTube here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzlpnzXdLP4.
There's lots more to expect too! Why not read the full details page at meta:Teyora and leave any feedback, comments or wishes at meta:Talk:Teyora (please leave any correspondence there to keep discussion centralised). If you're interested, you can leave your signature
*with basic features, advanced features require configuration. To prevent abuse, auto-confirmed users will be in a restricted mode until approved by an admin or via rollback rights.
All the best, ✨ Ed talk! ✨ 23:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Why do you remove the link ? its a Ngo and I added the information and the Wikipedia page for reference /info/en/?search=List_of_non-governmental_organisations_in_India — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asdfassaa ( talk • contribs) 12:36, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
my edit was not incorrect you are. i have my doctorate in editing wikipedia and i am smarter than you. you do not have any degrees in any thing and i have 12 in every thing. so put my edit back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:8827:3200:3020:8112:70C2:8F73 ( talk) 00:57, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
@ 2607:fea8:1d20:5605:8477:f301:d693:81a0: deleted this section in large part because it is poorly sourced and highly biased I agree it shouldn't all be deleted but it is in serious need of revision-- Tjpolega ( talk) 17:29, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
jj), but if you were able to make corrections to it, that's great! -- *Fehufangą ( ✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 04:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
hello sir why did you removed created article Asdfassaa ( talk) 09:35, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
For your swift actions in keeping vandals away. Keep it going! Volten001 ☎ 11:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC) |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Curious to know when you asked him about all these opinions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mooohargrove ( talk • contribs) 03:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
I invite you to please join the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari.
Hello, we are seeking help with the Sarah Azhari article, created in 2013 & recently the subject of a deletion proposal. At issue was whether or not the Indonesian language sources establish notability. I am inviting you to the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari#Help with Indonesian language sources because you are in the Category:User id-N & have a minimum of 1,000 edits across all Wikimedia projects.
I realize that some of you are very busy while others may no longer be editing. Nevertheless, I thought it wise to consult with you.
Thank your for the work that you do on Wiki[mp]edia! Peaceray ( talk) 21:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
I was shocked your site cannot take hard facts. NOTHING i posted was incorrect. IT is a British film that the cast was GOD AWFUL not by a few viewers but the reviews in 19 critics reviews. But hey . facts are not going to be posted on here. then what the site for? Propaganda. We got plenty of that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.9.168.6 ( talk) 23:59, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
I was recently on the singlet page and it dates 1 of the states of singlet is 1🔺G. It states 1 is dipole measure spin gravity.
This is wrong though if u refer to the quantum state of oxygen ur looking at 1 🔺g which is 1 dimensional gravity particle w no spin & no measurement other then a faint Planck measure which is same as the permeability or permiality electric or magnet ur enenuating by this article it’s radiation so it’s not a gravity particle and the g should be removed it’s a B flux sign 🪧 state
I look forward to ur response for clarification for my own edification as my understanding of this subject could be wrong
Thank you Alphamuon702 ( talk) 23:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you 👍 Alphamuon702 ( talk) 01:29, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Why did u remove meh edit? Watercolour1234 ( talk) 21:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC) |
Hi Fehufanga. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY 22:42, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Fehufanga, you just removed my edit. I was trying to add my link under the notes and reference section and I think my link is just as relevant as the two that are already in this section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndyK63 ( talk • contribs) 03:56, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
I have changed the link to the technical paper as you suggested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndyK63 ( talk • contribs) 05:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
-- *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 22:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Hey you just left a note on my talk page 1 second after I reverted vandalism, claiming you had reverted an edit because it wasn’t a constructive edit. In reality you did no such thing. I removed the unconstructive edit. You didn’t. There’s a lot of arrogant wikipedians and also some claiming credit for things they don’t do. 12.174.49.50 ( talk) 23:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
And @Fehufanga what does that have to do with someone here claiming to have fixed a problem they didn’t? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.174.49.50 ( talk) 23:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For helping with the botnet spam. Sea Cow ( talk) 00:52, 18 February 2022 (UTC) |
Sea Cow ( talk) 00:52, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
I would like you to put my edits back in plz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elias Boyd ( talk • contribs) 23:00, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Your decision was not right.
-- 2001:56B:BCB6:ED00:A9CB:A514:F1E1:3CCB ( talk) 00:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
This is your only notice, if you revert
vandalism before I do again, you may be awarded
barnstars without further notice.
You are so darn fast! I know how you do it though (Huggle). :P InterstateFive ( talk) - just another roadgeek 00:41, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Fehufanga, Thank you for your help. 178.148.119.189 ( talk) 08:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{ re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 13:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I'm Ed6767, the original creator of RedWarn, now one of the most popular tools on the English Wikipedia that's been used by over 1,000 Wikimedians to make over 300,000 edits since mid-2020 that's been praised for its user friendliness and ease of use, but criticised for its limited functionality. I'm leaving this message as I think it may be of interest here - I left the RedWarn project in November to develop Teyora, my successor to RedWarn (alongside Chlod's UltraViolet). It's a new in development web app that uses some of the latest web technologies to create a highly extendable all in one editing tool with a focus on administration, counter vandalism and general patrolling - not to mention, it'll work on every Wikimedia project without any prior configuration and can be used by any user with at least auto-confirmed rights*. Now, I'm ready to give the Wikimedia community a first look at what I've been doing over the past six months and what to expect going forward.
You can check out the 20 minute first look at the in development version on YouTube here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzlpnzXdLP4.
There's lots more to expect too! Why not read the full details page at meta:Teyora and leave any feedback, comments or wishes at meta:Talk:Teyora (please leave any correspondence there to keep discussion centralised). If you're interested, you can leave your signature
*with basic features, advanced features require configuration. To prevent abuse, auto-confirmed users will be in a restricted mode until approved by an admin or via rollback rights.
All the best, ✨ Ed talk! ✨ 23:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Why do you remove the link ? its a Ngo and I added the information and the Wikipedia page for reference /info/en/?search=List_of_non-governmental_organisations_in_India — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asdfassaa ( talk • contribs) 12:36, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
my edit was not incorrect you are. i have my doctorate in editing wikipedia and i am smarter than you. you do not have any degrees in any thing and i have 12 in every thing. so put my edit back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:8827:3200:3020:8112:70C2:8F73 ( talk) 00:57, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
@ 2607:fea8:1d20:5605:8477:f301:d693:81a0: deleted this section in large part because it is poorly sourced and highly biased I agree it shouldn't all be deleted but it is in serious need of revision-- Tjpolega ( talk) 17:29, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
jj), but if you were able to make corrections to it, that's great! -- *Fehufangą ( ✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 04:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
hello sir why did you removed created article Asdfassaa ( talk) 09:35, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
For your swift actions in keeping vandals away. Keep it going! Volten001 ☎ 11:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC) |