Hello, I'm
Cassiopeia. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Ahnenpass—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
Cassiopeia
talk
03:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
It was absolutely constructive, you did not even read it, I will be putting it back Faxspitter ( talk) 03:33, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Ahnenpass. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
{{User|
wylie39}} {
Talk}
03:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Ahnenpass, you may be
blocked from editing.
{{User|
wylie39}} {
Talk}
03:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
They are constructive, unless you can explain what you mean here, your baseless accusation of vandalism is built on sand Faxspitter ( talk) 03:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
TornadoLGS. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Ahnenpass, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. I would advise you to take this matter to the article's
talk page. Continuing to revert and add this to the article will constitute
edit warring.
TornadoLGS (
talk) 03:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
TornadoLGS (
talk)
03:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Cringe Faxspitter ( talk) 03:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make
personal attacks on others again, as you did at
User talk:Faxspitter, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Cassiopeia
talk
04:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
That’s what I think about your nonsense.
This is your only warning; if you make
personal attacks on others again, as you did at
User talk:Faxspitter, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Cassiopeia
talk
00:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Russian ruble.
Cassiopeia
talk
00:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:15, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Cassiopeia. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Ahnenpass—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
Cassiopeia
talk
03:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
It was absolutely constructive, you did not even read it, I will be putting it back Faxspitter ( talk) 03:33, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Ahnenpass. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
{{User|
wylie39}} {
Talk}
03:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Ahnenpass, you may be
blocked from editing.
{{User|
wylie39}} {
Talk}
03:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
They are constructive, unless you can explain what you mean here, your baseless accusation of vandalism is built on sand Faxspitter ( talk) 03:39, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
TornadoLGS. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Ahnenpass, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. I would advise you to take this matter to the article's
talk page. Continuing to revert and add this to the article will constitute
edit warring.
TornadoLGS (
talk) 03:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
TornadoLGS (
talk)
03:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Cringe Faxspitter ( talk) 03:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make
personal attacks on others again, as you did at
User talk:Faxspitter, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Cassiopeia
talk
04:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
That’s what I think about your nonsense.
This is your only warning; if you make
personal attacks on others again, as you did at
User talk:Faxspitter, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Cassiopeia
talk
00:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Russian ruble.
Cassiopeia
talk
00:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
00:15, 30 March 2022 (UTC)