Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Syria. When removing content, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
brew
crewer
(yada, yada)
01:57, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
2011–2012 Syrian uprising with
this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Jim1138 (
talk)
08:10, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with
Anti-Alawite Sentiment in the 2011-2012 Syrian Uprising. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.
Lord Roem (
talk)
18:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Please stop removing
speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with
Anti-Alawite Sentiment in the 2011-2012 Syrian Uprising. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing.
Lord Roem (
talk)
18:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
You are sopher99 under another tag, as obvious as a duck --
FavorLaw (
talk)
18:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Pardon my .... French... But your the duck, not me. Sopher99 ( talk) 19:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Childish. I called you on solid grounds so you are doing the same. Very childish. -- FavorLaw ( talk) 19:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
I called you on solid grounds that you a violating such wikiepdia guidelines, then you accuse me of being biased. Why don't you take some time to reflect on your statement about me. Sopher99 ( talk) 19:10, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
2011–2012 Syrian uprising. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sopher99 ( talk) 13:46, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
2011–2012 Syrian uprising. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sopher99 ( talk) 13:46, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Salvio
Let's talk about it!
18:51, 29 February 2012 (UTC) |
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Syria. When removing content, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
brew
crewer
(yada, yada)
01:57, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
2011–2012 Syrian uprising with
this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Jim1138 (
talk)
08:10, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with
Anti-Alawite Sentiment in the 2011-2012 Syrian Uprising. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.
Lord Roem (
talk)
18:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Please stop removing
speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with
Anti-Alawite Sentiment in the 2011-2012 Syrian Uprising. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing.
Lord Roem (
talk)
18:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
You are sopher99 under another tag, as obvious as a duck --
FavorLaw (
talk)
18:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Pardon my .... French... But your the duck, not me. Sopher99 ( talk) 19:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Childish. I called you on solid grounds so you are doing the same. Very childish. -- FavorLaw ( talk) 19:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
I called you on solid grounds that you a violating such wikiepdia guidelines, then you accuse me of being biased. Why don't you take some time to reflect on your statement about me. Sopher99 ( talk) 19:10, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
2011–2012 Syrian uprising. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sopher99 ( talk) 13:46, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
2011–2012 Syrian uprising. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sopher99 ( talk) 13:46, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Salvio
Let's talk about it!
18:51, 29 February 2012 (UTC) |