If I leave a message in your talk page, reply there. I'll keep it on my watchlist. If you leave a message here, I'll reply here. Fan-1967
Previous Archives
New messages, at the bottom, below:
Are you a robot, or machine? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.9.139.231 ( talk) 22:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC).
Nice to meet another one. Actually, I'm from Aurora, but still. Dropal 22:49, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Everything on here is so confusing >_< Dropal 02:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
I get very confused about things sometimes. Dropal 02:08, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
You probably could have added a Speedy deletion template here. The article was still deleted, but a CSD could have been faster. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 04:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up on repost rules, didn't relise they had changed-- Oliver202 21:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Fan-1967, regarding your report on User:JFBurton, that case was a little too complicated for WP:AIV, which is most appropriate for cases of simple vandalism. I moved your report to here. Cheers, Deathphoenix ʕ 16:24, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice - I was wondering what I might have actually done that was so heinous. Hammersfan 04/01/07, 16.30 GMT
Fan-1967 could you help my articles? -- 4vo 16:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC) ASAP
it is Pernambuco here, thank you for defending me and for restoration of my User Page. I think that Paul is mad at me because I am the person who proposed that an article with the name Cokelogic should be deleted, and that was a page which Paul made, but I am sorry, I have explained the reasons, and I am just defending wikipedia's rules, that is all. I have never heard of Cokelogic before and I have never heard of Paul either, so this is nothing personal, I just want to see the standards to be upheld correctly in Wikipedia, nothing else. That is my only motivation and why I proposed the page for deletion. Pernambuco 20:23, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Just a quip here, I think he's doing this simply for the sake of being childish. Makes me curious though - is there anything in Wikipedia policy that would not be a ban, but equally effective at letting him release whatever anguish he has over the now-salted Cokelogic article, without harming or disrupting Wikipedia? -- Dennisthe2 10:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm writing in response to your speedy deletion tag of the Neil Rackham article. Based on other articles that exist on Wikipedia, I believe that a Neil Rackham article is appropriate. If the contents of the article need to be adjusted, that is fine, and I welcome your feedback and guidance. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JLE1945 ( talk • contribs) 16:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC).
Oh ok sorry. I did not realise this. Claudz88
Please explain
I don't know how you tagged this one, or what you were trying to do. It looks like a copy/paste of part of an AFD notice, but there's no AFD discussion article. Since this is neither a valid AFD nomination nor a valid Speedy deletion tag, the article will not be deleted under any circumstances. Fan-1967 20:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
I hang my head in shame...used the wrong template. Sorry about that
Shoessss
20:48, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the warm welcome to Wikipedia, and the references. I will try again to create a stub for firsthand learning making use of your suggestions. dth 20:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
We attempted to submit an article about the Tilly's clothing company. We were unaware of the rules and guidelines for submitting information to Wikipedia. Therefore, our initial submission was a general description of Tilly's that was, naturally, very sales-oriented. After learning that our submission was deleted, we went back and re-submitted a description. The new submission included a description of the company with information about what kind of company it is, when and where it started, where it can be found, information about how the company has evolved, a description of how one would categorize the company, the culture to which it relates, and the type of products--without being too specific--carried by the company. In order to make sure the rules and guidelines weren't violated again, we followed Pacsun's company description as a general template--without copying or plagiarizing--since Pacsun is a similar company. We felt that our final submission was a clear description of Tilly's and wasn't any more sales-oriented than the article about Pacsun, which can be found on Wikipedia and includes brands that they carry with internal links and external links to their company Web site and related industry Web sites and Wikipedia articles.
If we have still managed to violate the rules and guidelines for submitting information to Wikipedia, please advise as to how we should proceed and what changes are necessary to ensure an unbiased, non-sales-oriented, encyclopedic entry. Thank you. ( Syllit123 21:27, 5 January 2007 (UTC))
Thanks for clearing things up. I'm learning more and more about Wikipedia every day. Sorry for the misunderstanding and thanks for your help. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Syllit123 ( talk • contribs) 21:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC).
thanks! SPC Knappenberger, E.M. 01:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)<
Hello, two days ago I saw this page being created Rosemary rogers. I would like an objective opinion besides mine. Ronbo76 12:46, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Check out this if you haven't seen it yet. Cheers, Mak (talk) 22:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello! I just copied to begin a translation.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomlobato ( talk • contribs)
Indeed, I made a mistake. When noted I created the right Portuguese page. Thanks.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomlobato ( talk • contribs)
KNOPFMULTIMEDIA, HERE. SORRY I FORGOT ABOUT WRITING FOR YOU. ED & I ARE NOT REALLY COMPUTER LIT. PLEASE DO NOT TAKE OFFENSE. IN TRYING TO RECTIFY THE DELETION OF TOO SHORT AN ARTICLE; I THINK I MAY HAVE JUST STARTED A NEW KNOPFMULTIMEDIA. DID I DO IT RIGHT? 'OR WHAT NOW.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Knopfmultimedia ( talk • contribs)
Hi
I only just realised what you ment by spamming using "How to add wikipedia" see i searched for this on wikipedia and seen add a article link, so I do apologize sincerly.
What is the correct Procedure for creating a page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cyberhostpro ( talk • contribs) 00:16, 8 January 2007 (UTC).
I've been helping out on the "new pages" recently and noticed that a user that you had had your eye on in the past ( JFizzle91) has created a page with dubious validity in the encyclopedia, " Cyssero."
I tagged this one initially with the "spam" tag for speedy deletion, but he has removed it three times so far. I checked out his talk page and saw that you had already warned him about his destructive editing.
Now, I'm not too familiar with the procedure for getting someone blocked, but this guy seems like a good candidate, and I have an idea that you are more knowledgeable in that subject, so I am referring both this user and his page as candidates for you.
Thanks for your time. Alekjds 03:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
You are a douche.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dallasfilthy4 ( talk • contribs)
Is there any way to contest the erasing? The constitution of Clearfield High has recently been modified to change the VP Assembly Student Body Position to VP Amabit vir ipse. Which is latin for "Love of Arts" to encompass a broader responsibility. Sorry for the "booger" I was frusterated with my denied attempts to change it.
Ducemus 07:13, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Image:AGMA logo.png —The preceding unsigned comment was added by YOYOJO89 ( talk • contribs) 15:42, 8 January 2007 (UTC).
I'm very new to editing pages on wikipedia and would like to see content that isn't on this certain page, on there. It is basic at the moment as I have only just started editing it but will remove it and carry on with the editing using another text based program...I hope this is ok?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan0987 ( talk • contribs)
I see now, how I thought it worked was that if the season one link came from The Crystal Maze webpage, then it'd be obvious that it came from there...on the breakdown of episode comment, I have seen another programme that breaks it down, but this is currently being shown on TV (as it's a new programme)...I welcome all queries and comments and would value more advice on how to compile a better page (or page from a link
"Humourous" is not "a perfectly valid British spelling". See [1]. — Wereon 19:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Calm down both of you, I reverted originally because someone had vandalised the article by removing the word in dispute and suggesting that one of the b3ta founders was dead. Can you try to come to a civil resolution, either that or remove the word entirely, I don't really think there is any need to get into a heated argument about the spelling of a single word. Fraslet 21:23, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
... and relax, happy new year etc Fraslet 21:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I was trying to get rid of this comment. Guess people are just too fast for me. Sorry! - CobaltBlueTony 20:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
You'd better spend your time defending Cock from vandals than tracking your own user page! Such is the fate of all admins, huh? - CobaltBlueTony 21:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
AskPoodle is the local search engine that created the Pay per chat concept and is currently the only search engine using it. This is not advertising the company but simply defining the pay per chat concept and its origin. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lpereira74 ( talk • contribs) 22:14, 8 January 2007 (UTC).
How should I define pay per chat? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lpereira74 ( talk • contribs) 22:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC).
The term par per chat is directly related to online advertising in the local search space. An industry that clearly you do not understand. Terms and concepts such as pay per click, pay per call, and pay per post are also Neologism and not Notable to most people on planet Earth. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lpereira74 ( talk • contribs) 23:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC).
i said look at a hiragana chart —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Surfingchornicle ( talk • contribs) 00:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC).
ROFL-ROFL-ROFL-ROFL-ROFL
I I L / \
LOL-----______\
L I I
THAT is a roflcopter btw, and second, why are you talking to me? i didnt write the article!
crap my roflcopter got messed up by your stupid talk page! you shall pay! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Surfingchornicle ( talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 January 2007 (UTC).
i have created a new one!
_____ ! L ! O ! L ! Z\ !______\ lolololol
you may have killed my roflcopter but i made a lollersk8! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Surfingchornicle ( talk • contribs) 00:44, 9 January 2007 (UTC).
STFU n00b -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Surfingchornicle ( talk • contribs)
Ha ha ha, what are the odds? That's very funny. Nolo contendere. I really don't know Latin very well, I hope that I shouldn't be too embarassed by it, I've just taken it as a hobby.
Ducemus 04:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm just not pissing people off like I used to! -- Merope 15:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey,
I just wanted to let you know that I replaced your deletion tag for god bord with a Speedy deletion tag because this artcile just seems like total nonsense.. Hope you aren't mad ;-) Mystify85JEC 20:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey—Preceding unsigned comment added by Stud muffin448 ( talk • contribs)
Thks for yr message. You will notice that there are a number of artists released on Decca Records (UK) with no article on wikipedia, among these is Terry Dene. As I do not have any original contribution, I merely created a link to a site that contains some info on him, as well as his discography. I was also surprised to find that there was no article on Brian Poole, or Brian Poole and The Tremeloes. Regards, imfred —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aliceinwland ( talk • contribs) 16:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC).
I forgot to thank you for not being mad about the SD tag ;-).. Aww I just like being kind ;-)
i won't do it anymore—Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamapple1 ( talk • contribs)
Per the latest clarified WP:CSD#G4 guidelines, an article can now only be speedied as a repost if it was deleted per an AFD (or CFD, MFD, etc.) discussion. Otherwise, the appropriate speedy criterion should just be re-used (in this case {{ db-web}} and {{ db-spam}}). Fan-1967 18:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry.—Preceding unsigned comment added by The Real Saints ( talk • contribs)
Your recent edit to Bill Gates ( diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
I am creating a list of online retail shops of India and need to create article describing each company , please allow me to create such acticles.
Im a packer myself.
I don't know if I tell you this enough, but thank Zeus you do new page patrol. I can always count on you to accurately tag articles and warn the creators. -- Merope 21:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
exchangeyou,
i have the domain exchangeyou.com and want to introduce it as a encyclopedic article and i'm been warned of a speedy deletion cos of advertising it.. well, i'm the renter of the domain, and if i'm doing propaganda.. what is 'hospitalityclub' doing? it is not hospitalityclub.org!
should i include exchangeyou.com as the title of the page?
I will try to make 'exchangeyou' more encyclopedic, .. tell me anything else if so
hey, i have 900 thousand members on my site, do you not think it meets the standards.
MySpace article is advertising, so why cant mine be, dont be hypocritical.
Joe, YourPro—Preceding unsigned comment added by Yourpro ( talk • contribs)
Yeah about that...ha ha I felt that I should do something redeemable for my actions. And it's not my high school it's sort of a rival high school, and as you can see we organize well against them, I had no (major) part in it though! Question: In my Lobbying Article how exactly do I cite, I tried a little "fill in the blanks" equation provided by Wikipedia but I'm obviously too techno-illiterate to get it right I tried a couple in my article if you want to check out my incompetency.
Thanks,
Ducemus 04:58, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
How Dare you even try and judge my site. Id like to see you try to create it yourself, dont try and judge other peoples work according to how important to how you think it is.
I suppose deleting these articles makes you feel important. I think it makes you very sad.
I can write an article if i like, and the Myspace article IS a blatant ad. im not comparing my site to Myspace for one second, i simply said that just because i dont have millions of members it doesnt mean that i cant have an article.
i think you are deliberately trying to make my site insignificant, i dont care if it is to you.
IT IS NOT TO ME.
In future consider that other people might like something even if you dont. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yourpro ( talk • contribs) 17:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC).
What you like or dislike is clearly relevant, my site is 'notable' as people use it. you are an ignorant person, i have spent time on this site and im making sure people know what it is. if you have a problem with that you are quite clearly an idiot.
i cannot be bothered to discuss this any longer, you pathetic man. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yourpro ( talk • contribs) 17:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC).
Hey, thanks so much for supporting my recent RFA. A number of editors considered that I wasn't ready for the mop yet and unfortunately the RFA did not succeed (69/26/11). There are a number of areas which I will be working on (including changing my username) in the next few months in order to allay the fears of those who opposed my election to administrator.
I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you sincerely for your support over the past week. I've been blown away by the level of interest taken in my RFA and appreciate the time and energy dedicated by all the editors who have contributed to it, support, oppose and neutral alike. I hope to bump into you again soon and look forward to serving you and Wikipedia in any way I can. Cheers! The Rambling Man 19:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC) (the non-admin, formerly known as Budgiekiller)
I have just posted a message on Paulmcdonald's talk page in which I make some comments suggesting that you may have oversimplified the advice you gave. You may possible want to comment to me or to him. DGG 20:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry; sent simultaneous warning message which posted just after yours.-- Anthony.bradbury 23:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
The Brian Wandziliak article is about my Economics/History Teacher who has influenced my life.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgibsoniv ( talk • contribs)
Well I'm sorry for wasting your time then
Good day.
He vadlised the WWE page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MattC13 ( talk • contribs) 20:40, 12 January 2007 (UTC).
I am rather a pop culture aficionado and I couldn't help but notice there are no articles on Princess Luciana Pignatelli (author of "The Beautiful People's Beauty Book" ... an iconic, ironic book by a woman who has long since become a caricature of herself) and fashion pundit and author Simon Doonan. How does one go about submitting an article to Wikipedia?
Thanks,
Flyrod—Preceding unsigned comment added by Flyrod ( talk • contribs) 01:47, 13 January 2007
I must admit that I do not know who made you a official censor however even if it was almighty god whatever I or anyone else writes takes time and thought and the least it deserver is that the all powerful censors read it before they delete it. Don´t know how to write my username, its vascofernandes.
If you did read it than i don't understand how you justify deletion. If you'd have said it didn't comply with wikipedia policy, very well, it's true, it's a bogus claim but it's true. Saying it said the same thing Active Criticism does is just not true! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vascofernandes ( talk • contribs) 02:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC).
No it does not kill me, I just believed that wikipedia belonged to the universe who helped create it. If it was so than I see no other way to know how the majority of the users feel than allowing texts (essays) like mine to exist. If I'm wrong and it actually belongs to the wikipedia foundation represented by yourself (in whatever quality you have) then very well, otherwise you may want to reflect how can the owners of wikipedia express their feelings if you're (in a general way) thinking for them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vascofernandes ( talk • contribs) 02:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC).
Finnaly, and I will leave you alone now, I don't understand what harm can a page do, specially since it is not trying to wrong anyone, I believe (now, this is just a single opinion) you over censor, trying to keep wikipedia so clean that it actually lacks heart. Vascofernandes 02:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
I've already reported him for page blanking and template removal -- Mhking 03:06, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
..but I really have to answer, for me it's not important how I feel, nor do I want come in and take over everything and say I'm right lets do things like I say. What is important is that all people, not just you (again generally) have the right to say, I think wikipedia should be a clean encyclopedia and I believe the majority of the users is on my side. The same way, I want the opportunity to say I oppose that view and give others (not force) the opportunity to agree, disagree or say anything else. Good Night. Vascofernandes 03:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Fan-1967, hope it's okay, I removed the db on the above article after Herostratus's edits. Please feel free to PROD or AfD if you think appropriate. Thanks -- Samir धर्म 03:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
idiot—Preceding unsigned comment added by Astro boy1928 ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Valgorth. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Chris 73 | Talk 18:10, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
It's unprotected now. Keep an eye on that user, would you? -- Merope 18:41, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
No... it is merely a STARTING POINT!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmozman ( talk • contribs)
I have seen you around quite a lot when I clear the CSD backlogs, I appreciate your hard work there in new page patrol, but in doing so I have often known your taggings to be a bit over-zealous. This is particularly true in the article I just posted, which you have tagged for speedy deletion. I will admit I am not 100% unbiased in this matter (regarding if I think the article should be kept or not), but the article clearly passes CSD A7... you are quoting from WP:WEB in your edit summary. That had no business as a CSD criteria. If you want to take this up at AfD, go ahead. Best, Irongargoyle 01:12, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
The article "Semen Fetishism" is sourced " http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Bukkake&oldid=90217605"
What is the method which the article "Semen Fetishism" is not deleted? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bluevainder ( talk • contribs) 01:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC).
I made several changes to Limelight Networks, and I think the article should be okay now, with notability adequately established. -- Eastmain 02:48, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
you just deleted my article of foop. I am foop so im not attacking anyone. im just showing myself to the world. because it is the truth
sorry i didnt read ur message thuroghly. i understand why you blocked it now i shall stop trying to get this on the site. i apologize for my rude behavior
ur mean im never going on again. and to think i was going to donate 5 dollars.
This is supposed to be an encyclopedia where we share knowledge. Just because you disagree... Yer Wrong 19:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Again, just because you disagree.. Yer Wrong 19:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
you are right.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Titipag ( talk • contribs) 02:18, 15 January 2007
VETO: zudeo.com is a completely new methodology of selling video streams and needs to be documented in wikipedia. It also need to be in category "video hosting" to allow a complete overview of video hosting services. -- Michael Janich 04:43, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Zudeo.com
A tag has been placed on
Zudeo.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Please see Wikipedia:Notability (web). -- Fan-1967 02:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
This user repeatedly changes {{ notenglish}} to {{ db-notenglish}} under many usernames, see here for some context. I have blocked the new account indefinitely and filed a new checkuser request. Please block accounts with this behaviour on sight and list them for checkuser or contact Mackensen. Thank you, Kusma (討論) 10:21, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Doo eet! - CobaltBlueTony 17:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
You win. Close my article. Delete it. That's just one less article you will have in your collection of knowledge. But when my site is a bit more "Notable" as people keep saying, may I publish an article then??
By The Way, How do you know what the site is like on the inside (I don't mean this smartly, but I am just curious) Do you have an account there? Dphantom15 20:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Just an FYI, if you're going to give him a final warning straight off for a spam post, use {{subst:spam4im|article}} as it says "This is your ONLY warning" rather than "This is your final warning". :) - Painezor T C 02:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Here's my riddle- ---Lazylaces-Helping Wikipedians since.. um.. for almost a year! Lazylaces ( talk • contribs Riddle 12:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey! I made a template for NPP that I use from time to time that says "Please do not resubmit this article. If you disagree with its deletion, you may request a deletion review." Would this be a template you would use? Should I create it on the Wikispace (instead of my userspace as it is now)? It's good for articles that aren't vandalism or vanity (and so don't really warrant escalating {{ t3a}} notices and the like), but that I don't want to salt. Thoughts? You can write back here (you're on my watchlist) or on my page. -- Merope 20:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
all the writing was false info, amy has not confirmed that 'All That I'm Living For' is actually the next single, she said it at a concert which cant be considered as a source, she hasn't yet said it on an official posting like Evthreads or Evanescence.com, or any interviews. so im not vandalising anything THANKYOU!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Zacanescence ( talk • contribs)
I came upon the user's contributions when going through the dead-end pages and saw your comments on her talk page (regarding copyvios of machine-translated articles). Do you remember if you ever get an answer regarding her edits? I'm just asking because I'd hate to go through all of them (there are hundreds of similar pages, most could probably be deleted as nonsense) if someone else already did it. - Bobet 16:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
FYI, I blocked this account indefinitely. -- Fang Aili talk 17:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
I was bored and did a vandal count for you. {{user vandalized|36}} sounds good in your userbox, I think. - Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 09:24, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
u need to chill ok —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kitty09 ( talk • contribs) 16:24, 18 January 2007 (UTC).
if its an encyclopedia why can i edit any information i want—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitty09 ( talk • contribs)
y are there video games and music artists doing here they arent significant......what if i told you that ur article sexual intercourse is not important we all know what sex is anmd how to do it duh
people that dont have a life like you odviously—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitty09 ( talk • contribs)
Mostly I get this bot message within 10 seconds. For some reason the bot's not working right now -- oh dear :o —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 154.5.187.90 ( talk) 18:12, 18 January 2007 (UTC).
My apologies for posting this article as it was. I was attempting to create a page in the same vein as Monitor Group, Mitchell Madison Group, etc. Please allow an undelete and I can create the article more objectively.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelinger ( talk • contribs)
If you're interested, I can probably give you a few hundred more
Oh Lord, just when I thought I had cleaned the majority out. Yeah, I've started the process, might just as well see it through -- I've already tagged somewhere in the neighborhood of 500 pages.
That's how I saw your Prods
Not a big coincidence, I'm afraid: for the past few days, I've been working off your Move Log, moving forward in time. -- Calton | Talk 23:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Subject of multiple independent news coverage, so not speediable -- but I wouldn't oppose an AFD. NawlinWiki 04:40, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Trust me, I am trying to help wikipedia just as much as the next guy. I have seen this around the country, and I think it is pretty notable. Like I said, let us see if it works out, because maybe I am wrong. Please do not accuse me of vandalism, I would be the last one to do something like that. Fortyniners9999 06:12, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Not sure how the communication works on this, so I'm hoping I'm sending this to the correct place. I edited my entry of "Merchants of Deception" and tried to make it as objective as possible. I'd be interested in some pointers if editing is still needed. Thank you very much for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tranquilize ( talk • contribs)
Hi - thank you for giving the suggestions. They are helpful as I'm new on wikipedia.org however like that resource very much.
Your comments were valuable, however let me disagree with the removal of ODC term (offshore dedicated center). This is tremendous trend in software outsourcing - that's why I think it should be covered in the article.
Take a look at the few independent links highlighting this form of outsourcing:
http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/Offshore+Dedicated+Center+(outsourcing)
This term is already used by CIOs and IT directors and is popular in paper editions of tech books. That's why I feel that my input into wikipedia is valuable.
-- Billystut 10:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Have you lived with RLS? How can you say that surviving it isn't notable. That's extremely offensive.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottaucoin ( talk • contribs)
I'm a survivor.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottaucoin ( talk • contribs)
Sorry about that last edit; the vandal was faster than me, and I accidently reverted it wrong. Paxsimius 16:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
OK thanks. My edit wasnt an endorsement of the article, just RC patrol. Ab e g92 contribs Boomer Sooners! 18:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
deuce bag—Preceding unsigned comment added by Apple321 ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for reverting my user and talk pages before. You were so quick I didn't even notice it had been moved! Cheers, Sarah 23:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
hey how do i change the name of an article ? TusharN 14:58, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
why would someone who has her own domain, janedark.com, with blogging dating back years, suddenly get a blogspot page, with nothing on it but a handful of phrases that happen to support otherwise unverifiable claims on a Wiki page. That stretches AGF way past the breaking point. Fan-1967 18:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
I am constantly being accused of rudeness on Wikipedia but actually, I always strive to be positive (if only to say "put it on your own website"). In this case you could have told my fellow Croydonian to create a user page. -- RHaworth 10:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Why is this user going round editing other peoples user pages? The edits arn't offensive, but they arnt exactly helpfull either? JFBurton 12:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
The whole article isnt' a spam article, only the last posting; I've made the appropriate change... -- Mhking 18:24, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
This may seem a bit odd coming out of the blue, but thank you for being a part of this project. -- Steel 19:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
This information is not real. What i changed it to, "Nige never crossed Korea", is. I feel the article created in the first place is vandalism as it is untrue information.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dog Man 64 ( talk • contribs)
no there is no such a dvd. please stop giving me warnings as i know more about the subject.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dog Man 64 ( talk • contribs)
i was making it into a good article not vandalism but thank you for taking an effort to stop vandalism and i am sorry for making my artivle to preseve as vandalism but i am planing on making it a good article. -Nate1028
can u remove it then coz i don't know how. also another thing, i dont know much about wikipedia but i know bear about staking euro papes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dog Man 64 ( talk • contribs)
are you a person or computer? how long have u been a wikipedia policemen—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dog Man 64 ( talk • contribs)
Dont bother changing that page. the information is offensive. but ive made it nice. are u a robot.—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Dog Man 64 (
talk •
contribs)
He works for the government and that information is classified.—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Dog Man 64 (
talk •
contribs)
its not a nonsence article you shit. -- SolitaryMoterplaatz 20:51, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
can i make the article though—Preceding unsigned comment added by Nate1028 ( talk • contribs)
so its a no to x rated nuns or x rated pandas—Preceding unsigned comment added by Nate1028 ( talk • contribs)
can you please write in english becusae i am 13 and i dont understand what you are saying—Preceding unsigned comment added by Nate1028 ( talk • contribs)
anyone who rites liek this and delcares taht they are underage should be blockd. :P - CobaltBlueTony 21:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
you posted some stuff on her page and i wanted to know is she the real one. i have found several myspace pages with her on it and several other pages of her all the pics are the same. and she looks like this girl i seen in williamsville calle airal z. i am courious if all this is is a scam to make a site to collect money and scam...well what do you think....± —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.24.144.4 ( talk) 13:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC).
Firstname Lastname is better than this person —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SAStarbucks ( talk • contribs) 16:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC).
Just wanted to say kudos for your sensible responses to all the nutjobs who attack you on this page! Er, yes, that's all. -- Bonadea 17:13, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi. As you're already aware, I recently nominated the article Simon cobb for AfD ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon cobb, which quickly got mobbed by apparent sockpuppetry from multiple single-purpose accounts (some of which created other non-notable youth footballer articles trumpeting that "he is good friends with Simon Cobb" and the like to try and add credibility). I try to avoid biting so in cases where it's clear that it's just someone trying to namecheck themselves or their friends, I often make a point of explaining things clearly to them on their or the article's talk page if they post there, eschewing generic templates if necessary, and in this case I decided to prod rather than just slapping a db-a7 on there because, strictly speaking, it did assert his notability (but that notability was low in the extreme). My question is, what is the most appropriate course of action in apparent "newbie" sockpuppetry cases like this? It seems a bit OTT to file a report on Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets or WP:AIV, as I don't think there's a particularly malicious element to it, just a misguided newbie believing they can sway the "vote". Should I be tagging the SPA's pages with a sockpuppet tag, or is that a step best left to admins? I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. Thanks. ~ Matticus T C 21:38, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Dear Fan,
I am actually new to Wikipedia, so I would appreciate any suggestions on an article on Miss Teenage California. I actually thought I was providing information that was worthy of publishing. Certainly one could argue that Wikepidia is hardly a place where someone would think as being a place of "advertising." Would appreciate a responce. Thank you.
Have you ever seen the zontar films? It seems you like deleting other people's articles too. Watch the films then delete the article but I have already stated my reasons why I think it is important. Would like a reply to this please. Just don't want to think you're one of those wierdos who get kicks out of destroying other people's work! ( Ferdinand4321 23:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC))
Well there's the deltic 22 website www.royalscotsgrey.com under latest news advertising the new zontar video. You can't reasonably expect me to find third party sources out of a hat like that. All, i can say is that I know plenty of people who have seen them and consider them extremely funny. I also wasn't saying the article should stay because it is on youtube. I was saying that it should stay because it is a perfect example of current trends in what is created for youtube in the united kingdom. I.e not chicago. If I went round deleting all the stuff about american TV shows and popular culture there wouldn't be much left because I think yours is some of the blandest in the world. You cannot operate as a self appointed censor deleting based on personal preference. Someone who posted a previous message on your user talk said you are over zealous. Maybe you should take a break and consider the fact that just because you don't like something nobody else will. It took me time and effort to write that article and I will improve it. Had you not been so hasty in requesting its deletion you might have seen me justify it. After all Wikepedia is for sharing of knowledge and useful information. That is why kids use it to do their schoolwork. It is NOT a place for people to share only the information THE think should be shared. That is not democracy. Although you americans don't like that word do you.
Replies to this on my user talk please.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferdinand4321 ( talk • contribs)
No the videos aren't mine! I don't like you insinuating that I would advertise on Wikipedia because I am totally against that. None of my other additions to wikipedia have been questioned. I simply felt that the zontar films, which I stumbled upon by accident were sufficiently well known amongst people in th UK to make them noteable. Unfortunately you don't have the UK perspective on them so you can't understand their notability.
I think personal view is important because I would dismiss for example darts as not being a sport but many other people think it is and so I have to abide by this. Many people think the zontar fims are funny and therefore you should abide by them.
Anyway, as I thought we were all supposed to be one big happy wikipedia family maybe you could check for the third party sources so as to make my article meet YOUR obviously very exacting standards.
But I know now that you are the kind of person who, no matter how obvious it is that you are totally wrong, will continue along your selected path. However know this. If the zontar article is deleted before I have had more time to change it i will contineue to replace it for as long as it takes for you to drill it through your obviously thick skull that it warrants a place on this great resource. A resource which you are doing your level best do destroy!
Again any respones on my user page I want to keep the zontar talk page clear of your ignorant remarks.
thank you again. please see the folowing link and let me know if it is ok.
http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070123/NEWS/701230354/1005/SPORTS0106
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070119/FEATURES01/701190351/1026/FEATURES
can you please check the links i put up? Thnak you so much for your comment and help1
The last time I offered to nominate you, you said you wanted "maybe somewhere down the road, but not right now." I think you're definitely ready now. Please consider my offer. :) Nishkid 64 02:32, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
can u give me an example like what kind of article is ok? It's ok you make fun of us. We will be on this for sure. just a matter of time. thanks for your help again.
Thank you again for you help! From OnlineIdols
Stupid kids. TheQuandry 16:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Ian Gerardo is a real person, secondly, The Chicago Bears will never win a Super Bowl ever again (As they suck balls, yes its true (Grossman's Rating against Green Bay: 0.0)). HAIL GREEN BAY PACKERS!
Signed,
King of the World. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
Xowfmp (
talk •
contribs)
18:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC).
Well, he has been looked at by scouts from colleges around the US, including Michigan, UCLA, Notre Dame, USC, Wisonsin and Ohio State. In a few years, you'll read about him in the papers.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Xowfmp ( talk • contribs)
Wikipedia sucks. In my opinion.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Xowfmp ( talk • contribs)
im very sory for vandalising the website i didnt realise it would save it. i wont do it again.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.240.37.127 ( talk • contribs)
The Order is notable enough. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ares Elite ( talk • contribs) 21:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC).
I provided the homepage, that should be enough. plus im the Ares Elite.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ares Elite ( talk • contribs)
The whole Order is backing me on this, they say it is notable so it is notable.
Jean d'Arc,
AOL is discontinuing free journal. Friends refered me to various
free sites as blogger.com, blogspot, Huffington etc. Why on earth would my little life concern you so.? Kathy Knopf KHARMAKIDS ( talk) 20:02, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
If I leave a message in your talk page, reply there. I'll keep it on my watchlist. If you leave a message here, I'll reply here. Fan-1967
Previous Archives
New messages, at the bottom, below:
Are you a robot, or machine? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.9.139.231 ( talk) 22:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC).
Nice to meet another one. Actually, I'm from Aurora, but still. Dropal 22:49, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Everything on here is so confusing >_< Dropal 02:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
I get very confused about things sometimes. Dropal 02:08, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
You probably could have added a Speedy deletion template here. The article was still deleted, but a CSD could have been faster. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 04:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up on repost rules, didn't relise they had changed-- Oliver202 21:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Fan-1967, regarding your report on User:JFBurton, that case was a little too complicated for WP:AIV, which is most appropriate for cases of simple vandalism. I moved your report to here. Cheers, Deathphoenix ʕ 16:24, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice - I was wondering what I might have actually done that was so heinous. Hammersfan 04/01/07, 16.30 GMT
Fan-1967 could you help my articles? -- 4vo 16:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC) ASAP
it is Pernambuco here, thank you for defending me and for restoration of my User Page. I think that Paul is mad at me because I am the person who proposed that an article with the name Cokelogic should be deleted, and that was a page which Paul made, but I am sorry, I have explained the reasons, and I am just defending wikipedia's rules, that is all. I have never heard of Cokelogic before and I have never heard of Paul either, so this is nothing personal, I just want to see the standards to be upheld correctly in Wikipedia, nothing else. That is my only motivation and why I proposed the page for deletion. Pernambuco 20:23, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Just a quip here, I think he's doing this simply for the sake of being childish. Makes me curious though - is there anything in Wikipedia policy that would not be a ban, but equally effective at letting him release whatever anguish he has over the now-salted Cokelogic article, without harming or disrupting Wikipedia? -- Dennisthe2 10:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm writing in response to your speedy deletion tag of the Neil Rackham article. Based on other articles that exist on Wikipedia, I believe that a Neil Rackham article is appropriate. If the contents of the article need to be adjusted, that is fine, and I welcome your feedback and guidance. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JLE1945 ( talk • contribs) 16:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC).
Oh ok sorry. I did not realise this. Claudz88
Please explain
I don't know how you tagged this one, or what you were trying to do. It looks like a copy/paste of part of an AFD notice, but there's no AFD discussion article. Since this is neither a valid AFD nomination nor a valid Speedy deletion tag, the article will not be deleted under any circumstances. Fan-1967 20:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
I hang my head in shame...used the wrong template. Sorry about that
Shoessss
20:48, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the warm welcome to Wikipedia, and the references. I will try again to create a stub for firsthand learning making use of your suggestions. dth 20:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
We attempted to submit an article about the Tilly's clothing company. We were unaware of the rules and guidelines for submitting information to Wikipedia. Therefore, our initial submission was a general description of Tilly's that was, naturally, very sales-oriented. After learning that our submission was deleted, we went back and re-submitted a description. The new submission included a description of the company with information about what kind of company it is, when and where it started, where it can be found, information about how the company has evolved, a description of how one would categorize the company, the culture to which it relates, and the type of products--without being too specific--carried by the company. In order to make sure the rules and guidelines weren't violated again, we followed Pacsun's company description as a general template--without copying or plagiarizing--since Pacsun is a similar company. We felt that our final submission was a clear description of Tilly's and wasn't any more sales-oriented than the article about Pacsun, which can be found on Wikipedia and includes brands that they carry with internal links and external links to their company Web site and related industry Web sites and Wikipedia articles.
If we have still managed to violate the rules and guidelines for submitting information to Wikipedia, please advise as to how we should proceed and what changes are necessary to ensure an unbiased, non-sales-oriented, encyclopedic entry. Thank you. ( Syllit123 21:27, 5 January 2007 (UTC))
Thanks for clearing things up. I'm learning more and more about Wikipedia every day. Sorry for the misunderstanding and thanks for your help. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Syllit123 ( talk • contribs) 21:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC).
thanks! SPC Knappenberger, E.M. 01:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)<
Hello, two days ago I saw this page being created Rosemary rogers. I would like an objective opinion besides mine. Ronbo76 12:46, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Check out this if you haven't seen it yet. Cheers, Mak (talk) 22:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello! I just copied to begin a translation.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomlobato ( talk • contribs)
Indeed, I made a mistake. When noted I created the right Portuguese page. Thanks.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomlobato ( talk • contribs)
KNOPFMULTIMEDIA, HERE. SORRY I FORGOT ABOUT WRITING FOR YOU. ED & I ARE NOT REALLY COMPUTER LIT. PLEASE DO NOT TAKE OFFENSE. IN TRYING TO RECTIFY THE DELETION OF TOO SHORT AN ARTICLE; I THINK I MAY HAVE JUST STARTED A NEW KNOPFMULTIMEDIA. DID I DO IT RIGHT? 'OR WHAT NOW.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Knopfmultimedia ( talk • contribs)
Hi
I only just realised what you ment by spamming using "How to add wikipedia" see i searched for this on wikipedia and seen add a article link, so I do apologize sincerly.
What is the correct Procedure for creating a page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cyberhostpro ( talk • contribs) 00:16, 8 January 2007 (UTC).
I've been helping out on the "new pages" recently and noticed that a user that you had had your eye on in the past ( JFizzle91) has created a page with dubious validity in the encyclopedia, " Cyssero."
I tagged this one initially with the "spam" tag for speedy deletion, but he has removed it three times so far. I checked out his talk page and saw that you had already warned him about his destructive editing.
Now, I'm not too familiar with the procedure for getting someone blocked, but this guy seems like a good candidate, and I have an idea that you are more knowledgeable in that subject, so I am referring both this user and his page as candidates for you.
Thanks for your time. Alekjds 03:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
You are a douche.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dallasfilthy4 ( talk • contribs)
Is there any way to contest the erasing? The constitution of Clearfield High has recently been modified to change the VP Assembly Student Body Position to VP Amabit vir ipse. Which is latin for "Love of Arts" to encompass a broader responsibility. Sorry for the "booger" I was frusterated with my denied attempts to change it.
Ducemus 07:13, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Image:AGMA logo.png —The preceding unsigned comment was added by YOYOJO89 ( talk • contribs) 15:42, 8 January 2007 (UTC).
I'm very new to editing pages on wikipedia and would like to see content that isn't on this certain page, on there. It is basic at the moment as I have only just started editing it but will remove it and carry on with the editing using another text based program...I hope this is ok?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan0987 ( talk • contribs)
I see now, how I thought it worked was that if the season one link came from The Crystal Maze webpage, then it'd be obvious that it came from there...on the breakdown of episode comment, I have seen another programme that breaks it down, but this is currently being shown on TV (as it's a new programme)...I welcome all queries and comments and would value more advice on how to compile a better page (or page from a link
"Humourous" is not "a perfectly valid British spelling". See [1]. — Wereon 19:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Calm down both of you, I reverted originally because someone had vandalised the article by removing the word in dispute and suggesting that one of the b3ta founders was dead. Can you try to come to a civil resolution, either that or remove the word entirely, I don't really think there is any need to get into a heated argument about the spelling of a single word. Fraslet 21:23, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
... and relax, happy new year etc Fraslet 21:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I was trying to get rid of this comment. Guess people are just too fast for me. Sorry! - CobaltBlueTony 20:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
You'd better spend your time defending Cock from vandals than tracking your own user page! Such is the fate of all admins, huh? - CobaltBlueTony 21:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
AskPoodle is the local search engine that created the Pay per chat concept and is currently the only search engine using it. This is not advertising the company but simply defining the pay per chat concept and its origin. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lpereira74 ( talk • contribs) 22:14, 8 January 2007 (UTC).
How should I define pay per chat? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lpereira74 ( talk • contribs) 22:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC).
The term par per chat is directly related to online advertising in the local search space. An industry that clearly you do not understand. Terms and concepts such as pay per click, pay per call, and pay per post are also Neologism and not Notable to most people on planet Earth. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lpereira74 ( talk • contribs) 23:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC).
i said look at a hiragana chart —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Surfingchornicle ( talk • contribs) 00:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC).
ROFL-ROFL-ROFL-ROFL-ROFL
I I L / \
LOL-----______\
L I I
THAT is a roflcopter btw, and second, why are you talking to me? i didnt write the article!
crap my roflcopter got messed up by your stupid talk page! you shall pay! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Surfingchornicle ( talk • contribs) 00:29, 9 January 2007 (UTC).
i have created a new one!
_____ ! L ! O ! L ! Z\ !______\ lolololol
you may have killed my roflcopter but i made a lollersk8! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Surfingchornicle ( talk • contribs) 00:44, 9 January 2007 (UTC).
STFU n00b -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Surfingchornicle ( talk • contribs)
Ha ha ha, what are the odds? That's very funny. Nolo contendere. I really don't know Latin very well, I hope that I shouldn't be too embarassed by it, I've just taken it as a hobby.
Ducemus 04:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm just not pissing people off like I used to! -- Merope 15:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey,
I just wanted to let you know that I replaced your deletion tag for god bord with a Speedy deletion tag because this artcile just seems like total nonsense.. Hope you aren't mad ;-) Mystify85JEC 20:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey—Preceding unsigned comment added by Stud muffin448 ( talk • contribs)
Thks for yr message. You will notice that there are a number of artists released on Decca Records (UK) with no article on wikipedia, among these is Terry Dene. As I do not have any original contribution, I merely created a link to a site that contains some info on him, as well as his discography. I was also surprised to find that there was no article on Brian Poole, or Brian Poole and The Tremeloes. Regards, imfred —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aliceinwland ( talk • contribs) 16:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC).
I forgot to thank you for not being mad about the SD tag ;-).. Aww I just like being kind ;-)
i won't do it anymore—Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamapple1 ( talk • contribs)
Per the latest clarified WP:CSD#G4 guidelines, an article can now only be speedied as a repost if it was deleted per an AFD (or CFD, MFD, etc.) discussion. Otherwise, the appropriate speedy criterion should just be re-used (in this case {{ db-web}} and {{ db-spam}}). Fan-1967 18:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry.—Preceding unsigned comment added by The Real Saints ( talk • contribs)
Your recent edit to Bill Gates ( diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
I am creating a list of online retail shops of India and need to create article describing each company , please allow me to create such acticles.
Im a packer myself.
I don't know if I tell you this enough, but thank Zeus you do new page patrol. I can always count on you to accurately tag articles and warn the creators. -- Merope 21:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
exchangeyou,
i have the domain exchangeyou.com and want to introduce it as a encyclopedic article and i'm been warned of a speedy deletion cos of advertising it.. well, i'm the renter of the domain, and if i'm doing propaganda.. what is 'hospitalityclub' doing? it is not hospitalityclub.org!
should i include exchangeyou.com as the title of the page?
I will try to make 'exchangeyou' more encyclopedic, .. tell me anything else if so
hey, i have 900 thousand members on my site, do you not think it meets the standards.
MySpace article is advertising, so why cant mine be, dont be hypocritical.
Joe, YourPro—Preceding unsigned comment added by Yourpro ( talk • contribs)
Yeah about that...ha ha I felt that I should do something redeemable for my actions. And it's not my high school it's sort of a rival high school, and as you can see we organize well against them, I had no (major) part in it though! Question: In my Lobbying Article how exactly do I cite, I tried a little "fill in the blanks" equation provided by Wikipedia but I'm obviously too techno-illiterate to get it right I tried a couple in my article if you want to check out my incompetency.
Thanks,
Ducemus 04:58, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
How Dare you even try and judge my site. Id like to see you try to create it yourself, dont try and judge other peoples work according to how important to how you think it is.
I suppose deleting these articles makes you feel important. I think it makes you very sad.
I can write an article if i like, and the Myspace article IS a blatant ad. im not comparing my site to Myspace for one second, i simply said that just because i dont have millions of members it doesnt mean that i cant have an article.
i think you are deliberately trying to make my site insignificant, i dont care if it is to you.
IT IS NOT TO ME.
In future consider that other people might like something even if you dont. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yourpro ( talk • contribs) 17:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC).
What you like or dislike is clearly relevant, my site is 'notable' as people use it. you are an ignorant person, i have spent time on this site and im making sure people know what it is. if you have a problem with that you are quite clearly an idiot.
i cannot be bothered to discuss this any longer, you pathetic man. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yourpro ( talk • contribs) 17:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC).
Hey, thanks so much for supporting my recent RFA. A number of editors considered that I wasn't ready for the mop yet and unfortunately the RFA did not succeed (69/26/11). There are a number of areas which I will be working on (including changing my username) in the next few months in order to allay the fears of those who opposed my election to administrator.
I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you sincerely for your support over the past week. I've been blown away by the level of interest taken in my RFA and appreciate the time and energy dedicated by all the editors who have contributed to it, support, oppose and neutral alike. I hope to bump into you again soon and look forward to serving you and Wikipedia in any way I can. Cheers! The Rambling Man 19:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC) (the non-admin, formerly known as Budgiekiller)
I have just posted a message on Paulmcdonald's talk page in which I make some comments suggesting that you may have oversimplified the advice you gave. You may possible want to comment to me or to him. DGG 20:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry; sent simultaneous warning message which posted just after yours.-- Anthony.bradbury 23:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
The Brian Wandziliak article is about my Economics/History Teacher who has influenced my life.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgibsoniv ( talk • contribs)
Well I'm sorry for wasting your time then
Good day.
He vadlised the WWE page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MattC13 ( talk • contribs) 20:40, 12 January 2007 (UTC).
I am rather a pop culture aficionado and I couldn't help but notice there are no articles on Princess Luciana Pignatelli (author of "The Beautiful People's Beauty Book" ... an iconic, ironic book by a woman who has long since become a caricature of herself) and fashion pundit and author Simon Doonan. How does one go about submitting an article to Wikipedia?
Thanks,
Flyrod—Preceding unsigned comment added by Flyrod ( talk • contribs) 01:47, 13 January 2007
I must admit that I do not know who made you a official censor however even if it was almighty god whatever I or anyone else writes takes time and thought and the least it deserver is that the all powerful censors read it before they delete it. Don´t know how to write my username, its vascofernandes.
If you did read it than i don't understand how you justify deletion. If you'd have said it didn't comply with wikipedia policy, very well, it's true, it's a bogus claim but it's true. Saying it said the same thing Active Criticism does is just not true! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vascofernandes ( talk • contribs) 02:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC).
No it does not kill me, I just believed that wikipedia belonged to the universe who helped create it. If it was so than I see no other way to know how the majority of the users feel than allowing texts (essays) like mine to exist. If I'm wrong and it actually belongs to the wikipedia foundation represented by yourself (in whatever quality you have) then very well, otherwise you may want to reflect how can the owners of wikipedia express their feelings if you're (in a general way) thinking for them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vascofernandes ( talk • contribs) 02:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC).
Finnaly, and I will leave you alone now, I don't understand what harm can a page do, specially since it is not trying to wrong anyone, I believe (now, this is just a single opinion) you over censor, trying to keep wikipedia so clean that it actually lacks heart. Vascofernandes 02:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
I've already reported him for page blanking and template removal -- Mhking 03:06, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
..but I really have to answer, for me it's not important how I feel, nor do I want come in and take over everything and say I'm right lets do things like I say. What is important is that all people, not just you (again generally) have the right to say, I think wikipedia should be a clean encyclopedia and I believe the majority of the users is on my side. The same way, I want the opportunity to say I oppose that view and give others (not force) the opportunity to agree, disagree or say anything else. Good Night. Vascofernandes 03:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi Fan-1967, hope it's okay, I removed the db on the above article after Herostratus's edits. Please feel free to PROD or AfD if you think appropriate. Thanks -- Samir धर्म 03:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
idiot—Preceding unsigned comment added by Astro boy1928 ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Valgorth. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Chris 73 | Talk 18:10, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
It's unprotected now. Keep an eye on that user, would you? -- Merope 18:41, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
No... it is merely a STARTING POINT!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmozman ( talk • contribs)
I have seen you around quite a lot when I clear the CSD backlogs, I appreciate your hard work there in new page patrol, but in doing so I have often known your taggings to be a bit over-zealous. This is particularly true in the article I just posted, which you have tagged for speedy deletion. I will admit I am not 100% unbiased in this matter (regarding if I think the article should be kept or not), but the article clearly passes CSD A7... you are quoting from WP:WEB in your edit summary. That had no business as a CSD criteria. If you want to take this up at AfD, go ahead. Best, Irongargoyle 01:12, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
The article "Semen Fetishism" is sourced " http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Bukkake&oldid=90217605"
What is the method which the article "Semen Fetishism" is not deleted? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bluevainder ( talk • contribs) 01:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC).
I made several changes to Limelight Networks, and I think the article should be okay now, with notability adequately established. -- Eastmain 02:48, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
you just deleted my article of foop. I am foop so im not attacking anyone. im just showing myself to the world. because it is the truth
sorry i didnt read ur message thuroghly. i understand why you blocked it now i shall stop trying to get this on the site. i apologize for my rude behavior
ur mean im never going on again. and to think i was going to donate 5 dollars.
This is supposed to be an encyclopedia where we share knowledge. Just because you disagree... Yer Wrong 19:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Again, just because you disagree.. Yer Wrong 19:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
you are right.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Titipag ( talk • contribs) 02:18, 15 January 2007
VETO: zudeo.com is a completely new methodology of selling video streams and needs to be documented in wikipedia. It also need to be in category "video hosting" to allow a complete overview of video hosting services. -- Michael Janich 04:43, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Zudeo.com
A tag has been placed on
Zudeo.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Please see Wikipedia:Notability (web). -- Fan-1967 02:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
This user repeatedly changes {{ notenglish}} to {{ db-notenglish}} under many usernames, see here for some context. I have blocked the new account indefinitely and filed a new checkuser request. Please block accounts with this behaviour on sight and list them for checkuser or contact Mackensen. Thank you, Kusma (討論) 10:21, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Doo eet! - CobaltBlueTony 17:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
You win. Close my article. Delete it. That's just one less article you will have in your collection of knowledge. But when my site is a bit more "Notable" as people keep saying, may I publish an article then??
By The Way, How do you know what the site is like on the inside (I don't mean this smartly, but I am just curious) Do you have an account there? Dphantom15 20:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Just an FYI, if you're going to give him a final warning straight off for a spam post, use {{subst:spam4im|article}} as it says "This is your ONLY warning" rather than "This is your final warning". :) - Painezor T C 02:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Here's my riddle- ---Lazylaces-Helping Wikipedians since.. um.. for almost a year! Lazylaces ( talk • contribs Riddle 12:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey! I made a template for NPP that I use from time to time that says "Please do not resubmit this article. If you disagree with its deletion, you may request a deletion review." Would this be a template you would use? Should I create it on the Wikispace (instead of my userspace as it is now)? It's good for articles that aren't vandalism or vanity (and so don't really warrant escalating {{ t3a}} notices and the like), but that I don't want to salt. Thoughts? You can write back here (you're on my watchlist) or on my page. -- Merope 20:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
all the writing was false info, amy has not confirmed that 'All That I'm Living For' is actually the next single, she said it at a concert which cant be considered as a source, she hasn't yet said it on an official posting like Evthreads or Evanescence.com, or any interviews. so im not vandalising anything THANKYOU!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Zacanescence ( talk • contribs)
I came upon the user's contributions when going through the dead-end pages and saw your comments on her talk page (regarding copyvios of machine-translated articles). Do you remember if you ever get an answer regarding her edits? I'm just asking because I'd hate to go through all of them (there are hundreds of similar pages, most could probably be deleted as nonsense) if someone else already did it. - Bobet 16:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
FYI, I blocked this account indefinitely. -- Fang Aili talk 17:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
I was bored and did a vandal count for you. {{user vandalized|36}} sounds good in your userbox, I think. - Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 09:24, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
u need to chill ok —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kitty09 ( talk • contribs) 16:24, 18 January 2007 (UTC).
if its an encyclopedia why can i edit any information i want—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitty09 ( talk • contribs)
y are there video games and music artists doing here they arent significant......what if i told you that ur article sexual intercourse is not important we all know what sex is anmd how to do it duh
people that dont have a life like you odviously—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitty09 ( talk • contribs)
Mostly I get this bot message within 10 seconds. For some reason the bot's not working right now -- oh dear :o —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 154.5.187.90 ( talk) 18:12, 18 January 2007 (UTC).
My apologies for posting this article as it was. I was attempting to create a page in the same vein as Monitor Group, Mitchell Madison Group, etc. Please allow an undelete and I can create the article more objectively.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelinger ( talk • contribs)
If you're interested, I can probably give you a few hundred more
Oh Lord, just when I thought I had cleaned the majority out. Yeah, I've started the process, might just as well see it through -- I've already tagged somewhere in the neighborhood of 500 pages.
That's how I saw your Prods
Not a big coincidence, I'm afraid: for the past few days, I've been working off your Move Log, moving forward in time. -- Calton | Talk 23:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Subject of multiple independent news coverage, so not speediable -- but I wouldn't oppose an AFD. NawlinWiki 04:40, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Trust me, I am trying to help wikipedia just as much as the next guy. I have seen this around the country, and I think it is pretty notable. Like I said, let us see if it works out, because maybe I am wrong. Please do not accuse me of vandalism, I would be the last one to do something like that. Fortyniners9999 06:12, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Not sure how the communication works on this, so I'm hoping I'm sending this to the correct place. I edited my entry of "Merchants of Deception" and tried to make it as objective as possible. I'd be interested in some pointers if editing is still needed. Thank you very much for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tranquilize ( talk • contribs)
Hi - thank you for giving the suggestions. They are helpful as I'm new on wikipedia.org however like that resource very much.
Your comments were valuable, however let me disagree with the removal of ODC term (offshore dedicated center). This is tremendous trend in software outsourcing - that's why I think it should be covered in the article.
Take a look at the few independent links highlighting this form of outsourcing:
http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/Offshore+Dedicated+Center+(outsourcing)
This term is already used by CIOs and IT directors and is popular in paper editions of tech books. That's why I feel that my input into wikipedia is valuable.
-- Billystut 10:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Have you lived with RLS? How can you say that surviving it isn't notable. That's extremely offensive.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottaucoin ( talk • contribs)
I'm a survivor.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottaucoin ( talk • contribs)
Sorry about that last edit; the vandal was faster than me, and I accidently reverted it wrong. Paxsimius 16:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
OK thanks. My edit wasnt an endorsement of the article, just RC patrol. Ab e g92 contribs Boomer Sooners! 18:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
deuce bag—Preceding unsigned comment added by Apple321 ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for reverting my user and talk pages before. You were so quick I didn't even notice it had been moved! Cheers, Sarah 23:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
hey how do i change the name of an article ? TusharN 14:58, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
why would someone who has her own domain, janedark.com, with blogging dating back years, suddenly get a blogspot page, with nothing on it but a handful of phrases that happen to support otherwise unverifiable claims on a Wiki page. That stretches AGF way past the breaking point. Fan-1967 18:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
I am constantly being accused of rudeness on Wikipedia but actually, I always strive to be positive (if only to say "put it on your own website"). In this case you could have told my fellow Croydonian to create a user page. -- RHaworth 10:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Why is this user going round editing other peoples user pages? The edits arn't offensive, but they arnt exactly helpfull either? JFBurton 12:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
The whole article isnt' a spam article, only the last posting; I've made the appropriate change... -- Mhking 18:24, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
This may seem a bit odd coming out of the blue, but thank you for being a part of this project. -- Steel 19:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
This information is not real. What i changed it to, "Nige never crossed Korea", is. I feel the article created in the first place is vandalism as it is untrue information.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dog Man 64 ( talk • contribs)
no there is no such a dvd. please stop giving me warnings as i know more about the subject.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dog Man 64 ( talk • contribs)
i was making it into a good article not vandalism but thank you for taking an effort to stop vandalism and i am sorry for making my artivle to preseve as vandalism but i am planing on making it a good article. -Nate1028
can u remove it then coz i don't know how. also another thing, i dont know much about wikipedia but i know bear about staking euro papes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dog Man 64 ( talk • contribs)
are you a person or computer? how long have u been a wikipedia policemen—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dog Man 64 ( talk • contribs)
Dont bother changing that page. the information is offensive. but ive made it nice. are u a robot.—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Dog Man 64 (
talk •
contribs)
He works for the government and that information is classified.—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Dog Man 64 (
talk •
contribs)
its not a nonsence article you shit. -- SolitaryMoterplaatz 20:51, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
can i make the article though—Preceding unsigned comment added by Nate1028 ( talk • contribs)
so its a no to x rated nuns or x rated pandas—Preceding unsigned comment added by Nate1028 ( talk • contribs)
can you please write in english becusae i am 13 and i dont understand what you are saying—Preceding unsigned comment added by Nate1028 ( talk • contribs)
anyone who rites liek this and delcares taht they are underage should be blockd. :P - CobaltBlueTony 21:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
you posted some stuff on her page and i wanted to know is she the real one. i have found several myspace pages with her on it and several other pages of her all the pics are the same. and she looks like this girl i seen in williamsville calle airal z. i am courious if all this is is a scam to make a site to collect money and scam...well what do you think....± —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.24.144.4 ( talk) 13:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC).
Firstname Lastname is better than this person —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SAStarbucks ( talk • contribs) 16:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC).
Just wanted to say kudos for your sensible responses to all the nutjobs who attack you on this page! Er, yes, that's all. -- Bonadea 17:13, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi. As you're already aware, I recently nominated the article Simon cobb for AfD ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon cobb, which quickly got mobbed by apparent sockpuppetry from multiple single-purpose accounts (some of which created other non-notable youth footballer articles trumpeting that "he is good friends with Simon Cobb" and the like to try and add credibility). I try to avoid biting so in cases where it's clear that it's just someone trying to namecheck themselves or their friends, I often make a point of explaining things clearly to them on their or the article's talk page if they post there, eschewing generic templates if necessary, and in this case I decided to prod rather than just slapping a db-a7 on there because, strictly speaking, it did assert his notability (but that notability was low in the extreme). My question is, what is the most appropriate course of action in apparent "newbie" sockpuppetry cases like this? It seems a bit OTT to file a report on Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets or WP:AIV, as I don't think there's a particularly malicious element to it, just a misguided newbie believing they can sway the "vote". Should I be tagging the SPA's pages with a sockpuppet tag, or is that a step best left to admins? I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. Thanks. ~ Matticus T C 21:38, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Dear Fan,
I am actually new to Wikipedia, so I would appreciate any suggestions on an article on Miss Teenage California. I actually thought I was providing information that was worthy of publishing. Certainly one could argue that Wikepidia is hardly a place where someone would think as being a place of "advertising." Would appreciate a responce. Thank you.
Have you ever seen the zontar films? It seems you like deleting other people's articles too. Watch the films then delete the article but I have already stated my reasons why I think it is important. Would like a reply to this please. Just don't want to think you're one of those wierdos who get kicks out of destroying other people's work! ( Ferdinand4321 23:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC))
Well there's the deltic 22 website www.royalscotsgrey.com under latest news advertising the new zontar video. You can't reasonably expect me to find third party sources out of a hat like that. All, i can say is that I know plenty of people who have seen them and consider them extremely funny. I also wasn't saying the article should stay because it is on youtube. I was saying that it should stay because it is a perfect example of current trends in what is created for youtube in the united kingdom. I.e not chicago. If I went round deleting all the stuff about american TV shows and popular culture there wouldn't be much left because I think yours is some of the blandest in the world. You cannot operate as a self appointed censor deleting based on personal preference. Someone who posted a previous message on your user talk said you are over zealous. Maybe you should take a break and consider the fact that just because you don't like something nobody else will. It took me time and effort to write that article and I will improve it. Had you not been so hasty in requesting its deletion you might have seen me justify it. After all Wikepedia is for sharing of knowledge and useful information. That is why kids use it to do their schoolwork. It is NOT a place for people to share only the information THE think should be shared. That is not democracy. Although you americans don't like that word do you.
Replies to this on my user talk please.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferdinand4321 ( talk • contribs)
No the videos aren't mine! I don't like you insinuating that I would advertise on Wikipedia because I am totally against that. None of my other additions to wikipedia have been questioned. I simply felt that the zontar films, which I stumbled upon by accident were sufficiently well known amongst people in th UK to make them noteable. Unfortunately you don't have the UK perspective on them so you can't understand their notability.
I think personal view is important because I would dismiss for example darts as not being a sport but many other people think it is and so I have to abide by this. Many people think the zontar fims are funny and therefore you should abide by them.
Anyway, as I thought we were all supposed to be one big happy wikipedia family maybe you could check for the third party sources so as to make my article meet YOUR obviously very exacting standards.
But I know now that you are the kind of person who, no matter how obvious it is that you are totally wrong, will continue along your selected path. However know this. If the zontar article is deleted before I have had more time to change it i will contineue to replace it for as long as it takes for you to drill it through your obviously thick skull that it warrants a place on this great resource. A resource which you are doing your level best do destroy!
Again any respones on my user page I want to keep the zontar talk page clear of your ignorant remarks.
thank you again. please see the folowing link and let me know if it is ok.
http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070123/NEWS/701230354/1005/SPORTS0106
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070119/FEATURES01/701190351/1026/FEATURES
can you please check the links i put up? Thnak you so much for your comment and help1
The last time I offered to nominate you, you said you wanted "maybe somewhere down the road, but not right now." I think you're definitely ready now. Please consider my offer. :) Nishkid 64 02:32, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
can u give me an example like what kind of article is ok? It's ok you make fun of us. We will be on this for sure. just a matter of time. thanks for your help again.
Thank you again for you help! From OnlineIdols
Stupid kids. TheQuandry 16:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Ian Gerardo is a real person, secondly, The Chicago Bears will never win a Super Bowl ever again (As they suck balls, yes its true (Grossman's Rating against Green Bay: 0.0)). HAIL GREEN BAY PACKERS!
Signed,
King of the World. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
Xowfmp (
talk •
contribs)
18:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC).
Well, he has been looked at by scouts from colleges around the US, including Michigan, UCLA, Notre Dame, USC, Wisonsin and Ohio State. In a few years, you'll read about him in the papers.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Xowfmp ( talk • contribs)
Wikipedia sucks. In my opinion.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Xowfmp ( talk • contribs)
im very sory for vandalising the website i didnt realise it would save it. i wont do it again.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.240.37.127 ( talk • contribs)
The Order is notable enough. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ares Elite ( talk • contribs) 21:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC).
I provided the homepage, that should be enough. plus im the Ares Elite.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ares Elite ( talk • contribs)
The whole Order is backing me on this, they say it is notable so it is notable.
Jean d'Arc,
AOL is discontinuing free journal. Friends refered me to various
free sites as blogger.com, blogspot, Huffington etc. Why on earth would my little life concern you so.? Kathy Knopf KHARMAKIDS ( talk) 20:02, 22 October 2008 (UTC)