![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Per your recent edits at Cockburn Town, are you confirming that it is pronounced COKE-bern and not COE-bern? I ask because not all our editors have a firm grasp on the IPA, and you didn't say anything at Talk. kwami ( talk) 05:20, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Ijust wanted to reiterate how problematic this has been from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation IP over the last few months. It's not just on the Morrison article, but that's the one I have watchlisted. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 04:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
[6], and was blocked for the same thing in July and is fairly persistent. I believe this isn't just changing for their use of dating, it's become vandalism. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 08:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
I especially liked the New York Times article. I also added it in on the 3rd Street (Los Angeles) article, which is pretty basic and needs help badly. That area is fun if you're ever in town. Joan's is seriously the best gourmet food place in LA. So I'm hoping the article will be around for a while. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 22:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
How can the falling Kingdom be copyright infringement)?? When it title on a book? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sven nordgren ( talk • contribs) 14:26, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Bill Clinton has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. -- Michael Johnson ( talk) 00:33, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. Just wanted to let you know that I've protected that page for one day to prevent further edit warring. Cheers, – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Would you please briefly explain which part of the top box was not satisfied in the reverted comment here? I try to examine some allegiations about the given user behaviour but I do not understand why his answer to your repeated question was removed from here, as it seems to satisfy every "requirements" of your top box. Thank you. -- grin ✎ 09:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
User talk:Faithlessthewonderboy/Issue-nav
![]()
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
| ||||
|
History of The Beatles has been recreated following the advice given in a
peer review of
The Beatles. We request your assistance in summarising the
Please take the time to review some articles (or submit your own) at our internal peer review page. It will help us to improve our articles. If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 017 – December 2008). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| |||
Complete To Do List
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
|
User talk:Faithlessthewonderboy/Issue-nav Denbot ( talk) 17:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey, the Battle of Grocka is the part of the
Austro-Turkish War, 1737-1739. But this article was move in the
Russo-Turkish War (1735–1739). Accordingly i wrote this Austro-Russo-Turkish War.
Doncsecz 17:16, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Uh huh. That will teach me to revert changes before I go eat Sunday dinner. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 18:05, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey, while browsing through recent changes, I noticed you reverting lots of vandalism, so I'm assuming you are experienced with reverting vandalism. I just have a quick question: I've noticed that when I try and revert vandalism, especially page blanks, I get a message saying that my edit contains new external links and it makes me type in the words in the box (To prevent automated spam). It makes reverting a little difficult, and if you could tell me how to avoid this, I'd be grateful. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 19:15, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Mizu onna sango15 Barnstar | |
Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed, all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Per your recent edits at Cockburn Town, are you confirming that it is pronounced COKE-bern and not COE-bern? I ask because not all our editors have a firm grasp on the IPA, and you didn't say anything at Talk. kwami ( talk) 05:20, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Ijust wanted to reiterate how problematic this has been from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation IP over the last few months. It's not just on the Morrison article, but that's the one I have watchlisted. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 04:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
[6], and was blocked for the same thing in July and is fairly persistent. I believe this isn't just changing for their use of dating, it's become vandalism. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 08:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
I especially liked the New York Times article. I also added it in on the 3rd Street (Los Angeles) article, which is pretty basic and needs help badly. That area is fun if you're ever in town. Joan's is seriously the best gourmet food place in LA. So I'm hoping the article will be around for a while. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 22:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
How can the falling Kingdom be copyright infringement)?? When it title on a book? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sven nordgren ( talk • contribs) 14:26, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Bill Clinton has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. -- Michael Johnson ( talk) 00:33, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. Just wanted to let you know that I've protected that page for one day to prevent further edit warring. Cheers, – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Would you please briefly explain which part of the top box was not satisfied in the reverted comment here? I try to examine some allegiations about the given user behaviour but I do not understand why his answer to your repeated question was removed from here, as it seems to satisfy every "requirements" of your top box. Thank you. -- grin ✎ 09:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
User talk:Faithlessthewonderboy/Issue-nav
![]()
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
| ||||
|
History of The Beatles has been recreated following the advice given in a
peer review of
The Beatles. We request your assistance in summarising the
Please take the time to review some articles (or submit your own) at our internal peer review page. It will help us to improve our articles. If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 017 – December 2008). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| |||
Complete To Do List
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
|
User talk:Faithlessthewonderboy/Issue-nav Denbot ( talk) 17:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey, the Battle of Grocka is the part of the
Austro-Turkish War, 1737-1739. But this article was move in the
Russo-Turkish War (1735–1739). Accordingly i wrote this Austro-Russo-Turkish War.
Doncsecz 17:16, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Uh huh. That will teach me to revert changes before I go eat Sunday dinner. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 18:05, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey, while browsing through recent changes, I noticed you reverting lots of vandalism, so I'm assuming you are experienced with reverting vandalism. I just have a quick question: I've noticed that when I try and revert vandalism, especially page blanks, I get a message saying that my edit contains new external links and it makes me type in the words in the box (To prevent automated spam). It makes reverting a little difficult, and if you could tell me how to avoid this, I'd be grateful. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 19:15, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Mizu onna sango15 Barnstar | |
Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed, all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |