Welcome!
Hello Factually, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the
NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! – Ch acor 09:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() | Once again, you are STRONGLY reminded that removing verifiable information from reliable sources that may seem to portray the Singapore government in a less-than-perfect light is a violation of our neutral point-of-view policy, and may result in a block. We're presenting both sides. – Ch acor 08:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC) |
Thanks for understanding, we have to be as unbiased as possible. Those seem legit, so they can be included. The population estimate doesn't have to be changed though, it's just a rough number. – Ch acor 09:08, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello Factually, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the
NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! – Ch acor 09:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
![]() | Once again, you are STRONGLY reminded that removing verifiable information from reliable sources that may seem to portray the Singapore government in a less-than-perfect light is a violation of our neutral point-of-view policy, and may result in a block. We're presenting both sides. – Ch acor 08:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC) |
Thanks for understanding, we have to be as unbiased as possible. Those seem legit, so they can be included. The population estimate doesn't have to be changed though, it's just a rough number. – Ch acor 09:08, 8 December 2006 (UTC)