![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Userpage | Talk | Awards | Dashboard | Programs | Sandbox | Sketchbook | Blocknote |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hey, Excirial ...
There's really no good reason to copy messages and replies between user Talk pages to "synch" them ... the trick is to keep comments and replies (on a particular subject) on only one page; the same one where it started.
In other words, please reply to this thread here, and not on my user Talk page. :-)
Happy Editing! — 72.75.98.105 ( talk · contribs) 17:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Howdy ... I found it ... {{
User totootwo}}
generates:
to
too
twoThis user thinks that too many people have no idea how to use words that they should have learned in grade two.
Happy Editing! — 72.75.98.105 ( talk · contribs) 01:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
I WAS TRYING TO PUT IN A NEW TEMPLATE WHICH WENT WRONG AND I TRY REVERTING BUT IT KEPT MESSING .THIS IS NOT DELIBEERATE VANDALISM —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.18.180 ( talk) 17:45, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Note: I removed the vandalism warnings as well as they are obviously not valid.
Don't understand the complaint. The reversion is objectively much worse than my changes which; shifted info in a 500 plus word lede to below the table of contents; added extremely relevant info about DOJ IG findings and appointment of special prosecutor; simplified language; and started removing completely irrelevant reems of information about "Other bush scandals." Could you explain? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bali ultimate (
talk •
contribs)
19:04, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Hmmm.... well, i did start stripping out a lot of text in a kitchen sink section at the bottom called "Other bush scandals". Could that have triggered something automatic? At any rate, thanks for taking the time. Bali ultimate ( talk) 19:23, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello Excirial. BentonComp is a username that was created for my High School Composition class to use in a project wherein they will create or edit a wikipedia article. It will allow me to track the changes they make, and monitor the quality of their content. I have done my best to inform them of Wikipedia's guidelines and standards, but some may still use the system clumsily and this should account for the excessive nature of BentonComp's edits. If this is in violation of any Wikipedia guideline, please let me know. Once the students have made their contributions, I will review each one and do my best to bring it up to Wikipedia's standards. Any articles that do not meet that standard will be deleted. BentonComp ( talk) 20:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi Excirial,
I noticed that you added the qualifier "(disambiguation)" to the Maler disambiguation page, stating that you were "Properly labelling as disambiguation page." Actually, the Manual of Style states that, if there is no primary topic, "the disambiguation page should be located at the plain title with no "(disambiguation)". I reverted your move, but I just wanted to drop you a note to explain why.
Happy editing,
Neelix ( talk) 20:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello again ... I'd like a second opinion on ValoreBooks.com ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) if you have a moment to spare. — 72.75.98.105 ( talk) 00:04, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reporting the legal threat against me promptly, before I even saw it. Good working with you, hope to see you around the Wikipedia. -- Leivick ( talk) 22:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed and reverted some vandalism here. I followed back the user link and noted that you have previously warned this user several times and wanted to draw your attention to the fact they are continuing this activity. Thanks! Prosthetic Head ( talk) 16:41, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey Excirial, You went on my home page and issued a vandalism warning which I fully acknowledge. The problem is I'm the party being vandalized and I'm repeatedly having to go in to Wikipedia and resubmit the page. The other party (vandal) is changing historical facts relating to the band When In Rome and using the page to promote the unofficial When In Rome concerning events that are in the future. I believet Wikipedia is a historical/fact based encyclopedia, not a promotional tool. Is there any way you can help to block the user from continuous vandalism ? For your reference the official When In Rome band reformed in 2006 and has a website which can be confirmed at www.myspace.com/wheninrome —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.93.105.165 ( talk) 23:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
For removing the vandalism that IP user added to my talk page. Seems like he is taking a liking to you now, so allow me to return the favor :). Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 15:08, 11 October 2008 (UTC) A bit unrelated, but might it be time to Archive your talk page? it is rather large.
Outdent Not doubting you can't do so yourself, but if you need a hand with archiving it, ill be glad to offer a hand in case you need it Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 15:12, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Just would like to say thanks for reverting the "AnonTalk" vandal on my user talk! SchfiftyThree (talk!) 18:04, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
oops seems like he was only copy editing badly and then he reverted his edits while I was pressing rollback on Huggle thanks for reverting that one :p . Alexnia (If you reply here, please leave me a {{ Talkback}} message on my talk page.) @ 18:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism done on my talk page. DiverseMentality (Boo!) 19:08, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Excellent Userpage Award | |
Your fantastic userpage warrants this award hands down. Blooded Edge awards 20:30, 11 October 2008 (UTC) |
Many thanks for the barnstar for the DPS articles. They're looking a lot better though there's lots more that could still be done. As you might have seen I've moved the copy for the Mathura Road and R K Puram schools to create new articles. These are both highly important Indian schools and really needed their own articles. I suspect in the long run all the other schools will merit their own individual articles and the parent page can host a list of all the schools in the Society. There is however only so much that can be done at any one time. I shall see if anyone else rises to the challenge! Dahliarose ( talk) 14:06, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello again, Excirial ... I need the opinion of Some Other Editor in regards to articles being created by Bekah3 ( talk · contribs):
I mean, should they be fixed, or are they
speedy delete candidates? Regardless, I wish that you might take a Gentler and More Patient approach to raising their consciousness about things like
WP:BIO and how to use <ref></ref>
and {{Reflist}}
... putting lipstick on these pigs may be a Fools Errand (if they're going to be deleted eventually), but this is the mood I'm in today, and I have some time to kill with nothing better to do ... but I am not in the mood for holding their hand, either. :-)
Happy Editing! — 72.75.110.31 ( talk · contribs) 22:29, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi Excirial, if you feel this article needs to be deleted thats fine with me, I would point out he is a popular standup comic and can be found on youtube. Interestingly I have noticed that anything remotely to do with sikhism is very sensitive (relatively much more so than Islam or Judaism) to ridicule/criticism See Sikh Extremism or Behzti Satanoid ( talk) 21:14, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello Excirial. I just wanted to let you know that on review I declined the speedy deletion on this article, and edited it down to a stub to address the WP:SPAM issue. I think he is borderline notable in the nutrition world, but if no 3rd party sources are provided soon to establish notability, I may AfD it myself. I'll give the creating editor a few days, though, as they are clearly new to Wikipedia. Rockpocke t 00:23, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your interest in this article - but I would appreciate it if you at least gave me two minutes to tidy things before tagging it etc! Contaldo80 ( talk) 10:49, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Excirial, I note your assessment that กงจักร ใจดี is Swahili. It is not. It is Thai. The "list of dates" is a biography, diary style, listing education from elementary, to collegiate, to post-grad. I can't track where that article went after it was marked "gone", but I see the "Goodjai" page and the header that it is Swahili, which, as I just said, isn't correct. - Thaimoss ( talk) 23:19, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
hi This is for the wikipedia page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanjay_Subrahmanyan where you warned me for vandalism, i dont understand why it is vandalism when i have made accurate factual comments i also wanted to link to the press pages however before that u have removed the same kindly advise —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dindiz ( talk • contribs) 12:56, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
I declined the speedy you placed on Lewis Girls Comprehensive School because secondary schools are generally considered notable and nothing in the article seemed promotional. -- Eastmain ( talk) 15:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Oh I see. I didn't realize you had a separate Viki site for definitions. In that case can I add a sentence to the lying type "bluffing" in the main "lie" article about double bluffs?
Lizzie.
Thanks for catching the vandalism on my talk page! Trusilver 10:54, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Oh, I'll just nominate Pepsi Wylde for AFD. I suppose technically as someone has challenged the Speedy, it is the proper thing to do. Five minutes of my life that I won't get back though. :) FlowerpotmaN·( t) 12:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, OxyVita, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OxyVita (2nd nomination). Thank you. Rogerb67 ( talk) 14:49, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
I have been using a slightly modifided version of the template you use for your user page for a while now. I was feeling a little guilty that people might think that I made it. I just wanted to make sure that its ok that I use this and if so if you would like me to leave the copyright thing at the bottom as it is your idea just slightly modified. Hda3ku ( talk) 18:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
"July 2008
"Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Run Lola Run has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 18:56, 8 July 2008 (UTC)"
I use a roaming IP address, and have never viewed, never mind edited, the aforementioned page.
86.160.64.192 ( talk) 23:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Please get involved with this article, I understand you can make a difference. I believe it should be marked for deletion but another user has un-done my changes and I am too new to know better. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Select_Family_of_Staffing_Companies http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Select_Family_of_Staffing_Companies —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jabrams-writer ( talk • contribs) 15:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi, any progress on this bot request? Thanks in advance, Richard 0612 19:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I went ahead and deleted the tag you left on the Dutch Wallace article. He was a pro football player and I have listed his stats from the NFL, Pro Football Reference and Database Football within the infobox. Every football source had his name as Datch Wallace, so I kept it as such. This should remove any confusion between the football palyers and the shipbuilder. If you have any questions/concerns, let me know. -- PA Pen ( talk) 13:53, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
More info - Dan Dank55 ( push to talk) 12:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I have just written this article from first hand knowledge. I would argue that it is not "blatant advertising" but certainly encyclopaedic and fits Wiki criteria. It is factually accurate and the info is sourced. I have no personal or professional connection with the subject. I hope that you will agree to remove the "speedy deletion" tag and let the article stand. Thanks. Captainclegg ( talk) 13:21, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Many thanks for the advice. I have followed them and I think you will find it improved. Can you remove the 'source' tag now? or does it matter? Captainclegg ( talk) 13:45, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Just for your information, I changed your speedy tag on 'Secret burger'. Since the article obviously includes "blatant and obvious misinformation" I figured a DB-VANDALISM was more appropriate. Happy hunting, Yintaɳ 12:16, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
While i will not object to replacing the speedy with a prod template on your side, i find the reason "Not a valid speedy. He is most famous for" a little odd for a reason. The article itself was deleted as an A7 with the same content minutes ago before it was recreated. Also, the reference for "Most Famous" is for a weebly site, which is blacklisted on wikipedia's spam blacklist. Besides, how many people put something such as "He is most famous for invention the moon" or something silly? :) Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 12:24, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Please don't flag SPI cases for speedy deletion. It causes the process to break. Just ask a clerk to fix the problems. Mayalld ( talk) 13:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
I have placed {{ db-ad}} on L'OCCITANE Foundation, an article which you had {{ PROD}}'ed. I believe this article falls under the category of "blatant advertising" and is suitable for speedy deletion. I have left the {{ PROD}} tag in place. If you feel that speedy is not appropriate, please feel free to undo my nomination. But I'd love to know your thinking in that case. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 13:28, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for nonconstructive edit :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.178.176 ( talk) 19:08, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Good catch on this. JFYI - I removed your prod and put for CSD because it looks more like an attack since it is negative, mentions a name and a school. JCutter ( talk) 08:06, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I've declined the speedy deletion nomination of Arindam Mukherjee as I consider the subject to be notable. Try Google Search before nominating. Check my changes, please. Thanks -- Vejvančický ( talk) 08:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
We've probably all done at some time or another, but can you make sure you actually revert toa clean version when you undo a vandal edit? You undid an edit by User:142.33.233.222, but went back to one User:142.33.233.213 (probably actually the same person from the closeness of the IP addresses), which had actually included far more vandalism and deletion of content. David Underdown ( talk) 10:28, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your tagging work, I've noticed you're doing a good job. However, here you added {{WP:NEO}} to a talk page ... bad move, that transcluded the whole guideline, and put that talk page into the same categories as the guideline. I changed it to [[WP:NEO]]. (Watchlisting) - Dan Dank55 ( push to talk) 14:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello i posted an article about Rick Otton i need help on why it was deleted and how i can create it ???
Kylie anne ( talk) 08:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Excirial. I think Precious Bible Promises is about a book. Ϣere SpielChequers 08:43, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for this page, I saved the page before completion and is was marked for speedy deletion. Apologies I removed the warning believing that if I added to it this would not be a problem, then I got a message that I was vandalising the page.
Please remove this entry and I will start again and do it properly this time!
Sorry, first time Wiki user! :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adimberline ( talk • contribs) 14:03, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, just letting you know that I've removed your speedy from Nestor Courakis because the criteriaa you used ( A1) only applies to very short articles which don't identify the subject, which Nestor Courakis didn't seem to meet. Feel free to use a different criteria or AfD. - Kingpin 13 ( talk) 11:43, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Good afternoon Excirial,
Could you please explain why you have opted to delete the "Nemesis & Arrogance" entry due to them being a "non-notable band"?
I have done some research regarding the outcome, and found this article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Stifle/Don't_say_non-notable
There are over 125, 000 google search hits for Nemesis & Arrogance, I would not call this non-notable. These are not all "self promotion". If there are any problems with the way the article has been written, these can be ammended, however I do not accept your secletion of "non-notable band" as a valid reason for not allowing this article to be published. I would also question your knowledge of the UK Hip Hop / Grime genre's and therefore your ability to call this band "non-notable" in the first place.
Please provide me with a more detailed answer than "non-notable band" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.206.7.50 ( talk) 13:28, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi I'd like you to reconsider the deletion of this post. I am just trying to help people who have the R4 Card as there is nothing on wikipedia about it. What can I do to make you reconsider, I am new here and this was my first article.
Do I need to provide a more indepth analysis of the R4 Card and how to get Free Ds Roms?
Thanks for your time
badboy_pro Badboy pro ( talk) 15:03, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
That was the fourth time in a mere two days that you were the blocking admin for a spambot. Thanks for that lightning fast speed on blocking them, it certainly saves me a whole lot of pages that need to be tagged (And of course, a whole lot that needs to be removed). Keep up the great work :) Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 09:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Before translating texts, you should always check if the text is not a copyright violation as after translation it is much harder to catch copyright infringments. 11:21, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello again, hope you don't mind but I've declined this deletion as I think I've managed to establish context (glad I'm editing anonymously, I'd hate it if any of my mates knew I'd identified that subject). Ϣere SpielChequers 11:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Luna, can you also deny User:Kirk Johnson80 the right to edit his talk page? Its a known, persistant vandalbot, and it seems he is playing with the unblock template on his talk page now. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 11:46, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Just to let you know, i removed the speedy you placed on What is the probability that a 9-digit phone number contains at least one 8?. While it is indeed a page that will eventually be removed, it does NOT fit into the category of test pages. I tagged it with a prod to be more accurate.
The effect will be the same, just taking a bureaucratic roundabout - if not for correctness sake, then avoid confusing / insulting a good faith editor of making test pages :) Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 14:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
I would suggest you do an AfD for UMBRELLA Consulting as it is not irredeemable promotion, you could delete the promotion text yourself. Interestingly the article was recreated by a vandal as well as you can see by the attack page delete. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 08:57, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Well, it certainly made no sense to me so bob's your uncle. The words and some of the phrases, sure, but all the rest was all 'Huh?'. Lots42 ( talk) 09:05, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
What are you trying to do with Talk:/Karl Rawer it seems to be a reduced content dup of Karl Rawer. It would make sense to me to just delete, is the history worth preserving? It does not look so to me. I will just delete it, and let me know if you want anything different. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 12:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi flag!
I thought i should let you know that i copied over a comment you made on this AFD to a relevant SSP case as evidence supplied by other users. It was a perceptive comment indicating that the user is indeed a likely vandal. I hope you won't mind that i did not ask in advantage for permission for this copyover.
With kind regards, Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 11:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello Graeme,
I wanted to let you know that i replaced the CSD template you declined on the Radhand with the comment that the template did not apply. I assume you removed the template because products are not explicitely named in the template text.
However, under the WP:PRODUCT guideline, all products should be included into the company's main article unless they received sufficient coverage to warrant a stand-alone article. In this case we are talking about a foam finger that did not receive any coverage - unless you would count the student organisation the article mentions as coverage (Which is of course no coverage - we could add every item for having been on TV that way).
If i overlooked or misunderstood your reasoning, please let me know :)
Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 11:21, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
G11. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 13:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
stuff you tagged to delete that has come back, you may want to check if they have become better!
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 14:17, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm deeply sorry for my sisters ignorance towards Wikipedia. She was editing all that info. Again I am oh so deeply sorry for those unfortunate remarks and I PROMISE it won't happen again. If it happens again I give you permission to ban me b/c it won't happen again i promise okay? does that sound like a good deal. one more time.... i'm so so so so sorry for my sisters actions. i will go punish her now and tell her to never do it again. again... i'm sorry. please forgive me and my sisters actions. do you forgive me? thanks if you do. and if you don't forgive me please tell me why and i will fix it i promise. again, i'm so sorry. it will never happen again. i apologize. take care EXCIRIAL! i'm happy you are taking care of your awesome site! again i'm sorry! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nipnipnip ( talk • contribs) 17:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Userpage | Talk | Awards | Dashboard | Programs | Sandbox | Sketchbook | Blocknote |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hey, Excirial ...
There's really no good reason to copy messages and replies between user Talk pages to "synch" them ... the trick is to keep comments and replies (on a particular subject) on only one page; the same one where it started.
In other words, please reply to this thread here, and not on my user Talk page. :-)
Happy Editing! — 72.75.98.105 ( talk · contribs) 17:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Howdy ... I found it ... {{
User totootwo}}
generates:
to
too
twoThis user thinks that too many people have no idea how to use words that they should have learned in grade two.
Happy Editing! — 72.75.98.105 ( talk · contribs) 01:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
I WAS TRYING TO PUT IN A NEW TEMPLATE WHICH WENT WRONG AND I TRY REVERTING BUT IT KEPT MESSING .THIS IS NOT DELIBEERATE VANDALISM —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.18.180 ( talk) 17:45, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Note: I removed the vandalism warnings as well as they are obviously not valid.
Don't understand the complaint. The reversion is objectively much worse than my changes which; shifted info in a 500 plus word lede to below the table of contents; added extremely relevant info about DOJ IG findings and appointment of special prosecutor; simplified language; and started removing completely irrelevant reems of information about "Other bush scandals." Could you explain? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bali ultimate (
talk •
contribs)
19:04, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Hmmm.... well, i did start stripping out a lot of text in a kitchen sink section at the bottom called "Other bush scandals". Could that have triggered something automatic? At any rate, thanks for taking the time. Bali ultimate ( talk) 19:23, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello Excirial. BentonComp is a username that was created for my High School Composition class to use in a project wherein they will create or edit a wikipedia article. It will allow me to track the changes they make, and monitor the quality of their content. I have done my best to inform them of Wikipedia's guidelines and standards, but some may still use the system clumsily and this should account for the excessive nature of BentonComp's edits. If this is in violation of any Wikipedia guideline, please let me know. Once the students have made their contributions, I will review each one and do my best to bring it up to Wikipedia's standards. Any articles that do not meet that standard will be deleted. BentonComp ( talk) 20:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi Excirial,
I noticed that you added the qualifier "(disambiguation)" to the Maler disambiguation page, stating that you were "Properly labelling as disambiguation page." Actually, the Manual of Style states that, if there is no primary topic, "the disambiguation page should be located at the plain title with no "(disambiguation)". I reverted your move, but I just wanted to drop you a note to explain why.
Happy editing,
Neelix ( talk) 20:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello again ... I'd like a second opinion on ValoreBooks.com ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) if you have a moment to spare. — 72.75.98.105 ( talk) 00:04, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reporting the legal threat against me promptly, before I even saw it. Good working with you, hope to see you around the Wikipedia. -- Leivick ( talk) 22:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed and reverted some vandalism here. I followed back the user link and noted that you have previously warned this user several times and wanted to draw your attention to the fact they are continuing this activity. Thanks! Prosthetic Head ( talk) 16:41, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey Excirial, You went on my home page and issued a vandalism warning which I fully acknowledge. The problem is I'm the party being vandalized and I'm repeatedly having to go in to Wikipedia and resubmit the page. The other party (vandal) is changing historical facts relating to the band When In Rome and using the page to promote the unofficial When In Rome concerning events that are in the future. I believet Wikipedia is a historical/fact based encyclopedia, not a promotional tool. Is there any way you can help to block the user from continuous vandalism ? For your reference the official When In Rome band reformed in 2006 and has a website which can be confirmed at www.myspace.com/wheninrome —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.93.105.165 ( talk) 23:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
For removing the vandalism that IP user added to my talk page. Seems like he is taking a liking to you now, so allow me to return the favor :). Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 15:08, 11 October 2008 (UTC) A bit unrelated, but might it be time to Archive your talk page? it is rather large.
Outdent Not doubting you can't do so yourself, but if you need a hand with archiving it, ill be glad to offer a hand in case you need it Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 15:12, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Just would like to say thanks for reverting the "AnonTalk" vandal on my user talk! SchfiftyThree (talk!) 18:04, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
oops seems like he was only copy editing badly and then he reverted his edits while I was pressing rollback on Huggle thanks for reverting that one :p . Alexnia (If you reply here, please leave me a {{ Talkback}} message on my talk page.) @ 18:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism done on my talk page. DiverseMentality (Boo!) 19:08, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Excellent Userpage Award | |
Your fantastic userpage warrants this award hands down. Blooded Edge awards 20:30, 11 October 2008 (UTC) |
Many thanks for the barnstar for the DPS articles. They're looking a lot better though there's lots more that could still be done. As you might have seen I've moved the copy for the Mathura Road and R K Puram schools to create new articles. These are both highly important Indian schools and really needed their own articles. I suspect in the long run all the other schools will merit their own individual articles and the parent page can host a list of all the schools in the Society. There is however only so much that can be done at any one time. I shall see if anyone else rises to the challenge! Dahliarose ( talk) 14:06, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello again, Excirial ... I need the opinion of Some Other Editor in regards to articles being created by Bekah3 ( talk · contribs):
I mean, should they be fixed, or are they
speedy delete candidates? Regardless, I wish that you might take a Gentler and More Patient approach to raising their consciousness about things like
WP:BIO and how to use <ref></ref>
and {{Reflist}}
... putting lipstick on these pigs may be a Fools Errand (if they're going to be deleted eventually), but this is the mood I'm in today, and I have some time to kill with nothing better to do ... but I am not in the mood for holding their hand, either. :-)
Happy Editing! — 72.75.110.31 ( talk · contribs) 22:29, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi Excirial, if you feel this article needs to be deleted thats fine with me, I would point out he is a popular standup comic and can be found on youtube. Interestingly I have noticed that anything remotely to do with sikhism is very sensitive (relatively much more so than Islam or Judaism) to ridicule/criticism See Sikh Extremism or Behzti Satanoid ( talk) 21:14, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello Excirial. I just wanted to let you know that on review I declined the speedy deletion on this article, and edited it down to a stub to address the WP:SPAM issue. I think he is borderline notable in the nutrition world, but if no 3rd party sources are provided soon to establish notability, I may AfD it myself. I'll give the creating editor a few days, though, as they are clearly new to Wikipedia. Rockpocke t 00:23, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your interest in this article - but I would appreciate it if you at least gave me two minutes to tidy things before tagging it etc! Contaldo80 ( talk) 10:49, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Excirial, I note your assessment that กงจักร ใจดี is Swahili. It is not. It is Thai. The "list of dates" is a biography, diary style, listing education from elementary, to collegiate, to post-grad. I can't track where that article went after it was marked "gone", but I see the "Goodjai" page and the header that it is Swahili, which, as I just said, isn't correct. - Thaimoss ( talk) 23:19, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
hi This is for the wikipedia page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanjay_Subrahmanyan where you warned me for vandalism, i dont understand why it is vandalism when i have made accurate factual comments i also wanted to link to the press pages however before that u have removed the same kindly advise —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dindiz ( talk • contribs) 12:56, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
I declined the speedy you placed on Lewis Girls Comprehensive School because secondary schools are generally considered notable and nothing in the article seemed promotional. -- Eastmain ( talk) 15:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Oh I see. I didn't realize you had a separate Viki site for definitions. In that case can I add a sentence to the lying type "bluffing" in the main "lie" article about double bluffs?
Lizzie.
Thanks for catching the vandalism on my talk page! Trusilver 10:54, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Oh, I'll just nominate Pepsi Wylde for AFD. I suppose technically as someone has challenged the Speedy, it is the proper thing to do. Five minutes of my life that I won't get back though. :) FlowerpotmaN·( t) 12:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, OxyVita, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OxyVita (2nd nomination). Thank you. Rogerb67 ( talk) 14:49, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
I have been using a slightly modifided version of the template you use for your user page for a while now. I was feeling a little guilty that people might think that I made it. I just wanted to make sure that its ok that I use this and if so if you would like me to leave the copyright thing at the bottom as it is your idea just slightly modified. Hda3ku ( talk) 18:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
"July 2008
"Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Run Lola Run has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 18:56, 8 July 2008 (UTC)"
I use a roaming IP address, and have never viewed, never mind edited, the aforementioned page.
86.160.64.192 ( talk) 23:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Please get involved with this article, I understand you can make a difference. I believe it should be marked for deletion but another user has un-done my changes and I am too new to know better. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Select_Family_of_Staffing_Companies http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Select_Family_of_Staffing_Companies —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jabrams-writer ( talk • contribs) 15:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi, any progress on this bot request? Thanks in advance, Richard 0612 19:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I went ahead and deleted the tag you left on the Dutch Wallace article. He was a pro football player and I have listed his stats from the NFL, Pro Football Reference and Database Football within the infobox. Every football source had his name as Datch Wallace, so I kept it as such. This should remove any confusion between the football palyers and the shipbuilder. If you have any questions/concerns, let me know. -- PA Pen ( talk) 13:53, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
More info - Dan Dank55 ( push to talk) 12:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I have just written this article from first hand knowledge. I would argue that it is not "blatant advertising" but certainly encyclopaedic and fits Wiki criteria. It is factually accurate and the info is sourced. I have no personal or professional connection with the subject. I hope that you will agree to remove the "speedy deletion" tag and let the article stand. Thanks. Captainclegg ( talk) 13:21, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Many thanks for the advice. I have followed them and I think you will find it improved. Can you remove the 'source' tag now? or does it matter? Captainclegg ( talk) 13:45, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Just for your information, I changed your speedy tag on 'Secret burger'. Since the article obviously includes "blatant and obvious misinformation" I figured a DB-VANDALISM was more appropriate. Happy hunting, Yintaɳ 12:16, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
While i will not object to replacing the speedy with a prod template on your side, i find the reason "Not a valid speedy. He is most famous for" a little odd for a reason. The article itself was deleted as an A7 with the same content minutes ago before it was recreated. Also, the reference for "Most Famous" is for a weebly site, which is blacklisted on wikipedia's spam blacklist. Besides, how many people put something such as "He is most famous for invention the moon" or something silly? :) Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 12:24, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Please don't flag SPI cases for speedy deletion. It causes the process to break. Just ask a clerk to fix the problems. Mayalld ( talk) 13:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
I have placed {{ db-ad}} on L'OCCITANE Foundation, an article which you had {{ PROD}}'ed. I believe this article falls under the category of "blatant advertising" and is suitable for speedy deletion. I have left the {{ PROD}} tag in place. If you feel that speedy is not appropriate, please feel free to undo my nomination. But I'd love to know your thinking in that case. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 13:28, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for nonconstructive edit :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.178.176 ( talk) 19:08, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Good catch on this. JFYI - I removed your prod and put for CSD because it looks more like an attack since it is negative, mentions a name and a school. JCutter ( talk) 08:06, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I've declined the speedy deletion nomination of Arindam Mukherjee as I consider the subject to be notable. Try Google Search before nominating. Check my changes, please. Thanks -- Vejvančický ( talk) 08:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
We've probably all done at some time or another, but can you make sure you actually revert toa clean version when you undo a vandal edit? You undid an edit by User:142.33.233.222, but went back to one User:142.33.233.213 (probably actually the same person from the closeness of the IP addresses), which had actually included far more vandalism and deletion of content. David Underdown ( talk) 10:28, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your tagging work, I've noticed you're doing a good job. However, here you added {{WP:NEO}} to a talk page ... bad move, that transcluded the whole guideline, and put that talk page into the same categories as the guideline. I changed it to [[WP:NEO]]. (Watchlisting) - Dan Dank55 ( push to talk) 14:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello i posted an article about Rick Otton i need help on why it was deleted and how i can create it ???
Kylie anne ( talk) 08:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Excirial. I think Precious Bible Promises is about a book. Ϣere SpielChequers 08:43, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for this page, I saved the page before completion and is was marked for speedy deletion. Apologies I removed the warning believing that if I added to it this would not be a problem, then I got a message that I was vandalising the page.
Please remove this entry and I will start again and do it properly this time!
Sorry, first time Wiki user! :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adimberline ( talk • contribs) 14:03, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, just letting you know that I've removed your speedy from Nestor Courakis because the criteriaa you used ( A1) only applies to very short articles which don't identify the subject, which Nestor Courakis didn't seem to meet. Feel free to use a different criteria or AfD. - Kingpin 13 ( talk) 11:43, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Good afternoon Excirial,
Could you please explain why you have opted to delete the "Nemesis & Arrogance" entry due to them being a "non-notable band"?
I have done some research regarding the outcome, and found this article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Stifle/Don't_say_non-notable
There are over 125, 000 google search hits for Nemesis & Arrogance, I would not call this non-notable. These are not all "self promotion". If there are any problems with the way the article has been written, these can be ammended, however I do not accept your secletion of "non-notable band" as a valid reason for not allowing this article to be published. I would also question your knowledge of the UK Hip Hop / Grime genre's and therefore your ability to call this band "non-notable" in the first place.
Please provide me with a more detailed answer than "non-notable band" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.206.7.50 ( talk) 13:28, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi I'd like you to reconsider the deletion of this post. I am just trying to help people who have the R4 Card as there is nothing on wikipedia about it. What can I do to make you reconsider, I am new here and this was my first article.
Do I need to provide a more indepth analysis of the R4 Card and how to get Free Ds Roms?
Thanks for your time
badboy_pro Badboy pro ( talk) 15:03, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
That was the fourth time in a mere two days that you were the blocking admin for a spambot. Thanks for that lightning fast speed on blocking them, it certainly saves me a whole lot of pages that need to be tagged (And of course, a whole lot that needs to be removed). Keep up the great work :) Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 09:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Before translating texts, you should always check if the text is not a copyright violation as after translation it is much harder to catch copyright infringments. 11:21, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello again, hope you don't mind but I've declined this deletion as I think I've managed to establish context (glad I'm editing anonymously, I'd hate it if any of my mates knew I'd identified that subject). Ϣere SpielChequers 11:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Luna, can you also deny User:Kirk Johnson80 the right to edit his talk page? Its a known, persistant vandalbot, and it seems he is playing with the unblock template on his talk page now. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 11:46, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Just to let you know, i removed the speedy you placed on What is the probability that a 9-digit phone number contains at least one 8?. While it is indeed a page that will eventually be removed, it does NOT fit into the category of test pages. I tagged it with a prod to be more accurate.
The effect will be the same, just taking a bureaucratic roundabout - if not for correctness sake, then avoid confusing / insulting a good faith editor of making test pages :) Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 14:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
I would suggest you do an AfD for UMBRELLA Consulting as it is not irredeemable promotion, you could delete the promotion text yourself. Interestingly the article was recreated by a vandal as well as you can see by the attack page delete. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 08:57, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Well, it certainly made no sense to me so bob's your uncle. The words and some of the phrases, sure, but all the rest was all 'Huh?'. Lots42 ( talk) 09:05, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
What are you trying to do with Talk:/Karl Rawer it seems to be a reduced content dup of Karl Rawer. It would make sense to me to just delete, is the history worth preserving? It does not look so to me. I will just delete it, and let me know if you want anything different. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 12:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi flag!
I thought i should let you know that i copied over a comment you made on this AFD to a relevant SSP case as evidence supplied by other users. It was a perceptive comment indicating that the user is indeed a likely vandal. I hope you won't mind that i did not ask in advantage for permission for this copyover.
With kind regards, Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 11:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello Graeme,
I wanted to let you know that i replaced the CSD template you declined on the Radhand with the comment that the template did not apply. I assume you removed the template because products are not explicitely named in the template text.
However, under the WP:PRODUCT guideline, all products should be included into the company's main article unless they received sufficient coverage to warrant a stand-alone article. In this case we are talking about a foam finger that did not receive any coverage - unless you would count the student organisation the article mentions as coverage (Which is of course no coverage - we could add every item for having been on TV that way).
If i overlooked or misunderstood your reasoning, please let me know :)
Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 11:21, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
G11. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 13:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
stuff you tagged to delete that has come back, you may want to check if they have become better!
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 14:17, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm deeply sorry for my sisters ignorance towards Wikipedia. She was editing all that info. Again I am oh so deeply sorry for those unfortunate remarks and I PROMISE it won't happen again. If it happens again I give you permission to ban me b/c it won't happen again i promise okay? does that sound like a good deal. one more time.... i'm so so so so sorry for my sisters actions. i will go punish her now and tell her to never do it again. again... i'm sorry. please forgive me and my sisters actions. do you forgive me? thanks if you do. and if you don't forgive me please tell me why and i will fix it i promise. again, i'm so sorry. it will never happen again. i apologize. take care EXCIRIAL! i'm happy you are taking care of your awesome site! again i'm sorry! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nipnipnip ( talk • contribs) 17:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)